Trusting groups

References

• American National Election Study. (2020) ‘Trust in government index 1958-2020’ Retrieved November 8, 2022. from https://electionstudies.org/resources/anes-guide/top-tables/?id=116
   Google Scholar
• Baddorf, M. (2017). Phenomenal consciousness, collective mentality, and collective moral responsibility. Philosophical Studies, 174(11), 2769–2786. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-016-0809-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baier, A. (1986). Trust and antitrust. Ethics, 96(2), 231–260. https://doi.org/10.1086/292745
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, M. (2021). Demoralising trust. Ethics, 131(3), 511–538. https://doi.org/10.1086/712564
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, R., & Kottasz, R. (2012). Public attitudes towards the UK banking industry following the global financial crisis. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 30(2), 128–147. https://doi.org/10.1108/02652321211210877
   Google Scholar
• Björnsson, G., & Hess, K. (2017). Corporate crocodile tears? On the reactive attitudes of corporate agents. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 94(2), 272–298. https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.12260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cogley, Z. (2012). Trust and the trickster problem. Analytic Philosophy, 53(1), 30–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2153-960X.2012.00546.x
   Google Scholar
• Dormandy, K. (2019). ‘Introduction’ in trust in Epistemology. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Faulkner, P. (2007). On telling and trusting. Mind, 116(464), 875–902. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzm875
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• French, P. (2017). The diachronic moral responsibility of firms. In Eric W Orts & N Craig Smith (Eds.), The moral responsibility of firms (pp. 53–65). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, M. (2006). Who’s to blame? Collective moral responsibility and its implications for group members. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 30(1), 94–114. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4975.2006.00130.x
   Google Scholar
• Hawley, K. (2014). Trust, distrust, and commitment. Noûs, 48(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawley, K. (2017). Trustworthy groups and organizations. In Paul Faulkner & Thomas Simpson (Eds.), The philosophy of trust (pp. 230–250). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hawley, K. (2019). How to be trustworthy. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, K. M. (2014). The free will of corporations (and other collectives). Philosophical Studies, 168(1), 241–260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-013-0128-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinchman, E. S. (2005). Telling as inviting to trust. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 70(3), 562–587. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1933-1592.2005.tb00415.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holton, R. (1994). Deciding to trust, coming to believe. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 72(1), 63–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048409412345881
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, K. Trust as an affective attitude. (1996). Ethics, 107(1), 4–25.https://doi.org/10.1086/233694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, K. (2012). Trustworthiness. Ethics, 123(1), 61–85. https://doi.org/10.1086/667838
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, K. (2017). But I was counting on you! In Paul Faulkner & Thomas Simpson (Eds.), The Philosophy of Trust (pp. 90–108). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marušić, B. (2015). Evidence and agency: Norms of belief for promising and resolving. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McLeod, C. (2002). Self-trust and reproductive autonomy. MIT Press).
   Google Scholar
• Moran, R. (2006). Getting Told and Being Believed. In Lackey & Sosa (Eds.), The Epistemology of testimony (pp. 272–306). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, C. T. (2021). ‘Transparency is surveillance’ philosophy and phenomenological research. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 105(2), 331–361. https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.12823
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, P. (2022). In praise of skepticism: Trust but verify. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Neill, O. (2002). A question of trust: The BBC Reith Lectures. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pouryousefi, S., & Tallant, J. (2022). Empirical and philosophical reflection on trust. Journal of the American Philosophical Association, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1017/apa.2022.14
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, A. (1986). Why do we believe what we are told? Ratio, 28(1), 69–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sepinwall, A. (2017). Blame, emotion, and the corporation. In Eric W. Orts & N. Craig Smith (Eds.), The moral responsibility of firms (pp. 143–166). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shoemaker, D. (2015). Responsibility from the margins. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shoemaker, D. (2019). Blameworthy but unblamable: A paradox of corporate responsibility. Georgetown Journal of Law and Public Policy, 17(SI), 897–918.
   Google Scholar
• Silver, K. (2022). Group action without group minds. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 104(2), 321–342. https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.12766
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strawson, P. F., 1962 [1993]. Freedom and resentment. In J.M. Fischer, & M. Ravizza, (Eds.), Perspectives on Moral Responsibility (pp. 45–66). Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Valgarðsson, V. O., Clarke, N., Jennings, W., & Stoker, G. (2021). The good politician and political trust: An authenticity gap in British politics? Political Studies, 69(4), 858–880. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321720928257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar