Moral Judgement and Moral Progress: The Problem of Cognitive Control

References

• Achen, C. H., & Bartels, L. M. (2016). Democracy for realists: Why elections do not produce responsive government. Princeton studies in political behavior. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, E. 2014. Social movements, experiments in living, and moral progress: Case studies from Britain’s abolition of slavery. University of Kansas. The Lindley Lecture.
   Google Scholar
• Appiah, A. (2009). Experiments in ethics . Harvard University Press. .
   Google Scholar
• Bartels, D. M., & Pizarro, D. A. (2011). The mismeasure of morals: Antisocial personality traits predict utilitarian responses to moral dilemmas. Cognition, 121(1), 154–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2011.05.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom, P. (2016). Against empathy: The case for rational compassion . Ecco.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, R. (1988). How to be a moral realist. In G. Sayre-macCord (Ed.), Essays on moral realism (pp. 307–356). Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, A. E., & Powell, R. (2016). Toward a naturalistic theory of moral progress. Ethics, 126(4), 983–1014. https://doi.org/10.1086/686003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan, A. E., & Powell, R. (2018). The evolution of moral progress: A biocultural theory. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190868413.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Caplan, B. D. (2008). The myth of the rational voter: Why democracies choose bad policies. . Princeton University. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, G. A. (2003). Facts and principles. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 31(3), 211–245. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.2003.00211.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. The arc of the moral universe. (1997). Philosophy & Public Affairs, 26(2), 91–134. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.1997.tb00078.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conway, P., Goldstein-Greenwood, J., Polacek, D., & Greene, J. D. (2018). Sacrificial utilitarian judgments do reflect concern for the greater good: Clarification via process dissociation and the judgments of philosophers. Cognition, 179(1), 241–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.04.018
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Corey, J. D., Hayakawa, S., Foucart, A., Aparici, M., Botella, J., Costa, A., & Keysar, B. (2017). Our moral choices are foreign to us. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43(7), 1109–1128. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000356
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Freitas, J., & Johnson, S. G. (2018). Optimality bias in moral judgment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 79, 149–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.07.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foot, P. (1967). The problem of abortion and the doctrine of the double effect. Oxford Review, 5, 5–15.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, J. D. (2008). The secret joke of Kant’s soul. In W. Sinnott-Armstrong (Ed.), A bradford book: Vol. 3. The neuroscience of morality: Emotion, brain disorders, and development (pp. 35–79). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, J. D. (2014). The cognitive neuroscience of moral judgement and decision making. In M. S. Gazzaniga, G. R. Mangun, & S.-J. Blakemore (Eds.), The cognitive neurosciences (pp. 1013–1023). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, J. D., & Nystrom, L. E., Engell, A. D., Darley, J. M, & Cohen, J. D. The neural bases of cognitive conflict and control in moral judgment. (2004). Neuron, 44(2), 389–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, J. D., Sommerville, R. B., & Nystrom, L. E., Darley, J. M, & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science, 293(5537), 2105–2108. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1062872
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108(4), 814–834. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.4.814
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horne, Z., & Livengood, J. (2017). Ordering effects, updating effects, and the specter of global skepticism. Synthese, 194(4), 1189–1218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-015-0985-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamieson, D. (2002). Is there progress in morality? Utilitas, 14(3), 318–338. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953820800003630
   Google Scholar
• Jamieson, D. (2017). Slavery, carbon, and moral progress. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 20(1), 169–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-016-9746-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahane, G. (2015). Sidetracked by trolleys: Why sacrificial moral dilemmas tell us little (or nothing) about utilitarian judgment. Social Neuroscience, 10(5), 551–560. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2015.1023400
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, D., & Hoburg, P. (2017). A tale of two processes: On Joseph Henrich’s the secret of our success: How culture is driving human evolution, domesticating our species, and making us smarter. Philosophical Psychology, 30(6), 832–848. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2017.1299857
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitcher, P. (2011). The ethical project. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klenk, M. (2021). The influence of situational factors in sacrificial dilemmas on utilitarian moral judgments: A literature review and meta-analysis. Review of Philosophy and Psychology. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13164-021-00547-4 https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3501289
   Google Scholar
• Lilienfeld, S. O., Ammirati, R., & Landfield, K. (2009). Giving debiasing away: Can psychological research on correcting cognitive errors promote human welfare? Perspectives on Psychological Science: A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 4(4), 390–398. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01144.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Macklin, R. (1977). Moral progress. Ethics, 87(4), 370–382. https://doi.org/10.1086/292049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May, J. (2018). Regard for reason in the moral mind. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moody-Adams, M. M. (1999). The idea of moral progress. Metaphilosophy, 30(3), 168–185. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9973.00120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musschenga, A. W., & Meynen, G. (2017). Moral progress: An introduction. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 20(1), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-017-9782-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagel, T. (1986). The view from nowhere. Oxford University Press. http://www.loc.gov/catdir/enhancements/fy0638/85031002-d.html
   Google Scholar
• Paulo, N. (2020). Moral intuitions between higher-order evidence and wishful thinking. In M. Klenk (Ed.), Higher-order evidence and moral epistemology. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Petrinovich, L., & O’Neill, P. (1996). Influence of wording and framing effects on moral intuitions. Ethology and Sociobiology, 17(3), 145–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(96)00041-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pölzler, T. (2018). Moral reality and the empirical sciences. Routledge. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gbv/detail.action?docID=5391363
   Google Scholar
• Roeser, S. (Ed.). (2014). Emotion and value. Oxford University Press
   Google Scholar
• Roth, A. (2012). Ethical progress as problem-resolving. Journal of Political Philosophy, 20(4), 384–406. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.2011.00400.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sauer, H. (2018). Debunking arguments in ethics. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108529181
   Google Scholar
• Schwitzgebel, E., & Cushman, F. (2012). Expertise in moral reasoning? Order effects on moral judgment in professional philosophers and non-philosophers. Mind & Language, 27(2), 135–153. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2012.01438.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwitzgebel, E., & Cushman, F. (2015). Philosophers’ biased judgments persist despite training, expertise and reflection. Cognition, 141, 127–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2015.04.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sellier, A. L., Scopelliti, I., & Morewedge, C. K. (2019). Debiasing training improves decision making in the field. Psychological Science. 30(9), 1371–1379. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797619861429
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shermer, M. (2016). The moral arc: How science makes us better people . St. Martin’s Griffin.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, P. (2011). The expanding circle: Ethics, evolution, and moral progress. Princeton University Press
   Google Scholar
• Tam, A. (2019). Why moral reasoning is insufficient for moral progress. Journal of Political Philosophy, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopp.12187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, J. J. (1985). The trolley problem. Yale Law Journal, 94(6), 1395–1415. https://doi.org/10.2307/796133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobia, K., Buckwalter, W., & Stich, S. (2013). Moral intuitions: Are philosophers experts? Philosophical Psychology, 26(5), 629–638. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2012.696327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, C. (2010). Moral progress without moral realism. Philosophical Papers, 39(1), 97–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/05568641003669508
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, T. (2004). Strangers to ourselves: Discovering the adaptive unconscious. Belknap.
   Google Scholar