The scientist–practitioner model in counseling psychology programs: a survey of training directors

References

• American Psychological Association. (2010). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct with the 2010 amendments. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/index.aspx
   Google Scholar
• American Psychological Association, Division of Counseling and Guidance Committee on Counselor Training. (1952). Recommended standards for training counseling psychologists at the doctoral level. American Psychologist, 17, 175–181.
   Google Scholar
• Aspenson, D. O., & Gersh, T. L. (1993). Graduate psychology students’ perceptions of the scientist-practitioner model of training. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 6, 201–215.10.1080/09515079308254115
   Google Scholar
• Barraclough, D. (2006). Improving what we do: Putting scientist-practitioner training into practice in a Master’s-level counsellor education program. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 19, 281–291. doi:10.1080/095150600959367
   Google Scholar
• Barlow, D. H., Hayes, S. C., & Nelson, R. O. (1984). The scientist practitioner: Research and accountability in clinical and educational settings. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Barnette, V. (2006). A scholarly work commitment in practice. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 19, 253–263. doi:10.1080/09515070600959334
   Google Scholar
• Belar, C. D. (2000). Scientist-Practitioner ≠ Science + practice: Bounder is bolder. American Psychologist, 55, 249–250.10.1037/0003-066X.55.2.248
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belar, C. D., & Perry, N. W. (1992). The national conference on scientist-practitioner education and training for the professional practice of psychology. American Psychologist, 47, 71–75.10.1037/0003-066X.47.1.71
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamin, L. T., & Baker, D. B. (2000). Boulder at 50: Introduction to the section. American Psychologist, 55, 233–236.10.1037/h0087859
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, B. L., & Kerr, B. (1993). Counseling psychology and the scientist-practitioner model: Implementation and implications. The Counseling Psychologist, 21, 136–151.10.1177/0011000093211008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, J. A. (2002). Integrating science and practice: Reclaiming the science in practice. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58, 1285–1290.10.1002/(ISSN)1097-4679
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chwalisz, K. (2003). Evidence-based practice: A framework for twenty-first-century scientist-practitioner training. The Counseling Psychologist, 31, 497–528. doi:10.1177/0011000003256347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claiborn, C. D. (1987). Science and practice: Reconsidering the pepinskys. Journal of Counseling and Development, 65, 286–288.10.1002/j.1556-6676.1987.tb01286.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fouad, N. A., Grus, C. L., Hatcher, R. L., Kaslow, N. J., Hutchings, P. S., Madson, M. B., … Crossman, R. E. (2009). Competency benchmarks: A model for understanding and measuring competence in professional psychology across training levels. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 3, S5–S26. doi:10.1037/a001583210.1037/a0015832
   Google Scholar
• Galassi, J. P., & Brooks, L. (1992). Integrating scientist and practitioner training in counseling psychology: Practicum is the key. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 5, 57–65.10.1080/09515079208254450
   Google Scholar
• Gelso, C. J. (1993). On the making of a scientist-practitioner: A theory of research training in professional psychology. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 24, 468–476.10.1037/0735-7028.24.4.468
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelso, C. J. (2006). On the making of a scientist-practitioner: A theory of research training in professional psychology. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 3–16. doi:10.1037/1931-3918.S.1.3
   Google Scholar
• Haring-Hidore, M., & Vacc, N. A. (1988). The scientist-practitioner model in training entry-level counselors. Journal of Counseling and Development, 66, 286–288.10.1002/j.1556-6676.1988.tb00870.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heppner, P. P., Carter, J. A., Claibom, C. D., Brooks, L., Gelso, C. J., Fassinger, R. E., … Galassi, J. P. (1992). A proposal to integrate science and practice in counseling psychology. The Counseling Psychologist, 20, 107–122.10.1177/0011000092201017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hicks, J. E. (1994). Health care, psychology, and the scientist-practitioner model. Austrian Psychologist, 29, 5–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horn, R. A., Troyer, J. A., Hall, E. J., Mellott, R. N., Cote, L. S., & Marquis, J. D. (2007). The scientist-practitioner model: A rose by any other name is still a rose. American Behavioral Scientist, 50, 808–819. doi:10.1177/0002764206296459
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoshmand, L. T. (1991). Clinical inquiry as scientific training. The Counseling Psychologist, 19, 431–453.10.1177/0011000091193011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoshmand, L. T., & Polkinghorne, D. E. (1992). Redefining the science-practice relationship and professional training. American Psychologist, 47, 55–66.10.1037/0003-066X.47.1.55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, G. S. (1985). Can research in human sciences become more relevant to practice? Journal of Counseling and Development, 63, 539–544.10.1002/j.1556-6676.1985.tb00675.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, G. S. (1993). Why William James might be considered the founder of the scientist-practitioner model. The Counseling Psychologist, 21, 118–135.10.1177/0011000093211007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John, I. (1998). The scientist-practitioner model: A critical examination. Australian Psychologist, 33, 24–30.10.1080/00050069808257259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanfer, F. H. (1990). The scientist-practitioner connection: A bridge in need of constant attention. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 21, 264–270.10.1037/0735-7028.21.4.264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lampropoulos, G. K., & Spengler, P. M. (2002). Introduction: Reprioritizing the role of science in a realistic version of the scientist-practitioner model. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58, 1195–1197.10.1002/(ISSN)1097-4679
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lampropoulos, G. K., Spengler, P. M., Dixon, D. N., & Nicholas, D. R. (2002). How psychotherapy integration can complement the scientist-practitioner model. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58, 1227–1240.10.1002/(ISSN)1097-4679
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, D., & Martin, M. (1989). Bridging the gap between research and practice. Journal of Counseling and Development, 67, 491–492.10.1002/j.1556-6676.1989.tb02128.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meara, N. M., Schmidt, L. D., Carrington, C. H., Davis, K. L., Dixon, D. N., Fretz, B. R., … Suinn, R. M. (1988). Training and accreditation in counseling psychology. The Counseling Psychologist, 16, 366–384.10.1177/0011000088163005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier, S. T. (1999). Training the practitioner-scientist: Bridging case conceptualization, assessment, and intervention. The Counseling Psychologist, 27, 846–869.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrow, S. L. (2005). Quality and trustworthiness in qualitative research in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 250–260. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murdock, N. L. (2006). On science-practice integration in everyday life: A plea for theory. The Counseling Psychologist, 34, 548–569.10.1177/0011000006288129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murdock, N. L., Alcorn, J., Heesacker, M., & Stoltenberg, C. D. (1998). Model training program in counseling psychology. The Counseling Psychologist, 26, 658–672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, C. E. (2009). Diffusion of innovation theory: A bridge for the research-practice gap in counseling. Journal of Counseling and Development, 87, 108–116.10.1002/j.1556-6678.2009.tb00556.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, D. (2007). Implication of the scientist-practitioner model in counseling psychology training and practice. American Behavioral Scientist, 50, 789–796. doi:10.1177/0002764206296457
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neimeyer, G. J., Saferstein, J., & Rice, K. G. (2005). Does the model matter? The relationship between science-practice emphasis and outcomes in academic training programs in counseling psychology. The Counseling Psychologist, 33, 635–654. doi:10.1177/0011000005277821
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nixon, M. (1990). Professional training in psychology: Quest for international standards. American Psychologist, 45, 1257–1262.10.1037/0003-066X.45.11.1257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Gorman, J. G. (2001). The scientist-practitioner model and its critics. Australian Psychologist, 36, 164–169.10.1080/00050060108259649
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Sullivan, J. J., & Quevillon, R. P. (1992). 40 years later: Is the Boulder model still alive? American Psychologist, 47, 67–70.10.1037/0003-066X.47.1.67
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, B. N. (1993). Challenging the stultifying bonds of tradition: Some philosophical, conceptual, and methodological issues in applying the scientist-practitioner model. School Psychology Quarterly, 8, 27–37.10.1037/h0088829
   Google Scholar
• Raimy, V. (1950). Training in clinical psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Ridley, C. R., Mollen, D., & Kelly, S. (2011). Beyond microskills: Toward a model of counseling competence. The Counseling Psychologist, 39, 825–864. doi:10.1177/0011000010378440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sauer, E. M. (2006). Living the scientist-practitioner model in a psychology training clinic. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 19, 293–304. doi:10.1080/09515070600960498
   Google Scholar
• Spengler, P. M., Strohmer, D. C., Dixon, D. N., & Shivy, V. A. (1995). A scientist-practitioner model of psychological assessment: Implications for training, practice and research. The Counseling Psychologist, 23, 506–534.10.1177/0011000095233009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoltenberg, C. D., Pace, T. M., Kashubeck-West, S., Biever, J. L., Patterson, T., & Welsh, I. D. (2000). Training models in counseling psychology: Scientist-practitioner versus practitioner-scholar. The Counseling Psychologist, 28, 622–640. doi:10.1177/0011000000285002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, G. L. (2006). The scientist-practitioner in context. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 19, 305–312. doi:10.1080/09515070600960522
   Google Scholar
• Trierweiler, S. J., & Stricker, G. (1998). The scientific practice of professional psychology. New York, NY: Plenum Press.10.1007/978-1-4899-1944-1
   Google Scholar
• Vespia, K. M., & Sauer, E. M. (2006). Defining characteristic or unrealistic ideal: Historical and contemporary perspectives on scientist-practitioner training in counselling psychology. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 19, 229–251. doi:10.1080/09515070600960449
   Google Scholar
• Vespia, K. M. (2006). Integrating professional identities: Counselling psychologist, scientist-practitioner and undergraduate educator. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 19, 265–280. doi:10.1080/09515070600960555
   Google Scholar
• Vespia, K. M., Sauer, E. M., & Lyddon, W. J. (2006). Counselling psychologists as scientist-practitioners: Finding unity in diversity. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 19, 223–227. doi:10.1080/0951507060096056
   Google Scholar