Comparisons of different treatment outcomes in IVF/ET patients with hydrosalpinx: a retrospective study

References

• G M H, A E H, R S S. Pathophysiology and management of proximal tubal blockage. Fertil Steril. 1999;71(5):1–6. doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(99)00014-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serafini P, Batzofin J. Diagnosis of female infertility. A comprehensive approach. J Reprod Med. 1989;34(1):1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen AN, Yue Z, Meng FJ, et al. Low implantation rate after in-vitro fertilization in patients with hydrosalpinges diagnosed by ultrasonography. Hum Reprod. 1994;9(10):1935–1938. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melo P, Georgiou EX, Johnson N, et al. Surgical treatment for tubal disease in women due to undergo in vitro fertilisation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;10(10):CD002125. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD002125.pub4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Camus E, Poncelet C, Goffinet F, et al. Pregnancy rates after in-vitro fertilization in cases of tubal infertility with and without hydrosalpinx: a meta-analysis of published comparative studies. Hum Reprod. 1999;14(5):1243–1249. doi:10.1093/humrep/14.5.1243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asrm PCO. Salpingectomy for hydrosalpinx prior to in vitro fertilization. Fertil. Steril. 2008;90(5):S66–S68. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.08.089.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ng K, Cheong Y. Hydrosalpinx - Salpingostomy, salpingectomy or tubal occlusion. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2019;59:41–47. doi:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2019.01.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlaff WD. A reconsideration of salpingectomy for hydrosalpinx before in vitro fertilization: why bother? Fertil Steril. 2019;111(4):650–651. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.02.014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asrm PCOT. Role of tubal surgery in the era of assisted reproductive technology: a committee opinion. Fertil. Steril. 2015;103(6):e37-43. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.03.032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu J, Harb HM, Gallos ID, et al. Salpingostomy in the treatment of hydrosalpinx: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 2015;30(8):1882–1895. doi:10.1093/humrep/dev135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson N, van Voorst S, Sowter MC, et al. Surgical treatment for tubal disease in women due to undergo in vitro fertilisation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;2010(1):CD002125. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD002125.pub3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Volodarsky-Perel A, Buckett W, Tulandi T. Treatment of hydrosalpinx in relation to IVF outcome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Biomed Online. 2019;39(3):413–432. doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2019.04.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiaona Lin GHHS. Chinese expert consensus on diagnosis and treatment of tubal infertility. J. Reprod. Med. 2018;27(11):1048–1056. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-3845.2018.11.002.
   Google Scholar
• Uk NCCF. Fertility: assessment and treatment for people with fertility problems. Royal College of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists, London. 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Tsiami A, Chaimani A, Mavridis D, et al. Surgical treatment for hydrosalpinx prior to in-vitro fertilization embryo transfer: a network meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;48(4):434–445. doi:10.1002/uog.15900.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammadieh N, Coomarasamy A, Ola B, et al. Ultrasound-guided hydrosalpinx aspiration during oocyte collection improves pregnancy outcome in IVF: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2008;23(5):1113–1117. doi:10.1093/humrep/den071.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou Y, Jiang H, Zhang WX, et al. Ultrasound-guided aspiration of hydrosalpinx occurring during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation could improve clinical outcome of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2016;42(8):960–965. doi:10.1111/jog.13013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arora P, Arora RS, Cahill D. Essure(®) for management of hydrosalpinx prior to in vitro fertilisation-a systematic review and pooled analysis. BJOG. 2014;121(5):527–536. doi:10.1111/1471-0528.12533.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omurtag K, Grindler NM, Roehl KA, et al. How members of the society for reproductive endocrinology and infertility and society of reproductive surgeons evaluate, define, and manage hydrosalpinges. Fertil Steril. 2012;97(5):1095–1100. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.02.026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D'Arpe S, Franceschetti S, Caccetta J, et al. Management of hydrosalpinx before IVF: a literature review. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2015;35(6):547–550. doi:10.3109/01443615.2014.985768.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hu L, Bu Z, Guo Y, et al. Comparison of different ovarian hyperstimulation protocols efficacy in poor ovarian responders according to the Bologna criteria. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2014;7(4):1128–1134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seli E, Kayisli UA, Cakmak H, et al. Removal of hydrosalpinges increases endometrial leukaemia inhibitory factor (LIF) expression at the time of the implantation window. Hum Reprod. 2005;20(11):3012–3017. doi:10.1093/humrep/dei188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ersahin AA, Ersahin S, Gungor ND. Surgical removal of hydrosalpinx improves endometrium receptivity by decreasing nuclear factor-kappa B expression. Reprod Sci. 2020;27(3):787–792. doi:10.1007/s43032-019-00136-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strandell A, Waldenström U, Nilsson L, et al. Hydrosalpinx reduces in-vitro fertilization/embryo transfer pregnancy rates. Hum Reprod. 1994;9(5):861–863. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138606.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajonuma LC, Ng EH, Chan HC. New insights into the mechanisms underlying hydrosalpinx fluid formation and its adverse effect on IVF outcome. Hum Reprod Update. 2002;8(3):255–264. doi:10.1093/humupd/8.3.255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukherjee T, Copperman AB, McCaffrey C, et al. Hydrosalpinx fluid has embryotoxic effects on murine embryogenesis: a case for prophylactic salpingectomy. Fertil Steril. 1996;66(5):851–853. doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)58652-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bao H, Qu Q, Huang X, et al. Impact of hydrosalpinx fluid on early human embryos. Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2017;63(4):279–284. doi:10.1080/19396368.2017.1319993.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng EH, Ajonuma LC, Lau EY, et al. Adverse effects of hydrosalpinx fluid on sperm motility and survival. Hum Reprod. 2000;15(4):772–777. doi:10.1093/humrep/15.4.772.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandromme J, Chasse E, Lejeune B, et al. Hydrosalpinges in in-vitro fertilization: an unfavourable prognostic feature. Hum Reprod. 1995;10(3):576–579. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a135992.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strandell A, Lindhard A, Waldenström U, et al. Hydrosalpinx and IVF outcome: a prospective, randomized multicentre trial in Scandinavia on salpingectomy prior to IVF. Hum Reprod. 1999;14(11):2762–2769. doi:10.1093/humrep/14.11.2762.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strandell A, Lindhard A, Waldenström U, et al. Hydrosalpinx and IVF outcome: cumulative results after salpingectomy in a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2001;16(11):2403–2410. doi:10.1093/humrep/16.11.2403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kontoravdis A, Makrakis E, Pantos K, et al. Proximal tubal occlusion and salpingectomy result in similar improvement in in vitro fertilization outcome in patients with hydrosalpinx. Fertil Steril. 2006;86(6):1642–1649. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.05.032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelbaya TA, Nardo LG, Fitzgerald CT, et al. Ovarian response to gonadotropins after laparoscopic salpingectomy or the division of fallopian tubes for hydrosalpinges. Fertil Steril. 2006;85(5):1464–1468. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.10.036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almog B, Wagman I, Bibi G, et al. Effects of salpingectomy on ovarian response in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for in vitro fertilization: a reappraisal. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(8):2474–2476. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.03.032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fouda UM, Sayed AM. Effect of ultrasound-guided aspiration of hydrosalpingeal fluid during oocyte retrieval on the outcomes of in vitro fertilisation-embryo transfer: a randomised controlled trial (NCT01040351). Gynecol Endocrinol. 2011;27(8):562–567. doi:10.3109/09513590.2010.507290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu B, Zhang Q, Zhao J, et al. Pregnancy outcome of in vitro fertilization after essure and laparoscopic management of hydrosalpinx: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2017;108(1):84–95.e5. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.05.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreyer K, Lier MC, Emanuel MH, et al. Hysteroscopic proximal tubal occlusion versus laparoscopic salpingectomy as a treatment for hydrosalpinges prior to IVF or ICSI: an RCT. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(9):2005–2016. doi:10.1093/humrep/dew050.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar