References
- Booth, D. (in press). The multiple realization book. Philosophical Psychology. DOI: 10.1080/09515089.2017.1381677.
- Chirimuuta, M. (in press). Marr, Mayr, and MR: What functionalism should now be about. Philosophical Psychology. doi:10.1080/09515089.2017.1381679.
- Couch, M. (2018). Some concerns with Polger and Shapiro’s view. Philosophical Psychology. doi:10.1080/09515089.2017.1381678.
- Fodor, J. (1974). Special sciences, or the disunity of science as a working hypothesis. Synthese, 28, 97–115.10.1007/BF00485230
- Janssen, A., Klein, C., & Slors, M. (2017). What is a cognitive ontology, anyway? Philosophical Explorations, 20(2), 23–128.
- Levin, J. (2016). Review of the multiple realization book. In Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews (p. 12). Retrieved from http://ndpr.nd.edu/news/the-multiple-realization-book/
- Maddy, P. (2007). Second philosophy: A naturalistic method. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199273669.001.0001
- Putnam, H. (1967). Psychological predicates. Reprinted as “The nature of mental states.” In H. Putnam (Ed.), Mind, language, and reality: Philosophical papers (Vol. 2, pp. 429–440). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Quine, W. V. O. (1948). On what there is. The Review of Metaphysics, 2(5), 21–38.
- Shapiro, L. (2004). The mind incarnate. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.