Advanced search
Publication Cover
Philosophical Psychology Volume 32, 2019 - Issue 2
Submit an article Journal homepage
151
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Article

Objective and epistemic gradability: Is the new angle on the Knobe effect empirically grounded?

Tomasz ZyglewiczInstitute of Philosophy, Warsaw University, Warsaw, PolandCorrespondence[email protected]
ORCID Iconhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-5656-3561View further author information
ORCID Icon &
Bartosz MaćkiewiczInstitute of Philosophy, Warsaw University, Warsaw, PolandORCID Iconhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-9460-5742View further author information
ORCID Icon
Pages 234-256 | Received 19 Dec 2017, Accepted 20 Jun 2018, Published online: 07 Nov 2018

References

  • Anscombe, G. E. (1957). Intention. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Brennan, G., Eriksson, L., Goodin, R. E., & Southwood, N. (2013). Explaining norms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Cova, F. (2017). Intentional action and the frame-of-mind argument: New experimental challenges to Hindriks. Philosophical Explorations, 20(1), 35–53.
  • Davidson, D. (1980). Essays on actions and events. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Ginet, C. (1990). On action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Goldman, A. I. (1970). A theory of human action. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Hindriks, F. (2008). Intentional action and the praise-blame asymmetry. Philosophical Quarterly, 58, 630–641.
  • Hindriks, F. (2011). Control, intentional action, and moral responsibility. Philosophical Psychology, 24(6), 787–801.
  • Hindriks, F. (2014). Normativity in action: How to explain the Knobe effect and its relatives. Mind & Language, 29(1), 51–72.
  • Hindriks, F. (2018). Explanatory unification in experimental philosophy: Let’s keep it real. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-018-0397-0
  • Hindriks, F., Douven, I., & Singmann, H. (2016). A new angle on the Knobe effect: Intentionality correlates with blame, not with praise. Mind and Language, 31, 204–220.
  • Holton, R. (2010). Norms and the Knobe effect. Analysis, 70, 417–424.
  • Kleinman, K., & Huang, S. S. (2016) Calculating power by bootstrap, with an application to cluster-randomized trials. eGEMs, 4(1), 1-18.
  • Knobe, J. (2003). Intentional action and side effects in ordinary language. Analysis, 63, 190–194.
  • Knobe, J. (2006). The concept of intentional action: A case study in the uses of folk psychology. Philosophical Studies, 130(2), 203–231.
  • Knobe, J. (2007). Reason explanation in folk psychology. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 31, 90–106.
  • Knobe, J., & Mendlow, G. S. (2004). The good, the bad and the blameworthy: Understanding the role of evaluative reasoning in folk psychology. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 24(2), 252.
  • Kuś, K., & Maćkiewicz, B. (2016). Z rozmysłem, ale nie specjalnie. O językowej wrażliwości filozofii eksperymentalnej. Filozofia Nauki, 3(95), 73–101.
  • Mele, A. R. (1992). Springs of actions: Understanding intentional behavior. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Mele, A. R., & Moser, P. K. (1994). Intentional action. Noûs, 28, 39–68.
  • Paprzycka, K. (2015). The omissions account of the Knobe effect and the asymmetry challenge. Mind & Language, 30(5), 550–571.
  • Paprzycka, K. (2016). Intention, knowledge, and disregard for norms: The omissions account and Holton’s account of the asymmetrical intentionality attributions. Poznań Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities, 107, 204–233.
  • Sripada, C. (2010). The deep self model and asymmetries in folk judgements about intentional action. Philosophical Studies, 151, 159–176.
  • Sripada, C., & Konrath, S. (2011). Telling more than we can know about intentional action. Mind and Language, 26, 353–380.
  • Tobia, K. P. (2014). Reflective intentions: Philosophical concepts of intentionality. Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Society, 36(36). https://mindmodeling.org/cogsci2014/papers/790/paper790.pdf
  • Wilson, G. (1989). The intentionality of human action. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Wright, J. C., & Bengson, J. (2009). Asymmetries in judgments of responsibility and intentional action. Mind and Language, 24, 24–50.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Supercharge Your Next Research Paper: Research and write your next paper with Jenni AI.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.