References
- Tesařék J, Kopečný V, Plachot M, et al. Early morphological signs of embryonic genome expression in human preimplantation development as revealed by quantitative electron microscopy. Dev Biol. 1988;128(1):15–20.
- Adamson GD, Abusief ME, Palao L, et al. Improved implantation rates of day 3 embryo transfers with the use of an automated time-lapse-enabled test to aid in embryo selection. Fertil Steril. 2016;105(2):369–375.
- VerMilyea MD, Tan L, Anthony JT, et al. Computer-automated time-lapse analysis results correlate with embryo implantation and clinical pregnancy: a blinded, multi-centre study. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014;29(6):729–736.
- Kaser DJ, Racowsky C. Clinical outcomes following selection of human preimplantation embryos with time-lapse monitoring: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2014;20(5):617–631.
- Shi WH, Zhang SL, Zhao WQ, et al. Factors related to clinical pregnancy after vitrified-warmed embryo transfer: a retrospective and multivariate logistic regression analysis of 2313 transfer cycles. Hum Reprod. 2013;28(7):1768–1775.
- Li M, Ma C, Xue X, et al. Effect of normal sperm morphology rate (NSMR) on clinical outcomes and fertilization methods selection in the ultra-short-term GnRH-a protocol. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2016;32(2):120–123.
- Li M, Wang H, Ma C, et al. Transferring two grades I cleavage-stage embryo might not be a good protocol. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2017;33(7):557–559.
- Kim HJ, Yoon HJ, Jang JM, et al. Evaluation of human embryo development in in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection fertilized oocytes: a time-lapse study. Clin Exp Reprod Med. 2017;44(2):90–95.
- Rubio I, Kuhlmann R, Agerholm I, et al. Limited implantation success of direct-cleaved human zygotes: a time-lapse study. Fertil Steril. 2012;98(6):1458–1463.
- Athayde Wirka K, Chen AA, Conaghan J, et al. Atypical embryo phenotypes identified by timelapse microscopy: high prevalence and association with embryo development. Fertil Steril. 2014;101(6):1637–1648.
- Kaser DJ, Bormann CL, Missmer SA, et al. A pilot randomized controlled trial of Day 3 single embryo transfer with adjunctive time-lapse selection versus Day 5 single embryo transfer with or without adjunctive time-lapse selection. Hum Reprod. 2017;32(8):1598–1603.
- Yang L, Cai S, Zhang S, et al. Single embryo transfer by Day 3 time-lapse selection versus Day 5 conventional morphological selection: a randomized, open-label, non-inferiority trial. Hum Reprod. 2018;33(5):869–876.
- Magli MC, Gianaroli L, Ferraretti AP, et al. Embryo morphology and development are dependent on the chromosomal complement. Fertil Steril. 2007;87(3):534–541.
- Maurer M, Ebner T, Puchner M, et al. Chromosomal aneuploidies and early embryonic developmental arrest. Int J Fertil Steril. 2015; 9:346–353.
- Verpoest W, Fauser BC, Papanikolaou E, et al. Chromosomal aneuploidy in embryos conceived with unstimulated cycle IVF. Hum Reprod. 2008;23(10):2369–2371.
- Faramarzi A, Khalili MA, Ashourzadeh S. Oocyte morphology and embryo morphokinetics in an intra-cytoplasmic sperm injectionprogramme. Is there a relationship? Zygote. 2017;25(2):190–196.
- Loutradis D, Drakakis P, Kallianidis K, et al. Oocyte morphology correlates with embryo quality and pregnancy rate after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril. 1999;72(2):240–244.
- Yu EJ, Ahn H, Lee JM, et al. Fertilization and embryo quality of mature oocytes with specific morphological abnormalities. Clin Exp Reprod Med. 2015;42(4):156–162.