Innateness as a natural cognitive kind

References

• Ariew, A. (1999). Innateness is canalization: In defense of a developmental account of innateness. In V. G. Hardcastle (Ed.), Where biology meets psychology: Philosophical essays (pp. 178–138). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ariew, A. (2006). Innateness. In M. Matthen & C. Stephens (Eds.), Philosophy of biology (pp. 567–584). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, M. C. (2001). The atoms of language: The mind’s hidden rules of grammar. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bateson, P., & Mameli, M. (2007). The innate and the acquired: Useful clusters or a residual distinction from folk biology? Developmental Psychobiology, 49, 818–831.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd, R. (1989). What realism implies and what it does not. Dialectica, 43, 5–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carey, S. (2009). The origin of concepts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chiandetti, C., & Valortigara, G. (2008). Is there an innate geometric module? Effects of experience with angular geometric cues on spatial re-orientation based on the shape of the environment. Animal Cognition, 11, 139–146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, J. (2005). Nativism: In defense of a biological understanding. Philosophical Psychology, 18, 157–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowie, F. (1999). What’s within? Nativism reconsidered. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Craver, C. (2009). Mechanisms and natural kinds. Philosophical Psychology, 22, 575–594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earman, J. (1977). Against indeterminacy. Journal of Philosophy, 74, 535–538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earman, J., & Friedman, M. (1973). The meaning and status of Newton’s law of inertia and the nature of gravitational forces. Philosophy of Science, 40, 329–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fodor, J. (1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths, P. E. (2002). What is innateness? Monist, 85, 70–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffiths, P. E. & Machery, E. (2008). Innateness, canalization and ‘biologicizing the mind’. Philosophical Psychology, 23, 397–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffiths, P. E., Machery, E., & Linquist, S. (2009). The vernacular concept of innateness. Mind & Language, 24, 605–630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffiths, P. E., & Stotz, K. (2008). Experimental philosophy of science. Philosophy Compass, 3(3), 507–521.
   Google Scholar
• Hermer, L., & Spelke, E. (1996). Modularity and development: The case of spatial reorientation. Cognition, 61, 195–232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalidi, M. A. (2002). Nature and nurture in cognition. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 53, 251–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalidi, M. A. (2007). Innate cognitive capacities. Mind & Language, 22, 92–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalidi, M. A. (2013). Natural categories and human kinds: Classification in the natural and social sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kitcher, P. (1997). The lives to come: The genetic revolution and human possibilities. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knobe, J. & Samuels, R. (2013). Thinking like a scientist: Innateness as a case study. Cognition, 126, 72–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurence, S., & Margolis, E. (2001). The poverty of the stimulus argument. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 52, 217–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, P., Dunham, Y., & Carey, S. (2009). Of substance: The nature of language effects on entity construal. Cognitive Psychology, 58, 487–524.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linquist, S., Machery, E., Griffiths, P. E., & Stotz, K. (2011). Exploring the folkbiological conception of human nature. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 366, 444–453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machamer, P., Darden, L., & Craver, C. F. (2000). Thinking about mechanisms. Philosophy of Science, 67, 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallon, R., & Weinberg, J. M. (2006). Innateness as closed process invariance. Philosophy of Science, 73, 323–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mameli, M. (2008). On innateness: The clutter hypothesis and the cluster hypothesis. Journal of Philosophy, 105, 719–736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mameli, M., & Bateson, P. E. (2006). Innateness and the sciences. Biology and Philosophy, 21, 155–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mameli, M., & Bateson, P. E. (2011). An evaluation of the concept of innateness. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 366, 436–443.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Partanen, E., Kujala, T., Tervaniemi, M., & Huotilainen, M. (2013). Prenatal music exposure induces long-term neural effects. PLoS ONE, 8(10), e78946.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radick, G. (2012). Should ‘heredity’ and ‘inheritance’ be biological terms? William Bateson’s change of mind as a historical and philosophical problem. Philosophy of Science, 79, 714–724.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuels, R. (2002). Innateness in cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 136–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuels, R. (2007). Is innateness a confused notion? In P. Carruthers, S. Laurence, & S. Stich (Eds.), The innate mind: Foundations and the future (Vol. 3, pp. 17–36). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shea, N. (2012a). New thinking, innateness, and inherited representation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 367, 2234–2244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shea, N. (2012b). Genetic representation explains the cluster of innateness-related properties. Mind & Language, 27, 466–493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shea, N. (2013). Inherited representations are read in development. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 64, 1–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spelke, E. S., & Newport, E. L. (1998). Nativism, empiricism, and the development of knowledge. In R. M. Lerner (Ed.) Handbook of child psychology: Theoretical models of human development (Vol. 1, pp. 275–340). New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Stich, S. P. (1975). Introduction: The idea of innateness. In S. P. Stich (Ed.), Innate ideas (pp. 1–24). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weinberg, J. M., & Mallon, R. (2008). Living with innateness (and environmental dependence too). Philosophical Psychology, 21, 415–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werker, J. F., & Tees, R. C. (2005). Speech perception as a window for understanding plasticity and commitment in language systems of the brain. Developmental Psychobiology, 46, 233–251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wimsatt, W. C. (1999). Generativity, entrenchment, innateness, and evolution: Philosophy, evolutionary biology, and conceptual foundations of science. In V. G. Hardcastle (Ed.), Where biology meets psychology: Philosophical essays (pp. 137–179). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wiser, M. (1988). The differentiation of heat and temperature: History of science and novice-expert shift. In S. Strauss (Ed.), Ontogeny, phylogeny, and historical development (pp. 28–48). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Wiser, M., & Carey, S. (1983). When heat and temperature were one. In D. Gentner & A. L. Stevens (Eds.), Mental models (pp. 267–297). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar