Trust as the glue of cognitive institutions

References

• Aizawa, K. (2018). Extended cognition, trust and glue, and knowledge. In C. J. Adam, A. Clark, J. Kallestrup, S. O. Palermos, & D. Pritchard (Eds.), Extended epistemology (pp. 64–78). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Altay, S., Hacquin, A. S., Chevallier, C., & Mercier, H. (2021). Information delivered by a chatbot has a positive impact on COVID-19 vaccines attitudes and intentions. Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000400
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachmann, R., & Inkpen, A. C. (2011). Understanding institutional-based trust building processes in inter-organizational relationships. Organization Studies, 32(2), 281–301. https://doi.org/10.1177/017084061039747
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baier, A. (1986). Trust and antitrust. Ethics, 96(2), 231–260. https://doi.org/10.1086/292745
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bamford, A., & MacKenzie, D. (2018, September/October). Counterperformativity. New Left Review, 113(Sept/Oct), 97–121.
   Google Scholar
• Beckert, J. (2005). Trust and the performative construction of markets (Discussion Paper No. 05/08). Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2465811
   Google Scholar
• Berg, J., Dickhaut, J., & McCabe, K. (1995). Trust, reciprocity, and social history. Games and Economic Behavior, 10(1), 122–142. https://doi.org/10.1006/game.1995.1027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betsch, C., & Sachse, K. (2013). Debunking vaccination myths: Strong risk negations can increase perceived vaccination risks. Health Psychology, 32(2), 146–155. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027387
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowles, S. (2016). The moral economy: Why good incentives are no substitute for good citizens. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braudel, F. (1977). La Dynamique du capitalism [The dynamics of capitalism]. Arthaud.
   Google Scholar
• Bruni, L., & Zamagni, S. (2017). Civil economy: Another idea of the market. Agenda Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M., & Muniesa, F. (2005). Peripheral vision: Economic markets as calculative collective devices. Organization Studies, 26(8), 1229–1250. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840605056393
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cash, M. (2013). Cognition without borders: ‘Third wave’ socially distributed cognition and relational autonomy. Cognitive Systems Research, 25(1), 61–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2013.03.007
   Google Scholar
• Castoriadis, C. (1997). The Imaginary Institution of Society K. Blamey (Ed.). MIT Press. Original work published in 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, A. (1997). Economic reason: The interplay of individual learning and external structure. In J. Drobak & J. Nye (Eds.), The frontiers of the new institutional economics (pp. 269–290). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, A. (1998). Being there: Putting brain, body, and world together again. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, A. (2008). Supersizing the mind: Embodiment, action, and cognitive extension. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 58(1), 7–19. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/58.1.7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danziger, S., Levav, J., & Avnaim-Pesso, L. (2011). Extraneous factors in judicial decisions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(17), 6889–6892. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.101803310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David, S., Cordes, R. J., & Friedman, D. A. (2021). Active inference in modeling conflict. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5750935
   Google Scholar
• De Jaegher, H., DiPaolo, E., & Gallagher, S. (2010). Can social interaction constitute social cognition? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(10), 441–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2010.06.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dekker, E. (2022). How cognitive institutions and interpretative rationality enable markets with infinite variety. In D. J. D’Amico & A. G. Martin (Eds.), Contemporary methods and Austrian economics (pp. 151–167). Emerald Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Denzau, A. T., & North, D. C. (1994). Shared Mental Models: Ideologies and Institutions. Kyklos, 47(1), 3–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6435.1994.tb02246.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiPaolo, E., & Thompson, E. (2014). The enactive approach. In L. Shapiro (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of embodied cognition (pp. 68–78). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Evensky, J. (2011). Adam Smith’s essentials: On trust, faith, and free markets. Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 33(2), 249–267. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1053837211000034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fonagy, P., & Allison, E. (2014). The role of mentalizing and epistemic trust in the therapeutic relationship. Psychotherapy, 51(3), 372–380. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036505
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frey, B. S. (1994). How intrinsic motivation is crowded out and in. Rationality and Society, 6(3), 334–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043463194006003004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher, S. (2013). The socially extended mind. Cognitive Systems Research, 25(1), 4–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2013.03.008
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, S. (2017). Enactivist interventions: Rethinking the mind. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, S. (2018). The extended mind: State of the question. The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 56(4), 421–447. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjp.12308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher, S. (2020). Action and interaction. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, S., & Crisafi, A. (2009). Mental institutions. Topoi, 28(1), 45–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-008-9045-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher, S., Mastrogiorgio, A., & Petracca, E. (2019). Economic reasoning and interaction in socially extended market institutions. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1856. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01856
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gode, D. K., & Sunder, S. (1993). Allocative efficiency of markets with zero-intelligence traders: Market as a partial substitute for individual rationality. The Journal of Political Economy, 101(1), 119–137. https://doi.org/10.1086/261868
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodin, R. E. (Ed.). (1998). The theory of institutional design. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gui, B. (2013). Relational goods. In L. Bruni & S. Zamagni (Eds.), Handbook on the economics of reciprocity and social enterprise (pp. 295–305). Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Gunn, L. A. (1978). Why is implementation so difficult? Management Services in Government, 33(4), 169–176.
   Google Scholar
• Hawley, K. (2014). Trust, distrust and commitment. Noûs, 48(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawley, K. J. (2017). Trustworthy groups and organisations. In P. Faulkner & T. Simpson (Eds.), The philosophy of trust (pp. 230–250). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayek, F. A. (1945). The use of knowledge in society. The American Economic Review, 35(4), 519–530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hindriks, F., & Guala, F. (2021). The functions of institutions: Etiology and teleology. Synthese, 198(3), 2027–2043. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-019-02188-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgson, G. M. (2004). The evolution of institutional economics. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jay, M. (2008). Introduction A. Honneth, reification: A new look at an old idea. Oxford University Press. (pp. 3–16).
   Google Scholar
• Keys, B. J., Mukherjee, T., Seru, A., & Vig, V. (2010). Did securitization lead to lax screening? Evidence from subprime loans. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125(1), 307–362. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2010.125.1.307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirchhoff, M. D. (2012). Extended cognition and fixed properties: Steps to a third-wave version of extended cognition. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 11(2), 287–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-011-9237-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKenzie, D. (2011). The credit crisis as a problem in the sociology of knowledge. The American Journal of Sociology, 116(6), 1778–1841. https://doi.org/10.1086/659639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKenzie, D., & Spears, T. (2014). ‘The formula that killed Wall Street’: The Gaussian copula and modelling practices in investment banking. Social Studies of Science, 44(3), 393–417. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312713517157
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKenzie, D., & Spears, T. (2014b). ‘A device for being able to book P&L’: The organizational embedding of the Gaussian copula. Social Studies of Science, 44(3), 418–440. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312713517158
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackenzie, C., & Stoljar, N. (Eds.). (2000). Relational autonomy: Feminist perspectives on autonomy, agency, and the social self. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Madhavan, A., Porter, D., & Weaver, D. (2005). Should securities markets be transparent? Journal of Financial Markets, 8(3), 265–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finmar.2005.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markey-Towler, B. (2017). I, ‘Roboticus Oeconomicus’: The philosophy of mind in economics, and why it matters. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 41(1), 203–237. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bew014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menary, R. (2007). Cognitive integration: Mind and cognition unbounded. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Menary, R. (2010). Cognitive integration and the extended mind. In R. Menary (Ed.), The Extended Mind (pp. 227–243). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mian, A., & Sufi, A. (2009). The consequences of mortgage credit expansion: Evidence from the US mortgage default crisis. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(4), 1449–1496. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2009.124.4.1449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newen, A., De Bruin, L., & Gallagher, S. (Eds). (2018). Oxford handbook of 4E cognition. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• North, D. C. (2005). Understanding the process of economic change. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Petracca, E., & Gallagher, S. (2020). Economic cognitive institutions. Journal of Institutional Economics, 16(6), 747–765. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137420000144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratcliffe, M. (2017). Selfhood, schizophrenia, and the interpersonal regulation of experience. In C. Durt, T. Fuchs, & C. Tewes (Eds.), Embodiment, enaction and culture (pp. 149–171). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, A. K., & Spiegel, M. M. (2012). Cross-country causes and consequences of the 2008 crisis: Early warning. Japan and the World Economy, 24(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japwor.2011.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, A. E. (2008). What have we learned from market design? The Economic Journal, 118(527), 285–310. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2007.02121.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rupert, R. D. (2004). Challenges to the hypothesis of extended cognition. The Journal of Philosophy, 101(8), 389–428. https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil2004101826
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmon, F. (2009, February23) Recipe for disaster: The formula that killed Wall Street. Wired. https://www.wired.com/2009/02/wp-quant/
   Google Scholar
• Searle, J. R. (2005). What is an institution? Journal of Institutional Economics, 1(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137405000020
   Google Scholar
• Slaby, J., & Gallagher, S. (2015). Critical neuroscience and socially extended minds. Theory Culture & Society, 32(1), 33–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276414551996
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slors, M. (2019). Symbiotic cognition as an alternative for socially extended cognition. Philosophical Psychology, 32(8), 1179–1203. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2019.1679591
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A. (1976a). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations R. H. Campbell & A. S. Skinner, Eds.; W. B. Todd Textual (Eds.Eds.). Clarendon Press. Original work published in 1776.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A. (1976b). The theory of moral sentiments D. D. Raphael & A. L. Macfie (Eds.). Clarendon Press. Original work published in 1759.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, V. L. (2007). Rationality in economics: Constructivist and ecological forms. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2011). Trust in public institutions over the business cycle. The American Economic Review, 101(3), 281–287. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.101.3.281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, J. R., Gapenne, O., & DiPaolo, E. A. (Eds.). (2010). Enaction: Toward a new paradigm for cognitive science. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sugden, R. (2018). The community of advantage: A behavioural economist’s defence of the market. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C. R. (2017). Nudges that fail. Behavioural Public Policy, 1(1), 4–25. https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2016.3
   Google Scholar
• Sutton, J. (2010). Exograms and interdisciplinarity: History, the extended mind, and the civilizing process. In R. Menary (Ed.), The Extended Mind (pp. 189–225). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taleb, N. N. (2007). The black swan: The impact of the highly improbable. Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Tollefsen, D. (2004). Collective intentionality. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://iep.utm.edu/collective-intentionality/
   Google Scholar
• Tuomela, R. (1995). The importance of us. Standford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Uhlaner, C. J. (1989). ‘Relational goods’ and participation: Incorporating sociability into a theory of rational action. Public Choice, 62(3), 253–285. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02337745
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar