What does it actually mean that Premotor Theory is about embodied attention?

References

• Allport, A. (1993). Attention and control: Have we been asking the wrong question? A critical review of twenty-five years. In D. E. Meyer & S. Kornblum (Eds.), Attention and performance 14: Synergies in experimental psychology, artificial intelligence, and cognitive neuroscience (pp. 183–218). The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bielas, J., & Michalczyk, Ł. (2019). Is the premotor theory of attention essentially about pre-reflective intentionality? Theory & Psychology, 29(6), 757–774. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354319834672
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Born, S., Ansorge, U., & Kerzel, D. (2012). Feature-based effects in the coupling between attention and saccades. Journal of Vision, 12(11), 27. https://doi.org/10.1167/12.11.27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley, F. H. (1886). Is there a special activity of attention? Mind, 11(43), 305–323. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/os-XI.43.305
   Google Scholar
• Broadbent, D. E. (1982). Task-combination and selective intake of information. Acta Psychologica, 50(3), 253–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(82)90043-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, A. (2008). Supersizing the mind: Embodiment, action, and cognitive extension. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (2008). The extended mind (reprinted.). Analysis, 58(1), 7–19. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/58.1.7
   Google Scholar
• Colombetti, G. (2014). The feeling body: Affective science meets the enactive mind. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Craighero, L., Fadiga, L., Rizzolatti, G., & Umiltà, C. (1999). Action for perception: A motor-visual attentional effect. Journal of Exp. Psychology Human Perception Performance, 25(6), 1673–1692. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.25.6.1673
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crovitz, H. F., & Daves, W. (1962). Tendencies to eye movement and perceptual accuracy. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(5), 495–498. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043452
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• D’Angelo, D. (2020). The phenomenology of embodied attention. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 19(5), 961–978. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-019-09637-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortney, M. (2019). Conceptualizing intellectual attention. Theory & Psychology, 29(6), 775–778. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354319853632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher, S., & Bower, M. (2014). Making enactivism even more embodied? AVANT /. Trends in Interdisciplinary Studies, 5(2), 232–247. https://doi.org/10.12849/50202014.0109.0011.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, S. (2015a). Interpretations of embodied cognition. In W. Tschacher & C. Bergomi (Eds.), The implications of embodiment: Cognition and communication (pp. 59–71). Andrews UK Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, S. (2018). Building a stronger concept of embodiment. In A. Newen, L. De Bruin, & S. Gallagher (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of 4E cognition (pp. 353-367). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198735410.013.18
   Google Scholar
• Glenberg, A. M., Witt, J. K., & Metcalfe, J. (2013). From the revolution to embodiment: 25 years of cognitive psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(5), 573–585. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691613498098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanning, N. M., Szinte, M., & Deubel, H. (2019). Visual attention is not limited to the oculomotor range. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116(19), 9665–9670. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1813465116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, L. (2010). The speed of feature-based attention: Attentional advantage is slow, but selection is fast. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36(6), 1382–1390. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018736
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurley, S. L. (2002). Consciousness in action. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Husserl, E. (1913). Ideas: General introduction to pure phenomenology. (W. R. Boyce-Gibson, Eds.). Collier Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. Dover.
   Google Scholar
• Jennings, C. D. (2012). The subject of attention. Synthese, 189(3), 535–554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-012-0164-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonides, J. 1976. Voluntary vs reflexive control of the mind’s eye movement. Presented at Psychonomic Society, St. Louis.
   Google Scholar
• Keat, R. (1982). Merleau-Ponty and the phenomenology of the body. [Unpublished manuscript]. University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK. http://www.russellkeat.net/admin/papers/51.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kentridge, R. W., & Heywood, C. A. (2001). Attention and alerting: Cognitive processes spared in blindsight. In B. De Gelder, E. De Haan, & C. A. Heywood (Eds.), Out of mind: Varieties of unconscious processes (pp. 163–181). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, R. M. (1980). Does oculomotor readiness mediate cognitive control of visual attention. In Nickerson, R. Ed., Attention and performance VIII. 259–276. Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, R. (2020). Is covert spatial orienting embodied or disembodied cognition? A historical review. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73(1), 20–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021819889497
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mack, A., & Rock, I. (1998). Inattentional blindness. The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maine de Biran, P. (1970). The influence of habit on the faculty of thinking. (M. D. Boehm, Eds.). Greenwood Press.
   Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception. (C. Smith Trans.). Routledge & Kegan Paul. Original work published 1945
   Google Scholar
• Mole, C. (2017, September 1). Attention. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Original entry published 2009. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2021/entries/attention.
   Google Scholar
• Neisser, U. (1976). Cognition and reality. Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335558008248231
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K., McConkie, G. W., & Ehrlich, S. (1978). Eye movements and integrating information across fixations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4(4), 529–544. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-1523.4.4.529
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reuter, M. (1999). Merleau-ponty’s notion of pre-reflective intentionality. Synthese, 118(1), 69–88. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005144911619
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizzolatti, G., Riggio, L., Dascola, I., & Umiltá, C. (1987). Reorienting attention across the horizontal and vertical meridians: Evidence in favour of a premotor theory of attention. Neuropsychologia, 25(1A), 31–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(87)90041-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizzolatti, G., Riggio, L., & Sheliga, B. M. (1994). Space and selective attention. In C. Umilta & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and Performance, 15, 231–265.
   Google Scholar
• Rizzolatti, G., & Sinigaglia, C. (2008). Mirrors in the brain – How our minds share actions and emotions. (F. Anderson, eds.), Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L. (2010). Premotor theory of attention. Scholarpedia, 5(1), 6311. https://doi.org/10.4249/scholarpedia.6311
   Google Scholar
• Rolfs, M., Jonikaitis, D., Deubel, H., & Cavanagh, P. (2011). Predictive remapping of attention across eye movements. Nature Neuroscience, 14(2), 252–256. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2711
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepherd, M., Findlay, J. M., & Hockey, R. J. (1986). The relationship between eye movements and spatial attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38A(3), 475–491. https://doi.org/10.1080/14640748608401609
   Google Scholar
• Siewert, C. (2005). Attention and sensorymotor intentionality. In D. W. Smith & A. L. Thomasson (Eds.), Phenomenology and philosophy of mind (pp. 270–294). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair, M. (2011). Ravaisson and the force of habit. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 49(1), 65–85. https://doi.org/10.1353/hph2011.0013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sperling, G., & Weichselgartner, E. (1995). Episodic theory of the dynamics of spatial attention. Psychol. Rev, 102(3), 503–532. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.102.3.503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, E., & Varela, F. J. (2001). Radical embodiment: Neural dynamics and consciousness. Trends Cogn. Sci, 5(10), 418–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01750-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, E., & Stapleton, M. (2009). Making sense of sense-making: Reflections on enactive and extended mind theories. Topoi, 28(1), 23–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-008-9043-2
   Google Scholar
• Tipper, S. P., Howard, L. A., & Houghton, G. (1998). Action-based mechanisms of attention. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 335(1373), 1385–1392. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1998.0292
   Google Scholar
• Treisman, A. (2003). Consciousness and perceptual binding. In A. Cleeremans (Ed.), The unity of consciousness: Binding, integration and dissociation (pp. 95–113). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Varela, F., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, R. A., & Foglia, L. (2017). Embodied cognition. In E. N. Zalta (Eds.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Spring.
   Google Scholar