Follow the Judas sheep: materializing post-qualitative methodology in zooethnographic space

References

• Adams , C. J. 1990/2002 . The sexual politics of meat: A feminist-vegetarian critical theory , New York , NY : Continuum .
   Google Scholar
• Adams , C. J. 2009 . “ Post-meateating ” . In Animal encounters , Edited by: Tyler , T. and Rossini , M. 47 – 72 . Leiden : Brill .
   Google Scholar
• Bough , J. 2006 . From value to vermin: A history of the donkey in Australia . Australian Zoologist , 33 : 388 – 397 .
   Google Scholar
• Brown , S. D. 2002 . Michel Serres: Science, translation and the logic of the parasite . Theory, Culture & Society , 19 ( 3 ) : 1 – 27 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvo, E. (2008). ‘Most farmers prefer blondes’: The dynamics of anthroparchy in animals’ becoming meat. Journal for Critical Animal Studies, VI. Retrieved from http://www.criticalanimalstudies.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/Erika-Calvo-32-451.doc
   Google Scholar
• Campbell , K. and Donlan , C. J. 2005 . Feral goat eradications on islands . Conservation Biology , 19 : 1362 – 1374 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole , M. 2011 . From “animal machines” to “happy meat”? Foucault’s ideas of disciplinary and pastoral power applied to “animal-centred” welfare discourse . Animals , 1 : 83 – 101 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fudge, E. (2009, February 21). A project for animal history. Presentation at the British Animal Studies Network meeting 10, University College, London.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. (2003). The companion species manifesto. Dogs, people, and significant otherness. Chicago, IL: Prickly Paradigm Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holloway , L. 2007 . Subjecting cows to robots: Farming technologies and the making of animal subjects . Environment and Planning D: Society and Space , 25 : 1041 – 1060 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, J. (2009, October 18). Creature consciousness. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved December 9, 2010, from http://chronicle.com/article/Creature-Consciousness/48804/
   Google Scholar
• Jackson , A. and Mazzei , L. 2012 . Thinking with theory in qualitative research: Viewing data across multiple perspectives , New York , NY : Routledge .
   Google Scholar
• Kirksey , S. E. and Helmreich , S. 2010 . The emergence of multispecies ethnography . Cultural Anthropology , 25 : 545 – 576 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law , J. and Mol , A. 2008 . “ The actor-enacted: Cumbrian sheep in 2001 ” . In Material agency: Towards a non-anthropocentric approach , Edited by: Knappett , C. and Malafouris , L. 57 – 77 . New York , NY : Springer .
   Google Scholar
• Lury, C. (2009, June 15–17). Space: The final frontier in nature and culture. Keynote lecture delivered at the ACSIS conference for cultural studies in Sweden, Norrköping.
   Google Scholar
• Marinker , M. 1978 . The chameleon, the Judas goat, and the cuckoo . Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners , 28 : 199 – 206 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nibert , D. 2002 . Animal rights/human rights: Entanglements of oppression and liberation , Lanham , MD : Rowman & Littlefield .
   Google Scholar
• Pachirat , T. 2011 . Every twelve seconds: Industrialized slaughter and the politics of sight , New Haven , CT : Yale University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen , H. 2011a . Undercover education: Mice, mimesis, and parasites in the teaching machine . Studies in Philosophy and Education , 31 : 365 – 386 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen , H. 2011b . Release the moths: Critical animal studies and the posthumanist impulse . Culture, Theory and Critique , 52 : 65 – 81 .
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen , H. 2012a . Education, animals, and the commodity form . Culture and Organization , 18 : 415 – 432 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen , H. 2012b . Unstable mixtures: Zooethnographic educational relations as difference, contagion, critique, and potential . Other Education: The Journal of Educational Alternatives , 1 : 152 – 165 .
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen, H., & Stănescu, V. (2012). Series editors’ introduction: What is “critical” about animal studies? From the animal “question” to the animal “condition”. In K. Socha, Women, destruction, and the avant-garde: A paradigm for animal liberation (pp. ix–xi). Amsterdam: Rodopi.
   Google Scholar
• Pick , D. 1993 . War machine: The rationalization of slaughter in the modern age , New Haven , CT : Yale University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Ramsey , D. S. L. , Parkes , J. and Morrison , S. A. 2008 . Quantifying eradication success: The removal of feral pigs from Santa Cruz Island, California . Conservation Biology , 23 : 449 – 459 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raunig, G. (2010). A thousand machines: A concise philosophy of the machine as social movement. Los Angeles, CA: Semiotext(e).
   Google Scholar
• Rose , D. B. 2008 . Judas work: Four modes of sorrow . Environmental Philosophy , 5 : 51 – 66 .
   Google Scholar
• Shukin , N. 2009 . Animal capital: Rendering life in biopolitical times , Minneapolis , MN : University of Minnesota Press .
   Google Scholar
• Smith , M. and Morra , J. 2006 . “ Introduction ” . In The prosthetic impulse: From a posthuman present to a biocultural future , Edited by: Smith , M. and Morra , J. 1 – 14 . Cambridge , MA : MIT Press .
   Google Scholar
• Vialles , N. 1994 . Animal to edible , Cambridge : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Williams , A. 2004 . Disciplining animals: Sentience, production, and critique . International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy , 24 : 45 – 57 .
   Google Scholar
• Wolfe , C. , ed. 2003 . Zoontologies: The question of the animal , Minneapolis , MN : University of Minnesota Press .
   Google Scholar
• Zembylas , M. 2006 . Witnessing in the classroom: The ethics and politics of affect . Educational Theory , 56 : 305 – 324 .
   Google Scholar