References
- Adams GP, Singh J, Baerwald AR. Large animal models for the study of ovarian follicular dynamics in women. Theriogenology 2012;78:1733–48.
- Baerwald AR, Adams GP, Pierson RA. A new model for ovarian follicular development during the human menstrual cycle. Fertil Steril 2003;80:116–22.
- Buendgen NK, Schultze-Mosgau A, Cordes T, et al. Initiation of ovarian stimulation independent of the menstrual cycle: a case-control study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2013;288:901–4.
- Decanter C, Robin G. [Fertility preservation strategies in young women in case of breast cancer or hematologic malignancy]. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 2013;41:597–600.
- Wang N, Wang Y, Chen Q, et al. Luteal-phase ovarian stimulation vs. conventional ovarian stimulation in patients with normal ovarian reserve treated for IVF: a large retrospective cohort study. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2016;84:720–8.
- Chen H, Wang Y, Lyu Q, et al. Comparison of live-birth defects after luteal-phase ovarian stimulation vs. conventional ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization and vitrified embryo transfer cycles. Fertil Steril 2015;103:1194–201.
- Kuang Y, Chen Q, Hong Q, et al. Double stimulations during the follicular and luteal phases of poor responders in IVF/ICSI programmes (Shanghai protocol). Reprod Biomed Online 2014;29:684–91.
- Ubaldi FM, Capalbo A, Vaiarelli A, et al. Follicular versus luteal phase ovarian stimulation during the same menstrual cycle (DuoStim) in a reduced ovarian reserve population results in a similar euploid blastocyst formation rate: new insight in ovarian reserve exploitation. Fertil Steril 2016;105:1488–95.
- Ferraretti AP, La Marca A, Fauser BC, et al. ESHRE consensus on the definition of ‘poor response’ to ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: the Bologna criteria. Hum Reprod 2011;26:1616–24.
- Sun Y, Feng Y, Zhang A, et al. Frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles in China: clinical outcomes of two and three multicellular embryos transfers. J Assist Reprod Genet 2012;29:417–21.
- Ubaldi F, Vaiarelli A, D’Anna R, et al. Management of poor responders in IVF: is there anything new? Biomed Res Int 2014;2014:352098
- Pandian Z, McTavish AR, Aucott L, et al. Interventions for ‘poor responders’ to controlled ovarian hyper stimulation (COH) in in vitro fertilisation (IVF). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010;(1):CD004379.
- Wei LH, Ma WH, Tang N, et al. Luteal-phase ovarian stimulation is a feasible method for poor ovarian responders undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection-embryo transfer treatment compared to a GnRH antagonist protocol: a retrospective study. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2016;55:50–4.
- Boots CE, Meister M, Cooper AR, et al. Ovarian stimulation in the luteal phase: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Assist Reprod Genet 2016;33:971–80.
- Li Y, Yang W, Chen X, et al. Comparison between follicular stimulation and luteal stimulation protocols with clomiphene and HMG in women with poor ovarian response. Gynecol Endocrinol 2016;32:74–7.
- Doldi N, Persico P, De Santis L, et al. Consecutive cycles in in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. Gynecol Endocrinol 2005;20:132–6.
- Hoveyda F, Engmann L, Steele J, et al. Ovarian response in three consecutive in vitro fertilization cycles. Fertil Steril 2002;77:706–10.
- Kolibianakis E, Osmanagaoglu K, Camus M, et al. Effect of repeated assisted reproductive technology cycles on ovarian response. Fertil Steril 2002;77:967–70.
- Barbarino-Monnier P, Gobert B, Guillet-Rosso F, et al. Antiovary antibodies, repeated attempts, and outcome of in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1991;56:928–32.
- Al-Azemi M, Bernal AL, Steele J, et al. Ovarian response to repeated controlled stimulation in in vitro fertilization cycles in patients with ovarian endometriosis. Hum Reprod 2000;15:72–5.