Party animals or responsible men: social class, race, and masculinity on campus

References

• Anderson, E. (1999). Code of the street: Decency, violence, and the moral life of the inner city. New York, NY: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, E. A., & Hamilton, L. T. (2013). Paying for the party: How college maintains inequality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674073517
   Google Scholar
• Arnett, J. J. (2004). Emerging adulthood: The winding road from the late teens through the twenties. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Astin, A. W. (1993). What matters in college. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Bergerson, A. A. (2007). Exploring the impact of social class on adjustment to college: Anna’s story. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 20, 99–119.10.1080/09518390600923610
   Google Scholar
• Bird, S. R. (1996). Welcome to the men’s club: Homosociality and the maintenance of hegemonic masculinity. Gender & Society, 10, 120–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogle, K. A. (2008). Hooking up: Sex, dating, and relationships on campus. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boswell, A. A., & Spade, J. Z. (1996). Fraternities and collegiate rape culture: Why are some fraternities more dangerous places for women? Gender & Society, 10, 133–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capraro, R. L. (2000). Why college men drink: Alcohol, adventure, and the paradox of masculinity. Journal of American College Health, 48, 307–315.10.1080/07448480009596272
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, A. S. (1999). Lives at the center of the periphery, lives at the periphery of the center: Chinese American masculinities and bargaining with hegemony. Gender & Society, 13, 584–607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, P. H. 1991. Learning from the outsider within: The sociological significance of black feminist thought. In M. M. Fonow & J. A. Cook (Eds.), Beyond methodology: Feminist scholarship as lived research (pp. 35–59). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, R. (2004). Interactional ritual chains. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Connell, R. W. (1987). Gender and power: Society, the person, and sexual politics. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Connell, R. W. (1995). Masculinities. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dellinger, K. (2004). Masculinities in “safe” and “embattled” organizations: Accounting for pornographic and feminist magazines. Gender & Society, 18, 545–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• England, P., Shafer, E. F., & Fogarty, A. C. K. (2008). Hooking up and forming romantic relationships on today’s college campuses. In M. Kimmel & A. Aronson (Eds.), The gendered society reader (3rd ed., pp. 531–547). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eshbaugh, E. M., & Gute, G. (2008). Hookups and sexual regret among college women. Journal of Social Psychology, 148, 77–90.10.3200/SOCP.148.1.77-90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, A. A. (2000). Bad boys: Public schools in the making of black masculinity. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freitas, D. (2010). Sex and the soul: Juggling sexuality, spirituality, romance, and religion on America’s college campuses. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Furstenberg, F. F., Jr, Kennedy, S., McLoyd, V. C., Rumbaut, R. G., & Settersten, R. A. (2004). Growing up is harder to do. Contexts, 3(3), 33–41.10.1525/ctx.2004.3.issue-3
   Google Scholar
• Grazian, D. (2007). The girl hunt: Urban nightlife and the performance of masculinity as collective activity. Symbolic Interaction, 30, 221–243.10.1525/si.2007.30.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grazian, D. (2008). On the make: The hustle of urban nightlife. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, L., & Armstrong, E. A. (2009). Gendered sexuality in young adulthood: Double binds and flawed options. Gender & Society, 23, 589–616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper, S. R. (2004). The measure of a man: Conceptualizations of masculinity among high-achieving African American male college students. Berkeley Journal of Sociology, 48, 88–107.
   Google Scholar
• Harper, S. R., Wardell, C. C., & McGuire, K. M. (2011). Man of multiple identities: Complex individuality and identity intersectionality among college men. In J. A. Laker & T. Davis (Eds.), Masculinities in higher education: Theoretical and practical considerations (pp. 81–96). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kuh, G., Kinzie, J., Schuh, J. H., & Whitt, E. J. (2005). Student success in college: Creating conditions that matter. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Lamont, M. (1992). Money, morals, and manners: The culture of the French and American upper-middle class. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226922591.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Pascarella, E. T., Pierson, C., Wolniak, G., & Terenzini, P. T. (2004). First-generation college students: Additional evidence on college experiences and outcomes. Journal of Higher Education, 75, 249–284.10.1353/jhe.2004.0016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul, E. L., McManus, B., & Hayes, A. (2000). “Hookups”: Characteristics and correlates of college students’ spontaneous and anonymous sexual experiences. Journal of Sex Research, 37, 76–88.10.1080/00224490009552023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ray, R., & Rosow, J. (2009). Getting off and getting intimate: How institutional arrangements structure black and white fraternity men’s approaches toward women. Men and Masculinities, 12, 523–546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rendon, L. I. (1994). Validating culturally diverse students: Toward a new model of learning and student development. Innovative Higher Education, 19, 33–51.10.1007/BF01191156
   Google Scholar
• Rizzo, T. A., Corsaro, W. A., & Bates, J. E. (1992). Ethnographic methods and interpretive analysis: Expanding the methodological options of psychologists. Developmental Review, 12, 101–123.10.1016/0273-2297(92)90005-M
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanday, P. R. (1990). Fraternity gang rape: Sex, brotherhood, and privilege on campus. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schrock, D., & Schwalbe, M. (1996). Identity work as group process. Advances in Group Processes, 13, 113–147.
   Google Scholar
• Schrock, D., & Schwalbe, M. (2009). Men, masculinity, and manhood acts. Annual Review of Sociology, 35, 277–295.10.1146/annurev-soc-070308-115933
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwalbe, M., Godwin, S., Holden, D., Schrock, D., Thompson, S., & Wolkomir, M. (2000). Generic processes in the reproduction of inequality: An interactionist analysis. Social Forces, 79, 419–452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sperber, M. (2001). Beer and circus: How big-time college sports is crippling undergraduate education. New York, NY: Henry Holt.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, M. L., Armstrong, E. A., & Arum, R. (2008). Sieve, incubator, temple, hub: Empirical and theoretical advances in the sociology of higher education. Annual Review of Sociology, 34, 127–151.10.1146/annurev.soc.34.040507.134737
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strombler, M. (1994). ‘Buddies’ or ‘slutties:’ The collective sexual reputation of fraternity little sisters. Gender & Society, 8, 297–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuber, J. M. (2011). Inside the college gates: How class and culture matter in higher education. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Ven, T. V. (2011). Getting wasted: Why college students drink too much and party so hard. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walpole, M. (2003). Socioeconomic status and college: How SES affects college experiences and outcomes. Review of Higher Education, 27, 45–73.10.1353/rhe.2003.0044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, K. G. (2013). Party school: Crime, campus, and community. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wetherell, M., & Edley, N. (1999). Negotiating hegemonic masculinity: Imaginary positions and psycho-discursive practices. Feminism and Psychology, 9, 335–356.10.1177/0959353599009003012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkins, A. C. (2012a). “Not out to start a revolution”: Race, gender, and emotional restraint among black university men. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 41, 34–65.10.1177/0891241611433053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkins, A. C. (2012b). Stigma and status: Interracial intimacy and intersectional identities among black college men. Gender & Society, 26, 165–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar