Comparing the success rate of natural cycle and modified natural cycle protocols for frozen-thawed embryo transfer

References

• European IVF-Monitoring Consortium (EIM) for ESHRE. ART in Europe, 2014: results generated from European registries by ESHRE: the European IVF-monitoring consortium (EIM) for ESHRE. Hum Reprod. 2018;33:1586–1601.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kalem Z, Kalem MN, Bakirarar B, et al. Natural cycle versus hormone replacement therapy cycle in frozen-thawed embryo transfer. Saudi Med J. 2018;39(11):1102–1108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutting R. Single embryo transfer for all. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2018;53:30–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Absalan F, Ghannadi A, Kazerooni M. Reproductive outcome following thawed embryo transfer in management of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. J Reprod Infert. 2013;14:133.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roque M, Haahr T, Geber S, et al. Fresh versus elective frozen embryo transfer in IVF/ICSI cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis of reproductive outcomes. Hum Reprod Update. 2019;25(1):2–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bedoschi G, Oktay K. Current approach to fertility preservation by embryo cryopreservation. Fertil Steril. 2013;99(6):1496–1502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackens S, Santos-Ribeiro S, van de Vijver A, et al. Frozen embryo transfer: a review on the optimal endometrial preparation and timing. Hum Reprod. 2017;32(11):2234–2242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghobara T, Gelbaya TA, Ayeleke RO. Cycle regimens for frozen thawed embryo transfer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;7(7):CD003414.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Groenewoud ER, Kollen BJ, Macklon NS, et al. Spontaneous LH surges prior to HCG administration in unstimulated-cycle frozen-thawed embryo transfer do not influence pregnancy rates. Reprod Biomed Online. 2012;24(2):191–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mizrachi Y, Horowitz E, Ganer Herman H, et al. Should women receive luteal support following natural cycle frozen embryo transfer? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2021;27(4):643–650.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalem Z, Kalem MN, Gürgan T. Methods for endometrial preparation in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles. J Turk Germ Gynecol Assoc. 2016;17:168.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fatemi HM, Kyrou D, Bourgain C, et al. Cryopreserved-thawed human embryo transfer: spontaneous natural cycle is superior to human chorionic gonadotropin-induced natural cycle. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(6):2054–2058.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackens S, Stubbe A, Santos-Ribeiro S, et al. To trigger or not to trigger ovulation in a natural cycle for frozen embryo transfer: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2020;35(5):1073–1081.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montagut M, Santos-Ribeiro S, de Vos M, et al. Frozen-thawed embryo transfers in natural cycles with spontaneous or induced ovulation: the search for the best protocol continues. Hum. Reprod. 2016;31(12):2803–2810.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyrou D, Kolibianakis EM, Fatemi HM, et al. Spontaneous triggering of ovulation versus HCG administration in patients undergoing IUI: a prospective randomized study. Reprod Biomed Online. 2012;25(3):278–283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litwicka K, Mencacci C, Arrivi C, et al. HCG administration after endogenous LH rise negatively influences pregnancy rate in modified natural cycle for frozen-thawed euploid blastocyst transfer: a pilot study. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018;35(3):449–455.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Azemi M, Kyrou D, Kolibianakis EM, et al. Elevated progesterone during ovarian stimulation for IVF. Reprod Biomed Online. 2012;24(4):381–388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weissman A, Levin D, Ravhon A, et al. What is the preferred method for timing natural cycle frozen-thawed embryo transfer? Reprod Biomed Online. 2009;19(1):66–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu X, Tian L, Li P, et al. Clinical outcomes of Frozen-Thawed embryo transfer in natural cycles with spontaneous or induced ovulation: a retrospective cohort study from 1937 cycles. Reprod Sci. 2021;28(3):794–800. Epub 2020 Oct 9. PMID: 33034864.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huberlant S, Vaast M, Anahory T, et al. Natural cycle for frozen-thawed embryo transfer: spontaneous ovulation or triggering by hCG. Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2018;46(5):466–473.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomas C, Alsbjerg B, Martikainen H, et al. Pregnancy loss after. frozen-embryo transfer—a comparison of three protocols. Fertil Steril. 2012;98(5):1165–1169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang EM, Han JE, Kim YS, et al. Use of the natural cycle and vitrification thawed blastocyst transfer results in better in vitro fertilization outcomes: cycle regimens of vitrification thawed blastocyst transfer. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2011;28(4):369–374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg SM, Luciano AA, Riddick DH. The luteal phase defect: the relative frequency of, and encouraging response to, treatment with vaginal progesterone. Fertil Steril. 1980;34(1):17–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casper RF, Yanushpolsky EH. Optimal endometrial preparation for frozen embryo transfer cycles: window of implantation and progesterone support. Fertil Steril. 2016;105(4):867–872.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horowitz E, Mizrachi Y, Finkelstein M, et al. A randomized controlled trial of vaginal progesterone for luteal phase support in modified natural cycle–frozen embryo transfer. Gynecological Endocrinology. 2021;37(9):792–797.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weissman A, Horowitz E, Ravhon A, et al. Spontaneous ovulation versus HCG triggering for timing natural-cycle frozen-thawed embryo transfer: a randomized study. Reprod Biomed Online. 2011;23(4):484–489.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greco E, Litwicka K, Arrivi C, et al. The endometrial preparation for frozen-thawed euploid blastocysts transfer: a prospective randomized trial comparing clinical results from natural modified cycle and exogenous hormone stimulation with GnRH agonist. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2016;33(7):873–884.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Idelevich A, Vilella F. Mother and embryo cross-communication. Genes. 2020;11(4):376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pállinger É, Bognar Z, Bodis J, et al. A simple and rapid flow cytometry-based assay to identify a competent embryo prior to embryo transfer. Nat. Publish. Group. 2017;7:39927–39928.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang T, Li Z, Ren X, et al. Endometrial thickness as a predictor of the reproductive outcomes in fresh and frozen embryo transfer cycles: a retrospective cohort study of 1512 IVF cycles with morphologically good-quality blastocyst. Medicine. 2018;97(4):e9689.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bu Z, Wang K, Dai W, et al. Endometrial thickness significantly affects clinical pregnancy and live birth rates in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2016;32(7):524–528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi W, Zhang S, Zhao W, et al. Factors related to clinical pregnancy after vitrified-warmed embryo transfer: a retrospective and multivariate logistic regression analysis of 2313 transfer cycles. Hum Reprod. 2013;28(7):1768–1775.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Toukhy T, Coomarasamy A, Khairy M, et al. The relationship between endometrial thickness and outcome of medicated frozen embryo replacement cycles. Fertil Steril. 2008;89(4):832–839.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gingold JA, Lee JA, Rodriguez-Purata J, et al. Endometrial pattern, but not endometrial thickness, affects implantation rates in euploidembryo transfers. Fertil Steril. 2015;104(3):620–6e5–8.e5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Check JH, Dietterich C, Graziano V, et al. Effect of maximal endometrial thickness on outcome after frozen embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 2004;81(5):1399–1400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar