4,910
Views
19
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Embracing uncertainty in research with young children

ORCID Icon
Pages 851-862 | Received 02 Dec 2016, Accepted 08 Jul 2018, Published online: 15 Aug 2018

References

  • Ang, L. (2014). Preschool or prep school? Rethinking the role of early years education. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 15, 185–199. doi:10.2304/ciec.2014.15.2.185
  • Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Barad, K. (2011). Nature’s queer performativity. Qui Parle: Critical Humanities and Social Sciences, 19, 121–158. doi:10.5250/quiparle.19.2.0121
  • Barad, K. (2012). On touching—the inhuman that therefore I am. Differences, 23, 206–223. doi:10.1215/10407391-1892943
  • Barad, K. (2014). Diffracting diffraction: Cutting together-apart. Parallax, 20, 168–187. doi:10.1080/13534645.2014.927623
  • Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Bettez, S.L. (2015). Navigating the complexity of qualitative research in postmodern contexts: Assemblage, critical reflexivity, and communion as guides. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 28, 932–954. doi:10.1080/09518398.2014.948096
  • Blaise, M. (2016). Fabricated childhoods: Uncanny encounters with the more-than-human. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 37, 617–626. doi:10.1080/01596306.2015.1075697
  • Chesworth, L. (2014). Multiple perspectives of play in a reception class: Exploring insider meanings (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Leeds Beckett University.
  • Clark, A. (2017). Listening to young children: A guide to understanding and using the mosaic approach (3rd ed.). London: Jessica Kingsley.
  • Clark, A., & Moss, P. (2011). Listening to young children: The mosaic approach (2nd ed.). London: National Children’s Bureau for the Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
  • Davies, B. (2014). Listening to young children: Being and becoming. London: Routledge.
  • Davies, B., De Schauwer, E., Claes, L., De Munck, K., Van De Putte, I., & Verstichele, M. (2013). Recognition and difference: a collective biography. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26, 680–691. doi:10.1080/09518398.2013.788757
  • Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus. London: Bloomsbury.
  • Dockett, S, Einarsdottir, J. & Perry, B. (2011). Balancing methodologies and methods in researching with young children. In D. Harcourt, B. Perry, & T. Waller (Eds.), Researching young children’s perspectives: Debating the ethics and dilemmas of educational research with children (pp. 68–81). Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Einarsdottir, J. (2011). Icelandic children’s early education transition experiences. Early Education and Development, 22, 737–756. doi:10.1080/10409289.2011.597027
  • Elwick, S., Bradley, B., & Sumsion, J. (2014). Infants as others: Uncertainties, difficulties and (im)possibilities in researching infants’ lives. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 27, 196–213. doi:10.1080/09518398.2012.737043
  • Flewitt, R. (2005). Conducting research with young children: Some ethical considerations. Early Child Development and Care, 175, 553–565. doi:10.1080/03004430500131338
  • Gallacher, L. A., & Gallagher, M. (2008). Methodological immaturity in childhood research? Thinking through participatory methods. Childhood: A Global Journal of Child Research, 15, 499–516. doi:10.1177/0907568208091672
  • Graham, A., Powell, M.A., & Taylor, N. (2015). Ethical research involving children: Encouraging reflexive engagement in research with children and young people. Children and Society, 29, 331–343. doi:10.1111/chso.12089
  • Guillemin, M., & Gillam, L. (2004). Ethics, reflexivity and ethically important moments in research. Qualitative Inquiry, 10, 261–280. doi:10.1177/1077800403262360
  • Hansen, S.R., Hansen, M.W., & Kristensen, N.H. (2017). Striated agency and smooth regulation: Kindergarten mealtime as an ambiguous space for the construction of child and adult relations, Children's Geographies, Advance online publication, 15, 237–248. doi:10.1080/14733285.2016.1238040
  • Hohti, R. (2016). Time, things, teacher, pupil: Engaging with what matters, International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 29, 1148–1160. doi:10.1080/09518398.2016.1201610
  • Holland, E. W. (2013). Deleuze and Guattari’s a thousand plateaus: Readers’ guide. London: Bloomsbury.
  • Holland, S., Renold, E., Ross, N.J., & Hillman, A. (2010). Power, agency and participatory agendas: A critical exploration of young people’s engagement in participative qualitative research. Childhood: A Global Journal of Child Research, 17, 360–375. doi:10.1177/0907568210369310
  • Jones, L., Holmes, R., MacRae, C. and MacLure, M. (2010). Documenting classroom life: How can I write about what I am seeing? Qualitative Research, 10, 479–491. doi:10.1177/1468794110366814
  • Lather, P., & St Pierre, E.A. (2013). Post-qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 26, 629–633. doi:10.1080/09518398.2013.788752
  • Law, J. (2004). After method: Mess in social science research. London: Routledge.
  • Lennon, S. (2017). Re-turning feelings that matter using reflexivity and diffraction to think with and through a moment of rupture in activist work. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 30, 534–545. doi:10.1080/09518398.2016.1263885
  • Lenz Taguchi, H. (2010). Going beyond the theory/practice divide in early childhood education: Introducing an intra-active pedagogy. London: Routledge.
  • MacLure, M. (2013). Classification or wonder? Coding as an analytic practice in qualitative research. In R. Coleman & J. Ringrose (Eds.), Deleuze and research methodologies (pp. 164–183). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  • Mayall, B. (2000). Conversations with children: Working with generational issues. In P. Chistensen & A. James (Eds.), Research with children: Perspectives and practices (pp. 120–135). London: Falmer Press.
  • McCoy, K. (2012). Toward a methodology of encounters: Opening to complexity in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 18, 762–772. doi:10.1177/1077800412453018
  • Palaiologou, I. (2014). ‘Do we hear what children want to say?’ Ethical praxis when choosing research tools with children under five. Early Child Development and Care, 184, 689–705. doi:10.1080/03004430.2013.809341
  • Pillow, W. (2003). Confession, catharsis, or cure? Rethinking the uses of reflexivity as methodological power in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 16, 175–196. doi:10.1080/0951839032000060635
  • Pink, S. (2009). Doing sensory ethnography (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
  • Prout, A. & James, A. (1997). A new paradigm for the sociology of childhood? Provenance, promise and problems. In A. James & A. Prout (Eds.), Constructing and reconstructing childhood (pp. 7–33). London: Falmer.
  • Rinaldi, C. (2006). In dialogue with Reggio Emilia: Listening, researching and learning. London: Routledge.
  • Thomson, F. (2007). Are methodologies for children keeping them in their place? Children’s Geographies, 5, 207–218. doi:10.1080/14733280701445762
  • Thomson, P. (2008). Doing visual research with children and young people. London: Routledge.
  • Tobin, J., Hsueh, Y., & Karasawa, M. (2009). Preschool in three cultures revisited: China, Japan, and the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Tobin, J., Wu, D. Y. H., & Davidson, D. (1989). Preschool in three cultures: Japan, China, and the United States. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Waller, T., & Bitou, A. (2011). Research with children: Three challenges for participatory research in early childhood education. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 19, 5–20. doi:10.1080/1350293X.2011.548964
  • Wood, E. (2014). The play-pedagogy interface in contemporary debates. In L. Brooker, M. Blaise, & S. Edwards (Eds.), The Sage handbook of play, learning and early childhood (pp. 145–156). London: Sage.