664
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Ideas and policy transformation: why preferences for regionalism and cross-regionalism diverged in Japan and Korea

References

  • Aggarwal, V. K. (2006). Bilateral trade agreements in the Asia-Pacific. In V. K. Aggarwal & S. Urata (Eds.), Bilateral trade agreements in the Asia-Pacific (pp. 3–26). London: Routledge.
  • Aggarwal, V. K., & Koo, M. G. (2008). The past, present, and future of Asia’s institutional architecture. In V. K. Aggarwal & M. G. Koo (Eds.), Asia’s new institutional architecture: Evolving structures for managing trade, financial, and security relations (pp. 289–308). Berlin: Springer.
  • Aoki, M. (2004). New Issues in FTAs: The case of economic partnership agreements between Japan and ASEAN Countries (Working Paper Series No. 8). Retrieved from JETRO APEC Study Center, Institute of Developing Economies.
  • Bhagwati, J. (1992). Regionalism versus multilateralism. The World Economy, 15(5), 535–556. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9701.1992.tb00536.x
  • Bhagwati, J. (2008). Termites in the trading system: How preferential agreements undermine free trade. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Bakir, C., & Jarvis, D. S. L. (2017). Contextualising the context in policy entrepreneurship and institutional change. Policy and Society, 36(4), 465–478. doi:10.1080/14494035.2017.1393589
  • Bae, J. H. (2005). 현장에서 본 농업통상 이야기 [Story of agricultural trade seen on site]. Ministry of Agriculture. Seoul: Jeannyrilation Press.
  • Baldwin, R. E. (2008). Managing the Noodle Bowl: The Fragility of East Asian Regionalism. The Singapore Economic Review, 53(03), 449–478. doi:10.1142/S0217590808003063
  • Baumgartner, F. R. (2013). Ideas and policy change. Governance, 26(2), 239–258. doi:10.1111/gove.12007
  • Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. D. (1993). Agendas and Instability in American Politics (American Politics and Political Economy). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Beeson, M. (2003). ASEAN plus three and the rise of reactionary regionalism. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 25(2), 251–268. doi:10.1355/CS25-2D
  • Béland, D. (2009). Ideas, institutions, and policy change. Journal of European Public Policy, 16(5), 701–718. doi:10.1080/13501760902983382
  • Béland, D. (2010). The idea of power and the role of ideas. Political Studies Review, 8(2), 145–154.
  • Bennett, C. J., & Howlett, M. (1992). The lessons of learning: Reconciling theories of policy learning and policy change. Policy Sciences, 25(3), 275–294. doi:10.1007/BF00138786
  • Blyth, M. (2003). Structures do not come with an instruction sheet: Interests, ideas, and progress in political science. Perspectives on Politics, 1(4), 695–706. doi:10.1017/S1537592703000471
  • Calder, K. E. (2004). Securing security through prosperity: The San Francisco System in comparative perspective. The Pacific Review, 17(1), 135–157. doi:10.1080/0951274042000182447
  • Calder, K. E., & Ye, M. (2004). Regionalism and critical junctures: Explaining the ‘organization gap’ in Northeast Asia. Journal of East Asian Studies, 4(2), 191–226. doi:10.1017/S1598240800001818
  • Calder, K. E., & Fukuyama, F. (2008). East Asian multilateralism: Prospects for regional stability. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Cho, I. H., & Park, S. H. (2014). Domestic legitimacy politics and varieties of regionalism in East Asia. Review of International Studies, 40(3), 583–606. doi:10.1017/S0260210513000399
  • Choi, B. I., & Oh, J. S. (2011). Asymmetry in Japan and Korea's agricultural liberalization in FTA: Domestic trade governance perspective. The Pacific Review, 24(5), 505–527. doi:10.1080/09512748.2011.596562
  • Choi, T. (2006). South Korea's FTA policy-making process. Korea and International Politics, 22(2), 87–119.
  • Cooper, W. H., Jurenas, R., Platzer, M. D., & Manyin, M. E. (2011). The EU-South Korea free trade agreement and its implications for the United States (CRS Report No. R41534). Retrieved from Congressional Research Service website: https://fas.org/sgp/crs/row/R41534.pdf
  • CSIS. (2017, January 31). Impact Player: Kim Hyun-chong. CSIS Newsletter. Retrieved from https://www.csis.org/analysis/impact-player-kim-hyun-chong
  • Dent, C. M. (2005). Bilateral Free Trade Agreements: Boon or Bane for Regionalism in East Asia and the Asia-Pacific?. European Journal of East Asian Studies, 15(54), 287–314. doi:10.1163/157006105774711468
  • Dent, C. M. (2006). New free trade agreements in the Asia-Pacific. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Dent, C. M. (2008). East Asian regionalism (1st ed.). London: Routledge.
  • Dür, A. (2007). Regionalism: Stepping stone or stumbling block for globalization. in S. Schirm (Ed.), Globalisation: State of the Art and Perspectives (pp.183–199). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
  • Federation of Korean Industries (2004). Korea FTA strategies and policy implications. Retrieved from http://www.fki.or.kr/Common/Download.aspx?id=d8cbb3c8-56f7-4377-b96e-0f14dcd1064e
  • Friedberg, A. L. (1993). Ripe for rivalry: Prospects for peace in a multipolar Asia. International Security, 18(3), 5–33. doi:10.2307/2539204
  • Goldfinch, S., & Hart, P. (2003). Leadership and institutional reform: Engineering macroeconomic policy change in Australia. Governance, 16(2), 235–270. doi:10.1111/1468-0491.00215
  • Goldstein, J. (1993). Ideas, interests, and American trade policy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Hall, P. A. (1993). Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: The case of economic policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics, 25(3), 275–296. doi:10.2307/422246
  • Hamanaka, S. (2014). Asian free trade agreements and WTO compatibility: Goods, services, trade facilitation and economic cooperation. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.
  • Hay, C. (2006). Constructivist Institutionalism. In S. A. Binder, R. A. W. Rhodes, & B. A. Rockman, The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions (pp.56–74). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Heclo, H. (1974). / (2010). Modern social politics in Britain and Sweden: From relief to income maintenance. Colchester: ECPR Press.
  • Helgadóttir, O., Blyth, M., & Kring, W. (2016). Ideas and Historical Institutionalism. In O. Fioretos, T. G. Falleti, & A. Sheingate (Eds.), Oxford handbook of historical institutionalism (pp. 142–162). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Higashi, S. (2008). The policy making process in FTA negotiations: A case study of Japanese bilateral EPAs. JETRO Institute of Developing Economies – Discussion Paper(138). Chiba: Japan: Institute of Developing Economies - JETRO.
  • Hwang, K. (1996). South Korea's bureaucracy and informal politics of economic development. Asian Survey, 36(3), 306–319. doi:10.2307/2645694
  • Jeon-Hong, G. (2003, February 25). 이제, 변방의 역사를 끝내자 “<노무현대통령 취임사> “사회지도층, 뼈를 깎는 성찰해야 [Let’s end the history of periphery “<President Roh Moo-hyun’s inaguration speech>” Social elites should put excruciating effort into introspection]. Pressian News.
  • Jeong, T-I. ( (2006, April 17). 노무현의 개혁욕구와 김현종의 야망이 만났을 때 [When Roh Moo-hyun’s desire for reform met Kim Hyun-Chong’s ambition]. Pressian News.
  • Jung, Y-D. (1999). Administrative reform in Korea: A historical-institutionalist perspective. Korea Journal, 39(2), 5–22.
  • Kawai, M., & Wignaraja, G. (2011). Asian FTAs: Trends, prospects and challenges. Journal of Asian Economics, 22(1), 1–22. doi:10.1016/j.asieco.2010.10.002
  • Kawasaki, T. (1993). Policy ideas and change in Japanese bureaucratic politics: The Ministry of Finance in International Monetary Crisis, 1969–1971. Journal of Public Policy, 13(2), 111–133. doi:10.1017/S0143814X00000982
  • Khan, H. ( (2003)., October 23). Mexico free trade founders on Japan’s farmers. The Asia Times. Retrieved from http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Japan/EJ23Dh01.html
  • Kim, C. (2015). 21세기 산업-통상시대의 新통상정책 방향 [New trade policy directions in the 21st century industry-trade era]. Korea Development Institute Nara-Kyeongjae (National Economy). May Edition, 48–49. Retrieved from http://eiec.kdi.re.kr/publish/naraView.do?cidx=9913
  • Kim, H-C. (2006). 김현종, 한미 FTA를 말하다 [Kim Hyun Chong speaks about the Korea–US FTA]. Seoul: Hongsung Press.
  • Kim, J. (2008). 日本のFTA政策をめぐる国内政治: JSEPA交渉プロセスの分析 [Japan’s FTA policy in domestic politics: An analysis of JSEPA negotiation process]. The Hitotsubashi Journal of Law and International Studies, 7(3), 683–719.
  • Kim, S-C. (2001, March 5). [韓ㆍ칠레 FTA] 농민반발에 협상 난기류 [[Korea-Chile FTA] Negotiation in turbulence due to farmer resistance]. Hankook Ilbo.
  • Kim, S-U. (2002, February 18). [흔들리는 협상전선] (7) 韓-칠레 FTA 사전검토도 없이 “협상하자” [[Shaky Negotiation Front] (7) Korea-Chile FTA “Let’s negotiate” without preliminary examination]. The Korean Economic Daily.
  • Kingdon, J. W. (1984/2014). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies (Pearson New International Edition, 2nd ed.). Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
  • KITA (2002). Korea’s FTA Strategy. Retrieved from http://www.kita.net/biz/html/tri/tri_fta_atta/80_1_FTA%20%C3%DF%C1%F8%B9%E6%BE%C8(%C3%D6%C1%BE).hwp
  • Koizumi, J. (2002). Japan and ASEAN in East Asia: A Sincere and Open Partnership. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies. Stanford Press.
  • Krueger, A. (1999). Are Preferential Trading Arrangements Trade-Liberalizing or Protectionist? The. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 13(4), 105–124. doi:10.1257/jep.13.4.105
  • Lee, J-M. ( (2007)., April 6) 노대통령 사로잡은 김현종 본부장 [Kim Hyun-chong, Who Won President Roh’s Heart]. Korea JoonAng Daily.
  • Lee, K-G. (2018). 일대일로와 신북방 신남방정책 [One Belt One Road and New Northern New Southern Policy]. Seoul: Bookstar.
  • Langhammer, R. J. (1995). Regional integration in East Asia: From Market-driven regionalisation to institutionalised regionalism? Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 131(1), 167–201. doi:10.1007/BF02709080
  • Lindblom, C. E. (1959). The science of “muddling through”. Public Administration Review, 19(2), 79–88. doi:10.2307/973677
  • Lindblom, C. E. (1968). The policymaking process. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Low, L. (2004). Singapore's bilateral trading arrangements in the context of East Asian Regionalism: State of play, issues, and prospects. Southeast Asian Affairs, 239–254.
  • Maclntyre, A., & Naughton, B. (2005). The decline of the Japan-led model of the East Asian Economy. In Pempel, T. J. (Ed.), Remapping East Asia: The construction of a region. New York, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Manger, M. S. (2005). Competition and bilateralism in trade policy: The case of Japan's free trade agreements. Review of International Political Economy, 12(5), 804–828. doi:10.1080/09692290500339800
  • Mehta, J. (2011). The varied role of ideas in politics: From ‘whether’ to ‘how. In D. Béland & R. H. Cox (Eds.), Ideas and Politics in Social Science Research (pp. 24–46). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • METI. (2017, November, 16). Commissioner, Japan Patent Office. Retrieved from https://www.meti.go.jp/english/aboutmeti/profiles/individual/jpo_munakata.html
  • Mintrom, M., & Norman, P. (2009). Policy entrepreneurship and policy change. Policy Studies Journal, 37(4), 649–667. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2009.00329.x
  • MOFA, Japan (2002a). Japan’s FTA strategy. Retrieved from https://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/economy/fta/strategy0210.html
  • MOFA, Japan (2002b). Joint announcement of the prime minister of Japan and the president of the United Mexican States on the initiation of negotiations for concluding a bilateral agreement to strengthen their economic partnership. Retrieved from http://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/economy/apec/2002/joint_me.html
  • MOFA, Republic of Korea (2007). Part 4. Economic and trade diplomacy to build advanced training nation (Diplomatic White Paper). Retrieved from http://www.mofa.go.kr/www/brd/m_4106/view.do?seq=314755&srchFr=&amp;srchTo=&amp;srchWord=&amp;srchTp=&amp;multi_itm_seq=0&amp;itm_seq_1=0&amp;itm_seq_2=0&amp;company_cd=&amp;company_nm=&page=2
  • MOFAT & KIEP. (2003). 한-칠레 FTA의 주요내용 [The Korea–Chile FTA Report]. Retrieved from http://www.fta.go.kr
  • Moon, D. (2007). 국제무역질서의 변화와 한국: 다자주의, 지역주의, 양자주의, 그리고 한국 (Changes of the international trading system and Korea: Multilateralism, regionalism, bilateralism, and Korea). Journal of Korean Politics, 16(2), 165–190.
  • Munakata, N. (2001). Evolution of Japans policy toward economic integration. Retrieved from the Brookings Institution.
  • Noguchi, A. (2015). Trade friction with no foundation: A review of US–Japanese economic relations in the 1980s and the 1990s. In T. Hirai (Ed.), Capitalism and the World Economy: The Light and Shadow of Globalization. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Oike, A. (2002). 日本 ・シンガポール経済連携協定とその応用の方向性について [Japan-Singapore EPA and its applicability]. Trade Journal, 24–36. Retrieved from http://www.kanzei.or.jp/book/boukan/boukan_info.htm
  • Oike, A. (2007). 東アジアを舞台とする各 国 の攻防 [Rivalry staging East Asia]. Trade Journal, (September), 10–40.
  • Oliver, T. R., & Paul-Shaheen, P. (1997). Translating ideas into actions: Entrepreneurial leadership in state health care reforms. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 22(3), 721. doi:10.1215/03616878-22-3-721
  • Pekkanen, S. (2005). Bilateralism, multilateralism, or regionalism? Japan's trade forum choices. Journal of East Asian Studies, 5(1), 77–103. doi:10.1017/S1598240800006263
  • Plummer, M. (2007). Best practices in regional trade agreements: An application to Asia. The World Economy, 30(12), 1771–1796. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9701.2007.01061.x
  • Promfret, R. (2010). Regionalism in East Asia: Why has it flourished since 2000 and how far will it go? Singapore: World Scientific.
  • Ravenhill, J. (2006). The political economy of the new Asia-Pacific bilateralism: Benign, banal, or simply bad?. In V. K. Aggarwal & S. Urata (Eds.), Bilateral Trade Agreements in the Asia-Pacific (pp. 27–49). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Ravenhill, J. (2008). The new trade bilateralism in East Asia. In K. E. Calder & F. Fukuyama (Eds.), East Asian multilateralism (pp.78–108). Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Ravenhill, J. (2010). The ‘New East Asian Regionalism’: A political domino effect. Review of International Political Economy, 17(2), 178–208.
  • RIETI (2019). Research Institute of Economy, Trade, Industry – NAKATOMI Michitaka. Retrieved from https://www.rieti.go.jp/users/nakatomi-michitaka/index_en.html
  • Sabatier, P. (1988). An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein. Policy Sciences, 21(2), 129–168. doi:10.1007/BF00136406
  • Schneider, M., Teske, P., & Mintrom, M. (1995). Public entrepreneurs: Agents for change in american government. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Schott, J. J. (2004). Free trade agreements: Boon or bane of the world trading system? In J. J. Schott (Ed.), Free trade agreements: us strategies and priorities (pp. 3–33). Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.
  • Schwartz, F. (1998). Advice and consent: The politics of consultation in Japan. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Solís, M. (2010). Can FTAs deliver market liberalization in Japan? A study on domestic political determinants. Review of International Political Economy, 17(2), 209–237. doi:10.1080/09692290902997908
  • Solís, M., & Katada, S. N. (2007a). Introduction: Understanding East Asian cross-regionalism: An analytical framework. Pacific Affairs, 80(2), 229–257. doi:10.5509/2007802229
  • Solís, M., & Katada, S. N. (2007b). The Japan–Mexico FTA: A cross-regional step in the path Towards Asian regionalism. Pacific Affairs, 80(2), 279–301.
  • Taniguchi, M. ( (2005, June 14). [Opinion] East Asian Community – Japan’s beneficent potential. The Japan Times. Retrieved from http://www.japantimes.co.jp/opinion/2005/06/14/commentary/world-commentary/japans-beneficent-potential/#.VS29rvmsVoQ
  • Terada, T. (2010). The Origins of ASEAN + 6: Japan’s initiatives and the agent-structure framework. The Pacific Review, 23(1), 71–92. doi:10.1080/09512740903398348
  • Urata, S. ( (2006). ). A shift from market-driven to institution-driven regionalization in East Asia. (Working Paper No. 303). Retrieved from Stanford Center for International Development: http://scid.stanford.edu/publications/shift-market-driven-institution-driven-regionalization-east-asia.
  • Urata, S. (2015). Postwar Japanese trade policy: A shift from multilateral GATT/WTO to bilateral/regional FTA regimes. In A.G. Mulgan & M. Honma (Eds.), The Political Economy of Japanese Trade Policy (pp.41–70). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Watanabe, & MOFA. (2007). 解説 FTA・EPA 交渉 [Commentary on FTA/EPA negotiations]. Tokyo: Nihon Keizai Hyoronsha
  • Yoshimatsu, H. (2003). Japan and East Asia in transition. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Yoshimatsu, H. (2007). Japan’s quest for free trade agreements: Constraints from bureaucratic and interest group politics. In M. Pangestu & L. Song (Eds.), Japan’s Future in East Asia and the Pacific (pp. 80–102). Canberra: Asia Pacific Press.
  • Yoshimatsu, H. (2012). Political leaders' preferences and trade policy: Comparing FTA politics in Japan and South Korea. Asian Politics & Policy, 4(2), 193–212.
  • [展望]加速する 対 アジアFTA. (2004, September 11). Forecast: FTAs with Asia accelerating. Nihon Nogyo Shimbun, 3.
  • ASEANとのFTA 枠 組み合意したたかな中国 、「日中韓」でも主導権狙う [FTA]. (2002, November 6). Framework agreement with ASEAN agreed, challenging china, seeking leadership in Japan-China-Korea. Yomiuri Shimbun, 2.
  • 「自由貿易」ぼかす日本――官僚主導、反発回避を優(NEWS反射鏡)(2003, January 12). Vague on “free trade” – bureaucracy lead, avoiding opposition. Nihon Keisai Shimbun, 3.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.