Advanced search
Publication Cover
Gynecological Endocrinology Volume 38, 2022 - Issue 7
Submit an article Journal homepage
107
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Pregnancy

Extratubal secondary trophoblastic implants (ESTI) following laparoscopic bilateral salpingectomy for ectopic pregnancy: problems that have been neglected for a long time

Ting WangDepartment of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
&
Qin LiDepartment of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, People’s Republic of ChinaCorrespondence[email protected]
ORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7424-226X
ORCID Icon
Pages 608-611 | Received 11 Mar 2022, Accepted 14 May 2022, Published online: 23 May 2022

References

  • Gaskins AJ, Missmer SA, Rich-Edwards JW, et al. Demographic, lifestyle, and reproductive risk factors for ectopic pregnancy. Fertil Steril. 2018;110(7):1328–1337.
  • Oron G, Tulandi T. A pragmatic and evidence-based management of ectopic pregnancy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013;20(4):446–454.
  • Canelas CM, Shih RD, Clayton LM, et al. Repeat acute abdomen and hemoperitoneum during the same pregnancy due to a ruptured ectopic treated by salpingostomy. Am J Emerg Med. 2017;35(6):942.e1–942.e3.
  • Reich H, DeCaprio J, McGlynn F, et al. Peritoneal trophoblastic tissue implants after laparoscopic treatment of tubal ectopic pregnancy. Fertil Steril. 1989;52(2):337–339.
  • Cartwright PS. Peritoneal trophoblastic implants after surgical management of tubal pregnancy. J Reprod Med Obstet Gynecol. 1991;36(7):523–524.
  • Schyum AC, Rosendal B-MB, Andersen B. Peritoneal reimplantation of trophoblastic tissue following laparoscopic treatment of ectopic pregnancy: a case report and review of literature. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2019;48(3):213–216.
  • Foulot H, Chapron C, Morice P, et al. Failure of laparoscopic treatment for peritoneal trophoblastic implants. Hum Reprod. 1994;9(1):92–93.
  • Sjøgren P, Hansen F. Disseminated implantation of peritoneal trophoblastic tissue secondary to laparoscopic removal of a tubal pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1996;75(4):408–409.
  • Doss BJ, Jacques SM, Qureshi F, et al. Extratubal secondary trophoblastic implants: clinicopathologic correlation and review of the literature. Hum Pathol. 1998;29(2):184–187.
  • Ben-Arie A, Goldchmit R, Dgani R, et al. Trophoblastic peritoneal implants after laparoscopic treatment of ectopic pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2001;96(1):113–115.
  • Shamini N, Chern B. Persistent ectopic pregnancy – a case report. Singapore Med J. 2002;43(2):93–94.
  • Pal L, Parkash V, Rutherford TJ. Omental trophoblastic implants and hemoperitoneum after laparoscopic salpingostomy for ectopic pregnancy: a case report. J Reprod Med Obstet Gynecol. 2003;48(1):57–59.
  • Deheragoda MG, Baithun S. Omental deposits of fetal parts as a sequal to salpingectomy for ruptured ectopic pregnancy. Histopathology. 2006;49(4):426.
  • Ali CR, Fitzgerald C. Omental and peritoneal secondary trophoblastic implantation – an unusual complication after IVF. Reprod Biomed Online. 2006;12(6):776–778.
  • Bucella D, Buxant F, Anaf V, et al. Omental trophoblastic implants after surgical management of ectopic pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2009;280(1):115–117.
  • Humphreys CA, Ragnarsdottir B, Brown P, et al. Acute hemoperitoneum 6 weeks post-laparoscopic salpingectomy – a rare case of secondary peritoneal trophoblast implantation. Gynecol Surg. 2012;9(4):457–460.
  • Robson D, Lusink V, Campbell N. Persistent omental trophoblastic implantation following salpingostomy, salpingectomy and methotrexate for ectopic pregnancy: a case report. Case Rep Womens Health. 2019;21:e00095.
  • Po L, Thomas J, Mills K, et al. Guideline no. 414: management of pregnancy of unknown location and tubal and nontubal ectopic pregnancies. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2021;43(5):614–630.e1.
  • Kirk E, Bottomley C, Bourne T. Diagnosing ectopic pregnancy and current concepts in the management of pregnancy of unknown location. Hum Reprod Update. 2014;20(2):250–261.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.