Many choices, one destination: multimodal university brand construction in an urban public transportation system

References

• Baudrillard, J. (1991). Simulacres et science-fiction [Simulacra and science fiction]. Science Fiction Studies, 18, 309–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baudrillard, J. (2005). The system of objects. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Bengtsson, A., & Ostberg, J. (2006). Researching the cultures of brands. In R. W. Belk (Ed.), Handbook of qualitative research methods in marketing (pp. 83–93). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, A. A. (2010). The objects of affection. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230109902
   Google Scholar
• Berger, J. B., & Milem, J. F. (2000). Organizational behavior in higher education and student outcomes. In J. C. Smart & W. G. Tierney (Eds.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. XV, pp. 268–338). New York, NY: Agathon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Birnbaum, R. (2000). Management fads in higher education: Where they come from, what they do, why they fail. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Curtis, T., Abratt, R., & Minor, W. (2009). Corporate brand management in higher education: The case of ERAU. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 18, 404–413.
   Google Scholar
• D’Andrea, V., Stensaker, B., & Allison, J. (2007). Images and identity in the branding of the university – Exploring the symbolic and cultural implications. In B. Stensaker & V. D’Andrea (Eds.), Branding in higher education: Exploring an emerging phenomenon (pp. 34–53). Amsterdam: EAIR.
   Google Scholar
• Delucchi, M., & Korgen, K. (2002). “We're the customer –We pay the tuition”: Student consumerism among undergraduate sociology majors. Teaching Sociology, 30, 100–107.10.2307/3211524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160.10.2307/2095101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, M., & Isherwood, B. (1996). The world of goods. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Emmison, M., Smith, P., & Mayall, M. (2000). Researching the visual. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Farber, P., & Holm, G. (2005). Selling the dream of higher education: Marketing images of university life. In S. Edgerton, G. Holm, T. Daspit, & P. Farber (Eds.), Imagining the academy: Higher education and popular culture (pp. 117–130). New York, NY: Routledge Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Featherstone, M. (2007). Consumer culture and postmodernism. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Finney, T. G., & Finney, R. Z. (2010). Are students their universities’ customers? An exploratory study. Education & Training, 52, 276–291.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzsimons, G. M., Chartrand, T. L., & Fitzsimons, G. J. (2008). Automatic effects of brand exposure on motivated behavior: How apple makes you “think different”. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 21–35.10.1086/524415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huisman, J. (2007). Images and words: How do UK universities present themselves on the internet? In B. Stensaker & V. D’Andrea (Eds.), Branding in higher education: Exploring an emerging phenomenon (pp. 13–33). Amsterdam: EAIR.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, K. (2003). Brand synthesis: The multidimensionality of brand knowledge. Journal of Consumer Research, 29, 595–600.10.1086/jcr.2003.29.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, N. (2010). No logo: No space, no choice, no jobs. New York, NY: Picador.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G. (2011). “Partnerships in research”: Multimodality and ethnography. Qualitative Research, 11, 239–260.10.1177/1468794111399836
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kress, G. R. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G. R., & van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S. (2013). Qualitative research in the 21st century. Annual meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, St. Louis, MO.
   Google Scholar
• Lomas, L. (2007). Are students customers? Perceptions of academic staff. Quality in Higher Education, 13, 31–44.10.1080/13538320701272714
   Google Scholar
• Manning, P. (2010). The semiotics of brand. Annual Review of Anthropology, 39, 33–49.10.1146/annurev.anthro.012809.104939
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marginson, S. (2007). Global position and position taking: The case of Australia. Journal of Studies in International Education, 11, 5–32.10.1177/1028315306287530
   Google Scholar
• Marginson, S. (2010). Making space in higher education. In S. Marginson, P. Murphy, & M. Peters (Eds.), Global creation: Space, mobility, and synchrony in the age of the knowledge economy (pp. 150–200). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Marginson, S., & Rhoades, G. (2002). Beyond national states, markets, and systems of higher education: A glonacal agency heuristic. Higher Education, 43, 281–309.10.1023/A:1014699605875
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McArdle-Clinton, D. (2008). The consumer experience of higher education: The rise of capsule education. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. W., Ramirez, F. O., Frank, D. J., & Schofer, E. (2007). Higher education as an institution. In P. J. Gumport (Ed.), Sociology of higher education: Contributions and their contexts (p. 221). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mourad, M., Ennew, C., & Kortam, W. (2011). Brand equity in higher education. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 29, 403–420.
   Google Scholar
• Naidoo, R., Shankar, A., & Veer, E. (2011). The consumerist turn in higher education: Policy aspirations and outcomes. Journal of Marketing Management, 27, 1142–1162.10.1080/0267257X.2011.609135
   Google Scholar
• Nakassis, C. V. (2012). Brand, citationality, performativity. American Anthropologist, 114, 624–638.10.1111/j.1548-1433.2012.01511.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, C. J. W. (2013). Semioticizing capitalism in corporate brand enactment: The case of Singapore’s corporatized universities. Critical Discourse Studies, 11, 139–157.
   Google Scholar
• Oswald, L. (2012). Marketing semiotics: Signs, strategies, and brand value. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pauwels, L. (2011). An integrated conceptual framework for visual research. In E. Margolis & L. Pauwels (Eds.), The Sage handbook of visual research methods (pp. 3–23). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.10.4135/9781446268278
   Google Scholar
• Peñaloza, L., & Cayla, J. (2006). Writing pictures/taking fieldnotes: Towards a more visual and material ethnographic consumer research. In R. W. Belk (Ed.), Handbook of qualitative research methods in marketing (pp. 279–290). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Pitman, T. (2000). Perceptions of academics and students as customers: A survey of administrative staff in higher education. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 22, 165–175.10.1080/713678138
   Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, D. B. (2014). Exploring a customer orientation: Free-market logic and college students. The Review of Higher Education, 37, 197–219.10.1353/rhe.2014.0013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stensaker, B. (2007). The relationship between branding and organisational change. Higher Education Management and Policy, 19(1), 1–17.10.1787/hemp-v19-1-en
   Google Scholar
• Temple, P. (2006). Branding higher education: Illusion or reality? Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, 10, 15–19.
   Google Scholar
• Temple, P. (2011). University branding: What can it do? Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, 15, 113–116.
   Google Scholar
• Urciuoli, B. (2003). Excellence, leadership, skills, diversity: Marketing liberal arts education. Language & Communication, 23, 385–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Leeuwen, T. (2011). Multimodality and multimodal research. In E. Margolis & L. Pauwels (Eds.), The Sage handbook of visual research methods (pp. 549–569). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar