When trade and foreign policy collide: Indonesia in Doha development round

References

• Agriculture Negotiations: Fact Sheet. (2014). The Bali decision on stockholding for food security in developing countries. WTO. Retrieved from https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/agric_e/factsheet_agng_e.htm
   Google Scholar
• Ahnlid, A., & Elgström, O. (2014). Challenging the European Union: The rising powers and the USA in the Doha Round. Contemporary Politics, 20(1), 77–89. doi:10.1080/13569775.2014.881606
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, K., & Martin, W. (2005). Agricultural trade reform and the Doha Development Agenda. The World Economy, 28(9), 1301–1327. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9701.2005.00735.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aspinall, E. (2016). The New Nationalism in Indonesia. Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies, 3(1), 72–82. doi:10.1002/app5.111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basri, M. C., & Hill, H. (2008). Indonesia – Trade Policy Review 2007. World Economy, 31(11), 1393–1408. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9701.2008.01134.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basri, M. C., & Rahardja, S. (2010). The Indonesian Economy amidst the global crisis: Good policy and good luck. ASEAN Economic Bulletin, 27(1), 77–97. doi:10.1355/AE27-1E
   Google Scholar
• Bird, K., Hill, H., & Cuthbertson, S. (2008). Making trade policy in a new democracy after a deep crisis: Indonesia. World Economy, 31(7), 947–968. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9701.2008.01110.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breuning, M. (2011). Role theory research in international relations. In S. Harnisch, C. Frank, & H. W. Maull (Eds.), Role theory in international relations (pp. 16–35). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• CAIRNS Groups’ Goal to Revive WTO negotiations: Groundless - Via Campesina. (2009, June 6). Via Campesina English. Retrieved from https://viacampesina.org/en/cairns-groups-goal-to-revive-wto-negotiations-groundless/.
   Google Scholar
• Chandra, A. C. (2016). Regional economic building amidst rising protectionism and economic nationalism in ASEAN. Journal of Asean Studies, 4(1), 1–19. doi:10.21512/jas.v4i1.878
   Google Scholar
• Clapp, J. (2006). WTO agriculture negotiations: Implications for the Global South. Third World Quarterly, 27(4), 563–577. doi:10.1080/01436590600720728
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, M. (2012). The Perils of Incoherence: ASEAN, Myanmar and the Avoidable Failures of Human Rights Socialization? Contemporary Southeast Asia: A Journal of International and Strategic Affairs, 34(1), 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Direktorat Pangan dan Pertanian. (2006). Profil Pangan dan Pertanian Indonesia 2003–2006. Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional. Retrieved from https://www.bappenas.go.id/files/5713/5229/9214/2-profil.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Drahos, P. (2003). When the Weak Bargain with the Strong: Negotiations in the World Trade Organization. International Negotiation, 8(1), 79–109. doi:10.1163/138234003769590677
   Google Scholar
• Eagleton-Pierce, M. (2013). Symbolic power in the World Trade Organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Efstathopoulos, C. (2015). Middle powers in World Trade Diplomacy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137381767_2.
   Google Scholar
• Finger, J. M. (2010). A Special Safeguard Mechanism for Agricultural Imports: What experience with other GATT/WTO safeguards tells us about what might work. World Trade Review, 9(2), 289–318. doi:10.1017/S1474745609990243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G8 Joint Statement. (2009). L’Aquila summit: Promoting the global recovery. Official Italian G8 website. Retrieved from http://www.g8.utoronto.ca/summit/2009laquila/2009-g5-g8.html.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez, C. G. (2002). Institutionalizing Inequality: The WTO Agreement on Agriculture, Food Security, and Developing Countries Symposium: Trade, Sustainability and Global Governance. Columbia Journal of Environmental Law, 27, 433–490.
