Training the scientist–practitioner in the twenty-first century: A risk–benefit analysis

References

• Addis, M., & Krasnow, A. (2000). A national survey of practicing psychologists’ attitudes toward psychotherapy treatment manuals. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 331–339. 10.1037/0022-006X.68.2.331
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Psychological Association, Committee on Counselor Training. (1952). Recommended standards for training counseling psychologists at the doctoral level. American Psychologist, 7, 175–181. 10.1037/h0056299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Psychological Association, Committee on Training in Clinical Psychology. (1947). Recommended graduate training program in clinical psychology. American Psychologist, 2, 539–558. 10.1037/h0058236
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aspenson, D., & Gersh, T. (1993). Graduate psychology students’ perceptions of the scientist–practitioner model of training. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 6, 349–364.
   Google Scholar
• Athanasiades, C. (2008). Towards an integrated identity in counselling psychology: Graduate, professional and academic experiences. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 21, 237–245. 10.1080/09515070802360893
   Google Scholar
• Barraclough, D. (2006). Improving what we do: Putting scientist–practitioner training into practice in a Master’s-level counsellor education program. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 19, 281–291. 10.1080/09515070600959367
   Google Scholar
• Barrom, C., Shadish, W., & Montgomery, L. (1988). PhDs, PsyDs, and real-world constraints on scholarly activity: Another look at the Boulder model. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 19, 93–101. 10.1037/0735-7028.19.1.93
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belar, C. (2008). Changing educational needs of psychologists: Do we need more medical knowledge, basic science and more psychological science? Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, 15, 12–17. 10.1007/s10880-008-9097-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belar, C., & Perry, N. (1992). The national conference on scientist–practitioner education and training for the professional practice of psychology. American Psychologist, 47, 71–75. 10.1037/0003-066X.47.1.71
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blair, L. (2010). A critical review of the scientist–practitioner model for counselling psychology. Counseling Psychology Review, 25, 19–30.
   Google Scholar
• Bury, D., & Strauss, S. (2006). The scientist–practitioner in a counselling psychology setting. In D. Lane & S. Corrie (Eds.), The modern scientist–practitioner (pp. 112–126). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Castonguay, L. (2011). Psychotherapy, psychopathology, research and practice: Pathways of connections and integration. Psychotherapy Research, 21, 125–140. 10.1080/10503307.2011.563250
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clement, P. (1988). Professional role modeling by faculty. Professional Psychology: Research & Practice, 18, 253–254.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, F., Leffingwell, T., & Belar, C. (1997). Teaching evidence-based practice: Implications for psychology. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 63, 657–670.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, J., & Coyne, J. (2005). Re-envisioning the training and practice of clinical psychologists: Preserving science and research orientations in the face of change. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 61, 1191–1196. 10.1002/(ISSN)1097-4679
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, M., & Reeves, A. (2012). The role of randomised controlled trials in developing an evidence-base for counselling and psychotherapy. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 12, 303–307. 10.1080/14733145.2012.687388
   Google Scholar
• Corrie, S., & Callanan, M. (2000). A review of the scientist-practitioner model: Reflections on its potential contribution to counselling psychology within the context of current health care trends. British Journal of Counseling Psychology, 73, 413–427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corrie, S., & Callanan, M. (2001). Therapists’ beliefs about research and the scientist–practitioner model in an evidence-based health care climate: A qualitative study. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 74, 135–149. 10.1348/000711201160858
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corrie, S., & Lane, D. (2009). The scientist–practitioner model as a framework for coaching psychology. The Coaching Psychologist, 5, 61–66.
   Google Scholar
• Davison, G. (1998). Being bolder with the Boulder model: The challenge of education and training in empirically supported treatments. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 163–167. 10.1037/0022-006X.66.1.163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drabick, D., & Goldfried, M. (2000). Training the scientist–practitioner for the 21st century: Putting the bloom back on the rose. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 56, 327–340. 10.1002/(ISSN)1097-4679
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, D., Dattilio, F., & Bromley, D. (2004). Developing evidence-based practice: The role of case-based research. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 35, 589–597. 10.1037/0735-7028.35.6.589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K. A. (1998). The scientific study of expert levels of performance: General implications for optimal learning and creativity. High Ability Studies, 9, 75–100. 10.1080/1359813980090106
   Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K. A. (2014). Expertise. Current Biology, 24, R508–R510. 10.1016/j.cub.2014.04.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100, 363–406. 10.1037/0033-295X.100.3.363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forsyth, D., & Leary, M. (1997). Achieving the goals of the scientist–practitioner model: The seven interfaces of social and counseling psychology. The Counseling Psychologist, 25, 180–200. 10.1177/0011000097252002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freedheim, D., & Overholser, J. C. (1997). Training issues in clinical psychology. In J. Matthews & C. E. Walker (Eds.), Basic skills and professional issues in clinical psychology (pp. 243–264). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Gazzola, N., De Stefano, J., Audet, C., & Theriault, A. (2011). Professional identity among counselling psychology doctoral students: A qualitative investigation. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 24, 257–275. 10.1080/09515070.2011.630572
   Google Scholar
• Gelso, C. (1979). Research in counseling: Methodological and professional issues. The Counseling Psychologist, 8, 7–36. 10.1177/001100007900800303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelso, C. (1985). Rigor, relevance, and counseling research: On the need to maintain our course between Scylla and Charybdis. Journal of Counseling and Development, 63, 551–553. 10.1002/j.1556-6676.1985.tb00678.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelso, C. (1997). The 1995 Leona Tyler address: The making of a scientist in applied psychology: An attribute by treatment conception. The Counseling Psychologist, 25, 307–320. 10.1177/0011000097252013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelso, C. (2006). On the making of a scientist–practitioner: A theory of research training in professional psychology. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, S, 3–16. 10.1037/1931-3918.S.1.3
   Google Scholar
• Gelso, C. (2011). Emerging and continuing trends in psychotherapy. Psychotherapy, 48, 82–187.
   Google Scholar
• Gelso, C., Baumann, E., Chui, H., & Savela, A. (2013). The making of a scientist–psychotherapist: The research training environment and the psychotherapist. Psychotherapy, 50, 139–149. 10.1037/a0028257
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldfried, M., & Wolfe, B. (1998). Toward a more clinically valid approach to therapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 143–150. 10.1037/0022-006X.66.1.143
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guidi, J., & Fava, G. (2014). Emerging trends in clinical psychology. Revista di Psichiatra, 49, 227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halpern, D., Smothergill, D., Allen, M., Baker, S., Baum, C., Best, D., ... Weaver, K. (1998). Scholarship in psychology: A paradigm for the twenty-first century. American Psychologist, 53, 1292–1297. 10.1037/0003-066X.53.12.1292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henrich, J., Heine, S., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 1–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henton, I. (2012). Practice-based research and counselling psychology. Counselling Psychology Review, 27, 11–28.
   Google Scholar
• Heppner, P., Carter, J., Claiborn, C., Brooks, L., Gelso, C., Fassinger, R., ... Galassi, J. (1992). A proposal to integrate science and practice in counseling psychology. The Counseling Psychologist, 20, 107–122. 10.1177/0011000092201017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Himelein, M., & Putnam, E. (2001). Work activities of academic clinical psychologists: Do they practice what they teach? Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 32, 537–542. 10.1037/0735-7028.32.5.537
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoshmand, L., & Polkinghorne, D. (1992). Redefining the science–practice relationship and professional training. American Psychologist, 47, 55–66. 10.1037/0003-066X.47.1.55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, G. (1986). The scientist–practitioner in counseling psychology: Toward a deeper integration of theory, research, and practice. The Counseling Psychologist, 14, 61–105. 10.1177/0011000086141006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarmon, H., & Halgin, R. (1987). The role of the psychology department clinic in training scientist–professionals. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 18, 509–514. 10.1037/0735-7028.18.5.509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, J., & Mehr, S. (2007). Foundations and assumptions of the scientist–practitioner model. American Behavioral Scientist, 50, 766–771. 10.1177/0002764206296454
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer, U., Berthoud, L., Koch, N., Michaud, L., Guex, P., & Despland, J. (2013). Monitoring the effects of adult psychotherapy in routine practice in Switzerland: A feasibility trial. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 13, 145–150. 10.1080/14733145.2012.729849
   Google Scholar
• Levant, R., & Hasan, N. (2008). Evidence-based practice in psychology. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 39, 658–662. 10.1037/0735-7028.39.6.658
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, C., & Hollin, C. (1995). Single case design: A critique of methodology and analysis of recent trends. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 2, 177–191. 10.1002/cpp.v2:3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, C., & Hollin, C. (1997). The scientist–practitioner model in clinical psychology: A critique. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 4, 75–83. 10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowman, R. (2012). The scientist–practitioner consulting psychologist. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 64, 151–156. 10.1037/a0030365
   Google Scholar
• Maddux, R., & Riso, L. (2007). Promoting the scientist–practitioner mindset in clinical training. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 37, 213–220. 10.1007/s10879-007-9056-y
   Google Scholar
• Matson, J., Malone, C., González, M., McClure, D., Laud, R., & Minshawi, N. (2005). Clinical psychology PhD program rankings: Evaluating eminence on faculty publications and citations. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 26, 503–513. 10.1016/j.ridd.2004.09.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCabe, O. L. (2004). Crossing the quality chasm in behavioral health care: The role of evidence-based practice. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 35, 571–579. 10.1037/0735-7028.35.6.571
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonnell, L., Stratton, P., Butler, S., & Cape, N. (2012). Developing research-informed practitioners – An organisational perspective. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 12, 167–177.
   Google Scholar
• McFall, R. (2006). Doctoral training in clinical psychology. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 2, 21–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merlo, L., Collins, A., & Bernstein, J. (2008). CUDCP-affiliated clinical psychology student views of their science training. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 2, 58–65. 10.1037/1931-3918.2.1.58
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moran, P. (2011). Bridging the gap between research and practice in counselling and psychotherapy training: Learning from trainees. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 11, 171–178. 10.1080/14733145.2010.509510
   Google Scholar
• Myers, D. (2007). Implication of the scientist–practitioner model in counseling psychology training and practice. American Behavioral Scientist, 50, 789–796. 10.1177/0002764206296457
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norcross, J., Klonsky, E., & Tropiano, H. (2008). The research–practice gap. The Clinical Psychologist, 61, 14–17.
   Google Scholar
• O’Sullivan, J., & Quevillon, R. (1992). 40 years later: Is the Boulder model still alive? American Psychologist, 47, 67–70. 10.1037/0003-066X.47.1.67
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Overholser, J. C. (2007). The Boulder model in academia: Struggling to integrate the science and practice of psychology. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 37, 205–211. 10.1007/s10879-007-9055-z
   Google Scholar
• Overholser, J. C. (2008). Advancing the field of psychotherapy through innovation and integration in scholarly works. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 38, 97–104. 10.1007/s10879-007-9074-9
   Google Scholar
• Overholser, J. C. (2010a). Ten criteria to qualify as a scientist–practitioner in clinical psychology: An immodest proposal for objective standards. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 40, 51–59. 10.1007/s10879-009-9127-3
   Google Scholar
• Overholser, J. C. (2010b). Stop maligning and start aligning with the ideals of the Boulder model. The Specialist, 29, 17–18.
   Google Scholar
• Overholser, J. C. (2010c). Clinical expertise: A preliminary attempt to clarify its core elements. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 40, 131–139. 10.1007/s10879-009-9129-1
   Google Scholar
• Overholser, J. C. (2012). Behind a thin veneer: What lurks beneath the scientist–practitioner label? Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 42, 271–279. 10.1007/s10879-012-9211-y
   Google Scholar
• Overholser, J. C. (2014). Protesting the decline while predicting the demise of clinical psychology: Can we avoid a total collapse? Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 44, 273–281. 10.1007/s10879-014-9270-3
   Google Scholar
• Parker, L., & Detterman, D. (1988). The balance between clinical and research interests among Boulder model graduate students. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 19, 342–344. 10.1037/0735-7028.19.3.342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, N. (1990). Scientist–practitioner training. The Clinical Psychologist, 43, 47–49.
   Google Scholar
• Petersen, C. (2007). A historical look at psychology and the scientist–practitioner model. American Behavioral Scientist, 50, 758–765. 10.1177/0002764206296453
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, D., & Knudson, R. (1979). Work preferences of clinical psychologists. Professional Psychology, 10, 175–182. 10.1037/0735-7028.10.2.175
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, R. (2001). On the use of college students in social science research: Insights from a second-order meta-analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 28, 450–461. 10.1086/jcr.2001.28.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, B. (1989). Role of the practitioner in applying science to practice. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 20, 3–8. 10.1037/0735-7028.20.1.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raimy, V. (1950). Training in clinical psychology. New York, NY: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Reybold, L. (2005). Surrendering the dream: Early career conflict and faculty dissatisfaction thresholds. Journal of Career Development, 32, 107–121. 10.1177/0894845305279163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rozin, P. (2009). What kind of empirical research should we publish, fund, and reward? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 435–439. 10.1111/ppsc.2009.4.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheel, M., Berman, M., Friedlander, M., Conoley, C., Duan, C., & Whiston, S. (2011). Whatever happened to counseling in counseling psychology? The Counseling Psychologist, 39, 673–692. 10.1177/0011000010380278
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skovholt, T., Rønnestad, M., & Jennings, L. (1997). Searching for expertise in counseling, psychotherapy, and professional psychology. Educational Psychology Review, 9, 361–369. 10.1023/A:1024798723295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, P., Roberts, M., & Roy, K. (2007). Scholarly productivity in psychology. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 14, 157–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, G. (2006). The scientist–practitioner in context. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 19, 305–312. 10.1080/09515070600960522
   Google Scholar
• Tanner, P., & Danielson, M. (2007). Components necessary for the preparation of the scientist–practitioner. American Behavioral Scientist, 50, 772–777. 10.1177/0002764206296455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, M. (1998). Moving beyond modernist discourses in psychological therapy: Challenging the British version of counselling psychology and its training. European Journal of Psychotherapy, Counseling & Health, 1, 435–457.
   Google Scholar
• Unsworth, G., Cowie, H., & Green, A. (2012). Therapists’ and clients’ perceptions of routine outcome measurement in the NHS: A qualitative study. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 12, 71–80. 10.1080/14733145.2011.565125
   Google Scholar
• Vespia, K. (2006). Integrating professional identities: Counselling psychologist, scientist–practitioner and undergraduate educator. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 19, 265–280. 10.1080/09515070600960555
   Google Scholar
• Vespia, K., & Sauer, E. (2006). Defining characteristic or unrealistic ideal: Historical and contemporary perspectives on scientist–practitioner training in counselling psychology. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 19, 229–251. 10.1080/09515070600960449
   Google Scholar
• Westen, D., Novotny, C., & Thompson-Brenner, H. (2004). The empirical status of empirically supported psychotherapies: Assumptions, findings, and reporting in controlled clinical trials. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 631–663. 10.1037/0033-2909.130.4.631
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar