Emergence, multiplicity and connection: rethinking ethical discernment in qualitative research through a rhizo-ethics approach

References

• Ansaloni, F., & Tedeschi, M. (2016). Ethics and spatial justice: Unfolding non-linear possibilities for planning action. Planning Theory, 15(3), 316–332. doi:10.1177/1473095215591676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austin, W. (2008). Relational ethics. In L.M. Given (Ed.), The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (p. 749). SAGE Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, K. (2003). How things come to matter: Performing posthumanism. Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(3), 801–831. doi:10.1086/345321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barad, K. (2012). Interview with Karen Barad. In R. Dolphijn & I. van der Tuin (Eds.), New materialism: Interviews and cartographies (pp. 48–70). Open Humanities Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, K. (2014). Diffracting diffraction: Cutting together-apart. Parallax, 20(3), 168–187. doi:10.1080/13534645.2014.927623
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlott, T., Shevellar, L., Turpin, M., & Setchell, J. (2020). The dissident interview: A Deterritorializing guerilla encounter. Qualitative Inquiry, 26(6), 650–660. doi:10.1177/1077800419859041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant, L. (2011). The ethics of the event: Deleuze and ethics without Aρχή. In N. Jun & D. Smith (Eds.), Deleuze and ethics (pp. 21–43). Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Charteris, J., Nye, A., & Jones, M. (2019). Posthumanist ethical practice: Agential cuts in the pedagogic assemblage. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 32(7), 909–928. doi:10.1080/09518398.2019.1609124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colebrook, C. (2002a). Understanding Deleuze. Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Colebrook, C. (2002b). Gilles Deleuze. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, R., & Ringrose, J. (2013). Deleuze and research methodologies. Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1984). Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (R. Hurley, M. Seem, & H.R. Lane, Trans.). Athlone.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (B. Massumi, Trans.). University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K. (1997). Interpretative ethnography: Ethnographic practices for the 21st century. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Finlay, L. (2002). “Outing” the researcher: The provenance, process, and practice of reflexivity. Qualitative Health Research, 12(4), 531–545. doi:10.1177/104973202129120052
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finlay, L. (2006). ‘Going Exploring’: The nature of qualitative research. In L. Finlay and C. Ballinger (Eds.), Qualitative research for allied health professionals: Challenging choices (pp. 3–8). Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, N. J., & Alldred, P. (2017). Social structures, power and resistance in monist sociology: (New) materialist insights. Journal of Sociology. 54(3), 315–330. doi:10.1177/1440783317730615
   Google Scholar
• Guttorm, H. E. (2012). Becoming-(a)-paper, or an article undone: (Post-) knowing and writing (again), nomadic and so messy. Qualitative Inquiry, 18(7), 595–605. doi:10.1177/1077800412450157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hein, S. F. (2019). Deleuze, immanence, and immanent writing in qualitative inquiry nonlinear texts and being a traitor to writing. Qualitative Inquiry, 25(1), 83–90. doi:10.1177/1077800418784328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickey-Moody, A., & Malins, P. (Eds) (2007). Deleuzian encounters: Studies in contemporary social issues. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hofsess, B. A., & Sonenberg, J. L. (2013). Enter: Ho/rhizoanalysis. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 13(4), 299–308. doi:10.1177/1532708613487877
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, D., & Gastaldo, D. (2004). Rhizomatic thought in nursing: An alternative path for the development of the discipline. Nursing Philosophy, 5(3), 258–267. doi:10.1111/j.1466-769X.2004.00184.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Honan, E. (2007). Writing a rhizome: An (im)plausible methodology. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 20(5), 531–546. doi:10.1080/09518390600923735
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, A. Y. (2003). Rhizovocality. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 16(5), 693–710. doi:10.1080/0951839032000142968
   Google Scholar
• Jun, N. (2011). Introduction. In N. Jun & D. Smith (Eds.), Deleuze and ethics (pp. 1–4). Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koro-Ljungberg, M., & Barko, T. (2012). “Answers,” assemblages, and qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 18(3), 256–265. doi:10.1177/1077800411431562
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcus, G. E., & Saka, E. (2006). Assemblage. Theory, Culture & Society, 23(2–3), 101–109. doi:10.1177/0263276406062573
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, J. (2010). Ethics. In A. Parr (Ed.), The Deleuze dictionary: Revised edition (pp. 87–89). Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Masny, D. (2013). Rhizoanalytic pathways in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 19(5), 339–348. doi:10.1177/1077800413479559
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masny, D. (2016). Problematizing qualitative research: Reading a data assemblage with rhizoanalysis. Qualitative Inquiry, 22(8), 666–675. doi:10.1177/1532708616636744
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayes, E. (2016). Shifting research methods with a becoming-child ontology: Co-theorising puppet production with high school students. Childhood, 23(1), 105–122. doi:10.1177/0907568215576526
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayes, E. (2016). The lines of the voice: An ethnography of the ambivalent affects of student voice [unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Mayes, E. (2019). The mis/uses of ‘voice’ in (post)qualitative research with children and young people: Histories, politics and ethics. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 32(10), 1191–1209. doi:10.1080/09518398.2019.1659438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salehi, S. (2008). Teaching contingencies: Deleuze (Creativity discourses, and art) [Doctoral dissertation], Queen’s University. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. http://search.proquest.com/docview/304400071?accountid=15115
   Google Scholar
• Sermijn, J., Devlieger, P., & Loots, G. (2008). The narrative construction of the self: Selfhood as a rhizomatic story. Qualitative Inquiry, 14(4), 632–650. doi:10.1177/1077800408314356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, D. (2011). Deleuze and the question of desire: Towards an immanent theory of ethics. In N. Jun & D. Smith (Eds.), Deleuze and ethics (pp. 123–141). Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• St. Pierre, E. A. (1997). Circling the text: Nomadic writing practices. Qualitative Inquiry, 3(4), 403–417.
   Google Scholar
• St. Pierre, E. A. (2013). The posts continue: Becoming. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 646–657. doi:10.1080/09518398.2013.788754
   Google Scholar
• Sutton, D., & Martin-Jones, D. (2008). Deleuze reframed. I.B. Tauris & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Ulmer, J. B., & Koro-Ljungberg, M. (2015). Writing visually through (methodological) events and cartography. Qualitative Inquiry, 21(2), 138–152. doi:10.1177/1077800414542706
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar