References
- Sighinolfi G, Grisendi V, La Marca A. How to personalize ovarian stimulation in clinical practice. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2017;18(3):148–153.
- La Marca A, Sunkara SK. Individualization of controlled ovarian stimulation in IVF using ovarian reserve markers: from theory to practice. Hum Reprod Update. 2014;20(1):124–140.
- Iliodromiti S, Anderson RA, Nelson SM. Technical and performance characteristics of anti-Müllerian hormone and antral follicle count as biomarkers of ovarian response. Hum Reprod Update. 2015;21(6):698–710.
- Iliodromiti S, Salje B, Dewailly D, et al. Non-equivalence of anti-Müllerian hormone automated assays-clinical implications for use as a companion diagnostic for individualised gonadotrophin dosing. Hum Reprod. 2017;32(8):1710–1715.
- La Marca A, Papaleo E, Grisendi V, et al. Development of a nomogram based on markers of ovarian reserve for the individualisation of the follicle-stimulating hormone starting dose in in vitro fertilisation cycles. BJOG. 2012;119(10):1171–1179.
- Arce JC, Klein BM, Erichsen L. Using AMH for determining a stratified gonadotropin dosing regimen for IVF/ICSI and optimizing outcomes. In: Seifer DB, Tal R, editors. Anti-Müllerian hormone: biology, role in ovarian function and clinical significance. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers; 2016. p. 83–102.
- Bosch E, Havelock J, Martin FS, et al. Follitropin delta in repeated ovarian stimulation for IVF: a controlled, assessor-blind Phase 3 safety trial. Reprod Biomed Online. 2019;38(2):195–205.
- Fleming R, Seifer DB, Frattarelli JL, et al. Assessing ovarian response: antral follicle count versus anti-Müllerian hormone. Reprod Biomed Online. 2015;31(4):486–496.
- Li HW, Ng EH, Wong BP, et al. Correlation between three assay systems for anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) determination. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2012;29(12):1443–1446.
- Li HW, Wong BP, Ip WK, et al. Comparative evaluation of three new commercial immunoassays for anti-Müllerian hormone measurement. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(12):2796–2802. Epub 2016 Oct 4.
- Pigny P, Gorisse E, Ghulam A, et al. Comparative assessment of five serum antimüllerian hormone assays for the diagnosis of polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2016;105(4):1063–1069.e3.
- Tadros T, Tarasconi B, Nassar J, et al. New automated antimüllerian hormone assays are more reliable than the manual assay in patients with reduced antral follicle count. Fertil Steril. 2016;106(7):1800–1806.
- Nelson SM, Pastuszek E, Kloss G, et al. Two new automated, compared with two enzyme-linked immunosorbent, antimüllerian hormone assays. Fertil Steril. 2015;104(4):1016–1021.e6.
- Nyboe Andersen A, Nelson SM, Fauser BC, et al. Individualized versus conventional ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: a multicenter, randomized, controlled, assessor-blinded, phase 3 noninferiority trial. Fertil Steril. 2017;107(2):387–396.e4.
- Ovarian Stimulation T, Bosch E, Broer S, et al. ESHRE guideline: ovarian stimulation for IVF/ICSI. Hum Reprod Open. 2020;2020(2):hoaa009.
- Allegra A, Marino A, Volpes A, et al. A randomized controlled trial investigating the use of a predictive nomogram for the selection of the FSH starting dose in IVF/ICSI cycles. Reprod Biomed Online. 2017;34(4):429–438.
- Gracia CR, Shin SS, Prewitt M, et al. Multi-center clinical evaluation of the Access AMH assay to determine AMH levels in reproductive age women during normal menstrual cycles. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018;35(5):777–783.