Whose ‘Freedom of Navigation’? Australia, China, the United States and the making of order in the ‘Indo-Pacific’

References

• Anand, R. P. (1983). Origin and development of the law of the sea: History of international law revisited. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, K. (2015, 31 May). Global Security Challenges and the Asia-Pacific: Building Cooperation between Regions. 14th Asia Security Summit: The Shangri-La Dialogue.
   Google Scholar
• Bateman, S. (2007). Securing Australia’s maritime approaches. Security Challenges, 3(3), 109–129. Retrieved from https://www.regionalsecurity.org.au/Resources/Files/vol3no3Bateman.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bateman, S. (2015a, 5 June). Australia and the freedoms of navigation. The ASPI Strategist. Retrieved from https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/australia-and-the-freedoms-of-navigation/
   Google Scholar
• Bateman, S. (2015b, 1 June). The risks of US freedom of navigation operations in the South China Sea. East Asia Forum.
   Google Scholar
• Bateman, S. (2017, 26 May). US FONOPs: Game on again in the South China Sea. The Interpreter. Retrieved from https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/us-fonop-game-back-south-china-sea
   Google Scholar
• BBC News. (2012, 12 May). China denies preparing war over South China Sea shoal. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-18045383
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, J. (2013, 26 November) China's announcement of an air-defence identification zone over the East China Sea. Minister of Foreign Affairs media release. Retrieved from https://foreignminister.gov.au/releases/Pages/2013/jb_mr_131126a.aspx?w=tb1CaGpkPX%2FlS0K%2Bg9ZKEg%3D%3D
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, J. (2016). Australian foreign policy: the Coalition approach. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 70(5), 453–459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bisley, N. (2016). Australia and the Evolving International Order. In Mark Beeson and Shahar Hameiri (Eds.), Navigating the New International Disorder: Australia in World Affairs 2011-2015 (pp. 39–55). Oxford: Oxford University Press in association with the Australian Institute of International Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Bisley, N. (2017, 4 February). We should think carefully about an Australian FONOP in the South China Sea. The Interpreter. Retrieved from https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/we-should-think-carefully-about-australian-fonop-south-china-sea
   Google Scholar
• Booth, K. (1985). Law, Force and Diplomacy at Sea. London: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Burke‚ A. (2007). Australia paranoid: Security politics and identity policy. In Anthony Burke and Matt McDonald (Eds.), Critical Security in the Asia-Pacific (pp. 121–135). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buzan, B., Waever O., & De Wilde J. (1998). Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.
   Google Scholar
• Cabinet Secretariat. (1994, 12 August). The Modality of the Security and Defense Capability of Japan, Report.
   Google Scholar
• Callick, R. (2012, 30 July). Awash in a Sea of Trouble. The Australian. Retrieved from http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/inquirer/awash-on-a-sea-of-trouble/news-story/3eaaea9273ca9165950e342339637399
   Google Scholar
• Carr, A. (ed.). (2018). Debating the Quad. Centre of Gravity Series (March). Retrieved from http://bellschool.anu.edu.au/sites/default/files/uploads/2018-03/cog_39_web_-_debating_the_quad.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cox, R. W. (1981). Social forces, states and world orders: Beyond international relations theory. Millennium - Journal of International Studies, 10 (2), 126–155.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Defence (DoD). (1987). The Defence of Australia 1987. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Defence (DoD). (1994). Defending Australia: Defence White Paper 1994. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Defence (DoD). (2000). Defence 2000: Our Future Defence Force. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Defence (DoD). (2009). Defending Australia in the Asia-Pacific Century: Force 2030, Defence White Paper 2009. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Defence (DoD). (2016). 2016 Defence White Paper. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Defense (DoD). (2017, 28 February). U.S. Department of Defense Freedom of Navigation (FON) Program. Retrieved from http://policy.defense.gov/Portals/11/DoD%20FON%20Program%20Summary%2016.pdf?ver=2017-03-03-141350-380
   Google Scholar
• Department of State (DoS). (undated). The Australia, New Zealand and United States Security Treaty (ANZUS Treaty), 1951. Retrieved from https://history.state.gov/milestones/1945-1952/anzus
   Google Scholar
• Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet (DoPC). (2013). Strong and Secure: A Strategy for Australia’s National Security. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Dutton P.A. & Kardon I.B. (2017, 10 June). Forget the FONOPs — Just Fly, Sail and Operate Wherever International Law Allows. Lawfareblog. Retrieved from https://lawfareblog.com/forget-fonops-%E2%80%94-just-fly-sail-and-operate-wherever-international-law-allows
   Google Scholar
• Dzurek, D.J. (1996). The Spratly Islands Dispute: Who’s On First?’ International Boundaries Research Unit Maritime Briefing, 2(1), 1–66.
   Google Scholar
• Farnsworth, M. (2011, 16 November). Gillard and Obama: appearance and reality,’ ABC News. Retrieved from http://www.abc.net.au/news/2011-11-17/farnsworth–/3676272
   Google Scholar
• Forward, C. (2009). Archipelagic sea-lanes in Indonesia – their legality in international law. Australian and New Zealand Maritime Law Journal, 23, 143–156. Retrieved from https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/ausnewma23&div=21&id=&page=
   Google Scholar
• Fravel, M.T & Twomey, C.P. (2014). Projecting strategy: The myth of Chinese counter-intervention. The Washington Quarterly, 37(4), 171–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garnaut, J. (2015, 16 April). ‘Fear and greed’ drive Australia's China policy, Tony Abbott tells Angela Merkel. Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved from https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/fear-and-greed-drive-australias-china-policy-tony-abbott-tells-angela-merkel-20150416-1mmdty.html
   Google Scholar
• Gillard, J. (2011, 10 March). Address to the Joint Meeting of the US Congress. Retrieved from http://australianpolitics.com/2011/03/10/julia-gillards-address-to-the-joint-meeting-of-the-us-congress.html
   Google Scholar
• Goldrick, J. (2008). Border Protection Command. In Forbes, A. (Ed.), Australia and its Maritime Interests: At home and in the region. Canberra: Sea Power Centre - Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Government of Australia (GoA). (2012). Australia in the Asian Century White Paper. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Government of Australia (GoA). (2017). 2017 Foreign Policy White Paper: Opportunity Security Strength. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Government of Indonesia (GoI). (1983, 18 October). Act No. 5 of 1983 on the Indonesian exclusive economic zone. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/Depts/los/LEGISLATIONANDTREATIES/PDFFILES/IDN_1983_Act.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Government of Malaysia (GoM). (1984) Exclusive Economic Zone Act, 1984, Act No. 311, An Act pertaining to the exclusive economic zone and certain aspects of the continental shelf of Malaysia and to provide for the regulations of activities in the zone and on the continental shelf and for matters connected therewith. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/Depts/los/LEGISLATIONANDTREATIES/PDFFILES/MYS_1984_Act.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Greene, A. (2017, 22 July). Chinese Navy spy ship rattles Talisman Sabre war games off Queensland coast, ABC News. Retrieved from http://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2017-07-22/chinese-navy-spy-ship-rattles-talisman-sabre-war-games-off-quee/8732944
   Google Scholar
• Greene, A. (2018, 20 April). Australian warships challenged by Chinese military in South China Sea. ABC News. Retrieved from http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-04-20/south-china-sea-australian-warships-challenged-by-chinese/9677908
   Google Scholar
• G-7. (2015). G-7 Summit June 7-8, 2015 Leaders’ Declaration. Retrieved from https://www.g7germany.de/Content/EN/_Anlagen/G7/2015-06-08-g7-abschluss-eng_en.pdf;jsessionid=71B34FF52A0386FBC78D5B23F3BFFA9E.s6t1?__blob=publicationFile&v=3%20pdf
   Google Scholar
• G-7. (2016). G-7 Summit May 26-27, 2016 Leaders Declaration. Retrieved from http://www.mofa.go.jp/files/000160266.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Halperin, S. (2004). Dynamics of conflict and system change: The Great Transformation revisited. European Journal of International Relations, 10(2), 263–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, H.B. (2017, 29 June). Australia, the US and the Indo-Asia-Pacific. The ASPI Strategist. Retrieved from https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/australia-us-indo-asia-pacific/
   Google Scholar
• Haushofer, K. (1938). Geopolitik des Pazifischen Ozeans: Studien über die Wechselbeziehungen zwischen Geographie und Geschichte [Geopolitics of the Pacific Ocean: Studies of the Interrelations between Geography and History] (3rd amended ed.). Heidelberg: Kurt Vonwinckel Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Hayton, B. (2014). The South China Sea: The Struggle for Power in Asia. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Higgott, R.A. & Nossal, K. (1997). The international politics of liminality: Relocating Australia in the Asia Pacific. Australian Journal of Political Science, 32(2), 169–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgott, R.A. & Nossal, K. (2008). Odd Man in, odd man out: Australia’s liminal position in Asia revisited: A reply to Ann Capling. The Pacific Review, 21(5), 623–634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurrell, A. (2007). On Global Order: Power, Values, and the Constitution of International Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, C. (2000). A rite of passage: The IMO consideration of the Indonesian Archipelagic Sea-Lanes submission. International Journal of Maine and Coastal Law, 15(3), 317–332.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, D.M. & Benvenuti, A. (2006). Tradition, myth and the dilemma of Australian foreign policy. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 60(1), 103–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kan, S.A., Best, R., Bolkcom, C., Chapman, R., Cronin, R., Dumbaugh, K., …Ackerman, D. (2001, 10 October). China-U.S. Aircraft Collision Incident of April 2001: Assessments and Policy Implications (Rep. RL30946). Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.
   Google Scholar
• Kaye, S. (2015). Australia and the negotiation of the law of the sea. Australian Journal of Maritime and Ocean Affairs, 7(4), 256–266.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, N. (2006). Legal limitations on ensuring Australia’s maritime security. Melbourne Journal of International Law, 7, 306–338. Retrieved from https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/meljil7&div=17&id=&page=
   Google Scholar
• Kwiatkowska, B. (1991a). Creeping jurisdiction beyond 200 miles in the light of the 1982 law of the sea convention and state practice. Ocean Development & International Law, 22(2), 153–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwiatkowska, B. (1991b). The archipelagic regime in practice in the Philippines and Indonesia - Making or Breaking International Law. International Journal of Estuarine and Coastal Law, 6(1), 1–32.
   Google Scholar
• Laurenceson, J. (2017). Economics and freedom of navigation in East Asia. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 71(5), 461–473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ludlam, S. (2016). Australian foreign policy: the Greens’ approach. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 70(5), 467–470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massola, J. (2016, 7 October). Navy should be authorised for freedom of navigation in South China Sea: Marles. Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved from https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/navy-should-be-authorised-for-freedom-of-navigation-in-south-china-sea-marles-20161007-grx553.html
   Google Scholar
• McGrath, C. (2013, 28 November). China, Australia spat over Air Defence Identification Zone highlights “troubled relations” in region. ABC News. Retrieved from http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-11-28/australia-taking-sides-in-china-defence-zone-stoush/5122756
   Google Scholar
• Medcalf, R. (2014). In defence of the Indo-Pacific: Australia’s new strategic map. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 68(4), 470–483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medcalf, R. (2015, 4 June). The Temperature in Canberra as the South China Sea Boils. Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative. Retrieved from https://amti.csis.org/the-temperature-in-canberra-as-the-south-china-sea-boils/
   Google Scholar
• Medcalf, R. (2016). Rules, balance, and lifelines: An Australian perspective on the South China sea. Asia Policy, 21, 6–13.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, C. (2006). Turning King Canute into Lord Neptune: Australia’s new offshore protection measures. University of New England Law Journal, 3(1), 57–82.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, N. (2010) Japan Bashing: Anti-Japanism since the 1980s. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Neher, P.J., Pedrozo, ‘Pete’ P.A. & Roach, A.J. (2009, 24 March). In Defense of High Seas Freedoms. RSIS Commentary, 31. Retrieved from https://www.rsis.edu.sg/rsis-publication/rsis/1189-in-defence-of-high-seas-freedo/
   Google Scholar
• Noer, J.H., & Gregory, D. (1996). Chokepoints: Maritime Economic Concerns in Southeast Asia. Washington, DC: National Defense University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nolan, P. (2013). Imperial archipelagos: China, Western Colonialism and the law of the sea. The New Left Review, 80, 77–95.
   Google Scholar
• O’Rourke, R. (2017, 10 April). Maritime Territorial and Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) Disputes Involving China: Issues for Congress (Rep. R42784). Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.
   Google Scholar
• Pan, C. (2012). Knowledge, Desire and Power in Global Politics: Western Representation of China’s Rise. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Pan, C. (2014). The ‘Indo-Pacific’ and geopolitical anxieties about China's rise in the Asian regional order. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 68(4), 453–469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panda, A. (2017, 12 October). South China Sea: Fourth US FONOP in Five Months Suggests a New Operational Rhythm. The Diplomat. Retrieved from https://thediplomat.com/2017/10/south-china-sea-fourth-us-fonop-in-five-months-suggests-a-new-operational-rhythm/
   Google Scholar
• People’s Republic of China (PRC). (1992, 25 February). Law on the Territorial Sea and the Contiguous Zone. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/depts/los/LEGISLATIONANDTREATIES/PDFFILES/CHN_1992_Law.pdf
   Google Scholar
• People’s Republic of China (PRC). (1998, 26 June). Exclusive Economic Zone and Continental Shelf Act. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/depts/los/LEGISLATIONANDTREATIES/PDFFILES/chn_1998_eez_act.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Perera, S. (2009). Australia and the Insular Imagination: Beaches, Borders, Boats, and Bodies. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA). (2016, 12 July). Case No. 2013-19 in the Matter of the South China Sea Arbitration before an Arbitral Tribunal Constituted under Annex VII to the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea between The Republic of the Philippines and The People’s Republic of China.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, A. (2015). Australia and International Order-Building, 1901-Present. In Mark Beeson and Shahar Hameiri (Eds.), Navigating the new international disorder: Australia in World Affairs 2011-2015 (pp.19–38). Oxford: Oxford University Press in association with the Australian Institute of International Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Plibersek, T. (2016). Australian foreign policy: the Labor approach. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 70(5), 460–466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RAAF. (Undated). Factsheet Jindalee Operational Radar Network. Retrieved from https://de.scribd.com/document/226520155/Jindalee-Operational-Radar-Network-JORN-Fact-Sheet
   Google Scholar
• Raymond, G. (2016, 20 July). More heat than light in Australian FONOPs debate. The Interpreter. Retrieved from https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/debate/south-china-sea-ruling
   Google Scholar
• Rothwell, D. (2017, 14 June). Freedom of navigation in the South China Sea: Australia must take a stand The Interpreter. Retrieved from https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/freedom-navigation-south-china-sea-australia-must-take-stand/
   Google Scholar
• Sciutto, J. (2015, 15 September). Exclusive: China warns U.S. surveillance plane. CNN News. Retrieved from http://edition.cnn.com/2015/05/20/politics/south-china-sea-navy-flight/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Shi, H. (2004, 15 June). Zhongguo de ‘Maliujia kunju’ [China’s ‘Malacca Dilemma’], Zhongguo Qingnian Ribao [China Youth Daily].
   Google Scholar
• Slevison, A. (2015, 13 October). An ADIZ with Chinese characteristics. The ASPI Strategist. Retrieved from https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/an-adiz-with-chinese-characteristics/
   Google Scholar
• Turnbull, M. (2017, 2 June). Keynote address. 16th IISS Asia Security Summit, Shangri-La Dialogue. Retrieved from https://www.pm.gov.au/media/2017-06-02/keynote-address-16th-iiss-asia-security-summit-shangri-la-dialogue
   Google Scholar
• Tusk, D. (2016, 12 July). Remarks by President Donald Tusk at the EU-China summit in Beijing. European Council. Retrieved from http://www.consilium.europa.eu/de/press/press-releases/2016/07/12-tusk-opening-remarks-eu-china/
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), (1982). United Nations Convention on the Law of the Seas. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/unclos/closindx.htm
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Z. (2015). Chinese discourse on the ‘nine-dashed line’: rights, interests, and nationalism. Asian Survey, 55(3), 502–524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weldes, J. (1999). The cultural production of crises; U.S. identity and missiles in Cuba. In J. Weldes, et al. (Eds.), Cultures of insecurity: States, communities, and the production of danger (pp. 35–62). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• White House. (2015). National Security Strategy. Washington, DC: The White House.
   Google Scholar
• White, H. (2011). Power shift: rethinking Australia’s place in the Asian century. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 65(1), 81–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, H. (2015, 2 June). Government reportedly planning ‘freedom of navigation’ exercise in South China Sea. ABC Radio International RV Breakfast. Retrieved from http://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/breakfast/government-reportedly-planning-freedom-of/6513778
   Google Scholar
• White, H. (2017, 2 June) America is Navigating Freely to Nowhere in the South China Sea. War on the Rocks. Retrieved from https://warontherocks.com/2017/06/america-is-navigating-freely-to-nowhere-in-the-south-china-sea/
   Google Scholar
• Wirth, C. (2017, 15 June). China and the United States in the South China Sea: International Hierarchy, Emotions, and the Problem of Solipsism’, paper presented at the International Studies Association Asia Pacific Conference, Hong Kong.
   Google Scholar
• Woolner, D. (2008). Policing our ocean domain: Establishing an Australian coast guard. ASPI Strategic Insights, 41, 2.
   Google Scholar
• Wroe, D. (2016, 16 July). Making Mischief in the South China Sea. Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved from http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/making-mischief-in-the-south-china-sea-20160715-gq6knp.html
   Google Scholar
• Zala, B. (2016). The Australian 2016 Defence White Paper, great power rivalry and a ‘rules-based order’: An imagined correspondence between Carr, Bull and Bell. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 70(5), 441–452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar