Engaging charitable giving: The motivational force of narrative versus philosophical argument

References

• Abend, G. (2014). The moral background. Princeton.
   Google Scholar
• Aristotle. 4th c.BCE/[1962]. Nicomachean ethics. M. Ostwald. Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bekkers, R., & Wiepking, P. (2011). A literature review of empirical studies of philanthropy: Eight mechanisms that drive charitable giving. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(5), 924–973. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764010380927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergh, R., & Reinstein, D. (2021). Empathic and numerate giving: The joint effects of victim images and charity evaluations. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 12(3), 407–416. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619893968
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhati, A., & Hansen, R. (2020). A literature review of experimental studies in fundraising. Journal of Behavioral Public Administration, 3(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.30636/jbpa.31.129
   Google Scholar
• Buckland, L., Lindauer, M., Rodríguez-Arias, D., & Véliz, C. (2021). Testing the motivational strength of positive and negative duty arguments regarding global poverty. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-021-00555-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, C. (2009). “Being hooked” by editorial content: The implications for processing narrative advertising. Journal of Advertising, 38(1), 21–33. https://doi.org/10.2753/JOA0091-3367380102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Currie, G. (2010). Narratives and narrators: A philosophy of stories. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Erlandsson, A., Västfjäll, D., Sundfelt, O., & Slovic, P. (2016). Argument-inconsistency in charity appeals: Statistical information about the scope of the problem decrease helping toward a single identified victim but not helping toward many non-identified victims in a refugee crisis context. Journal of Economic Psychology, 56, 126–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2016.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erlandsson, A., Nilsson, A., & Västfjäll, D. (2018). Attitudes and donation behavior when reading positive and negative charity appeals. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 30(4), 444–474. https://doi.org/10.1080/10495142.2018.1452828
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escalas, J. E., Moore, M. C., & Britton, J. E. (2004). Fishing for feelings? Hooking viewers helps! Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(1&2), 105–114 https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp1401&2_12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedrich, J., & McGuire, A. (2010). Individual differences in reasoning style as a moderator of the identifiable victim effect. Social Influence, 5(3), 182–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/15534511003707352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genevsky, A., Västfjäll, D., Slovic, P., & Knutson, B. (2013). Neural underpinnings of the identifiable victim effect: Affect shifts preferences for giving. Journal of Neuroscience, 23(43), 17188–17196. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2348-13.2013
   Google Scholar
• Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 701–721. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.701
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, M. C., & Sestir, M. (2017). Transportation theory. In P. Rössler (Ed.), International encyclopedia of media effects. Wiley Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Han, H., Workman, C. I., May, J., Scholtens, P., Dawson, K. J., Glenn, A. L., & Meindl, P. (2022). Which moral exemplars inspire prosociality? Philosophical Psychology, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2022.2035343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansson, S. O. (2020). Do moral philosophers have to be moral? Theoria, 86(4), 433–438. https://doi.org/10.1111/theo.12268
   Google Scholar
• Hart, P. S., Lane, D., Chinn, S., & Dickert, S. (2018). The elusive power of the individual victim: Failure to find a difference in the effectiveness of charitable appeals focused on one compared to many victims. PLoS ONE, 13(7), e0199535. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199535
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu, T. C. (2007). CPO physical science, student ed. CPO Science.
   Google Scholar
• Kidd, D. C., & Castano, E. (2013). Reading literary fiction improves theory of mind. Science, 342(6156), 377–380. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1239918
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kogut, T., & Ritov, I. (2011). The identifiable victim effect: Causes and boundary conditions. In D. M. Oppenheimer & C. Y. Olivola (Eds.), The science of giving (pp. 133–145). Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koopmann, E. M., & Hakemulder, F. (2015). Effects of literature on empathy and self-reflection: A theoretical-empirical framework. Journal of Literary Theory, 9(1), 79–111.
   Google Scholar
• Lamarque, P. (2004). On not expecting too much from narrative. Mind & Language, 19(4), 393–408. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0268-1064.2004.00265.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S., & Feeley, T. H. (2016). The identifiable victim effect: A meta-analytic review. Social Influence, 11(3), 199–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/15534510.2016.1216891
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindauer, M., Mayorga, M., Greene, J., Slovic, P., Västfjäll, D., & Singer, P. (2020). Comparing the effect of rational and emotional appeals on donation behavior. Judgment and Decision Making, 15(3), 413–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacAskill, W. (2015). Doing good better: How effective altruism can help you make a difference. Avery.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. C. (1995). Poetic justice. Beacon.
   Google Scholar
• Paluck, E. L. (2009). Reducing intergroup prejudice and conflict using the media: A field experiment in Rwanda. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(3), 574–587. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0011989
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (1991). Essentials of behavioral research: Methods and data analysis. McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Rust, J., & Schwitzgebel, E. (2014). The moral behavior of ethicists and the power of reason. In H. Sarkissian, J. C. Wright, & (Eds.), Advances in experimental moral psychology (91-108). Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Schönegger, P., & Wagner, J. (2019). The moral behavior of ethics professors: A replication-extension in German-speaking countries. Philosophical Psychology, 32(4), 532–559. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2019.1587912
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwitzgebel, E., & Rust, J. (2014). The moral behavior of ethics professors: Relationships among self-reported behavior, expressed normative attitude, and directly observed behavior. Philosophical Psychology, 27(3), 293–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2012.727135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwitzgebel, E., & Rust, J. (2016). The moral behavior of ethicists. In J. Sytsma & W. Buckwalter (Eds.), Companion to experimental philosophy (225-233). Wiley Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Schwitzgebel, E., & McVey, C. (2018, November 21). Narrative but not philosophical argument motivates giving to charity. Blog Post at the Splintered Mind. http://schwitzsplinters.blogspot.com/2018/11/narrative-but-not-philosophical.html
   Google Scholar
• Schwitzgebel, E., & Cushman, F. (2020, May 23). Contest winner! A philosophical argument that effectively convinces research participants to donate to charity. Blog Post at the Splintered Mind. http://schwitzsplinters.blogspot.com/2020/06/contest-winner-philosophical-argument.html
   Google Scholar
• Schwitzgebel, E., Cokelet, B., & Singer, P. (2020). Do ethics classes influence student behavior? Case study: Teaching the ethics of eating meat. Cognition, 203, 104397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104397
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singhal, A., & Rogers, E. M. (1999). Entertainment-education: A communication strategy for social change. Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Small, D. A., Loewenstein, G., & Slovic, P. (2007). Sympathy and callousness: The impact of deliberative thought on donations to identifiable and statistical victims. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 102(2), 143–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Small, D. A., & Verrochi, N. M. (2009). The face of need: Facial emotion expression on charity advertisements. Journal of Marketing Research, 46(6), 777–787. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.46.6.777
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velleman, J. D. (2003). Narrative explanation. Philosophical Review, 112(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-112-1-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar