Posthumanism as research methodology: inquiry in the Anthropocene

References

• Alaimo, S. (2010). Bodily natures: Science, environment, and the material self. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alaimo, S. (2012). States of suspension: Trans-corporeality at Sea. Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment, 19, 476–493.10.1093/isle/iss068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alaimo, S. (2015). Elemental love in the Anthropocene. In J. Cohen & L. Duckert (Eds.), Elemental ecocriticism: Thinking with earth, air, water, and fire (pp. 298–309). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alaimo, S. (2016). Exposed: Environmental politics and pleasures in posthuman times. Minnesota, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Åsberg, C., Koobak, R., & Johnson, E. (2011). Beyond the humanist imagination. NORA–Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 19, 218–230.10.1080/08038740.2011.625042
   Google Scholar
• Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28, 801–831.10.1086/345321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, J. (2012). Systems and things: A response to Graham Harman and Timothy Morton. New Literary History, 43, 225–233.10.1353/nlh.2012.0020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodén, L. (2013). Seeing red? The agency of computer software in the production and management of students’ school absences. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26, 1117–1131.10.1080/09518398.2013.816887
   Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R. (2006). Posthuman, All too human. Theory, Culture & Society, 23, 197–208.10.1177/0263276406069232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, C., MacLeod, J., & Neimanis, A. (Eds.). (2013). Thinking with water. Montreal, QC: McGill-Queen's University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J., & Duckert, L. (Eds.). (2015). Elemental ecocriticism: Thinking with earth, air, water, and fire. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Colebrook, C. (2014, April). We have always been post-anthropocene. Presentation at the Anthropocene Feminism conference, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI.
   Google Scholar
• Crutzen, P. J. (2002). Geology of mankind. Nature, 415, 23.10.1038/415023a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, B. (2017). Animating ancestors: From representation to diffraction. Qualitative Inquiry. Advance online publication.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1994). What is philosophy? (H. Tomlinson & G. Burchell, trans.). London: Verso. (Original work published 1991)
   Google Scholar
• Egan, P., & Spangler, T. (2016, January 16). President Obama declares emergency in Flint. Detroit Free Press. Retrieved from http://www.freep.com/story/news/local/michigan/2016/01/16/president-obama-declares-emergency-flint/78898604/
   Google Scholar
• Gleick, P. (2010). Bottled and sold: The story behind our obsession with bottled water. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in Feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14, 575–599.10.2307/3178066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. (2003). The companion species manifesto: Dogs, people, and significant otherness. Chicago, IL: Prickly Paradigm Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. (2016). Staying with the trouble. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.10.1215/9780822373780
   Google Scholar
• Harding, S. (1993). Rethinking standpoint epistemology: What is ‘strong objectivity?’. In L. Alcoff & E. Potter (Eds.), Feminist epistemologies (pp. 49–82). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ingold, T. (2006). Rethinking the animate, re-animating thought. Ethnos, 71, 9–20.10.1080/00141840600603111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingold, T. (2015). Foreword. In P. Vannini (Ed.), Non-representational methodologies: Re-envisioning research (pp. vii–x). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, A. Y. (2016, May). Thinking without method. Paper presented at the Twelfth International Congress of Qualitative Inquiry, Champaign-Urbana, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, A. Y., & Mazzei, L. A. (2012). Thinking with theory in qualitative research: Viewing data across multiple perspectives. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Koro-Ljungberg, M. (2016). Reconceptualizing qualitative research: Methodologies without methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kuby, C. R., & Rucker, T. G. (2016). Go be a writer! Expanding the curricular boundaries of literacy learning with children. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lather, P., & St. Pierre, E. A. (2013). Post-qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26, 629–633.10.1080/09518398.2013.788752
   Google Scholar
• Lorimer, H. (2005). Cultural geography: The busyness of being ‘more-than-representational’. Progress in Human Geography, 29, 83–94.10.1191/0309132505ph531pr
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorimer, H. (2008). Cultural geography: Non-representational conditions and concerns. Progress in Human Geography, 32, 551–559.10.1177/0309132507086882
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacLure, M. (2013). Researching without representation? Language and materiality in post-qualitative methodology. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26, 658–667.10.1080/09518398.2013.788755
   Google Scholar
• MacLure, M. (2016). The refrain of the a-grammatical child. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 16, 173–182.10.1177/1532708616639333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manning, E. (2013). Always more than one: Individuation’s dance. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Manning, E. (2016). The minor gesture. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.10.1215/9780822374411
   Google Scholar
• Marder, M. (2013). Plant-thinking: A philosophy of vegetal life. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marn, T., & Wolgemuth, J. (2016). Purposeful entanglements: A new materialist analysis of transformative interviews. Qualitative Inquiry. Advance online publication.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massumi, B. (1987). Translator’s foreword: Pleasures of philosophy. In G. Deleuze & Felix Guattari (Ed.), A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (pp. ix–xv). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzei, L. A., & McCoy, K. (2010). Thinking with Deleuze in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 23, 503–509.10.1080/09518398.2010.500634
   Google Scholar
• Morton, T. (2007). Ecology without nature: Rethinking environmental aesthetics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morton, T. (2016). Dark ecology. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.10.7312/mort17752
   Google Scholar
• Neimanis, A., Åsberg, C., & Hedrén, J. (2015). Four problems, four directions for environmental humanities: Toward critical posthumanities for the Anthropocene. Ethics & the Environment, 20, 67–97.10.2979/ethicsenviro.20.1.67
   Google Scholar
• Neimanis, A., & Walker, R. L. (2014). Weathering: Climate change and the ‘thick time’ of transcorporeality. Hypatia, 29, 558–575.10.1111/hypa.2014.29.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordstrom, S. N. (2013). Object-interviews: Folding, unfolding, and refolding perceptions of objects. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 12, 237–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordstrom, S. N. (2017). Antimethodology: Postqualitative generative conventions. Qualitative Inquiry. Advance online publication.
   Google Scholar
• Pacini-Ketchabaw, V., & Clark, V. (2016). Following watery relations in early childhood pedagogies. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 14, 98–111.10.1177/1476718X14529281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pacini-Ketchabaw, V., Taylor, A., & Blaise, M. (2016). Decentring the human in multispecies ethnographies. In C. Taylor & C. Hughes (Eds.), Posthuman research practices in education (pp. 149–167). London: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen, H. (2011a). Counting affects: Mo(ve)ments of intensity in critical avian education. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 16, 14–28.
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen, H. (2011b). Release the moths: Critical animal studies and the posthumanist impulse. Culture, Theory and Critique, 52, 65–81.10.1080/14735784.2011.621663
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen, H. (2013). Follow the Judas sheep: Materializing post-qualitative methodology in zooethnographic space. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26, 717–731.10.1080/09518398.2013.788760
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen, H., & Pini, B. (2016). Educational epistemologies and methods in a more-than-human world. Educational Philosophy and Theory. Advance online publication. 10.1080/00131857.2016.1199925
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rautio, P. (2013). Children who carry stones in their pockets: On autotelic material practices in everyday life. Children’s Geographies, 11, 394–408.10.1080/14733285.2013.812278
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinertsen, A. B. (Ed.). (2016). Becoming earth. Rotterdam, AN: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, G. (1997). Situating knowledges: Positionality, reflexivities and other tactics. Progress in Human Geography, 21, 305–320.10.1191/030913297673302122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rotman, B. (2000). Going parallel. SubStance, 29, 56–79.10.1353/sub.2000.0011
   Google Scholar
• Rowan, M. C. (2015). Thinking with land, water, ice, and snow: A proposal for Inuit Nunangat pedagogy in the Canadian arctic. In V. Pacini-Ketchabaw & A. Taylor (Eds.), Unsettling the colonial places and spaces of early childhood education (pp. 198–218). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Serres, M. (2007). The parasite. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shaviro, S. (2012). Without criteria: Kant, Whitehead, Deleuze, and aesthetics. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shields, C. M. (2013). Transformative leadership in education: Equitable change in an uncertain and complex world. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Snaza, N., Appelbaum, P., Bayne, S., Carlson, D., Morris, M., Rotas, N., … Weaver, J. (2014). Toward a posthumanist education. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 30, 39–55.
   Google Scholar
• Somerville, M. (2013). Water in a dry land: Place-learning through art and story. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Somerville, M. (2014). Developing relational understandings of water through collaboration with indigenous knowledges. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water, 1, 401–411.
   Google Scholar
• Somerville, M. (2016). The post-human I: Encountering ‘data’ in new materialism. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1080/09518398.2016.1201611
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spangler, K. (2016, January 16). All Flint’s children must be treated as exposed to lead. Detroit Free Press. Retrieved from http://www.freep.com/story/opinion/contributors/raw-data/2016/01/16/map-8657-flints-youngest-children-exposed-lead/78818888/
   Google Scholar
• Springgay, S., & Truman, S. E. (2016). Stone walks: Inhuman animacies and queer archives of feeling. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/01596306.2016.1226777
   Google Scholar
• St. Pierre, E. A. (2011). Post qualitative research: The critique and the coming after. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (4th ed.). (pp. 611–626). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• St. Pierre, E. A. (2015). Practices for the ‘new’ in the new empiricisms, the new materialisms, and post qualitative inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & M. D. Giardina (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry and the politics of research (pp. 75–95). Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
   Google Scholar
• Steffen, W., Crutzen, P. J., & McNeill, J. R. (2007). The Anthropocene: Are humans now overwhelming the great forces of nature? AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment, 36, 614–621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffen, W., Grinevald, J., Crutzen, P., & McNeill, J. (2011). The Anthropocene: Conceptual and historical perspectives. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 369, 842–867.10.1098/rsta.2010.0327
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stengers, I. (2011). Thinking with Whitehead: A free and wild creation of concepts. (M. Chase, trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published 2002)
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. A. (2013). Objects, bodies and space: Gender and embodied practices of mattering in the classroom. Gender and Education, 25, 688–703.10.1080/09540253.2013.834864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, C., & Hughes, C. (Eds.). (2016). Posthuman research practices in education. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Tesar, M. (2016, April). (Un/named) philosophy as method. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Tesar, M., & Arndt, S. (2016). Vibrancy of childhood things. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 16, 193–200.10.1177/1532708616636144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thrift, N. (2008). Non-representational theory: Space, politics, affect. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tuck, E., & McKenzie, M. (2015). Relational validity and the ‘where’ of inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 21, 633–638.10.1177/1077800414563809
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulmer, J. (2017a). Slow inquiry: More-than-methodologies in qualitative research. Paper presented at the 1st European Congress of Qualitative Inquiry, Leuven, Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• Ulmer, J. (2017b). Writing slow ontology. Qualitative Inquiry, 23, 201–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vannini, P. (2015a). Non-representational ethnography: New ways of animating lifeworlds. Cultural geographies, 22, 317–327.10.1177/1474474014555657
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vannini, P. (Ed.). (2015b). Non-representational methodologies: Re-envisioning research. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Whitehead, A. N. (1978). Process and reality. New York, NY: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wisely, J. (2016, February 17). Flint residents paid America’s highest water rates. Detroit Free Press. Retrieved from http://www.freep.com/story/news/local/michigan/flint-water-crisis/2016/02/16/study-flint-paid-highest-rate-us-water/80461288/
   Google Scholar
• Wolfe, C. (Ed.). (2003). Zoontologies: The question of the animal. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfe, C. (2010). What is posthumanism?. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wyatt, J., Gale, K., Gannon, S., Davies, B., Denzin, N., & St. Pierre, E. A. (2014). Deleuze and collaborative writing: Responding to/with JKSB’. Cultural Studies? Critical Methodologies, 14, 407–416.10.1177/1532708614530313
   Google Scholar