References
- Aizawa, K. (2003). The systematicity arguments. Boston, MA: Kluwer.
- Colombo, M. (2009). Does embeddedness tell against computationalism? A tale of bees and sea hares. AISB09 Proceedings of the 2nd Symposium on Computing and Philosophy (pp. 16–21). Edinburgh, Scotland: Society for the Study of Artificial Intelligence and the Simulation of Behaviour.
- Colombo, M. (2013). Moving forward (and beyond) the modularity debate: A network perspective. Philosophy of Science, 80(3), 356–377.
- Eliasmith, C. (2012). The complex systems approach: rhetoric or revolution. Topics in Cognitive Science, 4(1), 72–77.
- Fodor, J. A., & McLaughlin, B. (1990). Connectionism and the problem of systematicity: Why Smolensky’s solution doesn’t work. Cognition, 35(2), 183–204.
- Fodor, J. A., & Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1988). Connectionism and cognitive architecture: A critical analysis. Cognition, 28(1–2), 3–71.
- Johnson, K. (2004). On the systematicity of language and thought. Journal of Philosophy, 101, 111–139.
- Smolensky, P., & Legendre, G. (2006). The harmonic mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.