Can ASEAN offer a useful model? Chairmanship in decision-making by consensus

References

• Abdullah, A. B. (1998, July 24). Opening statement of H.E. Dato’ Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi Minister of Foreign Affairs of Malaysia. The 31st ASEAN Ministerial Meeting, Manila, The Philippines.
   Google Scholar
• Acharya, A. (1997). Ideas, identity and institution-building from the “ASEAN way” to the “Asia-Pacific way. The Pacific Review, 10(3), 319–346. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09512749708719226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASEAN. (1981, June 17–18). Joint communiqué of the fourteenth ASEAN Ministerial Meeting. Manila, the Philippines.
   Google Scholar
• ASEAN. (1982, June 14–16). Joint communiqué of the fifteenth ASEAN Ministerial Meeting. Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• ASEAN. (1983, June 24–25). Joint communiqué of the sixteenth ASEAN Ministerial Meeting. Bangkok, Thailand.
   Google Scholar
• ASEAN. (1984, July 9–10). Joint communiqué of the seventeenth ASEAN Ministerial Meeting. Jakarta, Indonesia.
   Google Scholar
• ASEAN. (1985, July 9). Joint communiqué of the seventeenth ASEAN Ministerial Meeting. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
   Google Scholar
• ASEAN. (1995, December 14–15). Bangkok summit declaration of 1995. Bangkok, Thailand.
   Google Scholar
• ASEAN. (1996, November 30). Press statement: The first Informal ASEAN Heads of Government Meeting. Jakarta, Indonesia.
   Google Scholar
• ASEAN. (1997, July 24–25). Joint communiqué of the thirtieth ASEAN Ministerial Meeting. Subang Jaya, Malaysia.
   Google Scholar
• ASEAN. (1999, July 23–24). Joint communiqué of the thirty-second ASEAN Ministerial Meeting. Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• ASEAN. (2002, November 4). Declaration on the conduct of parties in the South China Sea, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
   Google Scholar
• ASEAN. (2011, July). Guidelines for the implementation of the DOC.
   Google Scholar
• ASEAN. (2012, July 20). Statement of the ASEAN foreign ministers. Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
   Google Scholar
• ASEAN Secretariat (Ed.). (1996). Twenty-ninth ASEAN Ministerial Meeting (AMM), Post Ministerial Conferences with Dialogue Partners (PMC) and third ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF). Jakarta: Author.
   Google Scholar
• ASEAN Secretariat (Ed.). (2003). Handbook on selected ASEAN political documents. Jakarta: Author.
   Google Scholar
• ASEAN Secretariat (Ed.). (2007). The ASEAN charter. Jakarta: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Blavoukos, S., & Bourantonis, D. (2011). Chairs as policy entrepreneurs in multilateral negotiations. Review of International Studies, 37(2), 653–672. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210510000525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, G. W., & McCubbins, M. D. (2005). Setting the agenda: Responsible party government in the U.S. House of Representatives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Franck, T. M. (1988). Legitimacy in the international system. The American Journal of International Law, 82(4), 705–759. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2203510
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Funston, J. (1998). Thai foreign policy: Seeking influence. In D. Da Cunha & J. Funston (Eds.), Southeast Asian Affairs 1998 (pp. 292–306). Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Garret, G., & Weingast, B. R. (1993). Ideas, interests and institutions: Constructing the European Community’s internal market. In J. Goldstein & R. O. Keohane (Eds.), Ideas and foreign policy: Beliefs, institutions, and political change (pp. 173–206). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gehring, T. (1992). Dynamic international regimes: Institutions for international environmental governance. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Haacke, J. (1999). The concept of flexible engagement and the practice of enhanced integration: Intramural challenges to the “ASEAN way”. The Pacific Review, 12(4), 581–611. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09512749908719307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes-Renshaw, F., & Wallace, H. (1997). The Council of Ministers. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hoang, A. T. (1996). ASEAN dispute management: Implications for Vietnam and an expanded ASEAN. Cotemporary Southeast Asia, 18(1), 61–80.
   Google Scholar
• Hurd, I. (1999). Legitimacy and authority in international politics. International Organization, 53(2), 379–408. doi:https://doi.org/10.1162/002081899550913
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorgensen-Dahl, A. (1976). ASEAN 1967–1976: Development or stagnation? Pacific Community, 7(4), 519–535.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, J. (1996). Conference diplomacy. London: Macmillan Press Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Krasner, S. D. (1983). Structural causes and regime consequences: Regimes as intervening variables. In S. K. D (Ed.), International regimes (pp. 1–21). Ithaca, NY: Cornel University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kratochwil, F., & Ruggie, J. G. (2001). International organization: A state of the art on an art of the state. In L. L. Martin & B. A. Simmons (Eds.), International institutions (pp. 341–363). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300027363
   Google Scholar
• Kurus, B. (1995). ASEAN triad: National interest, consensus-seeking and economic cooperation. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 16(4), 404–420. doi:https://doi.org/10.1355/CS16-4C
   Google Scholar
• Leifer, M. (1980). Conflict and regional order in South-east Asia. The Adelphi Papers, 20(162), 1–1. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/05679328008448571
   Google Scholar
• Leifer, M. (1989). ASEAN and the security of South-East Asia. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• M’Bow, A.-M. (1978). The practice of consensus in international organizations. International Social Science Journal, 30(4), 893–903.
