References
- Wildemeersch D, Janssens D, Vrijens M, Weyers S. Ease of insertion, contraceptive efficacy and safety of new T-shaped levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine systems. Contraception 2005;71:465–9
- Hasson HM. Clinical studies of the Wing Sound II metrology device. In: Zatuchni GI, Goldsmith A, Sciarra JJ, eds. Intrauterine Contraception: Advances and Future Prospects. Philadelphia: Harper & Row; 1984:126–41
- Kurz KH. Cavimeter uterine measurements and IUD clinical correlation. In: Zatuchni GI, Goldsmith A, Sciarra JJ, eds. Intrauterine Contraception: Advances and Future Prospects. Philadelphia: Harper & Row; 1984:142–62
- Kamal I, Hefnawi F, Ghonheim M, et al. Dimensional and architectural disproportion between the intrauterine device and the uterine cavity: a cause of bleeding. Fert Steril 1971;22:514–21
- Goldstuck N. Assessment of Uterine Cavity Size and Shape: A Systematic Review Addressing Relevance to Intrauterine Procedures and Events. Afr J Reprod Health 2012;16:129–38
- Wildemeersch D, Janssens D, Andrade A. The Femilis LNG-IUS: contraceptive performance-an interim analysis. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2009;14:103–10
- Fillet M, Servais A-C, Jackers G, Wildemeersch D. Femilis® 60 – a LNG-IUS for use up to 10 years (APCOR 2016, data on file) 2016
- World Health Organization (WHO). Medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use. 3rd ed. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2004
- R Development Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. ISBN; 3-900051-07-0, URL. 2013. Available from: http://www.R-project.org
- Tietze C, Lewit S. Recommended procedures for the statistical evaluation of intrauterine contraception. Stud Fam Plann 1972;4:35–42
- Farley TMM. Life-table methods for contraceptive research. Stat Med 1986;5:475–89
- Hubacher D. Copper intrauterine device use by nulliparous women: review of side effects. Contraception 2007;75:S8–11
- Madden T, McNicholas C, Zhao Q, et al. Association of age and parity with intrauterine device expulsion. Obstet Gynecol 2014;124:718–26
- Wildemeersch D, Hasskamp T, Goldstuck N. Intrauterine devices that do not fit well cause side effects, become embedded, or are expelled and can even perforate the uterine wall. J Min Invasive Gynecol 2015;22:308–9
- Braaten KP, Benson CB, Maurer R, Goldberg AB. Malpositioned intrauterine contraceptive devices: risk factors, outcomes, and future pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 2011;118:1014–20