From silence to stillness: decolonial feminist ontologies and the mattering of history in educational research

References

• Ahmed, S. (2010a). Happy objects. In M. Gregg & G. J. Siegworth (Eds.), The affect theory reader (pp. 1–51). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed, S. (2010b). The promise of happiness. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed, S. (2017). Living a feminist life. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alcoff, L. M. (2009). The problem for speaking for others. In A. Y. Jackson & L. A. Mazzei (Eds.), Voice in qualitative inquiry: Challenging conventional, interpretive, and critical conceptions in qualitative research (pp. 117–135). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, M. (2012). The new Jim Crow: Mass incarceration in the age of colorblindness. New York: The New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anzaldúa, G. (1987). Borderlands la frontera: The new mestiza (4th ed.). San Francisco: Aunt Lute Books.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, B. (2013). Was Jane Addams a promiscuous pragmatist? International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(5), 610–624.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duhram, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berlant, L. (2011). Cruel optimism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, S. T., & Tucker, I. (2010). Eff the ineffable. The affective turn. In M. Gregg & G. J. Siegworth (Eds.), The affect theory reader (pp. 229–249). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (1997). Performative acts and gender constitution: An essay in phenomenology and feminist theory. In C. R. McCann and S.-K. Kim (Eds.), Feminist theory reader: Local and global perspectives (pp. 462–473). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (2005). Giving an account of oneself. New York: Fordham University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cannella, G. S., & Manuelito, K. D. (2008). Feminisms from unthought locations: Indigenous worldviews, marginalized feminisms, and revisioning anticolonial social science. In N. K. Denzin, Y. S. Lincoln & L. T. Smith (Eds.). Handbook of critical and indigenous methodologies (pp. 45–60). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Castillo, A. (1995). Massacre of the dreamers: Essays on Xicanisma (20th anniversary updated edition.). Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press.
   Google Scholar
• Childers, S. M. (2013). The materiality of fieldwork: An ontology of feminist becoming. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(5), 599–609.
   Google Scholar
• Clough, P. T. (2010). The affective turn. In M. Gregg & G. J. Siegworth (Eds.), The affect theory reader (pp. 206–224). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dolphijn, R., & van der Tuin, I. (2012). Interview with Karen Barad. In R. Dolphijn & I. van der Tuin (Eds.), New materialism: Interviews and cartographies (pp. 48–70). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feagin, J. R. (2010). Racist: Roots, current realities, and future reparations. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: The Continuum International Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Grosz, E. (1995). Space, time, and perversion. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. J. (1988). Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. J. (1992). The promises of monsters: A regenerative politics for inappropriate/d others. In L. Grossberg, C. Nelson, & P. Treichler (Eds.), Cultural studies (pp. 295–337). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hekman, S. (2010). The material of knowledge: Feminist disclosures. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Irigaray, L. (1977). This sex which is not one. In C. R. McCann & S.-K. Kim (Eds.), Feminist theory reader: Local and global perspectives (pp. 412–423). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lather, P. (2009). Against empathy, voice, and authenticity. In A. Y. Jackson & L. A. Mazzei (Eds.), Voice in qualitative inquiry: Challenging conventional, interpretive, and critical conceptions in qualitative research (pp. 17–43). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• MacLure, M. (2013). Researching without representation? Language and materiality in post-qualitative methodology. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 658–667.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzei, L. (2009). An impossibly full voice. In A.Y. Jackson & L. A. Mazzei (Eds.), Voice in qualitative inquiry: Challenging conventional, interpretive, and critical conceptions in qualitative research, (pp. 45–63). New York Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Meißner, H. (2016). New material feminisms and historical materialism: A diffractive reading of two (ostensibly unrelated perspectives). In V. Pitts-Taylor (Ed.), Mattering: Feminism, science and materialism (pp. 43–57). New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mohanty, C. T. (2003). Feminist encounters. In C. R. McCann and S. -K. Kim (Eds). Feminist theory reader: Local and global perspectives (pp. 460–471). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Patel, P. (2016). Decolonizing educational research: From ownership to answerability. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Roy, D., & Subramaniam, B. (2016). Matter in the shadows: Feminist new materialism and practices of colonialism. In V. Pitts-Taylor (Ed.). Mattering: Feminism, science and materialism (pp. 23–42). New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saavedra, C. M., & Nymark, E. D. (2008). Borderland-Mestizaje feminism: The new tribalism. In N. K. Denzin, Y. S. Lincoln & L. T. Smith (Eds.), Handbook of critical and indigenous methodologies (pp. 255–276). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Saldivar-Hull, S. (1987). Introduction to Borderlands la frontera: The new mestiza (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Aunt Lute books.
   Google Scholar
• Siegworth, G. J., & Gregg, M. (2010). An inventory of shimmers. In M. Gregg & G. J. Siegworth (Eds.), The affect theory reader (pp. 1–25). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Somerville, M. (2013). ‘Water in a dry land’ Place-learning through art and story. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? In C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and the interpretation of culture (pp. 271–313). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• St. Pierre, E. A. (1997). Methodology in the fold and the irruption of transgressive data. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 10(2), 175–189.
   Google Scholar
• St. Pierre, E. A. (2009). Decentering voice in qualitative inquiry. In A. Y. Jackson & L. A. Mazzei (Eds.), Voice in qualitative inquiry: Challenging conventional, interpretive, and critical conceptions in qualitative research (pp. 221–236). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Swadener, B. B., & Mutua, K. (2008). Decolonizing performances: Deconstructing the global postcolonial. In N. K. Denzin, Y. S. Lincoln, & L. T. Smith (Eds.), Handbook of critical and indigenous methodologies (pp. 31–44). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Villenas, S. A. (2000). The ethnography called my back: Writings of the exotic gaze, ‘othering’ Latina, and recuperating Xicanisma. In E. A. St. Pierre & W. S. Pillow (Eds.), Working the ruins: Feminist poststructural theory and methods in education (pp. 74–95). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Villenas, S. A. (2014). Thinking Latina education with and from Chicana/Latina feminist cultural studies. In A. Darber and R. D. Torres (Eds.). Latinos and education: A critical reader (pp. 205–226). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Voithofer, R. (2013). Promiscuous feminisms for troubling times. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(5), 524–536.
   Google Scholar
• Yosso, T. J. (2005). Whose culture has capital? A critical race theory discussion of community cultural wealth. Race Ethnicity and Education, 8(1), 69–91.
   Google Scholar