   Google Scholar
• March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1989). Rediscovering institutions: The organizational basis of politics. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• MFAT (Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Thailand). (1985). Documents on the Kampuchean problem 1979–1985. Bangkok: Department of Political Affairs, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Thailand.
   Google Scholar
• MFAT (Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Thailand). (1998, July 27). Thailand’s non-paper on the flexible engagement Approach. 743/2541. Bangkok: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Moravcsik, A. (1999). A new statecraft? Supranational entrepreneurs and international cooperation. International Organization, 53(2), 267–306. doi:https://doi.org/10.1162/002081899550887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nair, K. K. (1984). ASEAN-Indochina relations since 1975: The politics of accommodation. Canberra: The Strategic and Defence Studies Centre, Research School of Pacific Studies, Australian National University.
   Google Scholar
• Nischalke, T. I. (2002). Does ASEAN measure up? Post-Cold War diplomacy and the idea of regional community. The Pacific Review, 15(1), 89–117. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09512740110110873
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raiffa, H. (1982). Art and science of negotiation. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Riker, W. H. (1986). The art of political manipulation. New Heaven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Siazon, L. D. (1997, July 24–25). Opening statement by H.E. Domingo L. Siazon, Jr., Secretary of Foreign Affairs of the Philippines. The 30th ASEAN Ministerial Meeting, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
   Google Scholar
• Sohn, L. B. (1974). Introduction: United Nations decision-making: Confrontation and consensus? Harvard International Law Review, 15, 438–445.
   Google Scholar
• Stubbs, R. (2019). ASEAN sceptics versus ASEAN proponents: Evaluating regional institutions. The Pacific Review, 32(6), 923–950. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2019.1611627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Surin, P. (1998, July 24). Opening statement by H. E. Dr. Surin Pitsuwan Minister of Foreign Affairs of Thailand. The 31st ASEAN Ministerial Meeting, Manila, the Philippines.
   Google Scholar
• Tallberg, J. (2003). The agenda-shaping powers of the EU Council Presidency. Journal of European Public Policy, 10(1), 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tallberg, J. (2004). The power of the presidency: Brokerage, efficiency and distribution in EU negotiations. Journal of Common Market Studies, 42(5), 999–1022. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-9886.2004.00538.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tallberg, J. (2006). Leadership and negotiation in the European Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tallberg, J. (2010). The power of the chair: Formal leadership in international cooperation. International Studies Quarterly, 54(1), 241–265. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2009.00585.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thambipillai, P. (2000). Challenge to the ASEAN way: Musyawarah and non-interference. Kajian Malaysia (Journal of Malaysian Studies), 18(1–2), 157–170.
   Google Scholar
• Thambipillai, P., & Saravanamuttu, J. (1985). ASEAN negotiations: Two insights. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, R. (2008). The Council Presidency in the European Union: Responsibility with power. Jcms: Journal of Common Market Studies, 46(3), 593–617. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2008.00793.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, H. (1985). The Presidency of the Council of Ministers of the European Community: A comparative perspective. In C. O’Nuallain and J-M. Hoscheit (Eds.), The Presidency of the European Council of Ministers (pp. 261–279). London: CROOM HELM.
   Google Scholar
• Wendt, A. (1999). Social theory of international politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Winham, G. R. (1977). Negotiation as a management process. World Politics, 30(1), 87–114. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2010076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, O. R. (1991). Political leadership and regime formation: On the development of institutions in international society. International Organization, 45(3), 281–308. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300033117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zainal Abidin, B. A. W. (1983). Malaysian threat perceptions and regional security. In C. E. Morrison (Ed.), Threats to security in East Asia-Pacific: National and regional perspectives (pp. 103–112). Lexington: D. C. Health and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Zartman, I. W. (1994). Two’s company and more’s a crowd: The complexities of multilateral negotiations. In I. W. Zartman (Ed.), International multilateral negotiation (pp. 1–10). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Zemanek, K. (1983). Majority rule and consensus technique in law-making diplomacy. In R. St. J. Macdonald and D. M. Johnston (Eds.), The structure and process of international law: Essays in legal philosophy doctrine and theory (pp. 857–887). Dordrechit: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
   Google Scholar