References
- Aradau, C., Hoijtink, M., & Lesse, M. (2019). Technology, agency, critique: An interview with Claudia Aradau. In M. Hoijtink & M. Leese (Eds.), Technology and agency in international relations. Milton Park: Routledge.
- Bitzinger, R. A. (2015). Defense industries in Asia and the technonationalist impulse. Contemporary Security Policy, 36(3), 453–472. doi:10.1080/13523260.2015.1111649
- Bloor, D. (1991). Knowledge and social imagery (2nd ed). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Bloor, D. (1999). Anti-latour. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 30(1), 81–112. doi:10.1016/S0039-3681(98)00038-7
- Bowers, I. (2019). The Modernisation of the Republic of Korea Navy: Seapower, strategy and politics. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Bowers, I., & Hiim, H. S. (2021). Conventional counterforce dilemmas: South Korea’s deterrence strategy and stability on the Korean Peninsula. International Security, 45(3), 7–39. doi:10.1162/isec_a_00399
- Bridenstine, J. (2017, February 16). Exclusive – Rep. Bridenstine: Shoot the Next One Down, Mr. President. Breitbart. http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/02/16/exclusive-rep-bridenstine-shoot-the-next-one-down-mr-president/.
- Bueger, C., & Stockbruegger, J. (2018). Actor-Network Theory: Objects and actants, networks and narratives. In D. R. McCarthy (Ed.), Technology and world politics: An introduction. Milton Park: Routledge.
- Butler, A. (2015, February 5). MDA Eyes Thaad-ER, SM-6 To Counter Hypersonic Threat. Aviation Week Network. http://aviationweek.com/defense/mda-eyes-thaad-er-sm-6-counter-hypersonic-threat.
- Buzan, B. (1987). An introduction to strategic studies: Military technology and international relations. London: Macmillan.
- Callon, M. (1986). Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, action and belief: A new sociology of knowledge? (PDF extract). Milton Park: Routledge.
- Callon, M., Rip, A., & Law, J. (Eds.). (1986). Mapping the dynamics of science and technology sociology of science in the Real World. Palgrave: The Macmillan Press Limited.
- Cambone, S. A. (1997). The United States and theatre missile defence in North‐East Asia. Survival, 39(3), 66–84. doi:10.1080/00396339708442927
- Cha, V. (2017). Statement before the House Foreign Affairs Committee “Countering the North Korean Threat: New Steps in US Policy.” US House of Representatives. http://docs.house.gov/meetings/FA/FA00/20170207/105527/HHRG-115-FA00-Wstate-ChaV-20170207.pdf.
- Chang, J. (2017, February 3). Mattis: None other than N. Korea needs to worry about THAAD. Yonhap News Agency. http://english.yonhapnews.co.kr/national/2017/02/03/26/0301000000AEN20170203000200315F.html.
- China Military. (2017, August 31). Defense Ministry’s Regular Press Conference on August 31. http://eng.chinamil.com.cn/view/2017-08/31/content_7739360.htm.
- Choi, Y. S. (2020). Keeping the Americans in: The THAAD deployment on the Korean peninsula in the context of Sino-American rivalry. Contemporary Security Policy, 41(4), 632–652. doi:10.1080/13523260.2020.1733314
- Collins, H. M., & Pinch, T. (2002). The Golem at large: What you should know about technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511541353
- Conway, E. (2005). High-Speed Dreams: NASA and the Technopolitics of Supersonic Transportation, 1945–1999 (EPUB e-book). Baltimore: JHU Press.
- David Easton. (1966). The political system: An inquiry into the state of political science. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
- DeBiaso, P. (2006). Proliferation, MISSILE DEFENSE AND THE CONDUCT OF MODERN War. Comparative Strategy, 25(3), 157–171. doi:10.1080/01495930600956187
- DeLanda, M. (2006). A new philosophy of society: Assemblage theory and social complexity. London: Continuum.
- Department of Defense. (2010). Ballistic Missile Defense Review Report. https://www.defense.gov/Portals/1/features/defenseReviews/BMDR/BMDR_as_of_26JAN10_0630_for_web.pdf.
- Department of Defense. (2019). Missile Defense Review 2019. https://media.defense.gov/2019/Jan/17/2002080666/-1/-1/1/2019-MISSILE-DEFENSE-REVIEW.PDF.
- Department of Defense. (2022). The 2022 Missile Defense Review. Virginia: Department of Defense.
- Easton, I. (2015). Taiwan’s Naval Role in the Rebalance to Asia. Project 2049 Institute. http://www.project2049.net/documents/150303_Easton_Taiwans_Naval_Role_in_the_Rebalance.pdf.
- Fashola, K. (2020). Five types of international cooperation for missile defense (pp. 1–12). Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS).
- Frasher, M., & Agnew, B. (2016). Multinational Banking and Conflicts among US-EU AML/CTF Compliance & Privacy Law: Operational and Political Views in Context. Swift Institute. https://www.swiftinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/SIWP-2014-008-Conflicts_US_EU_AML_CTF_FINAL-1.pdf.
- Fritsch, S. (2014). Conceptualizing the ambivalent role of technology in international relations: Between systemic change and continuity. In M. Mayer, M. Carpes, & R. Knoblich (Eds.), The global politics of science and technology (Vol. 1, pp. 115–138). Berlin: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-55007-2_6
- Fuller, S. (2012). The emerging political economy of Humanity 2.0. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 25(1), 79–92. doi:10.1080/13511610.2012.660408
- Gady, F.-S. (2017, December 19). China’s Air Force Holds Drills Near Japan, South Korea and Taiwan. The Diplomat. https://thediplomat.com/2017/12/chinas-air-force-holds-drills-near-japan-south-korea-and-taiwan/.
- Goure, D. (2012). The Obama administration’s phased-adaptive architecture: Technological, operational and political issues. Defense & Security Analysis, 28(1), 17–35. doi:10.1080/14751798.2012.651376
- Guzik, K. (2016). Making things stick: Surveillance technologies and Mexico’s war on crime. Oakland: University of California Press.
- Harbers, H. (Ed.). (2005). Inside the politics of technology: Agency and normativity in the co-production of technology and society. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
- Hecht, G. (2009). The radiance of France nuclear power and national identity after World War II. Cambridge: MIT Press.
- Hecht, G. (Ed.). (2011). Entangled geographies: Empire and technopolitics in the global cold war. Gabrielle: MIT Press.
- Heinrichs, R. L. (2021, December 20). President Biden, Don’t Trade Away Missile Defense With the Russians. https://www.hudson.org/national-security-defense/president-biden-don-t-trade-away-missile-defense-with-the-russians.
- Herrera, G. L. (2006). Technology and International Transformation: The Railroad, the Atom Bomb, And the Politics of Technological Change. New York: State Univ of New York Press.
- Hill, J. A., & Atkinson, M. C. (2023, March 14). Missile defense agency officials hold a press briefing on President Biden’s Fiscal 2024 Mi. U.S. Department of Defense. https://www.defense.gov/News/Transcripts/Transcript/Article/3328637/missile-defense-agency-officials-hold-a-press-briefing-on-president-bidens-fisc/https%3A//www.defense.gov/News/Transcripts/Transcript/Article/3328637/missile-defense-agency-officials-hold-a-press-briefing-on-president-bidens-fisc/.
- Hoijtink, M., & Leese, M. (Eds.). (2019). Technology and agency in international relations. Milton Park: Routledge.
- Hughes, T. P. (1993). Networks of power: Electrification in western society, 1880–1930. Baltimore: John Hopkins Univ. Press.
- Ja, S. N. (2017, April). Letter dated 7 April 2017 from the Permanent Representative of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/1298487/files/A_71_866%26S_2017_303-EN.pdf.
- Jasanoff, S. (Ed.). (2004). States of knowledge: The co-production of science and social order. Milton Park: Routledge.
- Joint Statement. (2017, May 16). Now Is the Time for Dialogue on Denuclearization and Not Military Action That Will Escalate the Crisis on the Korean Peninsula. People’s Solidarity for Participatory Democracy. http://www.peoplepower21.org/English/1505943.
