Learning to ‘site-see’: place-reflexivity as a methodological tool for qualitative researchers

References

• Agee, J. (2002). ‘Winks upon winks’: Multiple lenses on settings in qualitative educational research. Qualitative Studies in Education, 15, 569–585. doi:10.1080/09518390210157298
   Google Scholar
• Agnew, J. A., & Duncan, J. S. (Eds.). (2014). The power of place (RLE Social & Cultural Geography): Bringing together geographical and sociological imaginations. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Hindi, K. F., & Staddon, C. (1997). The hidden histories and geographies of neotraditional town planning: The case of Seaside, Florida. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 15, 349–372. doi:10.1068/d150349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altman, I., & Low, S. M. (Eds.). (2012). Place attachment (Vol. 12). Berlin, Germany: Springer Science and Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Alvesson, M., & Sköldberg, K. (2009). Reflexive methodology: New vistas for qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Amit, V. (2003). Constructing the field: Ethnographic fieldwork in the contemporary world. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J., & Jones, K. (2009). The difference that place makes to methodology: Uncovering the ‘lived space’ of young people’s spatial practices. Children’s Geographies, 7, 291–303. doi:10.1080/14733280903024456
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, J., Adey, P., & Bevan, P. (2010). Positioning place: Polylogic approaches to research methodology. Qualitative Research, 10, 589–604. doi:10.1177/1468794110375796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, R. (2015). Now I see it, now I don’t: Researcher’s position and reflexivity in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 15, 219–234. doi:10.1177/1468794112468475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, L. (1999). Primary schools and the nature of the education market place. In Bush, T., Bell, L., Bolam, R., Glatter, R., & Ribbins, P. (Eds.). Educational management: Redefining theory, policy and practice (pp. 59–73). London: Paul Chapman.
   Google Scholar
• Besen-Cassino, Y. (2014). Consuming work: Youth labor in America. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bhabha, H. (1994/2004). The location of culture. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bhabha, H. K., & Rutherford, J. (2006). Third space. Multitudes, 26, 95–107. doi:10.3917/mult.026.0095
   Google Scholar
• Bhabha, H. K. (2009). In the cave of making: Thoughts on third space. In: Ikas, K., Wagner, G. (eds.) Communicating in the Third Space, ix–xiv. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bondy, C. (2013). How did I get here? The Social process of accessing field sites. Qualitative Research, 13, 578–590. doi:10.1177/1468794112442524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cajete, G. (2000). Indigenous knowledge: The Pueblo metaphor of Indigenous education. In M. Battiste (Ed). Reclaiming Indigenous Voice and Vision, pp. 181–191. Vancouver, Canada: UBC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cresswell, T. (2014). Place: An introduction. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Cunliffe, A. (2004). ‘On becoming a critically reflexive practitioner’. Journal of Management Education, 28, 407–426. doi:10.1177/1052562904264440
   Google Scholar
• Comaroff, J., & Comaroff, J. (2003). Reflections on liberalism. Social Identities, 9, 445–474. doi:10.1080/1350463032000174632
   Google Scholar
• De Laine, M. (2000). Fieldwork, participation and practice: Ethics and dilemmas in qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K., Lincoln, Y. S., & Smith, L. T. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of critical and indigenous methodologies. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• DeVault, M. L. (1994). Feeding the family: The social organization of caring as gendered work. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• DeVault, M. L. (1999). Liberating method: Feminism and social research. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ebersöhn, L. (2015). Making sense of place in school-based intervention research. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 40, 121–130. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ecker, J. (2017). A reflexive inquiry on the effect of place on research interviews conducted with homeless and vulnerably housed individuals [64 paragraphs]. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 18, http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs170151.
   Google Scholar
• Elwood, S. A., & Martin, D. G. (2000). ‘Placing’ interviews: Location and scales of power in qualitative research. The Professional Geographer, 52, 649–657. doi:10.1111/0033-0124.00253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J., & Jones, P. (2011). The Walking Interview: Methodology, mobility and place. Applied Geography, 31, 849–858. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein, S. E., Young, A., & Boyd, C. (2008). Relational aggression at school: Associations with school safety and social climate. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37, 641–654. doi:10.1007/s10964-007-9192-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossman, A. H., Haney, A. P., Edwards, P., Alessi, E. J., Ardon, M., & Howell, T. J. (2009). Lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender youth talk about experiencing and coping with school violence: A qualitative study. Journal of LGBT Youth, 6(1), 24–46. doi:10.1080/19361650802379748
   Google Scholar
• Grunewald, D. A. (2003). The best of both worlds: A critical pedagogy of place. Educational Researcher, 32, 3–12.
   Google Scholar
• Hurd, C. A. (2008). Cinco de mayo, normative whiteness, and the marginalization of Mexican‐descent students. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 39, 293–313. doi:10.1111/j.1548-1492.2008.00023.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyams, M. (2003). Adolescent Latina bodyspaces: Making homegirls, homebodies and homeplaces. Antipode, 35, 536–558. doi:10.1111/1467-8330.00338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitchin, R., & Tate, N. J. (1999). Conducting research in human geography. Harlow: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Kovach, M. (2010). Indigenous methodologies: Characteristics, conversations, contexts. Toronto, Ontario: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lather, P. (2013). Methodology-21: What do we do in the afterward? International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26, 634–645. doi:10.1080/09518398.2013.788753
   Google Scholar
• Low, S. M., & Altman, I. (2012). Place attachment: A conceptual inquiry. In Altman, I., & Low, S. M. (Eds.). Place attachment (Vol. 12). Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Luttrell, W. (2009). Qualitative educational research: Readings in reflexive methodology and transformative practice. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Milner, IV. H. R. (2007). Race, culture, and researcher positionality: Working through dangers seen, unseen, and unforeseen. Educational Researcher, 36, 388–400. doi:10.3102/0013189X07309471
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2014). Designing qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mignolo, W. (2013). On pluriversality [Online]. Retrieved from: http://waltermignolo.com/on-pluriversality/ [accessed October 15, 2017].
   Google Scholar
• Moore, J. (2012). A personal insight into researcher positionality. Nurse Researcher, 19, 11–14. doi:10.7748/nr2012.07.19.4.11.c9218
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mulvihill, T.M. & Swaminathan, R. (2017). Critical approaches to Life Writing Methods in Qualitative Research. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nazarea, V. D. (1999). Lenses and latitudes in landscapes and lifescapes. In Nazarea, V.D. (Ed). Ethnoecology: Situated Knowledge/Located Lives (pp. 91–106). Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nespor, J. (2000). Anonymity and place in qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 6, 546–569. doi:10.1177/107780040000600408
   Google Scholar
• Oberhauser, A. (1997). The home as ‘field’: households and homework in rural Appalachia. Thresholds in Feminist Geography, 165–182.
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, L. (1996). From nation to race: The Americanization of immigrants in a high school of the 1990s. Paper presented at AERA, New York, April 8–12, 1996. ERIC Document ED 396042
   Google Scholar
• Orr, D. W. (1992). Ecological literacy: Education and the transition to a postmodern world. Albany, NY: Suny Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pellow, D. (2001). Cultural differences and urban spatial forms: Elements of boundedness in an Accra community. American Anthropologist, 103(1), 59–75. doi:10.1525/aa.2001.103.1.59
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pillow, W. (2003). Confession, catharsis, or cure? Rethinking the uses of reflexivity as methodological power in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 16, 175–196. doi:10.1080/0951839032000060635
   Google Scholar
• Preston, C. (2005). Restoring misplaced epistemology. Ethics, Place and Environment, 8, 373–384. doi:10.1080/13668790500348398
   Google Scholar
• Reeves, C. L. (2010). A difficult negotiation: Fieldwork relations with gatekeepers. Qualitative Research, 10, 315–331. doi:10.1177/1468794109360150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Relph, E. (1976). Place and placeness. London: Pion.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, D. (1989). Locating the anthropological subject: Postcolonial anthropologists in other places. Inscriptions, 27, 75–85.
   Google Scholar
• Sin, C. H. (2003). Interviewing in ‘place’: the socio-spatial construction of interview data. Area, 35, 305–312. doi:10.1111/1475-4762.00179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J. M. (2008). Identities and urban social spaces in Little Tokyo, Los Angeles: Japanese Americans in two ethno-spiritual communities. Geografriska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 90, 389–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, L. T. (2012). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, D. A., & Anderson, L. (1987). Identity work among the homeless: The verbal construction and avowal of personal identities. American Journal of Sociology, 92, 1336–1371. doi:10.1086/228668
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soja, E. W. (2010). Seeking spatial justice. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swaminathan, R. (2004). It’s my place: Student perspectives of urban school effectiveness. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 15(1), 33–63. doi:10.1076/sesi.15.1.33.27493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swaminathan, R. (2006). Role Reversal Day: Student Empowerment and Teacher Learning at a Holistic School. Encounter: Education for Meaning and Social Justice 19(2), pp. 26–32.
   Google Scholar
• Swaminathan, R. & Mulvihill, T. M. (2010). Teacher perspectives on Teaching Students who are Placed “At-Risk. Journal of Educational Alternatives, 4(2), 56–78.
   Google Scholar
• Swaminathan, R. & Mulvihill, T.M. (2017). Critical Approaches to Questions in Qualitative Research. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Swaminathan, R. & Mulvihill, T.M. (2018). Teaching Qualitative Research: Strategies for Engaging Emerging Scholars. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, S. J. (1987). Observing abuse: Professional ethics and personal morality in field research. Qualitative Sociology, 10, 288–302. doi:10.1007/BF00988991
   Google Scholar
• Tuck, E., & McKenzie, M. (2014). Place in research: Theory, methodology, and methods. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tuck, E., McKenzie, M., & McCoy, K. (2014). Land education: Indigenous, post-colonial, and decolonizing perspectives on place and environmental education research. Environmental Education Research, 20(1), 1–23. doi:10.1080/13504622.2013.877708
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuck, E., & McKenzie, M. (2015). Relational validity and the ‘where’ of inquiry: Place and land in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 21, 633–638. doi:10.1177/1077800414563809
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, V. (1969). The ritual processes: Structure and anti-structure. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, S. (2008). Gang leader for a day. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Walford, G. (2018). The impossibility of anonymity in ethnographic research. Qualitative Research, 18, 516–525. doi:10.1177/1468794118778606
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar