An analysis of bias and distrust in social hinge epistemology

References

• Baier, A. (1987). Trust and Antitrust. Ethics, 96(2), 231–260. issn: 00141704, 1539297X. https://doi.org/10.1086/292745
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, J. “Trust and rationality”. en. (1987). Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 68(1), 1–13. issn: 1468-0114. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0114.1987.tb00280.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boncompagni, A. (2019). Hinges, prejudices, and radical doubters. Wittgenstein-Studien, 10(1), 165–181. https://doi.org/10.1515/witt-2019-0010
   Google Scholar
• Boncompagni, A. (2021). “Prejudice in testimonial justification: A hinge account”. en. Episteme, 1–18. issn: 1742-3600, 1750-0117. https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2021.40
   Google Scholar
• Coliva, A. (2015). Extended rationality: A hinge epistemology. eng. Palgrave innovations in philosophy. ( isbn: 978-1-137-50189-9978-1-137-50188-2). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Coliva, A. (2019a). Disagreeing with myself: Doxastic commitments and intrapersonal disagreement. American Philosophical Quarterly, 56(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.2307/45128639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coliva, A. “Testimonial hinges”. en. (2019b). Philosophical Issues, 29(1), 53–68. issn: 1758-2237. https://doi.org/10.1111/phis.12140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coliva, A. (forthcoming). Social hinge epistemology. In J. Lackey & A. McGlynn (Eds.), Oxford handbook of social epistemology (accepted). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• D’Cruz, J. (2020). “Trust and distrust”. The Routledge Handbook of Trust and Philosophy. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Faulkner, P. On Telling and trusting. (2007). Mind, 116(464), 875–902. issn: 0026-4423. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzm875
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faulkner, P. (2015). The attitude of trust is basic. Analysis, 75(3), 424–429. issn: 0003-2638. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/anv037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faulkner, P. (2017). The problem of trust. In B. P. Faulkner & T. Simpson (Eds.), The philosophy of trust (pp. 109–128). Oxford University Press. isbn: 978-0-19-873254-90007. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198732549.003.
   Google Scholar
• Faulkner, P. (2020). Trust and testimony. In The Routledge handbook of trust and philosophy isbn: 978-1-315-54229-4. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gendler, T. S. Alief and belief. (2008). The Journal of Philosophy, 105(10), 634–663. issn: 0022-362X. https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil20081051025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Govier, T. (1992). Distrust as a practical problem. Journal of Social Philosophy, 23(1), 52–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9833.1992.tb00484.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hardin, R. (2002). Trust and trustworthiness. Russell Sage Foundation. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7758/9781610442718
   Google Scholar
• Hawley, K. (2014). “Trust, distrust and commitment”. en. Noûs, 48(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12000. issn: 1468-0068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawley, K. (2019). How to be trustworthy (First ed). isbn. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hieronymi, P. (2008). “The reasons of trust”. en. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 86(2), 213–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048400801886496. issn: 0004-8402, 1471-6828.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holton, R. “Deciding to trust, coming to believe”. en. (1994). Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 72(1), 63–76. issn: 0004-8402,1471-6828. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048409412345881
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horwich, P. (1998). Truth”. eng. In Meaning isbn, pp. 978-0-19-823824–9. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/019823824X.003.0004.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, K. Trust as an affective attitude. (1996). Ethics, 107(1), 4–25. issn: 0014-1704. https://doi.org/10.1086/233694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moran, R. (2006). Getting Told and Being Believed. In J. Lackey & E. Sosa (Eds.), The epistemology of testimony (pp. 272–303). Oxford University Press. isbn:978-0-19-927601-1. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199276011.003.0013.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, C. T. (2022). Trust as an Unquestioning attitude. In T. S. Gendler, J. Hawthorne, & J. Chung (Eds.), Oxford studies in epistemology volume 7, oxford studies in epistemology (pp. 214–244). https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192868978.003.0007
   Google Scholar
• Potter, N. N. (2002). How can I be trusted?: A virtue theory of trust worthiness. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Pryor, J. The Skeptic and the Dogmatist. (2000). Noˆus, 34(4), 517–549. issn: 0029-4624. https://doi.org/10.1111/0029-4624.00277
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, T. W. “What is trust?” en. (2012). Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 93(4), 550–569. issn: 1468-0114 2012.01438.x. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0114.2012.01438.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, L. (August. 1990). “Opinion — next life, I’ll be white”. en-US. In: The New York Times. issn: 0362–4331.
   Google Scholar
• Wittgenstein, L., Anscombe, G. E. M., & von Wright, G. H. (1969). On certainty. ( isbn). Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, C. 2004. “Warrant for nothing (and foundations for free)?” en. Aristotelian Society Supplementary, 78(1), 167–212. issn: 1467-8349. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0309-7013.2004.00121.x
   Google Scholar
• Wright, C. (2014). On Epistemic Entitlement (II): Welfare State Epistemology. In D. Dodd & E. Zardini (Eds.), Scepticism and Perceptual Justification (pp. 213–247). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199658343.003.0011
   Google Scholar