524
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Vision and abstraction: an empirical refutation of Nico Orlandi’s non-cognitivism

&

References

  • Carrasco, M., Ling, S., & Read, S. (2004). Attention alters appearance. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 308–313.
  • Cavanagh, P. (1992). Attention-based motion perception. Science, 257, 1563–1565.
  • Chemero, A. (2000). Anti-representationalism and the dynamical stance. Philosophy of Science, 67(4), 625–647.
  • Degenaar, J., & Myin, E. (2014). Representation-hunger reconsidered. Synthese, 191(15), 1–10.
  • Duncan, J. (1998). Converging levels of analysis in the cognitive neuroscience of visual attention. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 353, 1307–1317.
  • Farennikova, A. (2013). Seeing absence. Philosophical Studies, 166(3), 429–454.
  • Fiser, J., & Aslin, R. N. (2001). Unsupervised statistical learning of higher-order spatial structures from visual scenes. Psychological Science, 12, 499–504.
  • Hutto, D. D., & Myin, E. (2014). Neural representations not needed: No more pleas, please. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 13(2), 241–256.
  • Kok, P., Brouwer, G. J., van Gerven, M. A., & de Lange, F. P. (2013). Prior expectations bias sensory representations in visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 33(41), 16275–16284.
  • Luck, S. J., & Ford, M. A. (1998). On the role of selective attention in visual perception. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 95, 825–830.
  • Milner, A. D., & Goodale, M. A. (2006). The visual brain in action (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Mitroff, S. R., & Scholl, B. J. (2003). Seeing the disappearance of unseen objects. Perception, 33(10), 1267–1273.
  • O’Connor, D. H., Fukui, M. M., Pinsk, M. A., & Kastner, S. (2002). Attention modulates responses in the human lateral geniculate nucleus. Nature neuroscience, 5(11), 1203–1209.
  • O’Regan, J. K. (1992). Solving the ‘real’ mysteries of visual perception: The world as an outside memory. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 46(3), 461–488.
  • Orlandi, N. (2014). The innocent eye: Why vision is not a cognitive process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Ruff, C. (2011). A systems-neuroscience view of attention. In C. Mole, D. Smithies, & W. Wu (Eds.), Attention: Philosophical and psychological essays (pp. 1–23). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Sorenson, R. (2009). Hearing silence: The perception and introspection of absences. In M. Nudds & C. O’Callaghan (Eds.), Sounds and perception: New philosophical essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Turk-Browne, N. B., Jungé, J., & Scholl, B. J. (2005). The automaticity of visual statistical learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 552–564.
  • Wu, W. (2014). Attention. London: Routledge.
  • Zhao, J., Al-Aidroos, N., & Turk-Browne, N. B. (2013). Attention is spontaneously biased toward regularities. Psychological Science, 24, 667–677.
  • Zhao, J., Cakal, S., & Yu, R. (2015). Statistical regularities merge object representation. Manuscript submitted for publication.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.