1,618
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

China’s rise, institutional balancing, and (possible) peaceful order transition in the Asia pacific

References

  • ABC News. (2019). China’s ‘Belt and Road’ strategy has a new competitor—Enter America’s ‘Blue Dot Network. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-11-06/us-introduces-blue-dot-network-as-answer-to-belt-and-road/11675226.
  • Allison, G. (2017). Destined for war: Can America and China escape Thucydides’s Trap? Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
  • Arase, D. (2010). Non-traditional security in China-ASEAN cooperation: The institutionalization of regional security cooperation and the evolution of East Asian regionalism. Asian Survey, 50(4), 808–833. doi:10.1525/as.2010.50.4.808
  • Art, R. (2006). Correspondence: Striking the balance. International Security, 30(3), 177–185. doi:10.1162/isec.2005.30.3.177
  • Baldwin, D. A. (1993). Neorealism and neoliberalism: The contemporary debate. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Beeson, M. (2019). Asia’s competing multilateral initiatives: Quality versus quantity. The Pacific Review, 32(2), 245–255. doi:10.1080/09512748.2018.1470556
  • Beeson, M. (2020). The great ASEAN Rorschach test. The Pacific Review, 33(3-4), 574–581. doi:10.1080/09512748.2019.1624384
  • Bell, S. (2006). A victim of its own success: Internationalization, neoliberalism, and organizational involution at the Business Council of Australia. Politics & Society, 34(4), 543–570. doi:10.1177/0032329206293643
  • Bull, H. (1977). The anarchical society: A study of order in world politics. London: Macmillan.
  • Caballero-Anthony, M., & Emmers, R. (in this issue). Keeping the Peace in Southeast Asia: ASEAN and the Quest for Positive Peace. The Pacific Review
  • Capie, D., & Taylor, B. (2010). The Shangri-La dialogue and the institutionalization of defence diplomacy in Asia. The Pacific Review, 23(3), 359–376. doi:10.1080/09512748.2010.481053
  • Chan, L. H. (2017). Soft balancing against the US ‘pivot to Asia’: China’s geostrategic rationale for establishing the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 71(6), 568–590. doi:10.1080/10357718.2017.1357679
  • Chan, S. (2020). Thucydides’s trap? Historical interpretation, logic of inquiry, and the future of Sino-American relations. Ann Harbor: University of Michigan Press.
  • Chan, S., Feng, H., He, K., & Hu, W. (2021). Contesting revisionism: China, the United States, and the transformation of international order. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Chan, S., Hu, W., & He, K. (2019). Discerning states’ revisionist and status-quo orientations: Comparing China and the US. European Journal of International Relations, 25(2), 613–640. doi:10.1177/1354066118804622
  • China State Council Information Office China. (2021). Democracy that works. http://www.news.cn/english/2021-12/04/c_1310351231.htm.
  • Chowdhury, D. R. (2021). December 10). Joe Biden’s Democracy Summit Is the Height of Hypocrisy. Time. https://time.com/6127359/biden-summit-for-democracy/.
  • Christensen, T. J. (2012). The meaning of the nuclear evolution: China’s strategic modernization and US-China security relations. Journal of Strategic Studies, 35(4), 447–487. doi:10.1080/01402390.2012.714710
  • Christensen, T. J. (2021). There will not be a new Cold War: The limits of U.S.-Chinese competition. Foreign Affairs. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/2021-03-24/there-will-not-be-new-cold-war.
  • Daßler, B., Kruck, A., & Zangl, B. (2019). Interactions between hard and soft power: The institutional adaptation of international intellectual property protection to global power shifts. European Journal of International Relations, 25(2), 588–612. doi:10.1177/1354066118768871
  • Davis, B., & Wei, L. (2020). Superpower showdown: How the battle between Trump and Xi threatens a new Cold War. New York: HarperCollins Publishers.
  • Ella, D. (2021). Balancing effectiveness with geo-economic interests in multilateral development banks: The design of the AIIB, ADB and the World Bank in a comparative perspective. The Pacific Review, 34(6), 1022–1053. doi:10.1080/09512748.2020.1788628
  • Emmers, T. (2013). Cooperative security and the balance of power in ASEAN and the ARF. London: Routledge.
  • Farrell, H., & Newman, A. (2020). The folly of decoupling from China: It isn’t just perilous—It’s impossible. Foreign Affairs. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/china/2020-06-03/folly-decoupling-china.
  • Feng, H. & He, K. (Eds.) (2020). China’s challenges and international order transition: Beyond “Thucydides’s Trap.” Ann Harbor: University of Michigan Press.
  • Feng, H. (2009). Is China a revisionist power? Chinese Journal of International Politics, 2(3), 313–334.
  • Ferlez, J. (2015). China creates a World Bank of its own, and the US balks. The New York Times.
  • Foot, R. (1998). China in the ASEAN Regional Forum: Organizational processes and domestic modes of thought. Asian Survey, 38(5), 425–440. doi:10.2307/2645501
  • Foot, R. (2006). Chinese strategies in a US-hegemonic global order: Accommodating and hedging. International Affairs, 82(1), 77–94. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2346.2006.00516.x
  • Foot, R. (2014). Doing some things’ in the Xi Jinping era: The United Nations as China’s venue of choice. International Affairs, 90(5), 1085–1100. doi:10.1111/1468-2346.12158
  • Foot, R., & Walter, A. (2010). China, the United States, and global order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Friedberg, A. L. (1993). Ripe for rivalry: Prospects for peace in a multipolar Asia. International Security, 18(3), 5–33. doi:10.2307/2539204
  • Geertz, C. (1963). Agricultural involution: The process of ecological change in Indonesia. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Gilpin, R. (1981). War and change in world politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Glaser, C. L., & Fetter, S. (2016). Should the United States reject MAD? Damage limitation and US nuclear strategy toward China. International Security, 41(1), 49–98. doi:10.1162/ISEC_a_00248
  • Goddard, S. E. (2018). Embedded revisionism: Networks, institutions, and challenges to world order. International Organization, 72(4), 763–797. doi:10.1017/S0020818318000206
  • Goh, E. (2004). The ASEAN regional forum in United States East Asian strategy. The Pacific Review, 17(1), 47–69. doi:10.1080/0951274042000182410
  • Gong, X. (2020). Non-traditional security cooperation between China and South-East Asia: Implications for Indo-Pacific geopolitics. International Affairs, 96(1), 29–48. doi:10.1093/ia/iiz225
  • Grieger, G. (2021). Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank: How lean, clean, and green is the AIIB. European Parliamentary Research Service. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/EPRS_BRI(2021. )679086
  • Hameiri, S., & Jones, L. (2018). China challenges global governance? Chinese international development finance and the AIIB. International Affairs, 94(3), 573–593. doi:10.1093/ia/iiy026
  • He, K. (2008). Institutional balancing and international relations theory: Economic interdependence and balance of power strategies in Southeast Asia. European Journal of International Relations, 14(3), 489–518.
  • He, K. (2009). Institutional balancing in the Asia Pacific: Economic interdependence and China’s rise, vol. 36. London: Routledge.
  • He, K. (2021). The Balance of Infrastructure in the Indo‐Pacific: BRI, Institutional Balancing, and Quad’s Policy Choices. Global Policy, 12(4), 545–552. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.12970
  • He, K., & Feng, H. (2008). If not soft balancing, then what? Reconsidering soft balancing and U.S. policy toward China. Security Studies, 17(2), 363–395. doi:10.1080/09636410802098776
  • He, K., & Feng, H. (2015). Transcending rationalism and constructivism: Chinese leaders’ operational codes, socialization processes, and multilateralism after the Cold War. European Political Science Review, 7(3), 401–426. doi:10.1017/S1755773914000241
  • He, K., & Feng, H. (2019). Leadership transition and global governance: Role conception, institutional balancing, and the AIIB. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 12(2), 153–178. doi:10.1093/cjip/poz003
  • He, K., Feng, H., Chan, S., & Hu, W. (2021). Rethinking revisionism in world politics. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 14(2), 159–186. doi:10.1093/cjip/poab004
  • Huang, C. (2015a). China frustrated by delayed reforms to increase its say at IMF. South China Morning Post. Retrieved from https://www.scmp.com/news/china/economy/article/1771630/china-frustrated-delayed-reforms-increase-its-say-imf.
  • Huang, C. (2015b). China-led Asian bank challenges US dominance of global economy. South China Morning Post. Retrieved from https://www.scmp.com/news/china/economy/article/1763525/china-led-asian-bank-challenges-us-dominance-global-economy.
  • Ignatius, D. (2020). ‘Decoupling’ the U.S. from China would backfire. The Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/global-opinions/decoupling-the-us-from-china-would-backfire/2020/09/08/46880cfe-f1fc-11ea-999c-67ff7bf6a9d2_story.html.
  • Ikenberry, G. J. (2008). The rise of China and the future of the West-can the liberal system survive. Foreign Affairs, 87(1), 23–37.
