Japan and the new Indo-Pacific order: the rise of an entrepreneurial power

References

• Abbondanza, G., & Wilkins, T. (Eds.), (2021). Awkward powers: Escaping traditional great and middle power theory. Singapore: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Abe, S. (2007). Futatsu no Umi no Majiwari [Confluence of the Two Seas], speech at the Parliament of the Republic of India, 22 August. Retrieved from https://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/press/enzetsu/19/eabe_0822.html.
   Google Scholar
• Abe, S. (2012). Asia’s democratic security diamond. Project Syndicate, 27 December. Retrieved from http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/a-strategic-alliance-for-japan-and-india-by-shinzo-abe.
   Google Scholar
• Abe, S. (2013). Japan is Back’, speech at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, 22 February. Retrieved from https://csis-website-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/legacy_files/files/attachments/130222_speech_abe.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Abe, S. (2015a). Address by Prime Minister Shinzo Abe on the Occasion of the ASEAN Business and Investment Summit, 21 November. Retrieved from https://www.mofa.go.jp/a_o/rp/page4e_000347.html.
   Google Scholar
• Abe, S. (2015b). ‘The Future of Asia: Be Innovative’, speech by Prime Minister Shinzo Abe at the Banquet of the 21st International Conference on the Future of Asia, 22 May. Retrieved from https://www.mofa.go.jp/ic/dapc/page1e_000042.html.
   Google Scholar
• Abe, S. (2016). Address by Prime Minister Shinzo Abe at the Opening Session of the Sixth Tokyo International Conference on African Development (TICAD VI), Nairobi, Kenya, 27 August. Retrieved from https://www.mofa.go.jp/afr/af2/page4e_000496.html.
   Google Scholar
• Acharya, A. (2007). The emerging regional architecture of world politics. World Politics, 59(4), 629–652. doi:10.1353/wp.2008.0000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acharya, A. (2009). Whose ideas matter? Agency and power in Asian Regionalism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Akimoto, D. (2018). The Abe Doctrine: Japan’s proactive Pacifism and security strategy. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Alagappa, M. (2003a). Preface. In M. Alagappa (Ed.), Asian security order: Instrumental and normative features (pp. ix–xv). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alagappa, M. (2003b). Introduction: Predictability and stability despite challenges. In M. Alagappa (Ed.), Asian security order: Instrumental and normative features (pp. 1–30). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alagappa, M. (2003c). The study of international order: An analytical framework. In M. Alagappa (Ed.), Asian security order: Instrumental and normative features (pp. 33–69). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alagappa, M. (2003d). Constructing security order in Asia: Conceptions and issues. In M. Alagappa (Ed.), Asian security order: Instrumental and normative features (pp. 70–105). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• ASEAN (Association of Southeast Asian Nations). (2019). ASEAN Outlook on the Indo-Pacific, 23 June. Retrieved from https://asean.org/asean-outlook-indo-pacific/.
   Google Scholar
• Aso, T. (2006). Speech on the Occasion of the Japan Institute of International Affairs Seminar “Arc of Freedom and Prosperity: Japan's Expanding Diplomatic Horizons”. 30 November. Retrieved from https://www.mofa.go.jp/announce/fm/aso/speech0611.html.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, M. (1999). Culture, strategy and foreign policy change: Israel’s road to Oslo. European Journal of International Relations, 5(1), 5–36. doi:10.1177/1354066199005001001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, T. (2003). The construction of Antagonism: The history problem in Japan’s foreign relations. In G. John Ikenberry & T. Inoguchi (Eds.), Reinventing the alliance: U.S.-Japan security partnership in an era of change (pp. 63–88). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bisley, N. (2019). Asia’s regional security order: Rules, power and status. Australian Journal of Politics & History, 65(3), 361–376. doi:10.1111/ajph.12587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bull, H. (2002). The anarchical society: A study of order in world politics (3rd ed.). New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buzan, B., & Waever, O. (2003). Regions and powers: The structure of international security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Calder, K. (2004). Securing security through prosperity: The San Francisco system in comparative perspective. The Pacific Review, 17(1), 135–157. doi:10.1080/0951274042000182447
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calder, K. E. (1988). Japanese foreign economic policy formation: Explaining the reactive state. World Politics, 40(4), 517–541. doi:10.2307/2010317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, A., & Baldino, D. (2015). An Indo-Pacific norm entrepreneur? Australia and Defence Diplomacy. Journal of the Indian Ocean Region, 11(1), 30–47. doi:10.1080/19480881.2015.1018500
   Google Scholar
• Che, C. (2021). Japan is the New Leader of Asia’s Liberal Order. Foreign Affairs, 24 February. Retrieved from https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/2021-02-24/japan-new-leader-asias-liberal-order.
   Google Scholar
• Ching, F. (2008). “Asian Arc” Doomed without Australia. Japan Times, 22 February. Retrieved from https://www.japantimes.co.jp/opinion/2008/02/22/commentary/asian-arc-doomed-without-australia/.
   Google Scholar
• Choong, W. (2019). The return of the Indo-Pacific strategy: An assessment. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 73(5), 415–430. doi:10.1080/10357718.2019.1639134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, M., Engel, D., & Thu, H. L. (2020). Suga signals commitment to ‘free and open Indo-Pacific’ with Vietnam and Indonesia Visits. Strategist, 2 November. Retrieved from https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/suga-signals-commitment-to-free-and-open-indo-pacific-with-vietnam-and-indonesia-visits/.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, A. F., Higgott, R. A., & Nossal, K. R. (1993). Relocating middle powers: Australia and Canada in a changing world order. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
   Google Scholar
• DFAT (Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade). (2017). Australia-India-Japan-United States Consultations on the Indo-Pacific. Media release, 12 November. Retrieved from https://dfat.gov.au/news/media/Pages/aus-india-japan-us-consultations-on-the-indo-pacific.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Economist. (2018a). Will China’s Belt and Road Initiative outdo the Marshall Plan? 10 March. Retrieved from https://www.economist.com/finance-and-economics/2018/03/08/will-chinas-belt-and-road-initiative-outdo-the-marshall-plan.
   Google Scholar
• Economist. (2018b). What on earth is the CPTPP?’ 12 March. Retrieved from https://www.economist.com/the-economist-explains/2018/03/12/what-on-earth-is-the-cptpp.
   Google Scholar
• Economist. (2019). Asian Countries Fear China, But Many Won’t Side with America’, June 5. Retrieved from https://www.economist.com/asia/2019/06/06/asian-countries-fear-china-but-many-wont-side-with-america.
   Google Scholar
• Economist. (2021). A Glimpse into Japan’s Understated Financial Heft in South-East Asia, 14 August. Retrieved from https://www.economist.com/finance-and-economics/2021/08/14/a-glimpse-into-japans-understated-financial-heft-in-south-east-asia.
   Google Scholar
• Emmers, R., & Teo, S. (2015). Regional security strategies of middle powers in the Asia-Pacific. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 15(2), 185–216. doi:10.1093/irap/lcu020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Envall, H. D. P. (2014). Japan's India engagement: From different worlds to strategic partners. In I. Hall (Ed.), The engagement of India: Strategies and responses (pp. 39–59). Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Envall, H. D. P. (2015a). Japanese diplomacy: The role of leadership. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Envall, H. D. P. (2015b). Clashing expectations: Strategic thinking and alliance mismanagement in Japan. In Y. Sato & T. S. Seng (Eds.), United States engagement in the Asia Pacific: Perspectives from Asia (pp. 61–88). Amherst, NY: Cambria Press.
   Google Scholar
• Envall, H. D. P. (2016). Japan’s ‘pivot’ perspective: Reassurance, restructuring, and the rebalance. Security Challenges, 12(3), 5–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Envall, H. D. P. (2017a). Japan: From passive partner to active ally. In M. Wesley (Ed.), Global allies: Comparing US alliances in the 21st Century (pp. 15–30). Canberra: ANU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Envall, H. D. P. (2017b). Can Japan’s Golden Golf Diplomacy Win Over Donald Trump? In Australian National University (Ed.), The Trump Administration’s First 100 Days: What Should Asia Do? (pp. 16–17). Canberra: ANU College of Asia and the Pacific.
   Google Scholar
• Envall, H. D. P. (2019a). What kind of Japan? Tokyo’s strategic options in a contested Asia. Survival, 61(4), 117–130. doi:10.1080/00396338.2019.1637126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Envall, H. D. P. (2019b, September). The Quadrilateral Security Dialogue: Towards an Indo-Pacific Order?. Policy Report, S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Envall, H. D. P. (2020a). The “Abe Doctrine”: Japan’s new regional realism. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 20(1), 31–59. doi:10.1093/irap/lcy014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Envall, H. D. P. (2020b). The Pacific Islands in Japan’s “Free and Open Indo-Pacific”: From “Slow and Steady” to strategic engagement? Security Challenges, 16(1), 65–77.
   Google Scholar
• Envall, H. D. P. (2020c). Has Shinzo Abe Left a Lasting Legacy? Inside Story, 1 September. Retrieved from https://insidestory.org.au/has-shinzo-abe-left-a-lasting-legacy/.
   Google Scholar
• Envall, H. D. P. (2021a, forthcoming). Japan’s perspective on the South China Sea. Australian Parliamentary Research Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Envall, H. D. P. (2021b). Japan and the dangers of multipolarisation. In B. Zala (Ed.), Interrogating a multipolar order (pp. 144–168). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Envall, H. D. P., & Hall, I. (2016a). Asian strategic partnerships: New practices and regional security governance. Asian Politics & Policy, 8(1), 87–105. doi:10.1111/aspp.12241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Envall, H. D. P., & Hall, I. (2016b). Strategic partnerships: Helping or hindering security?. East Asia Forum, 15 June. Retrieved from https://www.eastasiaforum.org/2016/06/15/strategic-partnerships-helping-or-hindering-security/.
   Google Scholar
• Finnemore, M., & Sikkink, K. (1998). International norm dynamics and political change. International Organization, 52(4), 887–917. doi:10.1162/002081898550789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George Mulgan, A. (2018). Japan–North Korea relations. In J. D. J. Brown & J. Kingston (Eds.), Japan’s foreign relations in Asia (pp. 233–247). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gilpin, R. (1981). War and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goh, E., & Sahashi, R. (2020). Worldviews on the United States, alliances, and the changing international order: An introduction. Contemporary Politics, 26(4), 371–383. doi:10.1080/13569775.2020.1777044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GOJ (Government of Japan). (2013). National Security Strategy. 17 December. Retrieved from http://japan.kantei.go.jp/96_abe/documents/2013/__icsFiles/afieldfile/2013/12/18/NSS.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Green, M. (2001). Japan’s reluctant realism: Foreign policy challenges in an era of uncertain power. New York: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Green, M. (2018). Japan’s “free and open Indo-Pacific strategy” as grand strategy. We Are Tomodachi, 29, 28–29.
   Google Scholar
• Hanada, R. (2018). Heading towards alliance? Domestic factors in the evolution of Japan–Australia security cooperation. In M. Heazle and A. O’Neil (Eds.), China’s rise and Australia–Japan–US relations: Primacy and leadership in East Asia (pp. 219–237). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Hanada, R. (2019). The Role of U.S.-Japan-Australia-India Cooperation, or the “Quad” in FOIP: A policy coordination mechanism for a rules-based order. CSIS Working Paper. Retrieved from https://csis-website-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/FINAL_Working%20Paper_Ryosuke%20Hanada.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, B. (2019). The Trump Administration’s Free and Open Indo-Pacific Approach. Southeast Asian Affairs, 19(1), 61–67. doi:10.1355/aa19-1e
   Google Scholar
• Harris, T. (2019). ‘“Quality Infrastructure”: Japan’s robust challenge to China’s Belt and Road. War on the Rocks, 9 April. Retrieved from https://warontherocks.com/2019/04/quality-infrastructure-japans-robust-challenge-to-chinas-belt-and-road/.
   Google Scholar
• Hatakeyama, K. (2019). A middle power’s roles in shaping East Asian Security Order: Analysis of Japan’s engagement from a normative perspective. Australian Journal of Politics & History, 65(3), 466–481. doi:10.1111/ajph.12592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, K. (2018). Three faces of the Indo-Pacific: Understanding the “Indo-Pacific” from an IR Theory Perspective. East Asia, 35(2), 149–161. doi:10.1007/s12140-018-9286-5
   Google Scholar
• He, K., & Feng, H. (2020). Introduction: Rethinking China and International Order: A conceptual analysis. In K. He & H. Feng (Eds.), China’s challenges and international order transition: Beyond ‘Thucydides’s Trap (pp. 1–24). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heazle, M., & Tatsumi, Y. (2018). Explaining Australia–Japan Security cooperation and its prospects: “the interests that bind?” The Pacific Review, 31(1), 38–56. doi:10.1080/09512748.2017.1310750
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hettne, B. (2005). Beyond the “New” regionalism. New Political Economy, 10(4), 543–571. doi:10.1080/13563460500344484
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornung, J. W. (2018). The Fate of the World Order Rests on Tokyo’s Shoulders. Foreign Policy, 30 October. Retrieved from https://foreignpolicy.com/2018/10/30/the-fate-of-the-world-order-rests-on-tokyos-shoulders/.
   Google Scholar
• Hosoya, Y. (2019). FOIP 2.0: The evolution of Japan’s free and open Indo-Pacific strategy. Asia-Pacific Review, 26(1), 18–28. doi:10.1080/13439006.2019.1622868
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, C. (2015). Japan’s foreign and security policy under the ‘Abe Doctrine’: New dynamism or new dead end? Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, C. W. (2017). Japan’s strategic trajectory and collective self-defense: Essential continuity or radical shift? The Journal of Japanese Studies, 43(1), 93–126. doi:10.1353/jjs.2017.0005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, C. W. (2018). Japan and the South China Sea Disputes: Emerging power politics and “fake liberalism”. In H. Feng & K. He (Eds.), US-China competition and the South China Sea disputes (pp. 82–97). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hurrell, A. (2007). On global order: Power, values, and the constitution of international society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• IISS (International Institute for Strategic Studies). (2021). Chapter six: Asia. Military Balance, 121(1), 218–313.
   Google Scholar
• Ikenberry, G. J. (2010). The liberal international order and its discontents. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 38 (3), 509–521. doi:10.1177/0305829810366477
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikenberry, G. J. (2014). The logic of order: Westphalia, liberalism, and the evolution of international order in the modern era. In G. John Ikenberry (Ed.), Power, order, and change in world politics (pp. 83–106). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ikenberry, G. J. (2018). The end of liberal international order? International Affairs, 94(1), 7–23. doi:10.1093/ia/iix241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingebritsen, C. (2002). Norm entrepreneurs: Scandinavia’s role in world politics. Cooperation and Conflict, 37(1), 11–23. doi:10.1177/0010836702037001689
   Google Scholar
• Insisa, A., & Pugliese, G. (2020). The free and open Indo-Pacific versus the belt and road: Spheres of influence and Sino-Japanese relations. The Pacific Review, 1–29. doi:10.1080/09512748.2020.1862899
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishihara, Y. (2014). Japan-Australia defence cooperation in the asia-pacific region. In W. Tow & T. Yoshizaki (Eds.), Beyond the Hub and Spokes: Australia-Japan Security Cooperation (pp. 93–122). Tokyo: National Institute for Defense Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Jain, P. (2020). Japan’s Weapon-Export Industry Takes its First Steps. East Asia Forum, 30 October. Retrieved from https://www.eastasiaforum.org/2020/10/30/japans-weapon-export-industry-takes-its-first-steps/.
   Google Scholar
• Jayasuriya, K. (2009). New modes of regionalising governance in Asia. In N. Thomas (Ed.), Governance and regionalism in Asia (pp. 321–333). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, K. (2018). Japan’s Own Belt and Road. Foreign Policy, 9 February. Retrieved from https://foreignpolicy.com/2018/02/09/japan-takes-the-lead-in-countering-chinas-belt-and-road/.
   Google Scholar
• Katada, S. N. (2020). Japan’s new regional reality: Geoeconomic strategy in the asia-Pacific. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Katagiri, N. (2019). Shinzo Abe’s Indo-Pacific Strategy: Japan’s recent achievement and future direction. Asian Security, 16(2), 179–122. doi:10.1080/14799855.2019.1607304
   Google Scholar
• Kersten, R. (2018a). Assumptions about Alliances: Australia, Japan and the Liberal International Order. In M. Heazle & A. O’Neil (Eds.), China’s rise and Australia–Japan–US relations: Primacy and leadership in East Asia (pp. 195–218). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Kersten, R. (2018b). Japan and the Quad. In A. Carr (Ed.), Debating the quad, centre of gravity series 39 (pp. 16–18). Canberra: Strategic and Defence Studies Centre, ANU.
   Google Scholar
• King, A. (2014). Where does Japan fit in China’s “new type of great power relations?” Asan Forum, 2 (2). https://theasanforum.org/where-does-japan-fit-in-chinas-new-type-of-great-power-relations/.
   Google Scholar
• Kitaoka, S. (2019). Vision for a free and open Indo-Pacific. Asia-Pacific Review, 26(1), 7–17. doi:10.1080/13439006.2019.1618592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koga, K. (2018). The concept of “hedging” revisited: The case of Japan’s foreign policy strategy in East Asia’s power shift. International Studies Review, 20(4), 633–660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koga, K. (2019). Japan’s “Free and Open Indo-Pacific” strategy: Tokyo’s tactical hedging and the implications for ASEAN. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 41(2), 286–313. doi:10.1355/cs41-2l
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koga, K. (2020). Japan’s “Indo-Pacific” question: Countering China or shaping a new regional order? International Affairs, 96(1), 49–73. doi:10.1093/ia/iiz241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koh, S. L. C. (2018). The Vietnamese perspective on the security partnership with Japan. In W. Vosse & P. Midford (Eds.), Japan’s new security partnerships: Beyond the security alliance (pp. 149–172). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kurusu, K. (2018). Japan as a norm entrepreneur for human security. In M. M. McCarthy (Ed.), Routledge handbook of Japanese foreign policy (pp. 321–336). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lake, D. A., & Morgan, P. M. (Eds.). (2010). Regional orders: Building security in a new world. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, L. (2020). Assessing the quad: Prospects and limitations of quadrilateral cooperation for advancing Australia’s interests. Lowy Institute Analyses, 19 May.
   Google Scholar
• Madan, T. (2017). The Rise, Fall, and Rebirth of the “Quad”. War on the Rocks, 16 November. Retrieved from https://warontherocks.com/2017/11/rise-fall-rebirth-quad/.
   Google Scholar
• Medcalf, R. (2020). Contest for the Indo-Pacific: Why China won’t map the future. Carlton: La Trobe University Press.
   Google Scholar
• MOD (Japan Ministry of Defense). (2018). Defense of Japan 2018. Tokyo: Ministry of Defense.
   Google Scholar
• MOD. (2020). Defense of Japan 2020. Tokyo: Ministry of Defense.
   Google Scholar
• MOFA (Japan Ministry of Foreign Affairs). (2018). Diplomatic Bluebook 2018. Tokyo: Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• MOFA. (2019a). Japan -Australia-India-U.S. Consultations, 31 May. Retrieved from https://www.mofa.go.jp/press/release/press4e_002464.html.
   Google Scholar
• MOFA. (2019b). Japan-Australia-India-U.S. Ministerial, 26 September. Retrieved from https://www.mofa.go.jp/fp/nsp/page3e_001112.html.
   Google Scholar
• MOFA. (2020a). ODA Yosan [ODA Budget], 10 April. Retrieved from https://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/gaiko/oda/shiryo/yosan.html.
   Google Scholar
• MOFA. (2020b). The Second Japan-Australia-India-U.S. Foreign Ministers’ Meeting. 6 October. Retrieved from https://www.mofa.go.jp/press/release/press6e_000244.html.
   Google Scholar
• MOFA. (2020c). Diplomatic bluebook 2020. Tokyo: Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, P. M. (1997). Regional security complexes and regional orders. In D. A. Lake & P. M. Morgan (Eds.), Regional Orders: Building security in a new world (pp. 20–42). University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mueller, L. M. (2020). Challenges to ASEAN centrality and hedging in connectivity governance—Regional and national pressure points. Pacific Review, 1–31. doi:10.1080/09512748.2020.1757741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikkei Asia. (2016). Japan’s Prime Minister: Japan Will Pour $200 Billion into Global Infrastructure. 9 June. Retrieved from https://asia.nikkei.com/magazine/20160609-TAKE-TWO/Future-of-Asia-2016/Japan-s-prime-minister-Japan-will-pour-200-billion-into-global-infrastructure.
   Google Scholar
• Nolte, D. (2011). Regional powers and regional governance. In N. Godehardt, & D. Nabers (Eds.), Regional powers and regional orders (pp. 49–67). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Oros, A. L. (2017). Japan’s security renaissance: New policies and politics for the twenty-first century. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pajon, C. (2019). Japan’s Indo-Pacific Strategy: Shaping a Hybrid Regional Order. War on the Rocks, 18 December. Retrieved from https://warontherocks.com/2019/12/japans-indo-pacific-strategy-shaping-a-hybrid-regional-order/.
   Google Scholar
• Pan, C. (2014). The “Indo-Pacific” and geopolitical anxieties about China’s Rise in the Asian Regional Order. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 68(4), 453–469. doi:10.1080/10357718.2014.884054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panda, A. (2017). US, Japan, India, and Australia Hold Working-Level Quadrilateral Meeting on Regional Cooperation. Diplomat, 13 November. Retrieved from https://thediplomat.com/2017/11/us-japanindia-and-australia-hold-working-level-quadrilateral-meeting-on-regional-cooperation/.
   Google Scholar
• Patalano, A. (2020). A gathering storm? The Chinese “Attrition” strategy for the Senkaku/Diaoyu Islands. RUSI Newsbrief, 40(7), 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Paul, T. V., & Hall, J. A. (Eds.). (1999). International order and the future of world politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Payne, R. A. (2001). Persuasion, frames and norm construction. European Journal of International Relations, 7(1), 37–61. doi:10.1177/1354066101007001002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, R. (1998). Reversing the gun sights: Transnational civil society targets land mines. International Organization, 52(3), 613–644. doi:10.1162/002081898550671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajagopalan, R. (2020). Evasive balancing: India’s unviable Indo-Pacific strategy. International Affairs, 96(1), 75–93. doi:10.1093/ia/iiz224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravenhill, J. (2018). Entrepreneurial states: A conceptual overview. International Journal: Canada's Journal of Global Policy Analysis, 73(4), 501–517. doi:10.1177/0020702018811813
   Google Scholar
• Sahashi, R. (2012). ‘Security arrangements in the Asia-Pacific’: A three-tier approach. In W. T. Tow, & R. Kersten (Eds.), Bilateral perspectives on regional security: Australia-Japan and the Asia-Pacific Region (pp. 214–240). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sakaki, A., & Maslow, S. (2020). Japan’s new arms export policies: Strategic aspirations and domestic constraints. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 74(6), 649–669. doi:10.1080/10357718.2020.1781789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satake, T. (2016). The new guidelines for Japan–US defense cooperation and an expanding Japanese security role. Asian Politics & Policy, 8(1), 27–38. doi:10.1111/aspp.12239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satake, T. (2019). Japan’s “free and open Indo-Pacific strategy” and its implication for ASEAN. Southeast Asian Affairs, 19(1), 69–82. doi:10.1355/aa19-1f
   Google Scholar
• Satake, T. (2020). The future of the quadrilateral security dialogue: Possibilities and challenges. In B. Singh, & S. Teo (Eds.), Minilateralism in the Indo-Pacific: The quadrilateral security dialogue, Lancang-Mekong Cooperation Mechanism, and ASEAN (pp. 42–56). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Satake, T., & Sahashi, R. (2021). The rise of China and Japan’s “Vision” for Free and Open Indo-Pacific. Journal of Contemporary China, 30(127), 18–35. doi:10.1080/10670564.2020.1766907
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, B. (2020). ‘The Black, White and Grey in Defining the “Rules-Based Order”’. Interpreter, 29 April. Retrieved from https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/black-white-and-grey-defining-rules-based-order.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, D. (2019). The geoeconomics and geopolitics of Japan’s ‘Indo-Pacific’ strategy. Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs, 6(2), 136–161. doi:10.1177/2347797019842440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sim, W. (2018). ASEAN at Heart of Japan’s Free and Open Indo-Pacific Strategy: Kono. Straits Times, 27 July.
   Google Scholar
• Slaughter, A.-M. (2009). A New World Order. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, S. A. (2019). Japan rearmed: The politics of military power. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Soeya, Y. (2005). Nihon no ‘Midoru Pawā’ Gaikō: Sengo Nihon no Sentaku to Kōsō [Japan’s ‘Middle Power’ Diplomacy: Postwar Japan’s Choices and Conceptions]. Tokyo: Chikuma Shinsho.
   Google Scholar
• Soeya, Y. (2020). Middle-power cooperation in the Indo-Pacific Era. Issues & Studies, 56(02), 2040009–2040022. doi:10.1142/S1013251120400093
   Google Scholar
• Solingen, E. (1998). Regional orders at Century’s dawn: Global and domestic influences on grand strategy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Solingen, E. (2012). Of dominoes and firewalls: The domestic, regional, and global politics of international diffusion. International Studies Quarterly, 56(4), 631–644. doi:10.1111/isqu.12034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solís, M., & Katada, S. N. (2015). Unlikely pivotal states in competitive free trade agreement diffusion: The effect of Japan's trans-pacific partnership participation on Asia-Pacific regional integration. New Political Economy, 20(2), 155–177. doi:10.1080/13563467.2013.872612
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevenson, K., & Envall, H. D. P. (2019). The “Quad” and Disaster Management: An Australian Perspective. In Y. Tatsumi, & J. Li (Eds.), International Disaster Response: Rebuilding the Quad? (pp. 13–23). Washington, DC: Stimson Center.
   Google Scholar
• Sudo, S. (2015). Japan’s ASEAN policy: In search of proactive multilateralism. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Suga, Y. (2020). Building Together the Future of Indo-Pacific, speech by Prime Minister Suga at the Vietnam-Japan University, 19 October. Retrieved from https://www.mofa.go.jp/s_sa/sea1/vn/page3e_001070.html.
   Google Scholar
• Suzuki, S., & Wallace, C. (2018). Explaining Japan’s response to geopolitical vulnerability. International Affairs, 94(4), 711–734. doi:10.1093/ia/iiy033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajima, Y. (2018). Abe softens tone on Indo-Pacific to Coax China's ASEAN Friends. Nikkei Asia, 13 November. Retrieved from https://asia.nikkei.com/Politics/International-relations/Abe-softens-tone-on-Indo-Pacific-to-coax-China-s-ASEAN-friends.
   Google Scholar
• Tamaki, N. (2020). Japan’s quest for a rules-based international order: The Japan-US Alliance and the decline of US Liberal Hegemony. Contemporary Politics, 26(4), 384–401. doi:10.1080/13569775.2020.1777041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, S. S. (2020). Consigned to Hedge: South-East Asia and America’s “free and open Indo-Pacific” Strategy. International Affairs, 96(1), 131–148. doi:10.1093/ia/iiz227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, B. (2011). Asia’s century and the problem of Japan’s Centrality. International Affairs, 87(4), 871–885. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2346.2011.01008.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, B. (2018). The four flashpoints: How Asia goes to war. Carlton: La Trobe University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, B. (2020). Is Australia’s Indo-Pacific Strategy an Illusion? International Affairs, 96(1), 95–109. doi:10.1093/ia/iiz228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terada, T. (2019). Japan and TPP/TPP-11: Opening black box of domestic political alignment for proactive economic diplomacy in face of “Trump Shock”. The Pacific Review, 32(6), 1041–1069. doi:10.1080/09512748.2019.1617771
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thankachan, S. (2017). Japan’s “free and open Indo-Pacific strategy”: Reality before the Rhetoric? Maritime Affairs: Journal of the National Maritime Foundation of India, 13(2), 84–91. doi:10.1080/09733159.2017.1414831
   Google Scholar
• Tow, W. T., & Envall, H. D. P. (2011). The U.S. and implementing multilateral security in the Pacific: Can Convergent Security Work? IFANS Review, 19(2), 49–72.
   Google Scholar
• USG (United States Government). (2021). U.S. Strategic Framework for the Indo-Pacific, 5 January, 000174. Retrieved from https://fas.org/sgp/news/2021/01/indopac-framework.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Vosse, W., & P. Midford (Eds.). (2018). Japan's new security partnerships: Beyond the security alliance. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, T. (2020). Timeline of a Broken Relationship: How China and Australia Went from Chilly to Barely Speaking. Conversation, 9 December. Retrieved from https://theconversation.com/timeline-of-a-broken-relationship-how-china-and-australia-went-from-chilly-to-barely-speaking-151567.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, C. (2019). Japan’s strategic contrast: Continuing influence despite relative power decline in Southeast Asia. The Pacific Review, 32(5), 863–897. doi:10.1080/09512748.2019.1569115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White House. (2021). ‘Quad Leaders’ joint statement: “The Spirit of the Quad”’, 12 March. Retrieved from https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/03/12/quad-leaders-joint-statement-the-spirit-of-the-quad/.
   Google Scholar
• White, H. (2017). Without America: Australia in the New Asia. Quarterly Essay 68. Carlton: Black Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Wiener, A. (2004). Contested compliance: Interventions on the normative structure of world politics. European Journal of International Relations, 10(2), 189–234. doi:10.1177/1354066104042934
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkins, T. S. (2007). Towards a “Trilateral Alliance?” Understanding the role of expediency and values in American–Japanese–Australian Relations. Asian Security, 3(3), 251–278. doi:10.1080/14799850701530440
   Google Scholar
• Wilkins, T. S. (2011). Japan’s Alliance diversification: A comparative analysis of the Indian and Australian strategic partnerships. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 11(1), 115–155. doi:10.1093/irap/lcq022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkins, T. S. (2012a). ‘Alignment’, not ‘Alliance’ – the shifting paradigm of International Security Cooperation: Toward a conceptual taxonomy of alignment. Review of International Studies, 38(1), 53–76. doi:10.1017/S0260210511000209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkins, T. S. (2012b). Japan–Australia Security Relations: Building a Real Strategic Partnership? In W. T. Tow & R. Kersten (Eds.), Bilateral perspectives on regional security: Australia-Japan and the Asia-Pacific Region (pp. 111–127). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkins, T. S. (2017). Australia and middle power approaches to Asia Pacific Regionalism. Australian Journal of Political Science, 52(1), 110–125. doi:10.1080/10361146.2016.1238870
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkins, T. S. (2018a). After a decade of strategic partnership: Japan and Australia “Decentering” from the US Alliance? The Pacific Review, 31(4), 498–514. doi:10.1080/09512748.2017.1391867
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkins, T. S. (2018b). ‘Australia and Japan Facing “Disruptive” Challenges to the Rules Based Order in the Indo-Pacific’, JIIA Policy Brief, 26 September.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkins, T. S. (2019). Security in the Asia-Pacific: The dynamics of alignment. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkins, T. S. (2021a). Elevating the Australia-Japan strategic partnership to “a new level”: Challenges and responses. JIIA Policy Brief, 13 April. Retrieved from https://www.jiia-jic.jp/en/policybrief/pdf/PolicyBrief_Wilkins_210413.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkins, T. S. (2021b). Japan as a contributor to the rules-based order in the Indo-Pacific. International Information Network Analysis, 22 September, 2021, Sasakawa Peace Foundation. Retrieved from https://www.spf.org/iina/en/articles/thomas_02.html.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkins, T., & Kim, J. (2020). Adoption, accommodation or opposition?-regional powers respond to American-led Indo-Pacific strategy. The Pacific Review, 1–31. doi:10.1080/09512748.2020.1825516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, J. D. (2015). Mega-regional trade deals in the Asia-Pacific: Choosing between the TPP and RCEP? Journal of Contemporary Asia, 45 (2), 345–353. doi:10.1080/00472336.2014.956138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2021). World Bank Development Indicators. Databank. Retrieved from https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators.
   Google Scholar
• Yamaguchi, M. (2020). Australia, Japan to Bolster Defense Ties Amid China’s Rise. Diplomat, 18 November. Retrieved from https://thediplomat.com/2020/11/australia-japan-to-bolster-defense-ties-amid-chinas-rise/.
   Google Scholar
• Yamamoto, R. (2020). The trajectory of ODA’s strategic use and reforms—From Nakasone Yasuhiro to Abe Shinzō. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 74(6), 633–616. doi:10.1080/10357718.2020.1787335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshimatsu, H. (2017). Japan’s Export of Infrastructure Systems: Pursuing Twin Goals through Developmental Means. The Pacific Review, 30(4), 494–512. doi:10.1080/09512748.2016.1276953
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshimatsu, H. (2018). New dynamics in Sino-Japanese rivalry: Sustaining infrastructure development in Asia. Journal of Contemporary China, 27(113), 719–743. doi:10.1080/10670564.2018.1458059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshimatsu, H. (2019). The Indo-Pacific in Japan’s strategy towards India. Contemporary Politics, 25 (4), 438–456. doi:10.1080/13569775.2018.1556769
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshimatsu, H. (2021). Japan’s Asian diplomacy: Power transition, domestic politics, and diffusion of ideas. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Yoshino, N. (2017). Abe takes a shine to China’s Belt and Road Plan. Nikkei Asia, 8 June. Retrieved from https://asia.nikkei.com/Politics/Abe-takes-a-shine-to-China-s-Belt-and-Road-plan.
   Google Scholar
• Young, O. R. (1991). Political leadership and regime formation: On the development of institutions in international society. International Organization, 45(3), 281–308. doi:10.1017/S0020818300033117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, S. (2017). Beijing’s Japan Dilemma: Balancing Nationalism, Legitimacy, and Economic Opportunity. In T. Fingar (Ed.), Uneasy partnerships: China’s engagement with Japan, the Koreas, and Russia in the Era of Reform (pp. 70–96). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar