214
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
EARLY PREGNANCY LOSS

The biochemical pregnancy loss rate remains stable up irrespective of age and differs in pattern from clinical miscarriages

, , , &
Pages 61-64 | Received 23 Apr 2020, Accepted 06 Aug 2020, Published online: 25 Aug 2020

References

  • Ellish NJ, Saboda K, O'Connor J, et al. A prospective study of early pregnancy loss. Hum Reprod. 1996;11(2):406–412.
  • Zinaman MJ, Clegg ED, Brown CC, et al. Estimates of human fertility and pregnancy loss. Fertil Steril. 1996;65(3):503–509.
  • Wilcox AJ, Weinberg CR, O'Connor JF, et al. Incidence of early loss of pregnancy. N Engl J Med. 1988;319(4):189–194.
  • ACOG Practice bulletin no. 200: Early pregnancy loss. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;132(5):E197–207.
  • McCoy RC, Demko ZP, Ryan A, et al. Evidence of selection against complex mitotic-origin aneuploidy during preimplantation development. PLoS Genet. 2015;11(10):e1005601.
  • Bowen P, Lee CSN. Spontaneous abortion. Chromosome studies on 41 cases and an analysis of maternal age and duration of pregnancy in relation to karyotype. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1969;104(7):973–983.
  • Salumets A, Suikkari A-M, Mäkinen S, et al. Frozen embryo transfers: implications of clinical and embryological factors on the pregnancy outcome. Hum Reprod. 2006; 21(9):2368–2374.
  • Mulcahy R. Effect of age, parity, and cigarette smoking on outcome of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1968;101(6):844–849.
  • Lathi RB, Gray Hazard FK, Heerema-Mckenney A, et al. First trimester miscarriage evaluation. Semin Reprod Med. 2011;29(6):463–469.
  • Lathi RB, Westphal LM, Milki AA. Aneuploidy in the miscarriages of infertile women and the potential benefit of preimplanation genetic diagnosis. Fertil Steril. 2008;89(2):353–357.
  • Zeadna A, Son WY, Moon JH, et al. A comparison of biochemical pregnancy rates between women who underwent IVF and fertile controls who conceived spontaneously. Hum Reprod. 2015;30(4):783–788.
  • De Neubourg D, Gerris J, Mangelschots K, et al. Single top quality embryo transfer as a model for prediction of early pregnancy outcome. [cited 2020 Jul 22]; Available from: https://academic.oup.com/humrep/article-abstract/19/6/1476/2356697.
  • Lenton EA, Hooper M, King H, et al. Normal and abnormal implantation in spontaneous in-vivo and in-vitro human pregnancies. J Reprod Fertil. 1991;92(2):555–565.
  • Sacchi L, Albani E, Cesana A, et al. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy improves clinical, gestational, and neonatal outcomes in advanced maternal age patients without compromising cumulative live-birth rate. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019;36(12):2493–2504.
  • Fiorentino F, Bono S, Biricik A, et al. Application of next-generation sequencing technology for comprehensive aneuploidy screening of blastocysts in clinical preimplantation genetic screening cycles. Hum Reprod. 2014;29(12):2802–2813.
  • Vaiarelli A, Cimadomo D, Patrizio P, et al. Biochemical pregnancy loss after frozen embryo transfer seems independent of embryo developmental stage and chromosomal status. Reprod Biomed Online. 2018;37(3):349–357.
  • Al Mamari N, Al Zawawi N, Khayat S, et al. Revisiting serum β-hCG cut-off levels and pregnancy outcomes using single embryo transfer. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019;36(11):2307–2313.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.