Negotiating ‘access’ to the international ‘rules-based order’: Taiwan’s South China Sea policy

References

• Aalberts, T. E. (2012). Constructing sovereignty: Between politics and law. Abingdon, Oxon and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Aalberts, T. E. (2014). Rethinking the principle of (sovereign) equality as a standard of civilisation. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 42(3), 767–789. Retrieved from. doi:10.1177/0305829814543731
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aalberts, T. E., & Werner, W. (2016). International Law. In X. Guillaume & P. Bilgin (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of international political sociology (pp. 36–46). Abingdon, Oxon and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Acharya, A. (2017). After liberal hegemony: The advent of a multiplex world order. Ethics & International Affairs, 31(3), 271–285. doi:10.1017/S089267941700020X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acharya, A. (2020). The myth of the ‘Civilization state’: Rising powers and the cultural challenge to the world order. Ethics & International Affairs, 34(2), 139–156. doi:10.1017/S0892679420000192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allison, G. (2018, July/August). The myth of the liberal order. From historical accident to conventional wisdom. Foreign Affairs, 97, 124. Retrieved from https://www.foreignaffairs.com/print/node/1122449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almond, R. G. (2016, September 13). South China Sea: The case against an AIDZ. The Diplomat. Retrieved from https://thediplomat.com/2016/09/south-china-sea-the-case-against-an-adiz/.
   Google Scholar
• ASEAN. (2017, November 13). Chairman’s Statement of the 31st ASEAN Summit, Manila, Philippines, §137. Retrieved from http://www.miti.gov.my/miti/resources/Media%20Release/Chairman_Statement_of_31st_ASEAN_Summit.pdf?mid=571.
   Google Scholar
• ASEAN. (2018, August 4). Chairman’s Statement of ASEAN Post Ministerial Conference (PMC) 10 + 1 Sessions with the Dialogue Partners, Singapore, §26. Retrieved from https://www.mfa.gov.sg/Newsroom/Press-Statements-Transcripts-and-Photos/2018/08/4_Chairmans-Statement-of-the-ASEAN-PMC-Sessions.
   Google Scholar
• Ashraf, S. (2016, July 23). What happens now in the South China Sea? East Asia Forum. Retrieved from http://www.eastasiaforum.org/2016/07/23/what-happens-now-in-the-south-china-sea/.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, M., & Duvall, R. (Eds.). (2005). Power in global governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bartelson, J. (2010). The social construction of globality. International Political Sociology, 4(3), 219–235. doi:10.1111/j.1749-5687.2010.00102.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckman, R. (2013). The UN Convention on the Law of the Sea and the maritime disputes in the South China Sea. American Journal of International Law, 107(1), 142–163. doi:10.5305/amerjintelaw.107.1.0142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chai, S., & Hou, E. (2017, April 11). Taiwan reaffirms sovereignty over South China Sea Islands. Taiwan Focus. Retrieved from http://focustaiwan.tw/news/aipl/201704110010.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Chao, S. (2016, September 7). Panel urges action over South China Sea ruling. The China Post. Retrieved from http://www.chinapost.com.tw/taiwan/intl-community/2016/09/07/477777/Panel-urges.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Checkel, J. T. (2005). International institutions and socialization in Europe: Introduction and Framework. International Organization, 59(04), 801–826. doi:10.1017/S0020818305050289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C. C., & Shimizu, K. (2019). International relations from the margins: The Westphalian meta-narratives in Okinawa-Taiwan relations. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 32(4), 521–540. doi:10.1080/09557571.2019.1622082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chinese (Taiwan) Society of International Law. (2016, March 23). Amicus Curiae in the matter of an arbitration under Annex VII to the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea on the issue of the feature of Taiping Island (Itu Aba) pursuant to article 121 (1) and (3) of the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, PCA Case No 2013-19 between the Republic of the Philippines and the People’s Republic of China.
