References
- Ariew, A. (1996). Innateness and canalization. Philosophy of Science, 63, S19– S27. https://doi.org/10.1086/289932
- Ariew, A. (1999). Innateness is canalization: In defense of a developmental account of innateness. In Hardcastle, V. G ed. Where biology meets psychology: Philosophical essays MIT Press (pp. 117–138).
- Baker, M. C. (2002). The atoms of language: The mind’s hidden rules of grammar. Basic books.
- Barkow, J. H., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1995). The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. Oxford University Press.
- Barrett, H. C. (2014). The shape of thought: How mental adaptations evolve. Oxford University Press.
- Bateson, P., & Mameli, M. (2007). The innate and the acquired: Useful clusters or a residual distinction from folk biology? Developmental Psychobiology: The Journal of the International Society for Developmental Psychobiology, 49(8), 818–831. https://doi.org/10.1002/dev.20277
- Boeckx, C. (2010). What principles and parameters got wrong. In C. Picallo (Ed.), Linguistic variation in the minimalist framework (pp. 155–178). Oxford University Press.
- Boeckx, C. (2014). Elementary syntactic structures: Prospects of a feature-free syntax (Vol. 144). Cambridge University Press.
- Borer, H. (2014). Parametric syntax: Case studies in semitic and romance languages (Vol. 13). Walter de Gruyter.
- Buller, D. J. (2006). Adapting minds: Evolutionary psychology and the persistent quest for human nature. MIT press.
- Burge, T. (2010). Origins of objectivity. Oxford University Press.
- Chater, N., Clark, A., Goldsmith, J. A., & Perfors, A. (2015). Empiricism and language learnability. OUP Oxford.
- Chater, N., Goodman, N., Griffiths, T. L., Kemp, C., Oaksford, M., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2011). The imaginary fundamentalists: The unshocking truth about bayesian cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34(4), 194–196. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X11000239
- Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. The MIT Press.
- Chomsky, N. (2006). Language and mind (3rd ed.).Cambridge University Press
- Chomsky, N. (1995). The minimalist program. The MIT Press.
- Chomsky, N. (2000). New horizons in the study of language and mind. Cambridge University Press.
- Chomsky, N. (2002). On nature and language. Cambridge University Press.
- Chomsky, N. (2005). Three factors in language design. Linguistic Inquiry, 36(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1162/0024389052993655
- Chomsky, N. (2007a). Approaching ug from below. In U. Sauerland & H. M. Gärtner (Eds.), Interfaces+ recursion= language? (Vol. 89, pp. 1–30). De Gruyter.
- Chomsky, N. (2007b). Biolinguistic explorations: Design, development, evolution. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 15(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/09672550601143078
- Chomsky, N. (2015). What kind of creatures are we? Columbia University Press.
- Christiansen, M. H., & Chater, N. (2008). Language as shaped by the brain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31(5), 489–509. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X08004998
- Collins, J. (2005). Nativism: In defense of a biological understanding. Philosophical Psychology, 18(2), 157–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515080500169686
- Cowie, F. (1999). What’s within? Nativism reconsidered. Oxford University Press.
- Crain, S., & Pietroski, P. (2001). Nature, nurture and universal grammar. Linguistics and Philosophy, 24(2), 139–186. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005694100138
- Culbertson, J., & Smolensky, P. (2012). A bayesian model of biases in artificial language learning: The case of a word-order universal. Cognitive Science, 36(8), 1468–1498. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2012.01264.x
- Culicover, P. W., & Jackendoff, R. (2005). Simpler syntax. Oxford University Press.
- Curtiss, S., Fromkin, V., Krashen, S., Rigler, D., & Rigler, M. (1974). The linguistic development of genie. Language vol. 50, No. 3 (pp. 528–554).
- Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes’ error. Random House.
- Descartes, R. (1641/2017). Meditations on first philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
- Devitt, M. (2006). Ignorance of language. Oxford University Press on Demand.
- Dupre, G. (2019). Linguistics and the explanatory economy. Synthese (pp. 1–43).
- Fodor, J. A. (1975). The language of thought. Harvard University Press.
- Fodor, J. A. (1981). The current status of the innateness controversy. In Fodor, J. RePresentations MIT Press (pp. 257–316).
- Fodor, J. A. (1998). Concepts: Where cognitive science went wrong. Oxford University Press.
- Fodor, J. A. (2008). LOT 2: The language of thought revisited. Oxford University Press.
- Gibson, E., & Wexler, K. (1994). Triggers. Linguistic Inquiry, 25(3), 407–454. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4178869
- Glackin, S. N. (2011). Universal grammar and the baldwin effect: A hypothesis and some philosophical consequences. Biology & Philosophy, 26(2), 201–222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-010-9225-3
- Goldberg, A. E. (2006). Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford University Press.
- Goldin-Meadow, S. (2005). The resilience of language: What gesture creation in deaf children can tell us about how all children learn language. Psychology Press.
- Goldin-Meadow, S., & Yang, C. (2017). Statistical evidence that a child can create a combinatorial linguistic system without external linguistic input: Implications for language evolution. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, vol. 81 part B, 150–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.12.016
- Gould, S. J., & Lewontin, R. C. (1979). The spandrels of san marco and the panglossian paradigm: A critique of the adaptationist programme. Proceedings of the Royal Society London B, 205(1161), 581–598. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1979.0086
- Griffiths, P. (2002). What is innateness? The Monist, 85(1), 70–85. https://doi.org/10.5840/monist20028518
- Gulordava, K., Bojanowski, P., Grave, E., Linzen, T., & Baroni, M. (2018). Colorless green recurrent networks dream hierarchically. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers) (pp. 1195–1205). New Orleans, Louisiana: Association for Computational Linguistics.
- Hale, M., & Reiss, C. (2008). The phonological enterprise. Oxford University Press.
- Jackendoff, R. (2002). Foundations of language: Brain, meaning, grammar, evolution. Oxford University Press.
- James, R., & Blair, R. (2002). Neuro-cognitive models of acquired sociopathy and developmental psychopathy. In Glickson, J. ed. The neurobiology of criminal behavior (pp. 157–186). Springer.
- Katz, J. J. (1980). Language and other abstract objects. Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.
- Kayne, R. S. (1994). The antisymmetry of syntax (Vol. 25). MIT Press.
- Legate, J. A., & Yang, C. D. (2002). Empirical re-assessment of stimulus poverty arguments. The Linguistic Review, 18(1–2), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.19.1–2.151
- Lewontin, R. C., Kamin, L. J., & Rose, S. P. (1984). Not in our genes: Biology, ideology, and human nature. Pantheon.
- Lickliter, R., & Honeycutt, H. (2003). Developmental dynamics: Toward a biologically plausible evolutionary psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 129(6), 819. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.6.819
- Lipton, P. (1990). Contrastive explanation. In D. Knowles (Ed.), Explanation and its limits (pp. 247–266). Cambridge University Press.
- Locke, J. (1836/1996). An essay concerning human understanding. Penguin.
- Lorenz, K. (1966). Evolution and modification of behavior. Methuen London.
- Mameli, M., & Bateson, P. (2006). Innateness and the sciences. Biology and Philosophy, 21(2), 155–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-005-5144-0
- Mameli, M., & Bateson, P. (2011). An evaluation of the concept of innateness. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 366(1563), 436–443. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0174
- Manning, C. D. (2003). Probabilistic syntax. In J. Hay., S. Jannedy, & R. Bod (Eds.), Probabilistic Linguistics (pp. 289–341). MIT press.
- Marcus, G. F. (1993). Negative evidence in language acquisition. Cognition, 46(1), 53–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(93)90022-N
- Margolis, E., & Laurence, S. (2013). In defense of nativism. Philosophical Studies, 165(2), 693–718. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-012-9972-x
- Marr, D. (1982). Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. MIT press.
- McClelland, J. L., & Patterson, K. (2002). Rules or connections in past-tense inflections: What does the evidence rule out? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(11), 465–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(02)01993-9
- Newmeyer, F. J. (2005). Possible and probable languages: A generative perspective on linguistic typology. Oxford University Press.
- O’Neill, E. (2015). Relativizing innateness: Innateness as the insensitivity of the appearance of a trait with respect to specified environmental variation. Biology & Philosophy, 30(2), 211–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-014-9465-8
- Onnis, L., Waterfall, H. R., & Edelman, S. (2008). Learn locally, act globally: Learning language from variation set cues. Cognition, 109(3), 423–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.10.004
- Oyama, S., Griffiths, P. E., & Gray, R. D. (2003). Cycles of contingency: Developmental systems and evolution. MIT Press.
- Perfors, A. (2012). Bayesian models of cognition: What’s built in after all? Philosophy Compass, 7(2), 127–138. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2011.00467.x
- Perfors, A., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Regier, T. (2011). The learnability of abstract syntactic principles. Cognition, 118(3), 306–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.11.001
- Perfors, A., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Wonnacott, E. (2010). Variability, negative evidence, and the acquisition of verb argument constructions. Journal of Child Language, 37(3), 607–642. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000910000012
- Pullum, G. K., & Scholz, B. C. (2002). Empirical assessment of stimulus poverty arguments. The Linguistic Review, 18(1–2), 9–50. https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.19.1–2.9
- Reali, F., & Christiansen, M. H. (2005). Uncovering the richness of the stimulus: Structure dependence and indirect statistical evidence. Cognitive Science, 29(6), 1007–1028. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0000_28
- Rose, H., & Rose, S. (2010). Alas poor darwin: Arguments against evolutionary psychology. Random House.
- Sakas, W. (2016). Computational approaches to parameter setting in generative linguistics. In J. Lidz, W. Snyder, & J. Pater (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of developmental linguistics (pp. 696–724). Oxford University Press.
- Sakas, W. G., & Fodor, J. D. (2012). Disambiguating syntactic triggers. Language Acquisition, 19(2), 83–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/10489223.2012.660553
- Sampson, G. (1989). Language acquisition: Growth or learning? Philosophical Papers, 18(3), 203–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/05568648909506320
- Samuels, R. (2002). Nativism in cognitive science. Mind & Language, 17(3), 233–265. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0017.00197
- Samuels, R. (2004). Innateness in cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(3), 136–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.01.010
- Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language. Harvard university press.
- Van Dongen, S. (2006). Prior specification in bayesian statistics: Three cautionary tales. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 242(1), 90–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2006.02.002
- Waddington, C. H. (1942). Canalization of development and the inheritance of acquired characters. Nature, 150(3811), 563–565. https://doi.org/10.1038/150563a0
- Wexler, K. (2003). Lenneberg’s dream: Learning, normal language development, and specific language impairment. In J. C. Schaeffer (Ed.), Language competence across populations Toward a definition of specific language impairment: (pp. 11–61). Routledge.
- Wiesel, T. N., & Hubel, D. H. (1963). Effects of visual deprivation on morphology and physiology of cells in the cat’s lateral geniculate body. Journal of Neurophysiology, 26(6), 978–993. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1963.26.6.978
- Yang, C. (2000). Internal and external forces in language change. Language Variation and Change, 12(3), 231–250. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394500123014
- Yang, C. (2002). Knowledge and learning in natural language. Oxford University Press.
- Yang, C. (2015). Negative knowledge from positive evidence. Language, 91(4), 938–953. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2015.0054
- Yang, C. (2016). The price of linguistic productivity: How children learn to break the rules of language. MIT Press.
- Yang, C. (2017). Rage against the machine: Evaluation metrics in the 21st century. Language Acquisition, 24(2), 100–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/10489223.2016.1274318
- Yang, C., Crain, S., Berwick, R. C., Chomsky, N., & Bolhuis, J. J. (2017). The growth of language: Universal grammar, experience, and principles of computation. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, vol.81 part B 103–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.12.023