  • Ikenberry, G. J. (2009). Liberal internationalism 3.0: America and the dilemmas of liberal world order. Perspectives on Politics, 7(1), 71–87. doi:10.1017/S1537592709090112
  • Ikenberry, G. J. (2011). Liberal Leviathan: The origins, crisis, and transformation of the American world order, vol. 128. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Johnston, A. I. (2003). Is China a status quo power? International Security, 27(4), 5–56. doi:10.1162/016228803321951081
  • Johnston, A. I. (2014). Social states: China in international institutions, 1980–2000. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Jones, D. M., & Smith, M. L. R. (2007). Making process, not progress: ASEAN and the evolving East Asian regional order. International Security, 32(1), 148–184. doi:10.1162/isec.2007.32.1.148
  • Kang, D. C. (2003). Getting Asia wrong: The need for new analytical frameworks. International Security, 27(4), 57–85. doi:10.1162/016228803321951090
  • Kastner, S. L., Pearson, M. M., & Rector, C. (2016). Invest, hold up, or accept? China in multilateral governance. Security Studies, 25(1), 142–179. doi:10.1080/09636412.2016.1134193
  • Kastner, S. L., Pearson, M. M., & Rector, C. (2018). China’s Strategic Multilateralism: Investing in Global Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Katsumata, H. (2006). Establishment of the ASEAN Regional Forum: Constructing a ‘talking shop’ or a ‘norm brewery’? The Pacific Review, 19(2), 181–198. doi:10.1080/09512740500473197
  • Keck, Z. (2014). October 10). Why the US is trying to squash China’s New Development Bank. The Diplomat
  • Keohane, R. (1984). After hegemony: Cooperation and discord in the world political economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Khrushchev, N. S. (1959). On peaceful coexistence. Foreign Affairs, 38(1), 1–18. doi:10.2307/20029395
  • Kissinger, H. A. (1957). Nuclear weapons and foreign policy. New York: Harper.
  • Kissinger, H. A. (2014). World order: Reflections on the character of nations and the course of history. London: Penguin Books.
  • Krauthammer, C. (1990). The unipolar moment. Foreign Affairs, 70(1), 23–33. doi:10.2307/20044692
  • Lanteigne, M. (2005). China and international institutions: Alternate paths to global power. London: Routledge.
  • Lardy, N. R. (2004). Integrating China into the global economy. Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.
  • Layne, V. (2020). Preventing the China-US Cold War from turning hot. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 13(3), 343–385. doi:10.1093/cjip/poaa012
  • Lieber, K. A., & Press, D. G. (2006). The end of MAD? The nuclear dimension of US primacy. International Security, 30(4), 7–44. doi:10.1162/isec.2006.30.4.7
  • Lieber, K. A., & Press, D. G. (2017). The new era of counterforce: Technological change and the future of nuclear deterrence. International Security, 41(4), 9–49. doi:10.1162/ISEC_a_00273
  • Lipscy, P. Y. (2017). Renegotiating the world order: Institutional change in international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lu, X. (2000). Cadres and corruption: The organizational involution of the Chinese Communist Party. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • Macias, A. (2021). Biden says there will be ‘extreme competition’ with China, but won’t take Trump approach. CNBC News. https://www.cnbc.com/2021/02/07/biden-will-compete-with-china-but-wont-take-trump-approach.html.
  • McDowell, D. (2015). New order: China’s challenge to the global financial system. World Politics Review.
  • Mérand, F., & Pouliot, V. (2020). International institutions and peaceful change. In T.V. Paul, D. W. Larson, H. A. Trinkunas, A. Wivel & R. Emmers (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of peaceful change in international relations (pp. 129–146) Oxford: Oxford University Press
  • MOFA (Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan). (2015). Announcement of ‘Partnership for Quality Infrastructure: Investment for Asia’s Future.’ https://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/oda/page18_000076.html.
  • Nikkei News. (2015). The AIIB storm: Japan lost its first vice president position. Online (in Chinese).
  • Nye, J. S. Jr., (2003). Understanding international conflicts: An introduction to theory and history. New York: Longman.
  • Organski, A. F. K. (1958). World politics. New York: Knopf.
  • Panda, J. (2020). The Abe doctrine on ‘Quad Plus.’ Japan Times. Retrieved from https://www.japantimes.co.jp/opinion/2020/07/17/commentary/japan-commentary/abe-doctrine-quad-plus/.
  • Pape, R. A. (2005). Soft Balancing against the United States. International Security, 30(1), 7–45. doi:10.1162/0162288054894607
  • Pardo, P. R., & Rana, P. B. (2018). Co-operation not competition: The new multilateral development banks and the old. Global Asia, 13(1), 70–77.
  • Paul, T. V. (2005). Soft balancing in the age of U.S. primacy. International Security, 30(1), 46–71. doi:10.1162/0162288054894652
  • Paul, T. V. (2018). Restraining great powers: Soft balancing from empires to the global era. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Paul, T. V. (2021). The study of peaceful change in world politics. In T. V. Paul, D. W. Larson, & H. A. Trinkunas (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of peaceful change in international relations (pp. 3–24). Oxford: Oxford University Press,
  • Paul, T. V. (In this issue). Realism, Liberalism and Regional Orders in East Asia: Toward a Hybrid Approach. The Pacific Review.
  • Pearlman, J. (2018). Australia commits more funds to Pacific Nations. The Straits Times. https://www.straitstimes.com/asia/australianz/australia-commits-more-funds-to-pacific-nations.
  • Pempel, T. J. (2010). Soft balancing, hedging, and institutional Darwinism: The economic-security nexus and East Asian regionalism. Journal of East Asian Studies, 10(2), 209–238. doi:10.1017/S1598240800003441
  • Pempel, T. J. (in this issue). Sources of Peace in East Asia: Interdependence, Institutions, and Middle Powers. The Pacific Review.
  • Pompeo, M. R. (2020). Communist China and the free world’s future. Speech at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library and Museum. Yorba Linda, California. Communist China and the Free World’s Future | U.S. Embassy & Consulates in China (usembassy-china.org.cn)
  • Ravenhill, J. (2009). East Asian regionalism: Much ado about nothing. Review of International Studies, 35(S1), 215–235. doi:10.1017/S0260210509008493
  • Reus-Smit, C. (2017). Cultural diversity and international order. International Organization, 71(4), 851–885. doi:10.1017/S0020818317000261
  • Roach, S. S. (2015). China’s global governance challenge. YaleGlobal Online.
  • Saaliq, S., & Hussain, A. (2020). In India, top US diplomat calls China ‘elephant in the room.’ Retrieved from https://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/top-us-diplomat-india-calls-china-elephant-room-73570392.
  • Seib, G. F. (2015). Obama presses case for Asia trade deal, warns failure would benefit China. Wall Street Journal. https://www.wsj.com/articles/obama-presses-case-for-asia-trade-deal-warns-failure-would-benefit-china-1430160415.
  • Singh, B. (in this issue). Minimal Peace in Northeast Asia: A Realist-Liberal Explanation. The Pacific Review
  • Singh, G. (2019). India, Japan and the Asia Africa Growth Corridor. Gateway House. https://www.gatewayhouse.in/japan-aagc/.
  • Stephen, M. D., & Skidmore, D. (2019). The AIIB in the liberal international order. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 12(1), 61–91. doi:10.1093/cjip/poy021
  • Tan, S. S. (2018). Multilateralisms at War? In S. Aris, A. Snetkov & A. Wenger (Eds.), Inter-organizational relations in international security: Cooperation and competition. London: Routledge.
  • Taylor, B. (2018). The four flashpoints: How Asia goes to war. Carlton: Black Inc.
  • Teo, S. (in this issue). Middle Powers amid Sino-U.S. Rivalry: Assessing the ‘Good Regional Citizenship’ of Australia and Indonesia. The Pacific Review.
  • The White House. (2018). Remarks by Vice President Pence at the 2018 APEC CEO Summit, Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea. Foreign Policy. Retrieved from Remarks by Vice President Pence at the 2018 APEC CEO Summit | Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea | U.S. Embassy & Consulates in China (usembassy-china.org.cn)
  • Thies, C. G., & Nieman, M. D. (2017). Rising powers and foreign policy revisionism: Understanding BRICS identity and behavior through time. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  • Tow, W. T. (2019). Minilateral security’s relevance to US strategy in the Indo-Pacific: Challenges and prospects. The Pacific Review, 32(2), 232–244. doi:10.1080/09512748.2018.1465457
  • Wan, M. (2015). The Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank: The construction of power and the struggle for the East Asian international order. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Wang, J. (1997). The role of the United States as a global and Pacific power: A View from China. The Pacific Review, 10(1), 1–18.
  • Westad, O. A. (2019). The sources of Chinese conduct: Are Washington and Beijing fighting a new Cold War. Foreign Affairs, 98(5), 86–95.
  • Wilson, J. D. (2019). The evolution of China’s Asian infrastructure investment bank: From a revisionist to status-seeking agenda. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 19(1), 147–176.
  • Woodward, B., & Costa, R. (2021). Peril. London: Simon & Schuster.
  • Wright, Y. (2017). All measures short of war: The contest for the twenty-first century and the future of American power. Yale: Yale University Press.
  • Wu, R. (2020). Living with uncertainty: Modeling China’s nuclear survivability. International Security, 44(4), 84–118.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.