Are epistemic emotions metacognitive?

References

• Allen, T., & Fortin, N. (2013). The evolution of episodic memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110, 10379–10386.10.1073/pnas.1301199110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alter, A., & Oppenheimer, D. (2009). Uniting the tribes of fluency to form a metacognitive nation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13, 219–235.10.1177/1088868309341564
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bar, M., Kassam, K., Ghuman, A., Boshyan, J., Schmid, A., Dale, A., … Halgren, E. (2006). Top-down facilitation of visual recognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103, 449–454.10.1073/pnas.0507062103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bednekoff, P., & Balda, R. (1997). Clark’s nutcracker spatial memory: Many errors might not be due to forgetting. Animal Behaviour, 54, 691–698.10.1006/anbe.1997.0473
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beran, M., Perdue, B., Church, B., & Smith, J. D. (2016). Capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) modulate their use of an uncertainty response depending on risk. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Learning and Cognition, 42, 32–43.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carruthers, P. (2008). Meta-cognition in animals: A skeptical look. Mind & Language, 23, 58–89.10.1111/mila.2008.23.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carruthers, P. (2013). Mindreading in infancy. Mind & Language, 28, 141–172.10.1111/mila.2013.28.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carruthers, P. (2015). The centered mind: What the science of working memory shows us about the nature of human thought. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198738824.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Carruthers, P. (forthcoming). Valence and value.
   Google Scholar
• Carruthers, P., Fletcher, L., & Ritchie, J. B. (2012). The evolution of self-knowledge. Philosophical Topics, 40, 13–37.10.5840/philtopics201240212
   Google Scholar
• Carruthers, P., & Ritchie, J. B. (2012). The emergence of metacognition: Affect and uncertainty in animals. In M. Beran, J. Brandl, J. Perner, & J. Proust (Eds.), Foundations of metacognition (pp. 76–93). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199646739.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Cheeseman, J., Millar, C., Greggers, U., Lehmann, K., Pawley, M., Gallistel, C., … Menzel, R. (2014). Way-finding in displaced clock-shifted bees proves bees use a cognitive map. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111, 8949–8954.10.1073/pnas.1408039111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, A. (2013). Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36, 181–204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clayton, N., Dally, J., Gilbert, J., & Dickinson, A. (2005). Food caching by western scrub-jays (Aphelocoma californica) is sensitive to the conditions at recovery. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 31, 115–124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clayton, N., Yu, K., & Dickinson, A. (2001). Scrub jays (Aphelocoma coerulescens) form integrated memories of the multiple features of caching episodes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 27, 17–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clayton, N., Yu, K., & Dickinson, A. (2003). Interacting cache memories: Evidence for flexible memory use by western scrub-jays (Aphelocoma californica). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 29, 14–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbetta, M., Patel, G., & Shulman, G. (2008). The reorienting system of the human brain: From environment to theory of mind. Neuron, 58, 306–324.10.1016/j.neuron.2008.04.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couchman, J., Beran, M., Coutinho, M., Boomer, J., & Smith, J. D. (2012). Evidence for animal metaminds. In M. Beran, J. Brandl, J. Perner, & J. Proust (Eds.), Foundations of metacognition (pp. 21–35). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199646739.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Couchman, J., Coutinho, M., Beran, M., & Smith, J. D. (2009). Metacognition is prior. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32, 142.10.1017/S0140525X09000594
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damasio, A. (1994). Descartes’ error. New York, NY: Putnam.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, D. (1982). Rational animals. Dialectica, 36, 317–327.10.1111/dltc.1982.36.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunlosky, J., & Metcalfe, J. (2009). Metacognition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ekman, P. (1992). Are there basic emotions? Psychological Review, 99, 550–553.10.1037/0033-295X.99.3.550
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J., & Stanovich, K. (2013). Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 223–241.10.1177/1745691612460685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flavell, J. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906–911.10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, D., & Wilson, T. (2005). Affective forecasting: Knowing what to want. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 131–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, D., & Wilson, T. (2007). Prospection: Experiencing the future. Science, 317, 1351–1354.10.1126/science.1144161
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman, A. (2006). Simulating minds. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0195138929.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Goldman-Rakic, P. (1995). Cellular basis of working memory. Neuron, 14, 477–485.10.1016/0896-6273(95)90304-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman-Rakic, P., Funahashi, S., & Bruce, C. (1990). Neocortical memory circuits. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology, 55, 1025–1038.10.1101/SQB.1990.055.01.097
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goupil, L., Romand-Monnier, M., & Kouider, S. (2016). Infants ask for help when they know they don’t know. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113, 3492–3496.10.1073/pnas.1515129113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hampton, R. (2001). Rhesus monkeys know when they remember. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98, 5359–5362.10.1073/pnas.071600998
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hampton, R. (2005). Can Rhesus monkeys discriminate between remembering and forgetting? In H. Terrace & J. Metcalfe (Eds.), The missing link in cognition (pp. 272–295). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hampton, R. (2009). Multiple demonstrations of metacognition in nonhumans: Converging evidence or multiple mechanisms? Comparative Cognition and Behavior Reviews, 4, 17–28.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hills, T. (2006). Animal foraging and the evolution of goal-directed cognition. Cognitive Science, 30, 3–41.10.1207/s15516709cog0000_50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hills, T., & Dukas, R. (2012). The evolution of cognitive search. In P. Todd, T. Hills, & T. Robbins (Eds.), Cognitive search: Evolution, algorithms, and the brain (pp. 11–24). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Izard, C. (1977). Human emotions. New York, NY: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4899-2209-0
   Google Scholar
• Jeannerod, M. (2006). Motor cognition. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198569657.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Knudsen, E. (2007). Fundamental components of attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 30, 57–78.10.1146/annurev.neuro.30.051606.094256
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kok, P., Brouwer, G., van Gerven, M., & de Lange, F. (2013). Prior expectations bias sensory representations in visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 33, 16275–16284.10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0742-13.2013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kornell, N. (2014). Where is the “meta” in animal metacognition? Journal of Comparative Psychology, 128, 143–149.10.1037/a0033444
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krachun, C., & Call, J. (2009). Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) know what can be seen from where. Animal Cognition, 12, 317–331.10.1007/s10071-008-0192-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, D., & Glimcher, P. (2012). The root of all value: A neural common currency for choice. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 22, 1027–1038.10.1016/j.conb.2012.06.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menzel, R., Greggers, U., Smith, A., Berger, S., Brandt, R., Brunke, S., … Watzl, S. (2005). Honey bees navigate according to a map-like spatial memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102, 3040–3045.10.1073/pnas.0408550102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, C., Legare, C., Bills, M., & Mejias, C. (2010). Preschoolers use questions as a tool to acquire knowledge from different sources. Journal of Cognition and Development, 11, 533–560.10.1080/15248372.2010.516419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milner, D., & Goodale, M. (1995). The visual brain in action. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mischiati, M., Lin, H. T., Herold, P., Imler, E., Olberg, R., & Leonardo, A. (2015). Internal models direct dragonfly interception steering. Nature, 517, 333–338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mysore, S., & Knudsen, E. (2013). A shared inhibitory circuit for both exogenous and endogenous control of stimulus selection. Nature Neuroscience, 16, 473–478.10.1038/nn.3352
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagel, J. (2014). The meanings of metacognition. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 89, 710–718.10.1111/phpr.2014.89.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, T., & Narens, L. (1990). Metamemory: A theoretical framework and new findings. In G. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and information (vol. 26, pp. 125–174). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Panksepp, J. (1998). Affective neuroscience. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Perner, J. (2012). MiniMeta: In search of minimal criteria for metacognition. In M. Beran, J. Brandl, J. Perner, & J. Proust (Eds.), Foundations of metacognition (pp. 94–116). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199646739.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Perry, C., & Barron, A. (2013). Honey bees selectively avoid difficult choices. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110, 19155–19159.10.1073/pnas.1314571110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proust, J. (2012). Metacognition and mindreading: One or two functions? In M. Beran, J. Brandl, J. Perner, & J. Proust (Eds.), Foundations of metacognition (pp. 234–251). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199646739.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Proust, J. (2014). The Philosophy of metacognition. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seligman, M., Railton, P., Baumeister, R., & Sripada, C. (2013). Navigating into the future or driven by the past. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 119–141.10.1177/1745691612474317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J. D. (2005). Studies of uncertainty monitoring and metacognition in animals and humans. In H. Terrace & J. Metcalfe (Eds.), The missing link in cognition (pp. 242–271). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J. D., Beran, M., Couchman, J., & Coutinho, M. (2008). The comparative study of metacognition: Sharper paradigms, safer inferences. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 679–691.10.3758/PBR.15.4.679
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J. D., Shields, W., & Washburn, D. (2003). The comparative psychology of uncertainty monitoring and meta-cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 26, 317–373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sober, E., & Wilson, D. (1999). Unto others: The evolution and psychology of unselfish behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Topolinski, S., & Strack, F. (2009). The architecture of intuition: Fluency and affect determine intuitive judgments of semantic and visual coherence and judgments of grammaticality in artificial grammar learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 39–63.10.1037/a0014678
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar