4,666
Views
43
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Using email interviews in qualitative educational research: creating space to think and time to talk

Pages 150-163 | Received 10 Jan 2013, Accepted 15 Dec 2014, Published online: 24 Apr 2015

References

  • Adams, C. A., & Thompson, T. L. (2011). Interviewing objects: Including educational technologies as qualitative research participants. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 24, 733–750.10.1080/09518398.2010.529849
  • Beneito-Montagut, R. (2011). Ethnography goes online: Towards a user-centred methodology to research interpersonal communication on the Internet. Qualitative Research, 11, 716–735.10.1177/1468794111413368
  • Boellstorff, T. (2012). Rethinking digital ethnography. In H. A. Horst & D. Miller (Eds.), Digital anthropology (pp. 39–60). London: Berg.
  • Bowker, N., & Tuffin, K. (2004). Using the online medium for discursive research about people with disabilities. Social Science Computer Review, 22, 228–241.10.1177/0894439303262561
  • Burns, E. (2010). Developing email interview practices in qualitative research. Sociological Research Online, 15(4). Retrieved from http://www.socresonline.org.uk/15/4/8.html
  • Burrell, J., & Anderson, K. (2008). ‘I have great desires to look beyond my world': Trajectories of information and communication technology use among Ghanaians living abroad. New Media Society, 10, 203–224.10.1177/1461444807086472
  • Busher, H., & James, N. (2012). Qualitative interviewing in cyberspace. In S. Delamont (Ed.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 223–240). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  • Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
  • Czarniawska, B. (2004). Narratives in social science research. London: Sage.
  • Davies, J. (2011). Discourse and computer-medicated communication. In B. Paltridge & K. Hyland (Eds.), Continuum companion to discourse analysis (pp. 228–242). London: Continuum.
  • Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Introduction: Entering the field of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 10–15). London: Sage.
  • Eichhorn, K. (2001). Sites unseen: Ethnographic research in a textual community. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 14, 565–578.10.1080/09518390110047075
  • Hallett, R., & Barber, K. (2013). Ethnographic research in a cyber era. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 12(8), 1–25.
  • Hardey, M. (2004). Digital life stories: Auto/biography in the information age. Auto/Biography, 12, 183–200.10.1191/0967550704ab010oa
  • Harricharan, M., & Bhopal, K. (2014). Using blogs in qualitative educational research: An exploration of method. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 37, 324–343.
  • Harvey, D. (1989). The conditions of postmodernity: An enquiry into the origins of cultural change. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Hasim, Z., De Luca, R., & Bell, B. (2011). Issues and challenges of using web blogs as a medium for research communication. Waikato Journal of Education, 16, 143–150.
  • Henkel, M. (2000). Academic identities. Policy change in higher education. London: Jessica Kingsley.
  • Hinchcliffe, V., & Gavin, H. (2008). Internet mediated research: A critical reflection upon the practice of using instant messenger for higher educational research interviewing. Psychology and Society, 1, 91–104.
  • Hine, C. (2000). Virtual ethnography. London: Sage.
  • Hine, C. (2005). Virtual methods. Issues in social research on the internet. Oxford: Berg.
  • Illingworth, N. (2006). Content, context, reflexivity and the qualitative research encounter: Telling stories in the virtual realm. Sociological Research Online, 11(1). Retrieved from http://www.socresonline.org.uk/11/1/illingworth.html
  • Irvine, A., Drew, P., & Sainsbury, R. (2012). ‘Am I not answering your questions properly?’: Clarification, adequacy and responsiveness in semi-structured telephone and face-to-face interviews. Qualitative Research, 13, 87–106.
  • Ison, N. (2009). Having their say: Email interviews for research data collection with people who have verbal communication impairment. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 12, 161–172.10.1080/13645570902752365
  • James, N. (2003, July). Teacher professionalism, teacher identity: How do I see myself? (Unpublished doctorate of education thesis). School of Education, University of Leicester, Leicester.
  • James, N. (2007). The use of email interviewing as a qualitative method of inquiry in educational research. British Educational Research Journal, 33, 963–976.10.1080/01411920701657074
  • James, N., & Busher, H. (2006). Credibility, authenticity and voice: Dilemmas in online interviewing. Qualitative Research, 6, 403–420.10.1177/1468794106065010
  • James, N., & Busher, H. (2007). Ethical issues in online educational research: Protecting privacy, establishing authenticity in email interviewing. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 30, 101–113.
  • James, N., & Busher, H. (2009). Online interviewing. London: Sage.10.4135/9780857024503
  • James, N., & Busher, H. (2013). Researching hybrid learning communities in the digital age through educational ethnography. Ethnography and Education, 8, 194–209.
  • Kitchin, R. M. (1998). Towards geographies of cyberspace. Progress in Human Geography, 22, 385–406.10.1191/030913298668331585
  • Kivits, J. (2005). Online interviewing and the research relationship. In C. Hine (Ed.), Virtual methods: Issues in social research on the Internet (pp. 35–51). Oxford: Berg.
  • Leander, K. M., & Mckim, K. K. (2003). Tracing the everyday ‘sitings’ of adolescents on the Internet: A strategic adaptation of ethnography across online and offline spaces. Education, Communication & Information, 3, 211–240.10.1080/14636310303140
  • Lebesco, K. (2004). Managing visibility, intimacy, and focus in online critical ethnography. In M. D. Johns, S. L. S. Chen, & G. J. Hall (Eds.), Online social research: Methods, issues and ethics (pp. 63–80). Oxford: Peter Lang.
  • Lee, H., & Liebenau, J. (2000). Time and the Internet at the turn of the millennium. Time and Society, 9, 43–56.10.1177/0961463X00009001003
  • Madge, C., & O’Connor, H. (2005). Mothers in the making? Exploring liminality in cyber/space. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 30, 83–97.10.1111/tran.2005.30.issue-1
  • Markham, A. N. (1998). Life online: Researching real experience in virtual space. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
  • Markham, A. N. (2004). Representation in online ethnography. In M. D. Johns, S. L. S. Chen, & G. J. Hall (Eds.), Online social research: Methods, issues and ethics (pp. 141–156). Oxford: Peter Lang.
  • Massey, D. (1994). Space, place and gender. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • McCoyd, J. L. M., & Kerson, T. S. (2006). Conducting intensive interviews using email: A serendipitous comparative opportunity. Qualitative Social Work, 5, 389–406.10.1177/1473325006067367
  • Meho, L. I. (2006). E-mail interviewing in qualitative research: A methodological discussion. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57, 1284–1295.10.1002/(ISSN)1532-2890
  • Morrow, O., Hawkins, R., & Kern, L. (2014). Feminist research in online spaces. Gender, Place and Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography, 10, 2–18.
  • Murthy, D. (2008). Digital ethnography: An examination of the use of new technologies for social research. Sociology, 42, 837–855.10.1177/0038038508094565
  • Orgad, S. (2005). From online to offline and back: Moving from online to offline relationships with research participants. In C. Hine (Ed.), Virtual methods: Issues in social research on the Internet (pp. 51–66). Oxford: Berg.
  • Russell, T., & Bullock, S. (1999). Discovering our professional knowledge as teachers: Critical dialogues about learning from experience. In J. Loughran (Ed.), Researching methodologies and practices for understanding pedagogy (pp. 132–152). New York, NY: The Falmer Press.
  • Seymour, W. S. (2001). In the flesh or online? Exploring qualitative research methodologies. Qualitative Research, 1, 147–168.
  • Tang, L. (2010). Development of online friendship in different social spaces. Information, Communication & Society, 13, 614–633.
  • Taylor, C. (1989). Sources of the self. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Thrift, N. (1994). Inhuman geographies: Landscapes of speed, light and power. In P. Cloke, M. Doel, D. Matless, M. Phillips, & N. Thrift (Eds.), Writing the rural: Five cultural geographies (pp. 453–486). London: Paul Chapman.
  • Tsatou, P. (2009). Reconceptualising time and space in the era of electronic media and communications. PLATFORM: Journal of Media and Communication, 3, 11–32.
  • Van Manen, M., & Adams, C. (2009). The phenomenology of space in writing online. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 41, 10–21.10.1111/j.1469-5812.2008.00480.x
  • Zhao, S. (2006). The Internet and the transformation of the reality of everyday life: Toward a new analytic stance in sociology. Sociological Inquiry, 76, 458–474.10.1111/soin.2006.76.issue-4

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.