The natural cycle protocol of endometrial preparation for frozen embryo transfer decreases the miscarriage rate in women with recurrent pregnancy loss

References

• de Mouzon J, Chambers GM, Zegers-Hochschild F, et al. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies World Report: assisted reproductive technology 2012. Hum Reprod. 2020;35(8):1–5. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaa090.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banker M, Dyer S, Chambers GM, et al. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ICMART): World Report on Assisted Reproductive Technologies, 2013. Fertil Steril. 2021;116(3):741–756. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.03.039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu L, Bu Z, Huang G, et al. Assisted reproductive technology in China: results generated from data reporting system by CSRM from 2013 to 2016. Front Endocrinol. 2020;11:458. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2020.00458.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zargar M, Dehdashti S, Najafian M, et al. Pregnancy outcomes following in vitro fertilization using fresh or frozen embryo transfer. JBRA Assist Reprod. 2021;25(4):570–574. doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20210024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Wu H, He X, et al. Retrospective study to compare frozen-thawed embryo transfer with fresh embryo transfer on pregnancy outcome following intracytoplasmic sperm injection for male infertility. Med Sci Monit. 2018;24:2668–2674. doi: 10.12659/MSM.907229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maheshwari A, Pandey S, Amalraj Raja E, et al. Is frozen embryo transfer better for mothers and babies? Can cumulative meta-analysis provide a definitive answer? Hum Reprod Update. 2018;24(1):35–58. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmx031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Ma C, Wu Z, et al. Frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles have a lower incidence of ectopic pregnancy compared with fresh embryo transfer cycles. Reprod Sci. 2018;25(9):1431–1435. doi: 10.1177/1933719117746759.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satwik R, Majumdar A, Mittal Gupta S, et al. Natural cycle versus hormone replacement cycle for transferring vitrified-warmed embryos in eumenorrhoeic women. A retrospective cohort study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021;263:94–99. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.06.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yarali H, Polat M, Mumusoglu S, et al. Preparation of endometrium for frozen embryo replacement cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2016;33(10):1287–1304. doi: 10.1007/s10815-016-0787-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li C, He YC, Xu JJ, et al. Perinatal outcomes of neonates born from different endometrial preparation protocols after frozen embryo transfer: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21(1):341. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03791-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mumusoglu S, Polat M, Ozbek IY, et al. Preparation of the endometrium for frozen embryo transfer: a systematic review. Front Endocrinol. 2021;12:688237. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.688237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glujovsky D, Pesce R, Sueldo C, et al. Endometrial preparation for women undergoing embryo transfer with frozen embryos or embryos derived from donor oocytes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;10(10):CD006359. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006359.pub3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lidegaard O, Mikkelsen AP, Egerup P, et al. Pregnancy loss: a 40-year nationwide assessment. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020;99(11):1492–1496. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13860.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The ESHRE Guideline Group on RPL, Bender Atik R, Christiansen OB, et al. ESHRE guideline: recurrent pregnancy loss. Hum Reprod Open. 2018;2018(2):hoy004.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liu X, Wang H, Pan R, et al. Comparison of the method of endometrial preparation prior to frozen-thawed embryo transfer: a retrospective cohort study from 9733 cycles. Reprod Sci. 2021;28(11):3155–3163. doi: 10.1007/s43032-021-00603-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng Q, Zhang H, Xu S, et al. Optimal endometrial preparation protocols for frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles by maternal age. Reprod Sci. 2021;28(10):2847–2854. doi: 10.1007/s43032-021-00538-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomas C, Alsbjerg B, Martikainen H, et al. Pregnancy loss after frozen-embryo transfer – a comparison of three protocols. Fertil Steril. 2012;98(5):1165–1169. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.07.1058.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greco E, Litwicka K, Arrivi C, et al. The endometrial preparation for frozen-thawed euploid blastocyst transfer: a prospective randomized trial comparing clinical results from natural modified cycle and exogenous hormone stimulation with GnRH agonist. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2016;33(7):873–884. doi: 10.1007/s10815-016-0736-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levron J, Yerushalmi GM, Brengauz M, et al. Comparison between two protocols for thawed embryo transfer: natural cycle versus exogenous hormone replacement. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2014;30(7):494–497. doi: 10.3109/09513590.2014.900032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melnick AP, Setton R, Stone LD, et al. Replacing single frozen-thawed euploid embryos in a natural cycle in ovulatory women may increase live birth rates compared to medicated cycles in anovulatory women. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2017;34(10):1325–1331. doi: 10.1007/s10815-017-0983-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu H, Zhou P, Lin X, et al. Endometrial preparation for frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021;38(8):1913–1926. doi: 10.1007/s10815-021-02125-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu X, Shi W, Shi J. Natural cycle frozen-thawed embryo transfer in young women with regular menstrual cycles increases the live-birth rates compared with hormone replacement treatment: a retrospective cohort study. Fertil Steril. 2020;113(4):811–817. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.11.023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolner AMF, Nagdeve P, Raja EA, et al. Family history and risk of miscarriage: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020;99(12):1584–1594. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13940.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du Fosse NA, van der Hoorn MP, van Lith JMM, et al. Advanced paternal age is associated with an increased risk of spontaneous miscarriage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2020;26(5):650–669. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmaa010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu XY, Fan Q, Wang J, et al. Higher chromosomal abnormality rate in blastocysts from young patients with idiopathic recurrent pregnancy loss. Fertil Steril. 2020;113(4):853–864. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.11.016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu H, Lin XX, Huang XB, et al. Systemic characterization of novel immune cell phenotypes in recurrent pregnancy loss. Front Immunol. 2021;12:657552. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.657552.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Luo L, Diao J, et al. Male sperm quality and risk of recurrent spontaneous abortion in Chinese couples: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine. 2021;100(10):e24828. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000024828.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vomstein K, Aulitzky A, Strobel L, et al. Recurrent spontaneous miscarriage: a comparison of international guidelines. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2021;81(7):769–779. doi: 10.1055/a-1380-3657.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Godines-Enriquez MS, Miranda-Velasquez S, Enriquez-Perez MM, et al. Prevalence of thyroid autoimmunity in women with recurrent pregnancy loss. Medicina. 2021;57(2):96. doi: 10.3390/medicina57020096.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kling C, Magez J, Hedderich J, et al. Two-year outcome after recurrent first trimester miscarriages: prognostic value of the past obstetric history. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016;293(5):1113–1123. doi: 10.1007/s00404-015-4001-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Governini L, Luongo FP, Haxhiu A, et al. Main actors behind the endometrial receptivity and successful implantation. Tissue Cell. 2021;73:101656. doi: 10.1016/j.tice.2021.101656.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D'Ippolito S, Di Nicuolo F, Papi M, et al. Expression of pinopodes in the endometrium from recurrent pregnancy loss women. Role of thrombomodulin and ezrin. J Clin Med. 2020;13:9.
   Google Scholar
• Karaer A, Cigremis Y, Celik E, et al. Prokineticin 1 and leukemia inhibitory factor mRNA expression in the endometrium of women with idiopathic recurrent pregnancy loss. Fertil Steril. 2014;102(4):1091–1095.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.07.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maliqueo M, Echiburu B, Crisosto N. Sex steroids modulate uterine-placental vasculature: implications for obstetrics and neonatal outcomes. Front Physiol. 2016;7:152. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2016.00152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonagura TW, Babischkin JS, Aberdeen GW, et al. Prematurely elevating estradiol in early baboon pregnancy suppresses uterine artery remodeling and expression of extravillous placental vascular endothelial growth factor and alpha1beta1 and alpha5beta1 integrins. Endocrinology. 2012;153(6):2897–2906. doi: 10.1210/en.2012-1141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Versen-Hoynck F, Schaub AM, Chi YY, et al. Increased preeclampsia risk and reduced aortic compliance with in vitro fertilization cycles in the absence of a corpus luteum. Hypertension. 2019;73(3):640–649. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.118.12043.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sauer MV. Reproduction at an advanced maternal age and maternal health. Fertil Steril. 2015;103(5):1136–1143. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.03.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikwar M, MacFarlane AJ, Marchetti F. Mechanisms of oocyte aneuploidy associated with advanced maternal age. Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res. 2020;785:108320. doi: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2020.108320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar