Object lessons: Spelke principles and psychological explanation

References

• Baillargeon R 1995 A model of physical reasoning in infancy In C. Rovee-Collier & L. Lipsitt (Eds.) Advances in infancy research 9 pp. 305–371 Norwood NJ Ablex
   Google Scholar
• Baillargeon , R and Graber , M . 1987 . Where is the rabbit? 5.5-month-old infants’ representation of the height of a hidden object . Cognitive Development , 2 : 375 – 392 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bermúdez JL 2003 Thinking without words Oxford England Oxford University Press
   Google Scholar
• Carey , S and Xu , F . 2001 . Infants’ knowledge of objects: Beyond object files and object tracking . Cognition , 80 : 179 – 213 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chomsky N 1965 Aspects of the theory of syntax Cambridge MA MIT Press
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky N 1980 Rules and representations New York Columbia University Press
   Google Scholar
• Cummins R 1983 The nature of psychological explanation Cambridge MA MIT Press
   Google Scholar
• Dennett D 1981 A cure for the common code. Reprinted in Brainstorms: Philosophical essays on mind and psychology Cambridge MA MIT Press
   Google Scholar
• Dienes , Z and Perner , J . 1999 . A theory of implicit and explicit knowledge . Behavioral and Brain Sciences , 22 ( 5 ) : 735 – 755 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans G 1982 The varieties of reference Oxford England Oxford University Press
   Google Scholar
• Feigenson , L , Carey , S and Hauser , M . 2002 . The representations underlying infants’ choice of more: Object files vs. analog magnitudes . Psychological Science , 13 : 150 – 156 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field H 1978 Mental representation In Ned Block (Ed.) Readings in philosophy of psychology Cambridge MA Harvard University Press
   Google Scholar
• Fodor , J . 1968 . The appeal to tacit knowledge in psychological explanation . Journal of Philosophy , 65 : 627 – 640 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fodor J 1975 The language of thought Cambridge MA Harvard University Press
   Google Scholar
• Fodor J 1983 Modularity of mind Cambridge MA MIT Press
   Google Scholar
• Fodor J 1985 Fodor's guide to mental representation Reprinted in Alvin Goldman (Ed.) Readings in philosophy and cognitive science Cambridge MA MIT Press
   Google Scholar
• Fodor J 2000 The mind doesn’t work that way: The scope and limits of computational psychology Cambridge MA MIT Press
   Google Scholar
• Gleitman H 1987 Basic psychology (2nd ed.) New York Norton
   Google Scholar
• Gopnik A Meltzoff A 1997 Words, thoughts, and theories Cambridge MA MIT Press
   Google Scholar
• Hadley , R . 1995 . The ‘explicit-implicit’ distinction . Minds and Machines , 5 : 219 – 242 .
   Google Scholar
• Hildreth E Ullman S 1989 The computational study of vision In M. Posner (Ed.) Foundations of cognitive science Cambridge MA MIT Press
   Google Scholar
• Kirsh D 1990 When is information explicitly represented? In P. Hanson (Ed.) Information, language, and cognition Vancouver Canada University of British Columbia Press
   Google Scholar
• Marr D 1982 Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information New York Freeman
   Google Scholar
• Matthews RJ 1991 Psychological reality of grammars In A. Kasher (Ed.) The Chomskyan turn Oxford England Blackwell
   Google Scholar
• Morgan CL 1894 An introduction to comparative psychology London Walter Scott
   Google Scholar
• Pylyshyn , ZW . 1994 . Some primitive mechanisms of visuospatial attention . Cognition , 50 : 364 – 384 .
   Google Scholar
• Pylyshyn , ZW . 1999 . Is vision continuous with cognition? The case for cognitive impenetrability of visual perception . Behavioral and Brain Sciences , 22 ( 3 ) : 341 – 423 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quine WVO 1960 Word and object Cambridge MA MIT Press
   Google Scholar
• Rizzolatti , G , Fogassi , L and Gallese , V . 2001 . Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action . Nature Reviews Neuroscience , 2 : 661 – 670 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholl BJ Leslie AM 1999 Explaining the infant's object concept: Beyond the perception/cognition dichotomy In E. Lepore & Z. Pylyshyn (Eds.) What is cognitive science? Oxford England Blackwell
   Google Scholar
• Smith E 1995 Concepts and categorization In E. Smith & D. Osherson (Eds.) An invitation to cognitive science, Vol. 3: Thinking Cambridge MA MIT Press
   Google Scholar
• Spelke ES 1988 Where perceiving ends and thinking begins: The apprehension of objects in infancy In A. Yonas (Ed.) Perceptual development in infancy pp. 197–234 Hillsdale NJ Erlbaum
   Google Scholar
• Spelke E Gutheil G Van de Walle G 1995a The development of object perception In S. Kosslyn & D. Osherson (Eds.) Visual cognition Cambridge MA MIT Press
   Google Scholar
• Spelke , E , Kestenbaum , R , Simons , DJ and Wein , D . 1995b . Spatiotemporal continuity, smoothness of motion and object identity in infancy . British Journal of Developmental Psychology , 13 : 113 – 142 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spelke E Van de Walle G 1993 Perceiving and reasoning about objects: Insights from infants In N. Eilan, R. McCarthy, & B. Brewer (Eds.) Spatial representation: Problems in philosophy and psychology Oxford England Oxford University Press
   Google Scholar
• Sperber D 1994 The modularity of thought and the epidemiology of representations In L. A. Hirschfeld & S. A. Gelman (Eds.) Mapping the mind: Domain specificity in cognition and culture pp. 39–67 Cambridge England Cambridge University Press
   Google Scholar
• Stabler , E . 1983 . How are grammars represented? . Behavioral and Brain Sciences , 6 : 391 – 421 .
   Google Scholar
• Stich , S . 1978 . Beliefs and subdoxastic states . Philosophy of Science , 45 : 495 – 518 .
   Google Scholar
• Streri , A and Spelke , ES . 1988 . Haptic perception of objects in infancy . Cognitive Psychology , 20 : 1 – 23 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Leeuwen C 1998 Perception In W. Bechtel & G. Graham (Eds.) A companion to cognitive science Oxford England Blackwell
   Google Scholar
• Winograd T 1975 Frame representations and the declarative–procedural controversy In D. G. Bobrow & A. Collins (Eds.) Representation and understanding pp. 185–210 New York Academic Press
   Google Scholar
• Xu , F . 1997 . From lot's wife to a pillar of salt: Evidence that physical object is a sortal concept . Mind and Language , 12 : 365 – 392 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar