The psychological reality of practical representation

References

• Anderson, J. (1982). Acquisition of cognitive skill. Psychological Review, 89(4), 369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. R. (2005). Cognitive psychology and its implications. New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Anscombe, G. E. M. (1957). Intentions. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Arbib, M. A. (1981). Perceptual structure and the distributed motor control. In V. B. Brooks (Ed.), Handbook of physiology, section I: The nervous system (Vol. 2, pp. 1449–1480). Motor Control, Baltimore: Williams et Wilkins.
   Google Scholar
• Arbib, M. A. (1985). Schemas for the temporal organization of behavior. Human Neurobiology, 4, 63–72.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Armstrong, D. (1973). Belief, truth and knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barker, C. (2012) Imperatives denote actions. In: Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung. Cambridge, MA: MITWPL, 57–70.
   Google Scholar
• Bayley, P., Franscino, J., & Squire, L. (2005). Robust habit learning in the absence of awareness and independent of the medial temporal lobe. Nature, 463(7050), 550–553.
   Google Scholar
• Bermúdez, J. L. (1995). Nonconceptual content: From perceptual experience to subpersonal computational states. Mind & Language, 10(4), 333–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, N. (1967). The coordination and regulation of movements. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braddon-Mitchell, D., & Jackson, F. (1996). Philosophy of mind and cognition. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publish.
   Google Scholar
• Brozzo, C. (2017). Motor intentions: How intentions and motor representations come together. Mind and Language, 32(2), 231–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burge, T. (2009). "Five theses on de re states and attitudes" in Almog J. and Leonardi P, The Philosophy of David Kaplan. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, pp. 246–324.
   Google Scholar
• Burge, T. (2010). Origins of objectivity. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Butterfill, S. A., & Sinigaglia, C. (2014). Intention and motor representation in purposive action. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 88, 119–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camp, E. (2009). Putting thoughts to work: Concepts, systematicity, and stimulus-independence. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 78(2), 275–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carruthers, P. (2006). The Architecture of Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, N. J., & Eichenbaum, H. (1993). Memory, amnesia, and the hippocampal system. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, N. J., & Squire, L. (1980). Preserved learning and retention of pattern-analyzing skill in amnesia: Dissociation of knowing how and knowing that. Science, 210(4466), 207–210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coombs, S., Fay, R. R., & Elepfandt, A. (2010). Dipole source encoding and tracking by the goldfish auditory system. Journal of Experimental Biology, 213(20), 3536–3547.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dau, T., Püschel, D., & Kohlrausch, A. (1996). A quantitative model of the “effective”signal processing in the auditory system. I. Model structure. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 99(6), 3615–3622.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeBrigard, F. (forthcoming). Know-how, intellectualism, and memory systems. In Philosophical Psychology.
   Google Scholar
• Dennett, D. C. (1969). The intentional stance. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Devitt, M. (2011). Methodology and the nature of knowing how. Journal of Philosophy, 108, 205–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dew, I. T., & Cabeza, R. (2011). The porous boundaries between explicit and implicit memory: Behavioral and neural evidence. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1224(1), 174–190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dretske, F. (1988). Explaining behavior: Reasons in a world of causes. Cambridge, MA, US: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, M. L. (1980). The relationship of mental imagery and mental rehearsal to performance of a motor task. Journal of Sport Psychology, 2(3), 211–220.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, G. (1982). The variety of reference. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feinberg, I. (1978). Efference copy and corollary discharge: Implications for thinking and its disorders. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 4(4), 636.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feltz, D. L., & Landers, D. M. (1983). The effects of mental practice on motor skill learning and performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Sport Psychology, 5(1), 25–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fodor, J. A. (1968). The appeal to tacit knowledge in psychological explanation. The Journal Of Philosophy, 65(20), 627-640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fodor, J. A. (1975). The Language of Thought. New York, NY: Thomas Y. Crowell.
   Google Scholar
• Fodor, J. A. (1994). Concepts: A potboiler. Cognition, 50(1), 95–113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fodor, J. A. (1998). Concepts: Where cognitive science went wrong. New york, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foerde, K., Knowlton, B. J., & Poldrack, R. A. (2006). Modulation of competing memory systems by distraction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 103, 11778–11783.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fridland, E. (2017). Skill and motor control: Intelligence all the way down. Synthese, 174(6), 1539–1560.
   Google Scholar
• Gallese, V., & Metzinger, T. (2003). Motor ontology: The representational reality of goals, actions and selves. Philosophical Psychology, 16, 365–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallistel. (1990). The organization of learning. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons, J. (2001). Knowledge in action. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 62(3), 579–600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Girard, J. Y., Taylor, P., & Lafont, Y. (1989). Proofs and types (Vol. 7). Cambridge Mass: Cambridge university press.
   Google Scholar
• Glick, E. (2011). Two methodologies for evaluating intellectualism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 83(2), 398–434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glick, E. (2012). Abilities and know-how attributions. In J. Brown and M. Gerken(Eds.), Knowledge Ascriptions, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.120–138.
   Google Scholar
• Henke, K. (2010). A model for memory systems based on processing modes rather than consciousness. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11(7), 523–532.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphreys, G. W. (1983). Reference frames and shape perception. Cognitive Psychology, 15(2), 151–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphreys, G. W., & Quinlan, P. T. (1988). Priming effects between two-dimensional shapes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14(2), 203–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeannerod, M. (1997). The cognitive neuroscience of action. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Jeannerod, M. (2006). Motor cognition: What actions tell the self. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kawato, M. (1999). Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 9(6), 718–727.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keane, M. M., Gabrieli, J. D., Fennema, A. C., Growdon, J. H., & Corkin, S. (1991). Evidence for a dissociation between perceptual and conceptual priming in Alzheimer‘s disease. Behavioral Neuroscience, 105(2), 326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knowlton, B. J., & Foerde, K. (2008). Neural representations of nondeclarative memories. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17, 62–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knowlton, B. J., Mangels, J. A., & Squire, L. R. (1996). A neostriatal habit learning system in humans. Science, 273(5280), 1399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulvicki, J. (2007). What is what it’s like? Introducing perceptual modes of presentation. Synthese, 156(2), 205–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lande, K. (2018a). Parts of Perception (PhD Dissertation). University of California, Los Angeles.
   Google Scholar
• Lande, K. (2018b). The Perspectival Character of Perception. The Journal of Philosophy, 115(4), 187–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lascarides, A. and N. Asher (2004) Imperatives in Dialogue, In P. Kuehnlein, H. Rieser and H. Zeevat (Eds.), The Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue for the New Millenium, Benjamins
   Google Scholar
• Laurence, S., & Margolis, E. (1999). Concepts and cognitive science. In S. Laurence and E. Margolis (Eds.), Concepts: Core Readings, Boston: MIT Press. 3–81.
   Google Scholar
• Levy, N. (2017). Embodied savoir faire: Knowledge-how requires motor representations. Synthese, 194(2), 511–530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, D. (1994). Reduction of mind. In S. Guttenplan (Ed.), Companion to the philosophy of mind (pp. 412–431). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, R. L., Vera, A. H., & Howes, A. (2004). A constraint-based approach to understanding the composition of skill. In M. C. Lovett, C. D. Schunn, C. Lebiere, P. Munro(Eds.), ICCM Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Cognitive Modeling (pp. 148–153) Mahvah NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Lex, H., Schütz, C., Knoblauch, A., & Schack, T. (2015). Cognitive representation of a complex motor action executed by different motor systems. Minds and Machines, 25(1), 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupyan, G., & Clark, A. (2015). Words and the world: Predictive coding and the language-perception-cognition interface. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(4), 279–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machery, E. (2009). Doing without concepts. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Margolis, E., & Laurence, S. (2014). Concepts. In E. N. Zalta Ed., The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Retrieved from URL=<https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/concepts/>
   Google Scholar
• Marr, D. (1982). Vision: A computational investigation. Into. New york, NY: WH Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• McCloskey, M. (2009). Visual reflections: A perceptual deficit and its implications. New york, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Millikan, R. G. (1984). Language, thought, and other biological categories: new foundations for realism. Boston Mass: MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Milner, B. (1962). Physiologie de l’hippocampe. In Passouant, P. (Ed.), Cen. Natl. Rech. Sci; Les troubles de la memoire acompagnant des lesions hippocampiques bilaterales (pp. 257–272). Paris: Éditions Recherche Scientifique.
