‘Working the ruins’ of collaborative feminist research

References

• Acker, J., Barry, K., & Esseveld, J. (1996). Objectivity and truth: Problems in doing feminist research. In H. Gottfried (Ed.), Feminism and social change: Bridging theory and practice (pp. 135–153). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Addison, J., & McGee, S. M. (Eds.). (1999). Feminist empirical research: Emerging perspectives on qualitative and teacher research. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Alvarez, W. (2013). Finding ‘home’ in/through Latinidad ethnography: Experiencing community in the field with ‘my people’ Liminalities: A Journal of Performance Studies, 9, 49-58.
   Google Scholar
• Bassett, R. (2012). Pensive poetics: Reflections on interprofessional team collaboration. Qualitative Inquiry, 18, 523–524.10.1177/1077800412442056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behar, R. (1993). Translated woman: Crossing the border with Esparanza’s story. Boston, MA: Beacon.
   Google Scholar
• Behar, R., & Gordon, D. (1995). Women writing culture. Berkeley, CA: University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Brayboy, B. M. (2000). The Indian and the researcher: Tales from the field. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 13, 415–426.10.1080/095183900413368
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (1990a). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (1990b). Performative acts and gender constitution: An essay in phenomenology and feminist theory. In S. Case (Ed.), Performing feminisms: Feminist critical theory and theatre (pp. 270–282). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of sex. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (1997a). Excitable speech: A politics of the performative. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (1997b). The psychic life of power: Theories in subjection. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (2004). Undoing gender. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Conquergood, D. (1982). Performing as a moral act: Ethical dimensions of the ethnography of performance. Literature in Performance, 5, 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Conquergood, D. (2002). Performance studies: Interventions and radical research. TDR/The Drama Review, 46, 145-156.10.1162/105420402320980550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conquergood, D. (2006). Rethinking ethnography. In D. S. Madison & J. Hamera (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of performance studies (pp. 351–365). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.10.4135/9781412976145
   Google Scholar
• Cotterill, P. (1992). Interviewing women. Women’s Studies International Forum, 15, 593–606.10.1016/0277-5395(92)90061-Y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creese, G., & Frisby, W. (Eds.). (2012). Feminist community research: Negotiating contested relationships. Vancouver, WA: University of British Columbia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K. (2003). Performance ethnography. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.10.4135/9781412985390
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K. (2006). The politics and ethics of performance pedagogy: Toward a pedagogy of hope. In D. S. Madison & J. Hamera (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of performance studies (pp. 325–338). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.10.4135/9781412976145
   Google Scholar
• Faulkner, S. (2013). Notes from a pretty straight girl: Questioning identities in the field. Liminalities: A Journal of Performance Studies, 9, 39–48.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1990). The history of sexuality (Vol. 1; R. Hurly, Trans.). New York, NY: Vintage. ( Original work published in 1976)
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1995). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. (A. Sheridan, Trans.). New York, NY: Vintage. ( Original work published in 1975)
   Google Scholar
• Gorelick, S. (1991). Contradictions of feminist methodology. Gender and Society, 5, 459–477.10.1177/089124391005004002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, J. C. (2013). On rhizomes, lines of flight, mangles, and other assemblages. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26, 749–758.10.1080/09518398.2013.788763
   Google Scholar
• Johnson-Bailey, J. (1999). The ties that bind and the shackles that separate: Race, gender, class, and color in a research process. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 12, 659–670.10.1080/095183999235818
   Google Scholar
• Khan, S. (2005). Reconfiguring the native informant: Positionality in the global age. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 30, 2017–2037.10.1086/428423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirsch, G. E. (2005). Friendship, friendliness, and feminist fieldwork. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 30, 2163-2172.10.1086/428415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krane, V., Ross, S. R., Barak, K. S., Rowse, J. L., & Lucas-Carr, C. B. (2012). Unpacking our academic suitcases: The inner workings of our feminist research group. Quest, 64, 249–267.10.1080/00336297.2012.706882
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lather, P. (2000). Drawing the line at angels: Working the ruins of feminist ethnography. In E. A. St. Pierre & W. S. Pillow (Eds.), Working the ruins: Feminist poststructural theory and methods in education (pp. 284-311) New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lather, P. (2007). Getting lost: Feminist efforts toward a double(d) science. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lather, P. (2013a). Methodology-21: What do we do in the afterward? International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26, 634–645.10.1080/09518398.2013.788753
   Google Scholar
• Lather, P. (2013b). ‘To give good science’: A review of Cartographies of knowledge: Exploring qualitative epistemologies. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26, 759–762.10.1080/09518398.2013.793431
   Google Scholar
• Lather, P., & Smithies, C. (1997). Troubling the angels: Women living with HIV/AIDS. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lather, P., & St. Pierre, E. A. (2013). Post-qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26, 629–633.10.1080/09518398.2013.788752
   Google Scholar
• Le Fevre, D. M., & Sawyer, R. D. (2012). Dangerous conversations: Understanding the space between silence and communication. In J. Norris, R. D. Sawyer, & D. Lund (Eds.), Duoethnography: Dialogic methods for social, health, and educational research (pp. 261–289). Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S. (1993). I and thou: Method, voice, and roles in research with the silenced. In D. McLaughlin & W. G. Tierney (Eds.), Naming silenced lives: Personal narratives and processes of educational change (pp. 20–27). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S. (1997). Self, subject, audience, text: Living at the edge, writing at the margins. In W. G. Tierney & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Representation and the text (pp. 37–55). Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacLure, M. (2009). Broken voices, dirty words: On the productive insufficiency of voice. In A. Y. Jackson & L. A. Mazzie (Eds.), Voice in qualitative inquiry: Challenging conventional, interpretive, and critical conceptions in qualitative research (pp. 98–113). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• MacLure, M. (2013). Researching without representation? Language and materiality in post-qualitative methodology. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26, 658–667.
   Google Scholar
• Madison, D. S. (1998). That was my occupation: Oral narrative, performance, and Black feminist thought. In D. Pollack (Ed.), Exceptional spaces: Essays in performance and history (pp. 319–342). Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Madison, D. S. (2006a). The dialogic performative in critical ethnography. Text and Performance Quarterly, 26, 320–324.10.1080/10462930600828675
   Google Scholar
• Madison, D. S. (2006b). Performing theory/embodied writing. In J. Hamera (Ed.), Opening acts: Performance in/as communication and cultural studies (pp. 243–266). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.10.4135/9781452233079
   Google Scholar
• Madison, D. S. (2008). Narrative poetics and performative interventions. In N. K. Denzin, Y. S. Lincoln, & L. T. Smith (Eds.), Handbook of critical and indigenous methodologies (pp. 391–406). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.10.4135/9781483385686
   Google Scholar
• Mazzei, L. A. (2003). Inhibited silences: In pursuit of a muffled subtext. Qualitative Inquiry, 9, 35–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzei, L. A. (2004). Silent listenings: Deconstructive practices in discourse-based research. Educational Researcher, 33, 26–34.10.3102/0013189X033002026
   Google Scholar
• Mazzei, L. A. (2009). An impossibly full voice. In A. Y. Jackson & L. A. Mazzei (Eds.), Voice in qualitative inquiry: Challenging conventional, interpretive, and critical concepts in qualitative research (pp. 45–62). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzei, L. A. (2013). A voice without organs: Interviewing in posthumanist research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26, 732–740.10.1080/09518398.2013.788761
   Google Scholar
• Mazzei, L. A., & Jackson, A. Y. (2009). Introduction: The limit of voice. In A. Y. Jackson & L. A. Mazzei (Eds.), Voice in qualitative inquiry: Challenging conventional, interpretive, and critical concepts in qualitative research (pp. 1–13). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, J. (2008). Duoethnography. In L. M. Given (Ed.), The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (Vol. 1, pp. 233–236). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, J., Sawyer, R. D., & Lund, D. (Eds.). (2012). Duoethnography: Dialogic methods for social, health, and educational research. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
   Google Scholar
• Olesen, V. (2011). Feminist qualitative research in the millenium’s first decade: Developments, challenges, prospects. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 129–146). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pillow, W. (2003). Confession, catharsis, or cure? Rethinking the uses of reflexivity as methodological power in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 16, 175–196.10.1080/0951839032000060635
   Google Scholar
• Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (2008). The SAGE handbook of action research (2nd ed.). London: Sage.10.4135/9781848607934
   Google Scholar
• Rhee, J. (2013). Working on a failed research: Promiscuity of wanting and doing both ways. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26, 553–566.10.1080/09518398.2013.786846
   Google Scholar
• Rhoades, K. A. (2000). Collaboration and collaborative research. In L. Code (Ed.), Encyclopedia of feminist theories (p. 126). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, L. (1996). Educational birds. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 14, 575–599.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, L. (1997). Fields of play: Constructing an academic life. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ronell, A. (2010). Fighting theory. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sawyer, R. D., & Norris, J. (2013). Duoethnography: Understanding qualitative research. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scantlebury, K., & LeVan, S. (2006). Re-visioning cogenerative dialogues as feminist pedagogy/research. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 7(2), 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Sitter, K., & Hall, S. (2012). Professional boundaries: Creating space and getting to the margins. In J. Norris, R. D. Sawyer, & D. Lund (Eds.), Duoethnography: Dialogic methods for social, health, and educational research (pp. 243–260). Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spencer, C., & Paisley, K. (2013). Two women, a bottle of wine, and The Bachelor: Duoethnography as a means to explore experiences of femininity in a leisure setting. Journal of Leisure Research, 45, 135–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• St. Pierre, E. A. (2011). Post qualitative research: The critique and the coming after. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 611–627). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• St. Pierre, E. A. (2013). The posts continue: Becoming. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26, 646–657.10.1080/09518398.2013.788754
   Google Scholar
• St. Pierre, E. A., & Pillow, W. S. (2000a). Inquiry among the ruins. In E. A. St. Pierre & W. S. Pillow (Eds.), Working the ruins: Feminist poststructural theory and methods in education (pp. 1-23) New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• St. Pierre, E. A., & Pillow, W. (Ed.). (2000b). Working the ruins: Feminist poststructural theory and methods in education. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stacey, J. (1988). Can there be a feminist ethnography? Women’s Studies International Forum, 11, 21–27.10.1016/0277-5395(88)90004-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taguchi, H. L. (2013). Images of thinking in feminist materialisms: Ontological divergences and the production of researcher subjectivities. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26, 706–716.10.1080/09518398.2013.788759
   Google Scholar
• Villenas, S. (1996). The colonizer/colonized Chicana ethnographer: Identity, marginalization, and co-optation in the field. Harvard Educational Review, 66, 711–732.10.17763/haer.66.4.3483672630865482
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visweswaran, K. (1994). Fictions of feminist ethnography. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Writers, S., & Nagar, R. (2006). Playing with fire: Feminist thought and action through seven lives in India. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Youngblood Jackson, A. (2013). Posthumanist data analysis of mangling practices. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26, 741–748.10.1080/09518398.2013.788762
   Google Scholar