2,923
Views
54
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Why a paradigm shift of ‘more than human ontologies’ is needed: putting to work poststructural and posthuman theories in writers’ studio

Pages 877-896 | Received 09 Jun 2016, Accepted 27 May 2017, Published online: 13 Jun 2017

References

  • Alaimo, S., & Hekman, S. (Eds.). (2008). Material feminisms. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
  • Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.10.1215/9780822388128
  • Barad, K. (2008). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. In Stacey Alaimo & Susan Hekman (Eds.), Material Feminisms (pp. 120–156). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
  • Bennett, L. (2016). Thinking like a brick: Posthumanism and building materials. In C. A. Taylor & C. Hughes (Eds.), Posthuman research practices in education (pp. 58–74). New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan.
  • Collier, D. R., Moffatt, L., & Perry, M. (2015). Talking, wrestling, and recycling: An investigation of three analytic approaches to qualitative data in education research. Qualitative Inquiry, 15, 389–404.
  • Coole, D., & Frost, S. (Eds.). (2010). New materialisms: Ontology, agency, and politics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (Eds.). (2000). Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Davies, B. (2014). Listening to children: Being and becoming. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • de Freitas, E. and Sinclair, N. (2014). Mathematics and the body: Material entanglements in the classroom. ( Foreword by Brian Rotman). Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139600378
  • Deleuze, G. (1990). Negotiations: 1972–1990. (M. Joughin, Trans.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
  • Deleuze, G. (1994). Difference and repetition. (P. Patton, Trans.). London: Athlone Press.
  • Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. (B. Massumi, Trans.). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Derrida, J. (1967/1976). Of grammatology. (G. C. Spivak, Trans.). Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Dolphijn, R., & van der Tuin, I. (2009). Interview with Karen Barad. Matter feels, converses, suffers, desires, yearns, and remembers. Retrieved November 4, 2015, from http://quod.lib.umich.edu/o/ohp/11515701.0001.001/1:4.3/–new-materialism-interviews-cartographies?rgn=div2;view=fulltext
  • Fenwick, T., & Edwards, R. (2010). Actor-network theory in education. New York, NY: Routeldge.
  • Gee, J. (1999). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Gee, J. (2001). A sociocultural perspective on early literacy development. In S. B. Neuman & D. K. Dickinson, (Ed.), Handbook of early literacy research (pp. 30–42). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
  • Gourlay, L., Hamilton, M., & Lea, M. R. (2013). Textual practices in the new media digital landscape: Messing with digital literacies. Research in Learning Technology, 21(1), 1–13.
  • Gourlay, L., Lanclos, D. M., & Oliver, M. (2015). Sociomaterial texts, spaces and devices: Questioning ‘digital dualism’ in library and study practices. Higher Education Quarterly, 69, 263–278.10.1111/hequ.2015.69.issue-3
  • Hagood, M. C. (2004). A rhizomatic cartography of adolescents, popular-culture, and constructions of self. In K. Leander & M. Sheehy, (Ed.), Spatializing literacy research and practice (pp. 143–160). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
  • Hein, S. F. (2016). The new materialism in qualitative inquiry: How compatible are the philosophies of Barad and Deleuze? Cultural Studies ←→ Critical Methodologies, 16, 132–140.10.1177/1532708616634732
  • Holmes, R., & Jones, L. (2016). Flickering, spilling and diffusing body/knowledge in the posthuman early years. In C. A. Taylor & C. Hughes (Eds.), Posthuman research practices in education (pp. 108–127). New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan.
  • Honan, E., Knobel, M., Baker, C., & Davies, B. (2000). Producing possible Hannahs: Theory and the subject of research. Qualitative Inquiry, 6, 9–32.10.1177/107780040000600102
  • Hultman, K., & Lenz Taguchi, H. (2010). Challenging anthropocentric analysis of visual data: A relational materialist methodological approach to educational research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 23, 525–542.10.1080/09518398.2010.500628
  • Jackson, A. Y. (2013). Posthumanist data analysis of mangling practices. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26, 741–748.10.1080/09518398.2013.788762
  • Jackson, A. Y., & Mazzei, L. A. (2012). Thinking with theory in qualitative research: Viewing data across multiple perspectives. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Jewitt, C., & Gunther, K. (Eds.). (2003). Multimodal literacy. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
  • Kaufmann, J., & Holbrook, T. (Eds.). (2016). Special issue: Hypermodal inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 22, 159–160.
  • Koro-Ljungberg, M., Carlson, D., Tesar, M., & Anderson, K. (2015). Methodology brut: Philosophy, ecstatic thinking, and some other (unfinished) things. Qualitative Inquiry, 21, 612–619.10.1177/1077800414555070
  • Kress, G. (1997). Before writing: Rethinking the paths to literacy. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Kuby, C. R., Aguayo, R. C., Holloway, N., Mulligan, J. A., Shear, S. B., & Ward, A. (2016). Teaching, troubling, transgressing: Thinking with theory in a post-qualitative inquiry course. Qualitative Inquiry, 22, 140–148.
  • Kuby, C. R., & Christ, R. C. (2017). Productive aporias and inten(t/s)ionalities of paradigming: Spacetimematterings in an introductory qualitative research course. Qualitative Inquiry. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/107780041668487
  • Kuby, C. R., Gutshall, T. L., & Kirchhofer, J. M. (2015). “Go Be a Writer”: Intra-activity with materials, time, and space in literacy learning. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 15, 394–419.
  • Kuby, C. R., & Gutshall Rucker, T. (2015). Everyone has a Neil: Possibilities of literacy desiring in writers’ studio. Language Arts, 92, 314–327.
  • Kuby, C. R., & Gutshall Rucker, T. (2016). Go be a writer!: Expanding the curricular boundaries of literacy learning with children. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Kuby, C. R. (in press). Poststructural and posthumanist theories and research methodologies. In R. Zaidi & J. Rowsell (Eds.), Literacy lives in transcultural times (pp. 157–174). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2011). New literacies: Everyday practices and social learning (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Open University Press.
  • Lather, P., & St. Pierre, E. A. (2013). Post-qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26, 629–633.10.1080/09518398.2013.788752
  • Leander, K. M., & Boldt, G. (2013). Rereading “A pedagogy of multiliteracies”: Bodies. Journal of Literacy Research, 45, 22–46.10.1177/1086296X12468587
  • Lenz Taguchi, H. (2010). Going beyond the theory/practice divide in early childhood education: Introducing an intra-active pedagogy. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Mazzei, L. A. (2013). A voice without organs: Interviewing in posthumanist research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26, 732–740.10.1080/09518398.2013.788761
  • Murris, K. (2016). The posthuman child: Educational transformation through philosophy with picturebooks. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • New London Group (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66, 60–92.
  • Olsson, L. M. (2009). Movement and experimentation in young children’s learning: Deleuze and Guattari in early childhood education. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Pacini-Ketchabaw, V, Taylor, A, & Blaise, M. (2016). Decentering the human in multispecies ethnographies. In C. A. Taylor & C. Hughes (Eds.), Posthuman research practices in education (pp. 149–167). New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan.
  • Pahl, K., & Rowsell, J. (2012). Literacy and education: Understanding the new literacy studies in the classroom (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.10.4135/9781473915237
  • Rose, G. (2016). Visual methodologies: An introduction to researching with visual materials (4th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
  • Rosiek, J. (2015, May). Hidden curriculum of race as non-human agent: An illustration application of Karen Barad’s Agent Ontology. Paper presented at International Congress of Qualitative Inquiry, Urbana, IL.
  • Savin-Baden, M., & Howell Major, C. (2013). Qualitative research: The essential guide to theory and practice. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Sellers, M. (2013). Young children becoming curriculum: Deleuze, Te Whāriki and curricular understandings. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Snaza, N., Applebaum, P., Bayne, S., Carlson, D., Morris, M., Rotas, N., … Weaver, J. (2014). Toward a posthuman education. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 30, 39–55.
  • Snaza, N., Sonu, D., Truman, S. E., & Zaliwska, Z. (Eds.). (2016). Pedagogical matters: New materialisms and curriculum studies. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
  • Somerville, M., & Green, M. (2015). Children, place, and sustainability. New York, NY: Palgrave- Macmillan.
  • St. Pierre, E. A. (2008). Deleuzian concepts for education: The subject undone. In I. Semetsky (Ed.), Nomadic education: Variations on a theme by Deleuze and Guattari (pp. 183–196). Rotterdam/Taipei: Sense Publishers.
  • St. Pierre, E. A (2011). Post qualitative research: The critique and the coming after. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 611–625). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • St. Pierre, E. A (2013a). The posts continue: Becoming. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26, 646–657.10.1080/09518398.2013.788754
  • St. Pierre, E. A. (2013b). The appearance of data. Cultural Studies ←→ Critical Methodologies, 13, 223–227.10.1177/1532708613487862
  • St. Pierre, E. A. (2014, April). Poststructural theories of language and the limits of coding. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Philadelphia, PA.
  • St. Pierre, E.A, & Jackson, A.Y. (2014). Qualitative data analysis after coding. Qualitative Inquiry, 20, 715–719.10.1177/1077800414532435
  • St. Pierre, E. A., Jackson, A. Y., & Mazzei, L. A. (2016). New empiricisms and new materialisms: Conditions for new inquiry. Cultural Studies ←→ Critical Methodologies, 16, 99–110.10.1177/1532708616638694
  • Street, B. V. (1984). Literacy in theory and practice. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Taylor, C. A., & Hughes, C. (Eds.). (2016). Posthuman research practices in education. New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan.
  • Thiel, J. (2015a). ‘Bumblebee’s in trouble!’ Embodied literacies during imaginative superhero play. Language Arts, 93, 38–49.
  • Thiel, J. (2015b). Vibrant matter: The intra-active role of objects in the construction of young children’s literacies. Literacy Research: Theory, Method and Practice, 64, 112–131.
  • Tuck, E. (2015, April). Re-visioning social, re-visioning context, re-visioning agency. Paper presented at American Education Research Association, Chicago, IL.
  • Wall Kimmerer, R. (2013). Braiding sweetgrass: Indigenous wisdom, scientific knowledge and the teachings of plants. Minneapolis, MN: Milkweed Editions.
  • Wohlwend, K. (2011). Playing their way into literacies: Reading, writing, and belonging in the early childhood classroom. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.