References
- Cokely, E. T., & Feltz, A. (2009). Individual differences, judgment biases, and theory-of-mind: Deconstructing the intentional action side effect asymmetry. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(1), 18–24.
- Cokely, E. T., Galesic, M., Schulz, E., Ghazal, S., & Garcia-Retamero, R. (2012). Measuring Risk Literacy: The Berlin Numeracy Test. Judgment and Decision Making, 7(1), 25–47.
- Feltz, A. (2013). Pereboom and premises: Asking the right questions in the experimental philosophy of free will. Consciousness and Cognition, 22(1), 53–63.
- Feltz, A. (2015). Experimental philosophy of actual and counterfactual free will intuitions. Consciousness and Cognition, 36, 113–130.
- Feltz, A., & Cokely, E. T. (2009). Do judgments about freedom and responsibility depend on who you are? Personality differences in intuitions about compatibilism and incompatibilism. Consciousness and Cognition, 18(1), 342–350.
- Feltz, A., & Cokely, E. T. (2011). Individual differences in theory-of-mind judgments: Order effects and side effects. Philosophical Psychology, 24, 343–355.
- Feltz, A., & Cokely, E. T. (2012). The philosophical personality argument. Philosophical Studies, 161(2), 227–246.
- Feltz, A., & Cokely, E. T. (2013). Predicting philosophical disagreement. Philosophy. Compass, 8, 978–989.
- Feltz, A., & Millan, M. (2015). An error theory for compatibilist intuitions. Philosophical Psychology, 28(4), 529–555.
- Kane, R. (1996). The significance of free will. New York: Oxford University Press.
- McKenna, M. (2008). A hard-line reply to Pereboom’s four-case Manipulation Argument. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 77(1), 142–159.
- Miller, J. S., & Feltz, A. (2011). Frankfurt and the folk: An experimental investigation of Frankfurt-style cases. Consciousness and Cognition, 20(2), 401–414.
- Russell, P. (2013). Compatibilist-fatalism: Finitued, pessimism, and the limits of free will. In P. Russell, & O. Deery (Eds.), The philosophy of free will (pp. 450–568). New York: Oxford University Press.
- Sommers, T. (2012). Relative justice: Cultural diversity, free will, and moral responsiblity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Weinberg, J., Nichols, S., & Stich, S. P. (2001). Normativity and epistemic intuitions. Philosophical Topics, 29, 429–460.
- Woolfolk, R. L., Doris, J. M., & Darley, J. M. (2006). Identification, situational constraint, and social cognition: Studies in the attribution of moral responsibility. Cognition, 100(2), 283–301.