   Google Scholar
• CNN. (2017, February 8). Disputed islands in the East China Sea and South China Sea. CNN. Retrieved from http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1702/08/sn.01.html.
   Google Scholar
• De Castro, R. (2015). The Philippines confronts China in the South China Sea: Power politics vs. liberalism-legalism. Asian Perspectives, 39(1), 71–100. doi:10.1353/apr.2015.0010
   Google Scholar
• De Cleen, B., Goyvaerts, J., Carpentier, N., Glynos, J., & Stavrakakis, Y. (2021). Moving discourse theory forward: A five-track proposal for future research. Journal of Language and Politics, 20(1), 22–46. doi:10.1075/jlp.20076.dec
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Lisle, J. (2016, February 11). Why Taiwan President Ma Ying-jeou’s day-trip to Taiping Island was such a big deal. Foreign Policy Research Institute. Retrieved from http://www.fpri.org/article/2016/02/why-taiwan-president-ma-ying-jeous-day-trip-taiping-island-was-such-big-deal/.
   Google Scholar
• Deudney, D., & Ikenberry, J. G. (2018, July/August). Liberal world. The resilient order. Foreign Affairs. Retrieved from https://www.foreignaffairs.com/print/node/1122498.
   Google Scholar
• Doty, R. L. (1993). Foreign policy as social construction: A Post-positivist analysis of US Counterinsurgency policy in the Philippines. International Studies Quarterly, 37(3), 297–320. doi:10.2307/2600810
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Focus Taiwan. (2016, May 20). Full text of President Tsai’s inaugural address. Focus Taiwan CNA English News. Retrieved from http://focustaiwan.tw/news/aipl/201605200008.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Gau, S. M. (2016). The Sino-Philippine arbitration case on the South China Sea disputes. Journal of East Asia and International Law, 9(2), 479–480. doi:10.14330/jeail.2016.9.2.09
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayton, B. (2017). Denounce but comply: China’s response to the South China Sea arbitration ruling. Georgetown Journal of International Affairs, 18(2), 104–111. doi:10.1353/gia.2017.0025
   Google Scholar
• Howarth, D. (2000). Discourse. Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Howarth, D., Glynos, J., & Griggs, S. (2016). Discourse, explanation and critique. Critical Policy Studies, 10(1), 99–104. doi:10.1080/19460171.2015.1131618
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howarth, D., Norval, A., & Stavrakakis, Y. (Eds.). (2009). Discourse theory and political analysis: Identities, hegemonies, and social change. Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L. (2023). Examining ASEAN’s effectiveness in managing South China Sea disputes. The Pacific Review, 36(1), 119–147. doi:10.1080/09512748.2021.1934519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, Y. J., & Frettingham, E. (2021). Sovereignty and identity: Taiwan’s claims in the South China Sea. In Y. J. Hwang & E. Frettingham (Eds.), Maritime and territorial disputes in the South China Sea: Faces of power and law in the age of China’s rise (pp. 69–91). Abingdon, Oxon and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ikenberry, J. G. (2011, May/June). The future of the liberal world order. Internationalism after America. Foreign Affairs. Retrieved from https://www.foreignaffairs.com/print/node/1110892.
   Google Scholar
• Ikenberry, J. G. (2018). Why the liberal world order will survive. Ethics & International Affairs, 32(1), 17–29. doi:10.1017/S0892679418000072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katzenstein, P. (Ed.). (1996). The culture of national security: Norms and identity in world politics. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koh, T. (1982). A constitution for the Oceans. Remarks by Tommy T.B. Koh, of Singapore, President of the Third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea. In Division for Ocean Affairs and the Law of the Sea, Office of Legal Affairs, United Nations, xxxiv–xxxvii. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/convention_overview_convention.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Kotkin, S. (2018, July/August). Realist world. The players change, but the game remains. Foreign Affairs. Retrieved from https://www.foreignaffairs.com/print/node/1122473,.
   Google Scholar
• Kotkin, S. (2022, May/June). The Cold War never ended. Ukraine, the China challenge, and the revival of the west. Foreign Affairs. Retrieved from https://www.foreignaffairs.com/print/node/1128672.
   Google Scholar
• Krickel-Choi, N. C., & Chen, C. C. (2023). Defending the islands, defending the self: Taiwan, sovereignty and the origin of the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands dispute as ontological security-seeking. The Pacific Review, 1–27. doi:10.1080/09512748.2023.2166978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ku, J. (2016, July 14). Dear Taiwan: The PCA ruling does not threaten your control over Taiping Island. Opinio Juris. Retrieved from http://opiniojuris.org/2016/07/14/dear-taiwan-pca-ruling-not-threaten-control-taiping-island/.
   Google Scholar
• Lake, D. (2020). Whither the liberal international order? Authority, hierarchy, and institutional Change. Ethics & International Affairs, 34(4), 461–471. doi:10.1017/S0892679420000611
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambach, D. (2021). The functional territorialization of the high seas. Marine Policy, 130, 104579. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2021.104579
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, C. (1997). Taiwan’s South China Sea Policy. Asian Survey, 37(4), 323–339. doi:10.2307/2645651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, F. K. (2017). Taiwan’s security policy options and future prospects. In F. K. Liu, K. Zou, S. Wu, & J. Spangler (Eds.), South China Sea lawfare: Post-arbitration policy options and future prospects. Taipei: South China Sea Think Tank and Taiwan Center for Security Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, F. K., Zou, K., Wu, S., & Spangler, J. (Eds.). (2017). South China Sea lawfare: Post-arbitration policy options and future prospects. Taipei: South China Sea Think Tank and Taiwan Center for Security Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Malik, M. (2013). Historical fiction: China’s South China Sea claims. World Affairs, 176, 83–90.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Foreign Affairs, People’s Republic of China (PRC). (2014, December 7) Position paper of the Government of the People’s Republic of China on the matter of jurisdiction in the South China Sea Arbitration initiated by the Republic of China. Retrieved from https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/wjdt_665385/2649_665393/201412/t20141207_679387.html.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA), Republic of China (Taiwan) (2015a, May 26). South China Sea Peace Initiative.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Republic of China (Taiwan) (2015b, May 26). Press release: President Ma proposes South China Sea Initiative.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Republic of China (Taiwan). (2015c, October 31). ROC government reiterates its position on South China Sea.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Republic of China (Taiwan). (2016a, January 28). Press release: Remarks by President Ma Ying-jeou on Taiping Island.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Republic of China (Taiwan). (2016b, March 21). Position Paper on ROC South China Sea Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Republic of China (Taiwan). (2016c, May 13). Press release: ROC reiterates position on South China Sea arbitration between Philippines, mainland China.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Republic of China (Taiwan). (2016d). Remarks by David Tawei Lee, Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of China (Taiwan), at the Foreign Affairs and National Defense Committee of the Legislative Yuan on May 25, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Republic of China (Taiwan). (2016e). Press release: ROC position on the South China Sea Arbitration, 12 July 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Republic of China (Taiwan) (2016f). Sustainable Governance and Enduring Peace in the South China Sea, 19 July 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Republic of China (Taiwan). (2016g). Remarks by David Tawei Lee, Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of China (Taiwan), at the Foreign Affairs and National Defense Committee of the Legislative Yuan on October 27, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Republic of China (Taiwan). (2016h). ROC marks 70th anniversary over the South China Sea Islands and all rights over their relevant waters at the opening of a special exhibition Dec. 9, emphasizing recent government measures with regard to issues in the South China Sea, 9 December 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Republic of China (Taiwan). (2017a). Report by H.E. David Tawei Lee, Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of China (Taiwan), at the Foreign Affairs and National Defense Committee of the Legislative Yuan on March 6, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Republic of China (Taiwan). (2017b). Report by H.E. David Tawei Lee, Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of China (Taiwan), at the Foreign Affairs and National Defense Committee of the Legislative Yuan on October 2, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Nasu, H., & Rothwell, D. R. (2014). Re-evaluating the role of international law in territorial and maritime disputes in East Asia. Asian Journal of International Law, 4(1), 55–79. June) doi:10.1017/S2044251313000210
   Google Scholar
• Nye, J. S.Jr (2017). Will the liberal order survive? The history of an idea. Foreign Affairs, 96(1), 10–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostermann, F., & Sjöstedt, R. (2023). Discourse analysis and discourse theories. In P. A. Mello & F. Ostermann (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of foreign policy analysis Methods (pp. 101–116). Abington, Oxon and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA). (2016, July 12). Award: PCA Case N° 2013-09 in the matter of the South China Sea arbitration before an Arbitral Tribunal constituted under Annex VII to the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea between the Republic of the Philippines and the People’s Republic of China. Retrieved from https://pca-cpa.org/en/cases/7/.
   Google Scholar
• Presidency of the Republic of China (Taiwan). (2016, December 9). President Tsai attends exhibition commemorating 70th anniversary of recovery of South China Sea Islands, Speech at the Academia Historica upon the opening ceremony of the special exhibition ‘Sustainable Governance and Enduring Peace: An Exhibition Commemorating the 70th Anniversary of the Recovery of the South China Sea Islands’.
   Google Scholar
• Price, R. (1997). The chemical weapons taboo. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Price, R., & Reus-Smit, C. (1998). Dangerous liaisons? Critical international theory and Constructivism. European Journal of International Relations, 4(3), 259–294. doi:10.1177/1354066198004003001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramzy, A. (2016, July 13). Taiwan, after rejecting South China Sea decision, sends patrol ship. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/14/world/asia/south-china-sea-taiwan.html?_r=1.
   Google Scholar
• Ratner, E. (2017). Course correction. How to stop China’s maritime advance. Foreign Affairs, 96(4), 64–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reus-Smit, C. (1997). The constitutional structure of international society and the nature of fundamental institutions. International Organization, 51(4), 555–589. doi:10.1162/002081897550456
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reus-Smit, C. (2008). Reading history through constructivist eyes. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 37(2), 395–414. doi:10.1177/0305829808097647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reus-Smit, C. (2013). The Concept of Intervention. Review of International Studies, 39, 1057–1076.
   Google Scholar
• Reuters. (2016, January 28). Taiwan president says visit to disputed island was to promote peace. Reuters. Retrieved from http://www.reuters.com/article/us-taiwan-southchinasea-idUSKCN0V600J.
   Google Scholar
• Romaniuk, S. N. (2019, March 20). China’s next phase of militarization in the South China Sea. The Diplomat. Retrieved from https://thediplomat.com/2019/03/chinas-next-phase-of-militarization-in-the-south-china-sea/.
   Google Scholar
• Samuels, M. S. (1982). Contest for the South China Sea. New York and London: Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Sasges, G. (2016). Absent maps, marine science, and the reimagination of the South China Sea, 1922 – 1939. The Journal of Asian Studies, 75(1), 157–180. doi:10.1017/S0021911815001564
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoenbaum, T. J. (2016). The South China Sea arbitration decision: The need for clarification. American Journal of International Law Unbound, 110, 290–295. doi:10.1017/S2398772300009181
   Google Scholar
• Simon, S. W. (2012). Conflict and diplomacy in the South China Sea. Asian Survey, 52(6), 995–1018. doi:10.1525/as.2012.52.6.995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, Y. H. (2015). Legal status of Taiping Island under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Korean Journal of International and Comparative Law, 3(2), 115–138. doi:10.1163/22134484-12340055
   Google Scholar
• Song, Y. H., & Tønnesson, S. (2013). The impact of the Law of the Sea Convention on conflict and conflict management in the South China Sea. Ocean Development & International Law, 44(3), 235–269. doi:10.1080/00908320.2013.808935
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storey, I. (2020, September 3). The South China Sea Dispute in 2020-2021. Perspective, 97, 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Storey, I., & Izzuddin, M. (2016). Introduction. Roundtable: The Arbitral Tribunal’s ruling on the South China Sea – Implications and regional responses. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 38(3), 337–338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, S. (2018). China and the future international order(s). Ethics & International Affairs, 32(1), 31–43. doi:10.1017/S0892679418000084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Guardian. (2016, May 8). Taiwan president visits disputed Taiping Island in South China Sea. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/jan/28/taiwan-president-ma-ying-jeou-visit-south-china-sea-.
   Google Scholar
• The Strait Times. (2016, August 17). Taiwan minister visits Taiping Island in South China Sea. The Strait Times. Retrieved from http://www.straitstimes.com/asia/taiwan-minister-visits-taiping-island-in-south-china-sea.
   Google Scholar
• Tønnesson, S. (2015). The South China Sea: Law trumps power. Asian Survey, 55(3), 455–477. doi:10.1525/as.2015.55.3.455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tran, T.T. & Le T. T. (Eds.). (2015). Power, law, and maritime order in the South China Sea. Lanham, Boulder, New York and London: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Tran, T.T. & C. J. Jenner (Eds.). (2016). The South China Sea. A crucible of regional cooperation or conflict-making sovereignty claims? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tran, T. T., Welfield, J. B., & Le, T. T. (2019). Building a normative order in the South China Sea. Evolving disputes, expanding options. Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Uras, A. (2017). The South China Sea and the building of a national maritime culture. A new Chinese province in the making. Asian Survey, 57(6), 1008–1031. doi:10.1525/as.2017.57.6.1008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, K. H. (2010). The ROC’s maritime claims and practices with special reference to the South China Sea. Ocean Development & International Law, 41(3), 237–252. doi:10.1080/00908320.2010.499282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wirth, C. (2018). Danger, development and legitimacy in East Asian politics: Securing the Seas, Securing the State. Abingdon, Oxon and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wirth, C., & Jenne, N. (2022). Filling the void: The Asia-Pacific problem of order and emerging Indo-Pacific regional multilateralism. Contemporary Security Policy, 43(2), 213–242. doi:10.1080/13523260.2022.2036506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wirth, C., & Schatz, V. (2022). South China Sea “lawfare”: Fighting over the freedom of Navigation. (GIGA Focus Asien, 5). Hamburg: GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies - Leibniz-Institut für Globale und Regionale Studien, Institut für Asien-Studien. Retrieved from https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-69366-1.
   Google Scholar
• Xinhua. (2016, July 17). Ad hoc tribunal on South China Sea arbitration has no legal relationship with PCA: Experts. Xinhua. Retrieved fromhttp://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2016-07/17/c_135519476.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Xinhua. (2016, May 23). Interview: SCS arbitration tribunal’s erroneous exercise of jurisdiction violates UNCLOS: Law expert. Xinhua. Retrieved from http://www.china.org.cn/world/Off_the_Wire/201605/23/content_38516752.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Yahuda, M. (2013). China’s new assertiveness in the South China Sea. The Pacific Review, 22(81), 446–459. doi:10.1080/10670564.2012.748964
   Google Scholar
• Yeh, J. (2016, July 21). Legislators visit Taiping to assert claim. The China Post. Retrieved from http://www.chinapost.com.tw/print/472925.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Yeh, S., & Liu, K. (2016, July 22). President rebuts South China Sea ruling in first newspaper Interview. Focus Taiwan. Retrieved from http://focustaiwan.tw/news/aipl/201607220009.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, S. (2020). East Asian disorder. Asian Survey, 60(3), 490–509. doi:10.1525/as.2020.60.3.490
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar