Correlation between different endometrial preparation protocols and pregnancy outcome of frozen embryo transfer in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome: a retrospective study

References

• Bozdag G, Mumusoglu S, Zengin D, et al. The prevalence and phenotypic features of polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(12):1–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li R, Zhang Q, Yang D, et al. Prevalence of polycystic ovary syndrome in women in China: a large community-based study. Hum Reprod. 2013;28(9):2562–2569.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoeger KM, Dokras A, Piltonen T. Update on PCOS: consequences, challenges, and guiding treatment. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2021;106(3):e1071–e1083.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beydoun HA, Stadtmauer L, Beydoun MA, et al. Polycystic ovary syndrome, body mass index and outcomes of assisted reproductive technologies. Reprod Biomed Online. 2009;18(6):856–863.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chian RC, Nargund G, Huang J. Cumulative pregnancy rates after six cycles of modified natural cycle IVF. Dev In Vitro Maturat Hum Oocytes. 2017;13)::211–226.
   Google Scholar
• Escobar-Morreale HF, Luque-Ramírez M, González F. Circulating inflammatory markers in polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(3):1048–1058. e1041-1042.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atabekoglu CS, Sönmezer M, Özmen B, et al. Increased monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 levels indicating early vascular damage in lean young PCOS patients. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(1):295–297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu J, Ma Y, Wu Z, et al. Endometrial preparation protocol of the frozen-thawed embryo transfer in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015;291(1):201–211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng MF, Zhou X, Duan JL. Stimulated cycle versus artificial cycle for frozen embryo transfer in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome: a meta-analysis. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2021;37(4):294–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou J, Liao HQ, Zhou J. Comparison of pregnancy outcome of blastocyst cryopreserved with different carrier in thawed-frozen embryo transfer cycle. J Chin Phys. 2017;19(4):502–505.
   Google Scholar
• Chang EM, Han JE, Kim YS, et al. Use of the natural cycle and vitrification thawed blastocyst transfer results in better in-vitro fertilization outcomes: cycle regimens of vitrification thawed blastocyst transfer. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2011;28(4):369–374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang Y, Kuang YP. Progress of endometrial preparation in the frozen-thawed embryo transfer. Reprod Contracep. 2012;32(7):478–481.
   Google Scholar
• Orvieto R, Meltcer S, Liberty G, et al. A combined approach to patients with repeated IVF failures. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(6):2462–2464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Houwen LE, Mijatovic V, Leemhuis E, et al. Efficacy and safety of IVF/ICSI in patients with severe endometriosis after long-term pituitary down-regulation. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014;28(1):39–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen X, Hao C, Deng W, et al. Effects of the zishen yutai pill compared with placebo on live births among women in a fresh embryo transfer cycle: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2022;139(2):192–201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Group REA-SPCW Revised 2003 consensus on diagnostic criteria and long-term health risks related to polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2004;81:19–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Toukhy T, Taylor A, Khalaf Y, et al. Pituitary suppression in ultrasound-monitored frozen embryo replacement cycles. A randomised study. Hum Reprod. 2004;19(4):874–879.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill MJ, Miller KA, Frattarelli JL. A GnRH agonist and exogenous hormone stimulation protocol has a higher live-birth rate than a natural endogenous hormone protocol for frozen-thawed blastocyst-stage embryo transfer cycles: an analysis of 1391 cycles. Fertil Steril. 2010;93(2):416–422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li DH, Wang X, Han X, et al. Effects of hormone replacement after down-regulation in frozen-thawed embryo transfer in patients with repeated implantation failure. Henan Med Res. 2018;27(9):1568–1570.
   Google Scholar
• Hong Y, Xie MQ, Wang LY, et al. Effect of GnRH-a on expression of integrin αVβ3 and PR in midluteal endometrium of patients with endometriosis after operation. Chin J Obstetr Gynecol. 2010;9:699–701.
   Google Scholar
• Lv YL. Selection and effect comparison of assisted pregnancy technology in elderly patients with endometriosis and infertility. Henan Med Res. 2018;27(19):3505–3507.
   Google Scholar
• Hao Y, Xu Y, Li JH, et al. Clinical application of down-regulation in luteal phase combined with artificial cycle scheme in patients with repeated implantation failure of frozen-thawed embryo. J Reprod Med. 2018;27(7):627–631.
   Google Scholar
• Li R, Qiao J, Liu P[, et al. Clinical analysis of 12,491 cycles treated in embryo transfer program. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2008;43(8):563–566.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yan J, Wu K, Tang R, et al. Effect of maternal age on the outcomes of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET). Sci China Life Sci. 2012;55(8):694–698.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoolcraft WB, Katz-Jaffe MG. Comprehensive chromosome screening of trophectoderm with vitrification facilitates elective single-embryo transfer for infertile women with advanced maternal age. Fertil Steril. 2013;100(3):615–619.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang W, Zhang T, Li Z, et al. Combined analysis of endometrial thickness and pattern in predicting clinical outcomes of frozen embryo transfer cycles with morphological good-quality blastocyst: a retrospective cohort study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97(2):e9577.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohlen BJ, Santbrink EV, Laven J. Ovulation induction: evidence based guidelines for daily practice. Fertil Steril. 2012;97:28–38.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar