The ‘fear of falling behind regime’ embraces school policy: state vs federal policy struggles in California and Texas

References

• Affeldt, J. T. (2015). New accountability in california through local control funding reforms: The promise and the gaps. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 23(23), 20.
   Google Scholar
• Anagnostopoulos, D., Rutledge, S., & Bali, V. (2013). State education agencies, information systems, and the expansion of state power in the era of test-based accountability. Educational Policy, 27(2), 217–247.10.1177/0895904813475713
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barba, M., Ginn, V., Grusendorf, K., & Heflin, T. (2016). Texas school finance: Basics and reform. Austin, TX: Texas Public Policy Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Berliner, D. C. (2011). The context for interpreting PISA results in the USA. In M. A. Pereyra, H.-G. Kotthoff, & R. Cowen (Eds.), Pisa under examination (pp. 77–96). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.10.1007/978-94-6091-740-0
   Google Scholar
• California County Superintendents Educational Services Association. (2013). Leadership Planning Guide CALIFORNIA: Common Core State Standards and Assessments Implementation. Retrieved from Consortium for the Implementation of the Common Core State Standards. Sacramento, CA. https://edsource.org/wp-content/uploads/old/LeadPlanGuide_WEB.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Calvoz, R. R., & Davis, B. W. (2014). The Texas Miracle: Racial discrimination alive and well sixty years after Brown. Texas Education Review, 2(2), 203–219.
   Google Scholar
• Coalition For Evidence-Based Policy. (2003). Identifying and implementing educational practices supported by rigorous evidence: A user friendly guide. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Collier, K. (2016). Rich schools hopeful Houston ISD could topple Robin Hood plan. Texas Tribune. Retrieved from https://www.texastribune.org/2016/08/30/rich-schools-hope-houston-topples-robin-hood-plan/
   Google Scholar
• Dean, M. (1999). Governmentality: Power and rule in modern society. vi, 229 p.
   Google Scholar
• Dean, M. (2007). Governing societies: Political perspectives on domestic and international rule. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• DeVore, C. (2015). Americas’s future: California or Texas? Retrieved January 10, 2018, from The Federalist http://thefederalist.com/2015/07/06/americas-future-california-or-texas/
   Google Scholar
• DeVore, C. (2016). Why does California have the nation’s highest poverty rate? Retrieved December 12, 2017, from Forbes https://www.forbes.com/sites/chuckdevore/2016/09/28/why-does-california-have-the-nations-highest-poverty-rate/#312f2fa612d9
   Google Scholar
• Dreyfus, H., & Rabinow, P. (1982). Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics. Brighton: Harvester Press.
   Google Scholar
• Finn, C., Jr (1993). We must take charge: Our schools and our future. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1971). L’ordre du discours; leçon inaugurale au Collège de France prononcée le 2 décembre 1970. Paris: Gallimard.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1993). Qu’est-ce que les Lumières? Magazine Littéraire(309, avril 1993), 61–74.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1997). On the genealogy of ethics - An overview of work in progress. In P. Rabinow (Ed.), Foucault - Ethics, subjectivity and truth (essential works of Foucault 1954–1984), Vol. 1 (pp. 253–280). New York, NY: The New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1998). Polemics, politics, and problematizations: An interview with Michel Foucault. In P. Rabinow (Ed.), Foucault - Ethics, subjectivity and truth (Essential works of Foucault 1954–1984) (pp. 111–119). New York, NY: The New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., & Gordon, C. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977 (1st Americ ed.). New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. (2015). A golden opportunity: The California collaborative for educational excellence as a force for positive change. In C. Forward (Ed.) (pp. 10). Toronto: Motion Leadership.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, L. S., Stecher, B. M., & Yuan, K. (2008). Standards-based reform in the United States: History, research, and future directions. Retrieved from RAND Corporation, Washington D.C. http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/reprints/2009/RAND_RP1384.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Haney, W. (2000). The myth of the Texas miracle in education. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(41), 323. Retrieved from https://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/432/828
   Google Scholar
• Heilig, J. V., Jez, S. Y., & Reddick, R. J. (2012). Is Texas leading its peers and the nation?: A decadal analysis of educational data. Retrieved from The Institute for Urban Policy Research & Analysis. The University of Texas at Austin. https://liberalarts.utexas.edu/iupra/_files/pdf/IUPRA%20Texas%20Decade%20Brief.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Heise, M. M. (1994). Goals 2000: Educate America Act: The federalization and legalization of educational policy. Fordham Law Review, 63(2), 345–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacoby, P., & Vasinda, S. (2014). Finding the common ground: A comparison of writing expectations and outcomes between Texas essential knowledge and skills and the common core state standards. Texas Journal of Literacy Education, 2(1), 59–86.
   Google Scholar
• Joffe, J. (2014). The Myth of America’s decline: Politics economics and half a century of false prophesies. New York, NY: Liveright Publishing Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, J. (2015). California’s Support for K-12 Education Ranks Low by Almost Any Measure. Fact Sheet, November 2015. Retrieved from California Budget & Policy Center. Sacramento, CA: http://calbudgetcenter.org/wp-content/uploads/Californias-Support-for-K-12-Education-Ranks-Low-by-Almost-Any-Measure_FactSheet_11.17.2015.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kirst, M. W. (2013). The Common Core meets state policy: This Changes Almost everything (Policy memorandum). Stanford, CA: Policy Analysis for California Education (PACE).
   Google Scholar
• Kirst, M. W., & Jung, R. (1991). The utility of a longitudinal approach in assessing implementation: A thirteen-year view of Title I, ESEA. In A. R. Odden (Ed.), Education policy implementation (pp. 39–63). Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kirst, M. W., & Wirt, F. M. (2009). The political dynamics of American education. Richmond, CA: McCutchan.10.12698/cpre.2009.PoliticalDynamics.KirstBk
   Google Scholar
• Klein, S. P., Hamilton, L. S., McCaffrey, D. F., & Stecher, B. M. (2000). What do test scores in Texas tell us? Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(49), 22. Retrieved from https://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/viewFile/440/563
   Google Scholar
• Koppich, J. E., Humphrey, D. C., & Marsh, J. E. (2015). Two years of California’s local control funding formula: Time to reaffirm the grand vision (policy brief). Stanford, CA: Policy Analysis of California Education (PACE).
   Google Scholar
• Kosar, K. R. (2005). Failing Grades: The federal politics of education standards. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Krejsler, J. B. (2018). Imagining school as standards-driven and students as career-ready! A comparative genealogy of US federal and European transnational turns in education policy. In F. Guorui & T. S. Popkewitz (Eds.), Education policy handbook. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Labaree, D. (2014). Let’s measure what no one teaches: PISA, NCLB and the shrinking aims of education. Teachers College Record, 116(090303), 14.
   Google Scholar
• Manna, P. (2010). Collision course: Federal education policy meets state and local realities. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
   Google Scholar
• McGuinn, P. (2005). The national schoolmarm: No Child Left Behind and the new educational federalism. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 35(1), 41–68.10.1093/publius/pji001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuinn, P. (2006). No Child Left Behind and the transformation of federal education policy 1965–2005. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
   Google Scholar
• McGuinn, P. (2016). From No Child Left Behind to the every student succeeds act: Federalism and the education legacy of the Obama administration. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 24(June 2016). doi:10.1093/publius/pjw014
   Google Scholar
• McGuinn, P. (2006). No Child Left Behind and the transformation of federal education policy 1965–2005. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
   Google Scholar
• McNeil, L., & Valenzuela, A. (2001). The harmful impact of the TAAS system of testing in Texas: Beneath the accountability rhetoric. In M. Kornhaber & G. Orfield (Eds.), Raising standards or raising barriers? Inequality and high stakes testing in public education (pp. 127–150). New York, NY: Century Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Menefee-Libey, D. J., & Kerchner, C. T. (2015). California’s first year with local control finance and accountability. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 23(22), 15.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, H.-D. & Benavot, A. E. (Eds.). (2013). PISA, power, and policy: The emergence of global educational governance. Oxford: Symposium Books.
   Google Scholar
• New York State Education Department. (2009). Federal education policy and the states, 1945–2009: A brief synopsis. Albany, NY: New York State Education Department. Retrieved from http://nysa32.nysed.gov/edpolicy/altformats/ed_background_overview_essay.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nichols, S. L., & Berliner, D. (2007). Collateral damage: How high-stakes testing corrupts America’s schools. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (1996). The knowledge based economy. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Pereyra, M. A. & Franklin, B. M. (Eds.). (2014). Systems of reason and the politics of schooling. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Popkewitz, T. S. (1998). Struggling for the soul: The politics of schooling and the construction of the teacher. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Popkewitz, T. S. (2008). Cosmopolitanism and the age of school reform – Science, education, and making society by making the child. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Popkewitz, T. S. & Brennan, M. (Eds.). (1998). Foucault’s challenge : Discourse, knowledge, and power in education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, J. H. (2012). An education in politics: The origin and evolution of No Child Left Behind. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.10.7591/cornell/9780801449710.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Rizvi, F., & Lingard, B. (2010). Globalizing education policy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Skrla, L., & Scheurich, J. J. (2004a). Conclusion: Keeping equity in the foreground. In L. Skrla & J. J. Scheurich (Eds.), Educational equity and accountability: Paradigms, policies, and politics (pp. 269–278). New York, NY: Routledge Falmer.10.4324/9780203465615
   Google Scholar
• Skrla, L., & Scheurich, J. J. (2004b). Thinking carefully about equity and accountability In Skrla, L. & Scheurich, J. J. (Eds.), Educational equity and accountability: Paradigms, policies, and politics (pp. 13–29). New York: Routledge Falmer.10.4324/9780203465615
   Google Scholar
• Skrla, L. & Scheurich, J. J. (Eds.). (2004c). Educational equity and accountability: Paradigms, policies, and politics. New York, NY: Routledge Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• State Board of Education (2016). Texans speak: Public feedback on assessment and accountability systems. Austin, TX: State Board of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Superintendent’s Advisory Task Force On Accountability & Continuous Improvement. (2016). Preparing all students for college, career, life, and leadership in The 21st century. Retrieved from Sacramento: California Department of Education: https://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/ar/documents/account-report-2016.pdf
   Google Scholar
• TEA. (2004). The Texas public schools sesquicentennial handbook. Austin, TX: Texas Education Agency.
   Google Scholar
• TEA. (2016). Texas education today: News from the Texas Education Agency (Vol. XXXI, No 5). Austin, TX: Texas Education Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Texas Association of School Administrators (2008). Creating a new vision for public education in Texas: A work in progress for conversation and further development. Austin, TX: Texas Association of School Administrators.
   Google Scholar
• Valenzuela, A., Sun, W.-L., Germain, E., & Barnes, M. (2015). High-stakes accountability in Texas reconsidered. Retrieved from Austin: Texas Center for Education Policy. https://www.edb.utexas.edu/tcep/resources/TCEP%20Graduate%20Seminar%20Policy%20Memorandum%20Texas%20Accountability%202.20.15.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, J. (2012, November 2012). Former Texas education commissioner Robert Scott Sparked national revolt against high-stakes testing. Dallas News. Retrieved from http://www.dallasnews.com/news/education/2012/11/28/former-texas-education-commissioner-robert-scott-sparked-national-revolt-against-high-stakes-testing
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, R., & Sands, J. (2016). A preliminary analysis of California’s new local control funding formula. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 24(34), 39.
   Google Scholar