- Juan, Y., Choi, Y., An, S., Lee, C.-K., & Lee, S. J. (2017). The constraints of Chinese tourists to visit Korea caused by THAAD using Q-methodology. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 22(12), 1261–1273. doi:10.1080/10941665.2017.1391306
- Keck, M. E., & Sikkink, K. (1998). Activists beyond borders: Advocacy networks in international politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
- Kim, I., & Park, S. (2019). Deterrence under nuclear asymmetry: THAAD and the prospects for missile defense on the Korean peninsula. Contemporary Security Policy, 40(2), 165–192. doi:10.1080/13523260.2018.1558750
- Kim, J. (2022, September 25). Outmoded as security system, THAAD retains rhetorical utility in Korea. The Hankyoreh. https://english.hani.co.kr/arti/english_edition/e_national/1059976.html.
- Klingner, B. (2015). The importance of Thaad Missile Defense. The Journal of East Asian Affairs, 29(2), 21–41.
- Korda, M., & Kristensen, H. M. (2019). US ballistic missile defenses, 2019. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 75(6), 295–306. doi:10.1080/00963402.2019.1680055
- Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge Mass: Harvard University Press.
- Latour, B. (1988). The pasteurization of France (A. Sheridan & John Law, Trans.). London: Harvard University Press.
- Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Law, J. (2017). STS as method. In U. Felt, R. Fouché, C. A. Miller, & L. Smith-Doerr (Eds.), The Handbook of science and technology studies (4th ed.). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
- Lee, B. (2017). THAAD Deployment in South Korea: Militarism leading to political regression. Harvard International Review, 37, 34–37. https://hir.harvard.edu/thaad-deployment-in-south-korea/
- Lee, J., & Jung, Y. (2017, September). President Moon releases statement justifying THAAD deployment. The Hankyoreh. http://english.hani.co.kr/arti/english_edition/e_national/810316.html.
- Lewis, G. N. (2015). Technical controversy: Can missile defense work? In C. M. Kelleher & P. J. Dombrowski (Eds.), Regional missile defense from a global perspective. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
- Lockheed Martin. (2014). It really is rocket science! http://www.lockheedmartin.com/us/news/features/2014/missile-defense-stopping-bullet-with-bullet.html.
- Lockheed Martin. (2017). The Missile defense all-stars: Making a difference when every second counts · Lockheed Martin. https://www.lockheedmartin.com/us/news/features/2017/170807-rms-the-missile-defense-all-stars-making-a-difference-when-every-second-counts.html.
- Lockheed Martin. (2018). Terminal high altitude area defense. https://www.lockheedmartin.com/us/products/thaad.html.
- Manjikian, M. (2018). Social construction of technology: How objects acquire meaning in society. In D. R. McCarthy (Ed.), Technology and world politics: An introduction. Milton Park: Routledge.
- Martin, B. (2017). Moon Jae-In’s THAAD Conundrum: South Korea’s “candlelight president” faces strong citizen opposition on missile defense. The Asia-Pacific Journal, 15(18), 1–10.
- Martin, D. J. D. (1997). The current situation in ballistic missile defence: The view from Washington. The RUSI Journal, 142(5), 64–67. doi:10.1080/03071849708446189
- Mayer, M., Carpes, M., & Knoblich, R. (Eds.). (2014). A toolbox for studying the global politics of science and technology. In The global politics of science and technology (Vol. 2, pp. 1–17). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer. 10.1007/978-3-642-55010-2_1.
- McCarthy, D. R. (2018). Introduction: Technology in world politics. In D. R. McCarthy (Ed.), Technology and world politics: An introduction. Milton Park: Routledge.
- Meick, E., & Salidjanova, N. (2017). China’s Response to THAAD Deployment and its Implications. U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission. https://www.uscc.gov/sites/default/files/Research/Report_China%27s%20Response%20to%20THAAD%20Deployment%20and%20its%20Implications.pdf.
- Ministry of Defense of the Republic of Korea. (2016). 2016 Defense White Paper. http://www.mnd.go.kr/user/mndEN/upload/pblictn/PBLICTNEBOOK_201705180357180050.pdf.
- Misa, T. J. (1992). Controversy and closure in technological change: Constructing steel. In W. E. Bijker & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology/building society: Studies in sociotechnical change. Cambridge: MIT Press.
- Missile Defense Agency. (2016). Fact Sheet—Terminal high altitude area defense. https://www.mda.mil/global/documents/pdf/thaad.pdf.
- Missile Defense Agency. (2017). The Ballistic Missile Defense System. https://www.mda.mil/global/documents/pdf/bmds.pdf.
- Mitchell, T. (2002). Rule of experts: Egypt, techno-politics, modernity. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
- Moon, C.-I., & Boo, S. (2017). Coping with China’s rise: Domestic politics and strategic adjustment in South Korea. Asian Journal of Comparative Politics, 2(1), 3–23. doi:10.1177/2057891116682650
- Oh, S. (2019, December 4). S. Korea decides to push in earnest for development for indigenous long-range surface-to-air missile. Yonhap News Agency. https://en.yna.co.kr/view/AEN20191204009700325.
- Pekkanen, S. M. (2015). Japan’s Ballistic Missile Defense and “Proactive Pacifism”. In C. M. Kelleher & P. J. Dombrowski (Eds.), Regional missile defense from a global perspective. Redwood City: Stanford University Press.
- People’s Solidarity for Participatory Democracy. (2016, February 19). THAAD Troublemaker [in Korean]. 참여연대. http://www.peoplepower21.org/PSPD_press/1394379.
- People’s Solidarity for Participatory Democracy. (2022, October 6). Emergency press conference condemning the import of THAAD performance improvement equipment [in Korean]. 참여연대. https://www.peoplepower21.org/peace/1915140.
- Pinch, T. J., & Bijker, W. E. (2012). The social construction of facts and artifacts: Or How the sociology of science and sociology of technology might benefit each other. In W. E. Bijker, T. P. Hughes, & T. J. Pinch (Eds.), The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology. Cambridge: MIT Press.
- Pollack, J. (2017). Ballistic missile defense in South Korea: Separate systems against a common threat. In C. Kelleher (Ed.), Missile Defense, Extended deterrence, and nonproliferation in the 21st century. Maryland, USA: Center for International and Security Studies at Maryland. https://cissm.umd.edu/sites/default/files/2019-07/Missile%20Defense%2C%20Extended%20Deterrence%2C%20and%20Nonproliferation%20in%20the%2021st%20Century%20-%20Full.pdf.
- Reynolds, M., & Goodman, M. P. (2023). Deny, Deflect, Deter: Countering China’s Economic Coercion. Center for Strategic and International Studies. https://www.csis.org/analysis/deny-deflect-deter-countering-chinas-economic-coercion.
- Riqiang, W. (2013). China’s anxiety about US Missile Defence: A solution. Survival, 55(5), 29–52. doi:10.1080/00396338.2013.841803
- Rogers, M., Franks, T., Lamborn, D., & Gabbard, T. (2017, February 3). Letter to President Trump on Missile Defense Policy. http://freebeacon.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Ltr-to-Trump-missile-defense-policy-signed-FINAL.pdf.
- Saalman, L. (2013). The China Factor. In A. Arbatov, V. Dvorkin, & N. Bubnova (Eds.), Missile defense: Confrontation and cooperation. Moscow: Carnegie Moscow Center.
- Sankaran, J., & Fearey, B. L. (2017). Missile defense and strategic stability: Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) in South Korea. Contemporary Security Policy, 38(3), 321–344. doi:10.1080/13523260.2017.1280744
- Saperstein, A. M. (1996). Demarcation between theater missile defense and strategic missile defense. Security Dialogue, 27(1), 110–112. doi:10.1177/0967010696027001018
- Shalal, A. (2016, March 23). U.S. hopes for talks with China about possible THAAD move to South Korea. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-southkorea-usa-missiledefense-china/u-s-hopes-for-talks-with-china-about-possible-thaad-move-to-south-korea-idUSKCN0WO2P2.
- Shin, H. (2017, February 3). Russia warns of ‘action’ if THAAD is deployed. The Korea Herald. http://www.koreaherald.com/view.php?ud=20170203000653.
- Sneddon, C., & Fox, C. (2011). The Cold War, the US Bureau of Reclamation, and the technopolitics of river basin development, 1950–1970. Political Geography, 30(8), 450–460. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2011.09.005
- Stop THAAD in Korea and Militarism in Asia and the Pacific Task Force. (n.d.). No to U.S. Missile Defense in Korea. Retrieved January 26, 2018, from http://stopthaad.org/about/.
- Swaine, M. (2017). Chinese views on South Korea’s deployment of THAAD. China Leadership Monitor, 52(4), 1–15. https://carnegieendowment.org/files/CLM52MS.pdf
- The State Council Information Office of the People’s Republic of China. (2017). China’s Policies on Asia-Pacific Security Cooperation. http://english.gov.cn/archive/white_paper/2017/01/11/content_281475539078636.htm.
- Twomey, C. P., & Chase, M. S. (2015). Chinese attitudes toward missile defense. In C. M. Kelleher & P. J. Dombrowski (Eds.), Regional missile defense from a global perspective. Redwood City: Stanford University Press.
- United States Government AccounTability Office. (2017). Some progress delivering capabilities, but challenges with testing transparency and requirements need to be addressed [Report to Congressional Committees]. https://www.globalsecurity.org/space/library/report/gao/684963.pdf.
- U.S. Embassy & Consulate in Korea. (2017, December 22). Ambassador haley on the adoption of strong New UN Security Council Sanctions on North Korea. https://kr.usembassy.gov/122217-explanation-vote-adoption-un-security-council-resolution-2397-imposing-new-sanctions-north-korea/.
- US Pacific Command Public Affairs. (2017, March 6). U.S. Pacific Command Deploys THAAD to Korean Peninsula. U.S. Pacific Command. http://www.pacom.mil/Media/News/NewsArticleView/tabid/11348/Article/1104300/us-pacific-command-deploys-thaad-to-korean-peninsula.aspx.
- Weinberger, H. (2001). The Neutrality Flagpole: Swedish neutrality policy and technological alliances, 1945–1970. In M. T. Allen & G. Hecht (Eds.), Technologies of power: Essays in honor of Thomas Parke Hughes and Agatha Chipley Hughes. Cambridge: MIT Press.
- Wendt, A. (2003). Social theory of international politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Winner, L. (1980). Do artifacts have politics? Daedalus, 109(1), 121–136.
- Winner, L. (1993). Upon opening the black box and finding it empty: Social constructivism and the philosophy of technology. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 18(3), 362–378. doi:10.1177/016224399301800306
- Woo, J.-Y., & Block, E. (2015). Misinformation hinders debate on THAAD deployment in Korea. Asia Pacific Bulletin Number 319 (August), 1–2. http://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/bitstream/10125/36699/1/apb319_0.pdf.
- Wyatt, S. (2008). Technological determinism is dead; Long live technological determinism. In E. J. Hackett, O. Amsterdamska, M. Lynch, & J. Wajcman (Eds.), The handbook of science and technology studies (3rd ed.). Cambridge: MIT Press.
- Yang, H., & Jin, H. (2017, June 16). As missile row drags on, South Korea’s Lotte still stymied in China. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/article/lotte-china/as-missile-row-drags-on-south-koreas-lotte-still-stymied-in-china-idUSL3N1JC3BA.
- Yonhap News Agency. (2017a, May 30). Cheong Wa Dae says no briefing from defense ministry on THAAD launchers. http://english.yonhapnews.co.kr/news/2017/05/30/0200000000AEN20170530009800315.html.
- Yonhap News Agency. (2017b, December 3). Damage from China’s ban on S. Korean tours estimated at 7.5 tln won. http://english.yonhapnews.co.kr/business/2017/12/03/0502000000AEN20171203004100320.html.
- Yonhap News Agency. (2022, September 4). Equipment delivered to THAAD base amid residents’ protest. Yonhap News Agency. https://en.yna.co.kr/view/AEN20220904001100315.
- Zhao, L. (2017, January 30). THAAD overshadows 25th anniversary of Beijing-Seoul diplomacy. Global Times. http://www.globaltimes.cn/content/1030888.shtml.