   Google Scholar
• Hameiri, S., & Zeng, J. (2019). State transformation and China’s engagement in global governance: The case of nuclear technologies. The Pacific Review, 1–31. doi:10.1080/09512748.2019.1613441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harnisch, S. (2011). Role theory: Operationalization of key concepts. In S. Harnisch, C. Frank, & H. W. Maull (Eds.), Role theory in international relations. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• He, K. (2007). Indonesia’s foreign policy after Soeharto: International pressure, democratization, and policy change. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 8(1), 47–72. doi:10.1093/irap/lcm021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgott, R. A., & Cooper, A. F. (1990). Middle power leadership and coalition building: Australia, the cairns group, and the Uruguay round of trade negotiations. International Organization, 44(4), 589–632. doi:10.1017/S0020818300035414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoekman, B. (2005). Operationalizing the concept of policy Space in the WTO: Beyond special and differential treatment. Journal of International Economic Law, 8(2), 405–424. doi:10.1093/jielaw/jgi027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holsti, K. J. (1970). National role conceptions in the study of foreign policy. International Studies Quarterly, 14(3), 233–309. doi:10.2307/3013584
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopewell, K. (2015). Different paths to power: The rise of Brazil, India and China at the World Trade Organization. Review of International Political Economy, 22(2), 311–338. doi:10.1080/09692290.2014.927387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopewell, K. (2017). The BRICS—merely a fable? Emerging power alliances in global trade governance. International Affairs, 93(6), 1377–1396. doi:10.1093/ia/iix192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurrell, A., & Narlikar, A. (2006). A new politics of confrontation? Brazil and India in multilateral trade negotiations. Global Society, 20(4), 415–433. doi:10.1080/13600820600929762
   Google Scholar
• Ismail, F. (2009). An assessment of the WTO Doha Round July–December 2008 collapse. World Trade Review, 8(4), 579–605. doi:10.1017/S1474745609990073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahler, M. (2013). Rising powers and global governance: Negotiating change in a resilient status quo. International Affairs, 89(3), 711–729. doi:10.1111/1468-2346.12041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanth, D. R. (2015, June 29). US-EU Block permanent solution for food security public stockholding. South-North Development Monitor. Retrieved from http://www.twn.my/title2/susagri/2015/sa404.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Karim, M. F. (2017). Institutional Dynamics of regulatory actors in the recruitment of migrant workers. Asian Journal of Social Science, 45(4–5), 440–464. doi:10.1163/15685314-04504004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karim, M. F. (2018). Middle power, status-seeking and role conceptions: The cases of Indonesia and South Korea. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 72(4), 343–363. doi:10.1080/10357718.2018.1443428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karim, M. F. (2019). State transformation and cross-border regionalism in Indonesia’s periphery: Contesting the centre. Third World Quarterly, 40(8), 1554–1570. doi:10.1080/01436597.2019.1620598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laporan Akuntabilitas Kinerja Kementerian Perdagangan Tahun 2010 [Performance Accountability Report of the Ministry of Trade in 2010]. (2011). Bureau of Planning, Secretariat General, Ministry of Trade of the Republic of Indonesia. http://www.kemendag.go.id/files/pdf/2012/12/06/lakip-2010-id0-1354798811.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Mably, P. (2009). Centralized production: The group of 33. In D. Tussie (Ed.), The politics of trade: The role of research in trade policy and negotiation (pp. 239–270). Netherlands: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, A. (2005). The road from Doha to Hong Kong in the WTO agricultural negotiations: A developing country perspective. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 32(4), 561–574. doi:10.1093/erae/jbi031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merdeka.com. (2005, December 8). Indonesia Ngotot Perjuangkan Fleksibilitas Liberalisme Perdagangan di WTO. Merdeka.Com. Retrieved from https://www.merdeka.com/uang/indonesia-ngotot-perjuangkan-fleksibilitas-liberalisme-perdagangan-di-wto-l0fbyoa.html
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Foreign Affairs. (2005). Indonesia will host the G-33 Ministerial Meeting. Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Republic of Indonesia. Retrieved from https://www.kemlu.go.id/en/berita/siaran-pers/Pages/Indonesia-will-host-the-G-33-Ministerial-Meeting.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Munadi, E. (2016). Indonesia’s non-tariff measures: An overview. In L. Y. Ing, S. F. de Cordoba, & O. Cadot (Eds.), Non-tariff measures in ASEAN (pp. 65–76). Jakarta: Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia and United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
   Google Scholar
• Musjtari, D. N. (2014). Dampak Liberalisasi Perdagangan dalam WTO Agreement terhadap Ketahanan Pangan Indonesia. Kanun: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 16(2), 221–246. 10.24815/kanun.v16i2.6028.
   Google Scholar
• Muzaka, V., & Bishop, M. L. (2015). Doha stalemate: The end of trade multilateralism? Review of International Studies, 41(2), 383–406. doi:10.1017/S0260210514000266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narlikar, A. (2006). Peculiar chauvinism or strategic calculation? Explaining the negotiating strategy of a rising India. International Affairs, 82(1), 59–76. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2346.2006.00515.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narlikar, A., & Tussie, D. (2004). The G20 at the Cancun Ministerial: Developing Countries and Their Evolving Coalitions in the WTO. World Economy, 27(7), 947–966. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9701.2004.00636.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumann, A. L., & Washarti, R. (2013, November 29). The WTO in Bali: What to ExpectExclusive interview with Trade Ministry DG Iman Pambagyo. Strategic Review. Retrieved from http://www.sr-indonesia.com/web-exclusives/view/the-wto-in-bali-what-to-expect
   Google Scholar
• Patunru, A., & Rahardja, S. (2015). Trade protectionism in Indonesia: Bad times and bad policy [Analysis]. Lowy Institute for International Policy. Retrieved from https://www.lowyinstitute.org/publications/trade-protectionism-indonesia-bad-times-and-bad-policy
   Google Scholar
• Quinsaat, S. M. (2012). The Philippines Waltzes with the Big Boys: Coalition-building Strategy in the WTO. Asian Survey, 52(5), 970–994. doi:10.1525/as.2012.52.5.970
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raja, K. (2014, February). WTO conference closes after adopting Bali package. TWN: Third World Network, 21–22.
   Google Scholar
• Ribka, S. (2017, October 23). Indonesian lawmakers agree to ratify WTO’s TFA. The Jakarta Post. Retrieved from http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2017/10/23/indonesian-lawmakers-agree-ratify-wto-s-tfa.html
   Google Scholar
• Santikajaya, A. (2016). Walking the middle path: The characteristics of Indonesia’s rise. International Journal: Canada's Journal of Global Policy Analysis, 71(4), 563–586. doi:10.1177/0020702016686381
   Google Scholar
• Sawit, M. H. (2006). Indonesia dalam Tatanan perubahan Perdagangan Beras Dunia. Jurnal Pangan, 15(2), 16–23. Retrieved from http://www.jurnalpangan.com/index.php/pangan/article/view/291
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J., & Wilkinson, R. (2010). What happened to Doha in Geneva? The European Journal of Development Research, 22(2), 141–153. doi:10.1057/ejdr.2010.6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soesastro, H., & Basri, M. C. (2005). The Political Economy of Trade Policy in Indonesia. ASEAN Economic Bulletin, 22(1), 3–18. doi:10.1355/AE22-1B
   Google Scholar
• Stephen, M. D. (2012). Rising Regional Powers and International Institutions: The Foreign Policy Orientations of India, Brazil and South Africa. Global Society, 26(3), 289–309. doi:10.1080/13600826.2012.682277
   Google Scholar
• Stephen, M. D., & Parízek, M. (2019). New powers and the distribution of preferences in global trade governance: From deadlock and drift to fragmentation. New Political Economy, 24(6), 735–758. doi:10.1080/13563467.2018.1509065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tadem, T. S. E. (2016). Negotiating North–South dynamics and the Philippine experience in the WTO. The Pacific Review, 29(5), 717–739. doi:10.1080/09512748.2015.1040055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tambunan, T. T. H. (2010). The Indonesian experience with two big economic crises. Modern Economy, 1(3), 156–167. doi:10.4236/me.2010.13018
   Google Scholar
• Thies, C. G. (2009). Role Theory and Foreign Policy*. International Studies Association Compendium Project.
   Google Scholar
• Tijaja, J., & Faisal, M. (2014). Industrial Policy in Indonesia: A Global Value Chain Perspective (ADB Economics Working Paper Series). Manila: Asia Development Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Trade Data and Information Center. (2017). Total Balance of Trade of Indonesia. Ministry of Trade, Republic of Indonesia. Retrieved from http://www.kemendag.go.id/en/economic-profile/indonesia-export-import/indonesia-trade-balance
   Google Scholar
• Wade, R. H. (2011). Emerging world order? From multipolarity to multilateralism in the G20, the world bank, and the IMF. Politics & Society, 39(3), 347–378. doi:10.1177/0032329211415503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warburton, E. (2017). Resource Nationalism in Indonesia: Ownership structures and sectoral variation in mining and palm oil. Journal of East Asian Studies, 17(3), 285–312. doi:10.1017/jea.2017.13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, R. (2006). The WTO in Hong Kong: What it really means for the Doha Development Agenda. New Political Economy, 11(2), 291–304. doi:10.1080/13563460600655672
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, R., Hannah, E., & Scott, J. (2014). The WTO in Bali: What mc9 means for the Doha Development Agenda and why it matters. Third World Quarterly, 35(6), 1032–1050. doi:10.1080/01436597.2014.907726
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winanti, P. S., Arfani, R. N., Putra, A. A., Suberata, I. G. K. C. B., Syarifuddin, M. R., & Puspaningrum, V. (2013). The Future of Doha Round: Optimalisasi Diplomasi Ekonomi Indonesia dalam Kerangka WTO (Practices in Trade and Indonesian Encounters). Pusat Studi Perdagangan Dunia.
   Google Scholar
• WTO. (2019). Map of negotiating groups in the Doha negotiations. Retrieved from https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dda_e/negotiating_groups_maps_e.htm?group_selected=GRP017
   Google Scholar
• WTO Secretariat. (2003). Trade Policy Review, Indonesia. Trade Policy Review Body, WTO. Retrieved from https://docs.wto.org/dol2fe/Pages/FE_Search/ExportFile.aspx?Id=82607&filename=Q/WT/TPR/S117-0.pdf
   Google Scholar