How reforms morph as they move. Performative approaches to education reforms and their un/intended effects

References

• Ahmed, S. (2004). Affective economies. Social Text, 22(2), 117–139.10.1215/01642472-22-2_79-117
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed, S. (2010). The promise of happiness. Durham: Duke University Press.10.1215/9780822392781
   Google Scholar
• Alaimo, S., & Hekman, S. (2008). Introduction: Emerging models of materiality in feminist theory. In S. Alaimo & S. Hekman (Eds.), Material feminisms (pp. 1–19). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bagley, W. C. (1912). Classroom management; its principles and technique. London: HardPress Publishing/The Macmillian Company.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway. Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham: Duke University Press.10.1215/9780822388128
   Google Scholar
• Berlant, L. (2011). Cruel optimism. Durham: Duke University Press.10.1215/9780822394716
   Google Scholar
• Bjerg, H., & Staunæs, D. (2017). Governing the intermediary spaces. Reforming school and subjectivities through liminal motivational technologies. In T. P. E. H. S. Lindblad (Ed.), Critical analyses of educational reform in an era of transnational governance. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Brøgger, K. (2014). The ghosts of higher education reform: On the organisational processes surrounding policy borrowing. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 12(4), 520–541.10.1080/14767724.2014.901905
   Google Scholar
• Brøgger, K. (2016). The rule of mimetic desire in higher education: Governing through naming, shaming and faming. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 37(1), 72–91.10.1080/01425692.2015.1096191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brøgger, K., & Staunæs, D. (2016). Standards and (self)implosion: How the circulation of affects accelerates the spread of standards and intensifies the embodiment of colliding, temporal ontologies. Theory & Psychology, 26(2), 223–242. doi:10.1177/0959354316635889
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunsson, N., & Jacobsson, B. (2000). A world of standards. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (1993a). Bodies that matter. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (1993b). Bodies that matter. On the discursive limits of sex. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (1999). Gender trouble : Feminism and the subversion of identity (10th anniversary ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (2010). Performative agency. Journal of Cultural Economy, 3(2), 147–161.10.1080/17530350.2010.494117
   Google Scholar
• Clough, P., & Halley, J. (2007). The affective turn. Theorizing the social. Durham: Duke University Press.10.1215/9780822389606
   Google Scholar
• Coole, D., & Frost, S. (2010). Introducing the new materialisms. In D. Coole, & S. Frost (Eds.), New materialisms. Ontology, agency, and politics (pp. 1–43). Durham: Duke University Press.10.1215/9780822392996
   Google Scholar
• Cowen, R. (2009). The transfer, translation and transformation of educational processes: And ther shape-shifting? Comparative Education, 45(3), 315–327.10.1080/03050060903184916
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuban, L. (1998). How schools change reforms: Redefining reform succes and failure. Teachers College Record, 99(3), 453–477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1997). ‘What is critique?’ In J. Schmidt (Ed.), What is enlightenment? Eighteenth-century questions and twentieth century answers (pp. 23–61). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gay, P. D. (2010). Performativities: Butler Callon and the moment of theory. Journal of Cultural Economy, 3(2), 171–179.10.1080/17530350.2010.494120
   Google Scholar
• Grek, S. (2009). Governing by numbers: The PISA ‘effect’ in Europe. Journal of Education Policy., 24(1), 23–37. doi:10.1080/02680930802412669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. J. (2008). When species meet. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hopmann, S. T. (2008). No child, no school, no state left behind: Schooling in the age of accountability. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 40, 417–456.10.1080/00220270801989818
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juelskjær, M., & Staunæs, D. (2016). Orchestrating intensities and rhythms: How post-psychologies are assisting new educational standards and reforming subjectivities. Theory & Pscyhology, 26(2), 182–201.10.1177/0959354316634217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krejsler, J. B. (forthcoming). Imagining school as standards-driven and students as career-ready! A comparative genealogy of US federal and European transnational turns in education policy. In F. Guorui & T. S. Popkewitz (Eds.), Education policy handbook. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Krejsler, J. B., Olsson, U., & Petersson, K. (2012). Governing Europe by comparison, peer pressure & self-interest : On the Bologna stocktaking process. Bulletin of Institute of Technology and Vocational Education, 9, 35–47.
   Google Scholar
• Krejsler, J. B., Olsson, U., & Petersson, K. (2014). The transnational grip on Scandinavian education reforms: The open method of coordination challenging national policy-making. Nordic Studies in Education, 34(3), 172–186.
   Google Scholar
• Lawn, M., & Grek, S. (2012). Europeanizing education: Governing a new policy space. Oxford: Symposium Books.10.15730/books.78
   Google Scholar
• Lyotard, J.-F. (1979/1996). Viden og det postmoderne samfund. Aarhus: Slagmark.
   Google Scholar
• Massumi, B. (2010). The future birth of the affective fact: The political ontology of threat. In M. G. G. J. Seigworth (Ed.), The affect theory reader (1st ed.). (pp. 52–70). Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McGuinn, P. (2006). No child left behind and the transformation of federal education policy 1965–2005. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, H.-D. & Benavot, A. E. (Eds.). (2013). PISA, power, and policy: The emergence of global educational governance. Oxford: Symposium Books.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, H. (2007). Performativity as performance/performativity as speech act: Derrida’s special theory of performativity. South Atlantic Quarterly, 106(2), 219–235.10.1215/00382876-2006-022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nietzsche, F. W. (1874/1999). Vom Nutzen und Nachteil der Historie für das Leben. Unzeitgemässe Betrachtungen. Berlin: Taschenbuch Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• OECD (1996). The knowledge based economy. Paris: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Pereyra, M. A., Kotthoff, H.-G., & Cowen, R. (Eds.). (2011). PISA under examination. Rotterdam: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Popkewitz, T. S., & Brennan, M. (1998). Foucault’s challenge: Discourse, knowledge and power in education. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, J. H. (2012). An education in politics: The origin and evolution of no child left behind. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.10.7591/cornell/9780801449710.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Rinne, R. (2008). The growing supranational impacts od the OECD and the EU on national educational policies, and the case of Finland. Policy Futures in Education, 6(6), 665–680.10.2304/pfie.2008.6.6.665
   Google Scholar
• Rizvi, F., & Lingard, B. (2010). Globalizing education policy. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sahlberg, P. (2011). The fourth way of Finland. Journal of Educational Change, (12), 173–185.10.1007/s10833-011-9157-y
   Google Scholar
• Sellar, S. (2014). A feel for numbers: Affect, data and education policy. Critical studies in education, 56(1), 131–146. doi:10.1080/17508487.2015.981198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sellar, S., & Lingard, R. (2013). The OECD and global governance in education. Journal of Education Policy, 28(5), 710–725.10.1080/02680939.2013.779791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staunæs, D. (2011). Governing the potentials of life itself. Interrogating the promises of affective educational leadership. Journal of Educational History & Administration, 43(3), 227–247.10.1080/00220620.2011.586454
   Google Scholar
• Staunæs, D., & Pors, J. (2015). Thinking educational policy and management through (frictional) concepts of affects. In K. N. Gulson, M. Clark, & E. B. Petersen (Eds.), Education policy and contemporary theory. Implications for research (pp. 99–109). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Steiner-Khamsi, G. (2016). Standards are good (for) business: Standardised comparison and the private sector in education. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 14(2), 161–182. doi:10.1080/14767724.2015.1014883
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Telhaug, A. O., Mediås, O. A., & Aasen, P. (2006). The Nordic model in education: Education as part of the political system in the last 50 years. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 50(3), 245–283.10.1080/00313830600743274
   Google Scholar
• Wetherell, M. (2012). Affect and emotion. A new social science understanding. London: Sage.10.4135/9781446250945
   Google Scholar