Reading phenomenology mechanistically: The way through constraints

References

• Barrett, D. (2014). Functional analysis and mechanistic explanation. Synthese, 191(12), 2695–2714. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-014-0410-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bechtel, W. (2019). Resituating cognitive mechanisms within heterarchical networks controlling physiology and behavior. Theory & Psychology, 29(5), 620–639. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354319873725.2020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bechtel, W., & Abrahamsen, A. (2010). Dynamic mechanistic explanation: Computational modeling of circadian rhythms as an exemplar for cognitive science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 41(3), 321–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2010.07.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bechtel, W., & Richardson, R. C. (1993). Discovering complexity: Decomposition and localization as strategies in scientific research. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Craver, C. F. (2007). Explaining the brain. University Press Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Cummins, R. (1975). Functional Analysis. The Journal of Philosophy, 72(20), 741–764. https://doi.org/10.2307/2024640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreyfus, H. L., & Hall, H. (Eds.). (1982). Husserl, intentionality and cognitive science. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, S. (1997). Mutual enlightenment: Recent phenomenology in cognitive science. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 4(3), 195–214. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233588780_Gallagher_S_1997_Mutual_enlightenment_Recent_phenomenology_in_cognitive_science
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, S., & Schmicking, D. (Eds.). (2010). Handbook of phenomenology and cognitive science. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Glennan, S., & Illari, P. (Eds.). (2018). The Routledge handbook of mechanisms and mechanical philosophy. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gurwitsch, A. (2009). The collected works of Aron Gurwitsch (1901–1973). In J. García-Gómez (Ed.), Constitutive phenomenology in historical perspective (Vol. 1, pp.1–556). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Husserl, E. (1977). Phenomenological psychology (J. Scanlon, Trans.). Martinus Nijhoff.
   Google Scholar
• Husserl, E. (1980). Phenomenology and the foundations of the sciences: Third book of ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy (T. E. Klein & W. E. Pohl, Trans.). Martinus Nijhoff.
   Google Scholar
• Husserl, E. (1982). Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy; First book: General introduction to a pure phenomenology (F. Kersten, Trans.). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Husserl, E. (1989). The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology: An introduction to phenomenological philosophy (D. Carr, Trans.). Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Husserl, E. (1999). The Idea of Phenomenology (Hardy L, Ed. & Trans.). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Husserl, E. (2002). Philosophy as rigorous science. In M. Brainard (Ed.), New yearbook for phenomenology and phenomenological philosophy (Vol. 2, pp. 249–295). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ingarden, R. (1971). U podstaw teorii poznania Foundations of the Theory of Knowledge. PWN.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B., & Woolgard, S. (1979). Laboratory Life: The construction of scientific facts. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Levine, J. (1983). Materialism and qualia: The explanatory gap. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 64(4), 354–361. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0114.1983.tb00207.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopes, J. (2021). On the psychologism of neurophenomenology. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-021-09773-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madary, M. (2017). Visual phenomenology. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty, M. (2001). The Incarnate Subject (P. B. Milan, Trans.). Humanity Books.
   Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty, M. (2013). Phenomenology of perception (D. Landes, Trans.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Miłkowski, M. (2016). Integrating cognitive (neuro)science using mechanisms. AVANT. The Journal of the Philosophical-Interdisciplinary Vanguard, VII(2), 45–67. https://doi.org/10.26913/70202016.0112.0003
   Google Scholar
• Murray, A. (2002). Philosophy and the ‘anteriority complex’. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 1(1), 27–47. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015520602346
   Google Scholar
• Neisser, J. (2015). The science of subjectivity. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Overgaard, M. (2004). On the naturalising of phenomenology. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 3(4), 365–379. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PHEN.0000048939.62282.a4
   Google Scholar
• Petitot, J., Varela, F. J., Pachoud, B., & Roy, J.-M. (Eds.). (1999). Naturalizing phenomenology: Issues in contemporary phenomenology and cognitive science. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Piccinini, G., & Craver, C. (2011). Integrating psychology and neuroscience: Functional analyses as mechanism sketches. Synthese, 183(3), 283–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-011-9898-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piekarski, M. (2019). Normativity of predictions: A new research perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1710. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01710
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Płotka, W. (2021). A commentary on Pokropski’s functionalist reading of Husserlian phenomenology. Front Psychology 12, 614842. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.614842
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pokropski, M. (2020). Phenomenology and functional analysis. A functionalist reading of Husserlian phenomenology. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 19(5), 869–889. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-020-09694-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pokropski, M. (2021). Mechanisms and consciousness integrating phenomenology with cognitive science. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Raja, V., & Anderson, M. L. (2021). Behavior Considered as an Enabling Constraint. In F. Calzavarini & M. Viola, (Eds.), Neural mechanisms, studies in brain and mind 17 (pp. 209–232). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54092-0_10
   Google Scholar
• Ramstead, M. J. D., Seth, A. K., Hesp, C., Sandved-Smith, L., Mago, J., Lifshitz, M., Pagnoni, G., Smith, R., Dumas, G., Lutz, A., Friston, K., & Constant, A. (2022). From generative models to generative passages: A computational approach to (Neuro) phenomenology. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-021-00604-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds, J. (2018). Phenomenology, naturalism and science a hybrid and heretical proposal. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, J. (2020). Embodiment and emergence: Navigating an epistemic and metaphysical dilemma. Journ Transc Philosophy, 1(1), 135–159. https://doi.org/10.1515/jtph-2019-0008
   Google Scholar
• Umerez, J., & Mossio, M. (2013). Constraint. In W. Dubitzky, O. Wolkenhauer, K. H. Cho, & H. Yokota, (Eds.), Encyclopedia of systems biology (pp. 490–493). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9863-7
   Google Scholar
• Varela, F. J. (1996). Neurophenomenology: A methodological remedy for the hard problem. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 3(4), 330–349. https://www.scinapse.io/papers/2113034208
   Google Scholar
• Weiskopf, D. A. (2011). Models and mechanisms in psychological explanation. Synthese, 183(3), 313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-011-9958-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winning, J. (2020). Mechanistic causation and constraints: Perspectival parts and powers, non-perspectival modal patterns. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 71(4), 1385–1409. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axy042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winning, J., & Bechtel, W. (2018). Rethinking causality in biological and neural mechanisms: Constraints and control. Minds and Machines, 2(28), 287–310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-018-9458-5
   Google Scholar
• Zahavi, D. (2004). Phenomenology and the project of naturalization. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 3(4), 331–347. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PHEN.0000048935.94012.4e
   Google Scholar
• Zahavi, D. (2021). Applied phenomenology: Why it is safe to ignore the epoché. Continental Philosophy Review, 54(2), 259–273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11007-019-09463-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zednik, C. (2008). Dynamical models and mechanistic explanations. In B. C. Love, K. McRae, & V. M. Sloutsky (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1454–1459). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
   Google Scholar