   Google Scholar
• Milner, B. (1965). Memory disturbance after bilateral hippocampal lesions. In P. M. Milner & S. Glickman (Eds.), Cognitive processes and the brain (pp. 97–111). Princeton, N.J.: Van Nostrand.
   Google Scholar
• Moschovakis, Y. N. (1994). Sense and denotation as algorithm and value. Lecture Notes in Logic, 2, 210–249.
   Google Scholar
• Mulligan, N. W. (1997). Attention and implicit memory tests: The effects of varying attentional load on conceptual priming. Memory & Cognition, 25(1), 11–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muskens, R. (2005). Sense and the computation of reference. Linguistics and Philosophy, 28(4), 473–504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mylopoulos, M., & Pacherie, E. (2016). Intentions and motor representations: The interface challenge. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mylopoulos, M, & Pacherie, E. (2017). Intentions and motor representations: The interface challenge. Review Of Philosophy and Psychology, 8(2), 317–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagel, J. (2013). 10. Knowledge as a mental state. Oxford Studies in Epistemology, 4, 273.
   Google Scholar
• Nanay, B. (2013). Between perception and action. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Neander, K. (2017). A mark of the mental: In defense of informational teleosemantics. Cambridge, Massachusetts; London, England: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Noe, A. (2005). Against intellectualism. Analysis, 65(4), 278–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pacherie, E. (2011). Nonconceptual representations for action and the limits of intentional control. Social Psychology, 42(1), 67–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer, S. E. (1999). Vision science: Photons to phenomenology. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Papineau, D. (1984). Representation and explanation. Philosophy Of Science, 51(4), 550–572. doi:10.1086/289205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavese, C. (2013). The unity and scope of knowledge (Dissertation). Rutgers University.
   Google Scholar
• Pavese, C. (2015a). Knowing a rule. Philosophical Issues, 25(1), 165–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavese, C. (2015b). Practical senses. Philosophers’ Imprint, 15(29), 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavese, C. (2017a). Know-how and gradability. Philosophical Review, 126(3), 345–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavese, C. (2017b). A theory of practical meaning. Philosophical Topics, 45(2), Fall, 85–116.
   Google Scholar
• Pavese, C. (2018). Know-how, action, and luck. Synthese.
   Google Scholar
• Pavese, C. (forthcoming). Probabilistic knowledge in action. Analysis.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peacocke, C. (1992). A study of concepts. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peacocke, C. (1998). Nonconceptual content defended. Philosophy and phenomenological research, 58(2), 381–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peacocke, C. (2001). Does Perception Have a Nonconceptual Content? The Journal Of Philosophy, 98(5), 239–264.
   Google Scholar
• Platts, M. (1979). Ways of meaning. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, J., Craven, B., Khan, R. M., Chang, S.-J., Kang, I., Judkewitz, B., … Sobel, N. (2007). Mechanisms of scent-tracking in humans. Nature Neuroscience, 10(1), 27–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prinz, J. J. (2004). Furnishing the mind: Concepts and their perceptual basis. Cambridge,MA: MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsey, F. (1931). General propositions and causality. In  D. H. Mellor (Ed.), The foundations: Essays in Philosophy, Logic, Mathematics and Economics. (pp. 133–51) London, UK: Routledge
   Google Scholar
• Rizzolatti, G., Fogassi, L., & Gallese, V. (2000). Cortical mechanisms subserving object grasping and action recognition: A new view on the cortical motor functions. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (pp. 539–552). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rizzolatti, G., & Sinigaglia, C. (2008). Mirrors in the brain: How our minds share actions, emotions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rock, I. (1973). Orientation and form. Cambridge,MA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch & B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization (pp. 27–48). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Rosch, E., & Mervis, C. (1975). Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 573–605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossetti, Y. (2001). Implicit perception in action: Short-lived motor representation of space. In P. G. Grossenbacher (Ed.), Finding consciousness in the brain: A neurocognitive approach. Advances in consciousness research (pp. 133–181). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Roy, S., & Park, N. W. (2010). Dissociating the memory systems mediating complex tool knowledge and skills. Neuropsychologia, 48(10), 3026–3036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryle, G. (1949). The concept of mind. London, UK: Hutchinson
   Google Scholar
• Sakai, K, Kitaguchi, K, & Hikosaka, O. (2003). Chunking during human visuomotor sequence learning. Experimental Brain Research, 152(2), 229–242. doi:10.1007/s00221-003-1548-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. A. (1975). A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychological Review, 82(4), 225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. A. (2003). Motor schema theory after 27 years: Reflections and implications for a new theory. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 74(4), 366–375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulte, P. (2019). Naturalizing the content of desire Philosophical Studies. 176(1), 161–174.
   Google Scholar
• Shepard, R. N., & Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science, 171(3972), 701–703.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegel, S. (2011). The contents of visual experience. New york, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Singley, M. K., & Anderson, J. (1989). The transfer of cognitive skill (Vol. 9). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Squire, L., & Zola-Morgan, S. (1988). Memory: Brain systems and behavior. Trends in Neurosciences, 11, 170–175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Squire, L. R. (1992). Memory and the hippocampus: A synthesis from findings with rats, monkeys, and humans. Psychological Review, 99(2), 195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Squire, L. R. (2009). Memory and Brain Systems: 1969–2009. Journal of Neuroscience, 29(41), 12711–12716.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Squire, L. R., & Kandel, E. R. (2003). Memory: From mind to molecules. New York, N.Y.: Owl Books.
   Google Scholar
• Squire, L. R., & Wixted, J. (2011). The cognitive neuroscience of human memory since H.M. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 34, 259–288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Squire, L. R., & Wixted, J. (2016). Remembering. In Groes, Sebastian (Eds.), Memory in the twenty-first century: New critical perspectives from the arts, humanities, and sciences (pp. 251–262). Hampshire, England: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Stalnaker, R. (1998). What might nonconceptual content be? Philosophical Issues, 9, 339–352.
   Google Scholar
• Stanley, J. (2011). Know how Oxford U.P. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stanley, J., & Krakauer, J. W. (2013). Motor skill depends on knowledge of facts. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 503.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanley, J., & Williamson, T. (2001). Knowing How. Journal of Philosophy, 98(8), 411–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, J. A. (2005). Interference effects demonstrate distinct roles for visual and motor imagery during the mental representation of human action. Cognition, 95(3), 329–350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton, J. (2007). Batting, habit, and memory: The embodied mind and the nature of skill. Sport in Society, 10, 763–786.
   Google Scholar
• Taatgen, N. A. (2013). The nature and transfer of cognitive skills. Psychological Review, 120(3), 439.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trappenberg, T. (2009). Fundamentals of computational neuroscience. Oxford UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tulving, E. (1985). How many memory systems are there? American Psychologist, 40(4), 385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verwey, W. B. (1996). Buffer loading and chunking in sequential keypressing. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance, 22, 544–562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verwey, W. B. (2001). Concatenating familiar movement sequences: The versatile cognitive processor. Acta Psychologica, 106, 69–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verwey, W. B. (2010). Diminished motor skill development in elderly: Indications for limited motor chunk use. Acta Psychologica, 134, 206–214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verwey, W. B., Abrahamse, E. L., Ruitenberg, M. F., Jiménez, L., & de Kleine, E. (2011). Motorskill learning in the middle-aged: Limited development of motor chunks and explicit sequence knowledge. Psychological Research, 75(5), 406–422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, T. (2000). Knowledge and its limits. Oxford UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wolpert, D. M. (1997). Computational approaches to motor control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1(6), 209–216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolpert, D. M., Diedrichsen, J., & Flanagan, J. R. (2011). Principles of sensorimotor learning. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 12(12), 739–751.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolpert, D. M., & Flanagan, J. R. (2001). Motor prediction. Current Biology, 11(18), R729–R732.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolpert, D. M., & Ghahramani, Z. (2000). Computational principles of movement neuroscience. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 1212–1217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolpert, D. M., Ghahramani, Z., & Jordan, M. I. (1995). An internal model for sensorimotor integration. Science, 269(5232), 1880–1882.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolpert, D. M., & Kawato, M. (1998). Multiple paired forward and inverse models for motor control. Neural Networks, 11, 1317–1329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolpert, D. M., Miall, R. C., & Kawato, M. (1998). Internal models in the cerebellum. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2(9), 338–347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar